╌>

St Louis couple who brandished guns at protesters plead guilty

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  hallux  •  3 years ago  •  49 comments

By:   SOURCE: AFP

St Louis couple who brandished guns at protesters plead guilty
A Missouri court fines Mark McCloskey and his wife, Patricia, for pointing an assault rifle and handgun at Black Lives Matter protesters last year

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Two wealthy American lawyers who earned notoriety by pointing guns at Black Lives Matter (BLM) activists marching past their mansion have pleaded guilty to misdemeanour charges, a court official has said.

Mark McCloskey, who ran across his lawn and threatened protesters with an assault rifle in the incident last year, was fined $750 on Thursday for fourth-degree assault, said Tom Gross, spokesman for the 22nd Circuit Court in St Louis, Missouri.

His wife Patricia McCloskey was fined $2,000 for misdemeanour harassment after brandishing a handgun at the protesters.

Both had originally been charged with felony misuse of weapons after they were seen in video footage and photographs barefoot on their lawn in front of their palatial home, waving their guns and shouting as the peaceful protest march against police abuse and racism passed by on June 28, 2020.

There was no evidence that either had been threatened by the protesters.

The couple became a symbol of the gap between conservative white Americans and Black people seeking justice.

But conservatives in the state defended their actions and the state’s governor, Mike Parson, declared he would pardon them if they were convicted.

The couple became Republican heroes in the hotly fought presidential election last year, warning that Democrats would take away Americans’ gun rights.

“Make no mistake: No matter where you live, your family will not be safe in the radical Democrats’ America,” Patricia McCloskey said in a video the two made for the August Republican national convention that nominated Donald Trump for a second term as president.

In May, Mark McCloskey announced he was running for one of Missouri’s seats in the United States Senate.

In a campaign video he highlighted the incident, while exaggerating the threat the couple faced.

“When the angry mob came to destroy my house and kill my family, I took a stand against them,” he said. “I will never back down.”


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Hallux    3 years ago

Couldn't happen to a nicer pair.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Hallux @1    3 years ago

those poor persecuted trumpsters.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Hallux @1    3 years ago

peaceful protest march against police abuse and racism passed by on June 28, 2020.

Actually, the marchers were trespassing and threatening them

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2  Sparty On    3 years ago

Meh, seems fair.   A couple grand and a misdemeanor each.

Had they not pointed their weapons at the protestors and made them piss their pants they would have gotten off scott-free

Even in [deleted Missouri]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1  devangelical  replied to  Sparty On @2    3 years ago

had they lived in a number of other states and done this, they could have been legally dropped in their own front yard. bummer.

The rest of the personal banter was deleted SP

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3  Paula Bartholomew    3 years ago

“When the angry mob came to destroy my house and kill my family, I took a stand against them,” he said. “I will never back down.”

These two are seriously mentally disturbed and should not be allowed to own firearms.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3    3 years ago
“I will never back down.”

He did ... he could have fought it but they both took the cheap way out.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Hallux @3.1    3 years ago

No he didn't.   They accepted the legally decided consequences of their actions.   They never backed down protecting their property

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.1.2  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.1    3 years ago

You have the choice of pleading innocent or guilty when the charges are read. Both are lawyers and knew the monetary consequences of fighting. If you read up on them, you will find that both are cheapskates. His "I'll never back down" was b.s. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Sparty On  replied to  Hallux @3.1.2    3 years ago

Your logic is flawed on several levels.  

First, if they are cheapskates as your say, why would they spend tens maybe hundreds of thousands dollars fighting a couple thousand dollars in fines and two misdemeanors.   The answer is they wouldn't.

Second, in the context of his quote, he never did back down.   The context being defending his property.   You can try to spin it differently but that is all it would be.   Spin.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Hallux @3.1.2    3 years ago
"I'll never back down"

... plead guilty...

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Hallux @3.1    3 years ago

That is because they are cheap useless people.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.2  Sparty On  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3    3 years ago

You have a very low standard for mentally disturbed since many Americans would do exactly the same thing.  

Perhaps you'd just give them free reign to maybe trash your place or worse

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Sparty On @3.2    3 years ago

define "them"...

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.2.2  Sparty On  replied to  devangelical @3.2.1    3 years ago

Already clearly defined in the seed/article ..... [deleted]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.2.3  devangelical  replied to  Sparty On @3.2.2    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
FortunateSon
Freshman Silent
3.3  FortunateSon  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3    3 years ago
When the angry mob came to destroy my house and kill my family, I took a stand against them,” he said. “I will never back down.”

