The Latest Texas Abortion Ban Is Bad. Really, Really Bad. - Rewire News Group
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
May 8, 2021, 9:40am Rewire News Group Staff
SB 8 would let any random anti-choicer sue abortion providers for damages—as if anti-choice advocates needed any more license to harass health-care workers.
Lynda M. Gonzalez/Getty Images
Anti-abortion lawmakers are at it again in Texas. Let's take a look at what in the cinnamon toast crunch is going on in the state because it's … not good.
Last week, residents of Lubbock, Texas, voted to pass an ordinance to make the city the largest "sanctuary for the unborn" in the state. What does being a "sanctuary for the unborn" mean, exactly? It means Lubbock voters have tried to criminalize abortion. But the ordinance goes further.
It also criminalizes helping someone get an abortion within the city. That means anyone who drives someone to an appointment, provides information on abortion, or even donates to an abortion fund could be charged with aiding and abetting.
There's more! If you "aided and abetted" an abortion in Lubbock, you could be sued for "emotional distress" by the pregnant person's family—or by anyone who wants to take you to court. (And while you'd probably win the case, legal battles are expensive.)
Sex. Abortion. Parenthood. Power.
This could be devastating for abortion funds and for the city's Planned Parenthood clinic—which just started offering abortion care last month, in a part of West Texas with no other abortion clinic for 300 miles.
You can read more on all this mess in a Twitter thread by Rewire News Group editor Imani Gandy:
this is five alarm bad.
this means any person who donates to an abortion fund is "aiding and abetting" an abortion.
christ. https://t.co/nYXYIkrnh9
— ⚓️Imani Gandy ⚓️ (@AngryBlackLady) May 4, 2021
The only good news about the Lubbock ordinance is that there's a trigger before its criminal penalties can take effect. That means something else would have to happen—like the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade —before Lubbock could enforce this "sanctuary city" nonsense with criminal charges.
Before we proceed further, let's take a scream break, shall we?
OK, moving right along. Lubbock isn't the only abortion story in Texas. Let's talk about SB 8. SB 8 is a six-week abortion ban—which is technically a near-total abortion ban but functionally a total abortion ban.
This one is really bad.
Six weeks is so early in a pregnancy that most people don't realize they're even pregnant—so by the the time they do realize, it is probably going to be too late to have an abortion.
Anti-abortion lawmakers love these six-week bans. But they never survive court challenges because a six-week ban is a pre-viability abortion ban and—we're going to type this loudly—PRE-VIABILITY ABORTION BANS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
SB 8 is different, though. Most six-week bans give power to the state to enforce, but SB 8 gives individuals the power to sue abortion providers. Lawmakers crafted the bill this way in hopes that it will survive legal challenges that other six-week bans haven't.
Basically, they know the state can't enforce an unconstitutional abortion ban like this, so they want to try letting random anti-choicers sue for private damages (just like in Lubbock). For a great explainer of what that means, see this thread by Andrea Grimes:
A rapist might sue a doctor if they want to go after the person they attacked. An abusive ex might sue a doctor if they don't like the sound of "Oh no, I miscarried." Any chucklefuck can sue an abortion fund — or your mom if she gave you a few bucks — for helping people get care.
— andrea grimes (@andreagrimes) May 4, 2021
It is nothing short of a green light to legally harass abortion providers. As if anti-choice advocates needed any more license to do so. But we digress.
On Thursday, SB 8 moved one step closer to heading to Gov. Greg Abbott, who's tweeted, "I look forward to signing it."
Texas has next on this.
A heartbeat bill is making its way through the Texas legislature.
I look forward to signing it.#ProLifehttps://t.co/emyRUuElH1
— Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) April 26, 2021
The law will take effect September 1 if the courts don't block it first. Advocates have promised a legal challenge.
"What happens in Texas does not stay in Texas," Yamani Hernandez, executive director of the National Network of Abortion Funds, said in a statement. "Texas is a testing ground for catastrophic anti-abortion bills, and anti-abortion extremists and legislators across the country are watching this fight."
Unluckily for those lawmakers, we'll be watching too, by keeping an eye on every maneuver these pesky anti-abortion zealots make in their quest to decimate access.
This post was adapted from a Twitter thread.
Tags
Who is online
430 visitors
The latest Texas antiabortion laws are really bad...
It's all about control. Nothing more. They don't think women should ever leave the kitchen much less make their own healthcare decisions. They oppose anything that would aid an infant, but want to force it to be born?
Makes no sense at all.
All abortion bans and most anti-abortion laws are bad.
Seriously, why can’t these people just let it go? Their obsession with everyone else’s medical choices is disturbing.
Like you said, it's an obsession.
Really? What damages do they suffer? Are they forced to participate, forced to watch, forced to pay any attention at all? Sounds more to me like some woke snowflakes want a shot at the lawsuit lottery.
Meanwhile, the pregnant woman can actually suffer from physical, emotional, or psychological damage because she's forced to endure a pregnancy against her will by draconian (and misogynistic) thinking politicians and anti-abortionists.
Another example of politicians pandering to a vocal minority. Oh well I guess they'll be wasting more taxpayer money hiring lawyers to try (and fail) to defend this in court
Indeed. We've seen this play out many times before.
I just LOVE those that want to control others.