╌>

40 quintillion stellar-mass black holes are lurking in the universe, new study finds

  

Category:  Health, Science & Technology

Via:  john-russell  •  2 years ago  •  11 comments

40 quintillion stellar-mass black holes are lurking in the universe, new study finds
And it's astonishing: 40,000,000,000,000,000,000, or 40 quintillion, stellar-mass black holes populate the observable universe, making up approximately 1% of all normal matter, according to the new estimate.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



www.msn.com   /en-us/news/technology/40-quintillion-stellar-mass-black-holes-are-lurking-in-the-universe-new-study-finds/ar-AAT5FTh

40 quintillion stellar-mass black holes are lurking in the universe, new study finds


5-7 minutes   Invalid Date



original

Scientists have estimated the number of "small" black holes in the universe. And no surprise: It's a lot.

This number might seem impossible to calculate; after all, spotting   black holes   is not exactly the simplest task. Because they're are as pitch-black as the space they lurk in, the light swallowing cosmic goliaths can be detected only under the most extraordinary circumstances — like when they're bending the light around them, snacking on the unfortunate gases and stars that stray too close, or spiraling toward enormous collisions that unleash   gravitational waves .

But that hasn't stopped scientists from finding some ingenious ways to guess the number. Using a new method, outlined Jan. 12 in   The Astrophysical Journal , a team of astrophysicists has produced a fresh estimate for the number of stellar-mass black holes — those with masses 5 to 10 times that of the sun — in the universe.

Related :   The 12 strangest objects in the universe

And it's astonishing: 40,000,000,000,000,000,000, or 40 quintillion, stellar-mass black holes populate the observable universe, making up approximately 1% of all normal matter, according to the new estimate.

So how did the scientists arrive at that number? By tracking the evolution of stars in our universe they estimated how often the stars — either on their own, or paired into binary systems — would transform into black holes, said first author Alex Sicilia, an astrophysicist at the International School of Advanced Studies (SISSA) in Trieste, Italy.

"This is one of the first, and one of the most robust, ab initio [ground up] computation[s] of the stellar black hole mass function across cosmic history," Sicilia   said in a statement .

To make a black hole, you need to start with a large star — one with a mass roughly five to 10 times that of the sun. As big stars reach the end of their lives, they begin to fuse heavier and heavier elements, such as   silicon   or   magnesium , inside their fiery cores. But once this   fusion process   begins forming   iron , the star is on a path to violent self-destruction. Iron takes in more energy to fuse than it gives out, causing the star to lose its ability to push out against the immense   gravitational forces   generated by its enormous mass. It collapses in on itself, packing first its core, and later all the matter close to it, into a point of infinitesimal dimensions and infinite density — a   singularity . The star becomes a black hole, and beyond a boundary called the event horizon, nothing — not even light — can escape its gravitational pull.

To arrive at their estimate, the astrophysicists modeled not just the lives, but the pre-lives of the universe's stars. Using known statistics of various   galaxies , such as their sizes, the elements they contain, and the sizes of the gas clouds stars would form in, the team built a model of the universe that accurately reflected the different sizes of stars that would be made, and how often they would be created. 

After pinning down the rate of formation for stars that could eventually transform into black holes, the researchers modeled the lives and deaths of those stars, using data such as their mass and a trait called metallicity — the abundance of elements heavier than   hydrogen   or   helium   — to find the percentage of candidate stars that would transform into black holes. By also looking at stars paired into binary systems, and by calculating the rate at which black holes can meet each other and merge, the researchers ensured that they weren’t double-counting any black holes in their survey. They also figured out how these mergers, alongside the snacking by black holes on nearby gas, would affect the size distribution of the black holes found across the universe.

With these calculations in hand, the researchers designed a model that tracked the population and size distribution of stellar-mass black holes over time to give them their eye-watering number. Then, by comparing the estimate with data taken from gravitational waves, or ripples in   space-time , formed by black hole and binary star mergers, the researchers confirmed that their model was in good agreement with the data.

Astrophysicists hope to use the new estimate to investigate some perplexing questions that arise from observations of the very early universe — for instance, how the early universe became so quickly populated by supermassive black holes — often with masses millions, or even billions, of times greater than the stellar-mass holes the researchers examined in this study — so soon after the   Big Bang .

Because these gigantic black holes came from the merging of smaller, stellar-mass black holes — or black hole 'seeds' — the researchers hope that a better understanding of how small black holes formed in the early universe could help them to unearth the origins of their supermassive cousins.

"Our work provides a robust theory for the generation of light seeds for supermassive black holes at high redshift [further back in time], and can constitute a starting point to investigate the origin of "heavy seeds", that we will pursue in a forthcoming paper," Lumen Boco, an astrophysicist at SISSA, said in the statement.

Originally published on Live Science.

Microsoft may earn an Affiliate Commission if you purchase something through recommended links in this article.




Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    2 years ago
 40,000,000,000,000,000,000, or 40 quintillion, stellar-mass black holes populate the observable universe

Utterly meaningless to most people. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
1.1  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 years ago

Only 40,000,000,000,000,000,000?   I would think they can do better than that.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Gsquared @1.1    2 years ago

This is a problem with trying to popularize science. This figure means nothing to most people, and very few people care because the information has no real world implications. It is information for a very tiny niche of people to ponder. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    2 years ago

It is interesting.  I just forwarded the article to my friends and I'm sure it will be a topic in our weekly Zoom this afternoon.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
1.1.3  Gordy327  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    2 years ago

It's a shame if few people, including myself, are interested in such things. That shows how badly we are declining scientifically. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    2 years ago

There are 19 zeroes after that 4.   I think this figure is a guess at best and probably meant to catch the eye. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3  TᵢG    2 years ago

It should help people better comprehend the enormity of the known universe.    Not everything in life need help one do a better job of buying groceries, walking the dog, fixing a leaky faucet, etc.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @3    2 years ago

I think people who have paid even minimal attention to developments related to the cosmos already have some feeling for the "enormity" of the universe. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    2 years ago

I agree.   But as you note, the enormity is extremely hard to actually grasp.   The more examples (like this seed) the better one's understanding.

And as we ponder the enormity of the universe, we also ponder the potential that exolife does exist (given this enormous universe operates on the same physics as what we see here in our extremely tiny bit of it).

 
 

Who is online







Gsquared


404 visitors