Over half the country feels the same way.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.3.1  devangelical  replied to  FortunateSon @3.3    3 years ago

sorry, but way less than a quarter of the entire US population voted for the autocratic grifter of morons.

 
 
 
exexpatnowinTX
Freshman Quiet
3.3.2  exexpatnowinTX  replied to  devangelical @3.3.1    3 years ago

You are aware are you not that the same can be said for the current sleeper in chief Biden.   The totals were not that different.   So sane Americans are saddled with a mentally challenged individual that the Democrats chose as an alternative to a mad scientist type Bernie Sanders who even scared the left.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.3.3  devangelical  replied to  exexpatnowinTX @3.3.2    3 years ago
The totals were not that different. 

yeah, almost 8 million votes difference is a real squeaker to the mathematically challenged...

 
 
 
exexpatnowinTX
Freshman Quiet
3.3.4  exexpatnowinTX  replied to  devangelical @3.3.3    3 years ago
yeah, almost 8 million votes difference is a real squeaker to the mathematically challenged...

Yeah, in a place with a population of over 330,000,000 it's not all that much.  Do you want to do the math and tell us the actual percentage?  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.3.5  devangelical  replied to  exexpatnowinTX @3.3.4    3 years ago

no problem. give me the exact % parameters. I have a calculator app on my phone.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.3.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  exexpatnowinTX @3.3.4    3 years ago

approximately 24%

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.3.7  seeder  Hallux  replied to  exexpatnowinTX @3.3.4    3 years ago
in a place with a population of over 330,000,000

That's nice, 213,799,485 of that population were what counts, eligible voters. Do your math with that number.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4  Trout Giggles    3 years ago

They were in no danger of the "mob" trashing/looting their house. They were just walking past their house

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.1  Sparty On  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Sparty On @4.1    3 years ago

I see you still have a desire for masochism.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  devangelical @4.1.1    3 years ago

Nope but i promise i'll let you know when i become more like the mutual admiration society here.

Don't hold your breath though .....

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.1.3  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Sparty On @4.1.2    3 years ago

There's no mutual admiration society on you side? What's that you said before ..."spin"?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Sparty On @4.1.2    3 years ago
[re][m][oved]
 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.5  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @4.1.4    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @4.1.1    3 years ago

LOL! I had to put him on ignore or he'd be following me around the rest of the day irritating the fuck out of me

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.7  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @4.1.4    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.1.8  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.7    3 years ago

He's such a card.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.9  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.7    3 years ago

they're waiting for a bigger hammer to come along.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.10  devangelical  replied to  Hallux @4.1.8    3 years ago

you mean a decal, a yellow one with a snake on it...

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.1.11  Sparty On  replied to  Hallux @4.1.3    3 years ago
There's no mutual admiration society on you side?

Did i say there wasn't?   That said, the discussion wasn't about them was it?

It is clear to any casual observer where the MA society here exists.   Just read this thread.

Simple,

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.1.12  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Sparty On @4.1.11    3 years ago

When I seed an article, I do not flag any comment and I also object to TPTB doing the same or anyone else for that matter. There is nothing more boring than a dinner party with a static topic of conversation ... it's inorganic.

Feel free to try one of Vic's cancel anything seeds.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.1.13  seeder  Hallux  replied to  devangelical @4.1.10    3 years ago

No, I meant Master as in the card.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.1.14  Sparty On  replied to  Hallux @4.1.12    3 years ago
When I seed an article, I do not flag any comment

I never said you did and that wasn't the point.   It is clear who the gang is here, between the same old passive aggressive to the old angry internet badass.   It still runs the gamut here and nothing has changed that i can see in that regard.

That said, unless something has changed, i know Vic well enough to know he generally doesn't flag, honest, topical posts.   And they don't get removed unless aren't that.   Your problem is likely that he doesn't let the random off topic, sophomoric post just go by like many folks here do.   But hey, that's just my opinion, i could be wrong.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
5  Hal A. Lujah    3 years ago

384

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
6  Kavika     3 years ago

Here is a little background on the McCloskey's. 

BTW, my neighbor at Table Rock Lake lived in the same neighborhood as these two and said they were a pain in the ass.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1  Sparty On  replied to  Kavika @6    3 years ago
they were a pain in the ass.

Well lets be honest here .... what attorney isn't?

 
 

Who is online



Tessylo
JBB
jw


94 visitors