╌>

DA to drop death penalty retrial against Scott Peterson, his attorney says

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  sister-mary-agnes-ample-bottom  •  3 years ago  •  10 comments

By:   Erin Tracy, The Modesto Bee (MSN)

DA to drop death penalty retrial against Scott Peterson, his attorney says
May 28—In an about-face, the Stanislaus County District Attorney's Office informed one of Scott Peterson's attorneys on Friday that they no longer plan to pursue the death penalty against him, another of Peterson's attorneys said. Pat Harris said the District Attorney's Office served Peterson's attorney, Andras Farkas, with the notice on Friday and a third attorney notified Harris. Farkas, an ...

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



May 28—In an about-face, the Stanislaus County District Attorney's Office informed one of Scott Peterson's attorneys on Friday that they no longer plan to pursue the death penalty against him, another of Peterson's attorneys said.

Pat Harris said the District Attorney's Office served Peterson's attorney, Andras Farkas, with the notice on Friday and a third attorney notified Harris.

Farkas, an attorney with the Habeas Corpus Resource Center, who worked on Peterson's death penalty appeal, could not be reached for comment.

District Attorney Birgit Fladager and Assistant District Attorney Dave Harris did not respond to several attempts by The Bee to reach them Friday.

Online court records for the case show a 'Notice of Decision on Retrial Phase' was entered into the system on Friday.

The decision would mean that Scott Peterson's sentence would remain life without the possibility of parole. It was reverted to that in August when the California Supreme Court overturned his death sentence for the murder of his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner, because it said the trial judge erred by excluding potential jurors opposed to the death penalty.

Peterson still has a chance to get a whole new trial if his conviction is overturned.

In a separate matter, the California Supreme Court in October also ruled that a trial court must decide whether one of the jurors intentionally withheld information on a questionnaire in order to get on the jury.

The case was remanded back to San Mateo Superior Court where the original trial was held.

Scott's sister-in-law Janey Peterson said in a text that she is "Grateful that they are no longer seeking to take Scott's life, but still looking forward to getting back into the courtroom."

She said the family had not yet given the news to Scott but will talk to him Saturday. Janey Peterson posted about the apparent decision on the Scott Peterson Appeal Facebook page.

Asked whether the DA gave a reason for changing course, Pat Harris said, "I don't think they gave the reasons but I think it is obvious. They see the writing on the wall that if there is a fair and impartial jury they are going to lose."

Pat Harris said by phone Friday he has new evidence to prove Scott Peterson innocent.

"We want to show in a court of law before an unbiased jury, without all the headlines and the craziness that went into the first trial, we want to show the evidence of who committed this murder," he said.

He said the new evidence will focus on burglars who investigators said committed a break-in across the street from the Peterson house after Laci's disappearance. Harris said he can prove that the burglary was committed the day Laci disappeared.

"He deserves another day in court," Harris said.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    3 years ago

Oh hell no.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @1    3 years ago

try to look at the bright side. he'll be put into general population and spend the rest of his life digging plastic fork tines out of his eye sockets, genitals, and asshole.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
1.1.1  seeder  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  devangelical @1.1    3 years ago
try to look at the bright side. he'll be put into general population and spend the rest of his life digging plastic fork tines out of his eye sockets, genitals, and asshole.

 I know it's late to ask this question, but why couldn't he just walk away?  He could have signed his parental rights away and that would have been the end of the matter.  No hassle, no child support, etc.  Laci and Conner would have been just fine.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  Tessylo    3 years ago

What a scumbag.  

Did you hear about the Daybells?  Those freaks that killed her children and their spouses?  Dead bodies all along the way?  That scumbag bitch was found unfit to stand trial.  

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
2.1  seeder  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Tessylo @2    3 years ago
That scumbag bitch was found unfit to stand trial.  

She knows it's the only thing that might keep her out of the death chamber.  I hope she's prepared to remain nuts for the rest of her life.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3  Tacos!    3 years ago

Isn’t it amazing that this is still in the courts? This happened in 2004.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
3.1  seeder  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Tacos! @3    3 years ago

It might have happened back then, but the switch from death to life in prison just happened yesterday.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @3.1    3 years ago

I know, but with this Habeas Corpus, we’re talking about maybe a new trial now. I don’t begrudge anyone their right to exercise all available legal options. I just think it’s amazing that this goes on so long.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
3.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  Tacos! @3    3 years ago

It is pretty impressive how long some of this takes.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4  Kavika     3 years ago

It would be better if it was in solitary, 23 hours a day in 8x10 cell.

 
 

Who is online









166 visitors