╌>

ADL: More than 100 midterm candidates hold extremist views

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  john-russell  •  2 years ago  •  36 comments

ADL: More than 100 midterm candidates hold extremist views
Adding that at least 45 candidates have “lent credence in some way to the QAnon conspiracy theory” or “posted QAnon-related social media content in 2020 or earlier,” the ADL charged that several candidates have continued to promote the conspiracy theory while running for office.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



www.israelnationalnews.com   /news/321127

ADL: More than 100 midterm candidates hold extremist views


Israel National News 3-3 minutes   1/25/2022




The Anti-Defamation League is sending a warning that it is tracking more than 100 candidates in the upcoming 2022 Congressional midterm elections who it says hold extremist views.

The ADL’s Center on Extremism said that these candidates “promote extreme views, associate with extremists, and/or promote potentially dangerous conspiracy theories.”

According to the ADL, “Support for such candidates demonstrates a continuing shift of the so-called Overton Window – the parameters of what is considered “normal” or “acceptable” in political and social discourse. This ever-shifting window signals an expanding mainstream acceptance of extreme beliefs and ideologies.”

They added that their list is increasing on a “near-daily basis,” and includes over a dozen candidates with known connections to extremist groups or movements, including white supremacists, anti-government extremists and members of the Proud Boys.

“At least two dozen candidates have expressed admiration for or appeared in public alongside extremists,” the ADL said.

The ADL accused many of these candidates of “boosting conspiracy theories.”

“We know conspiracy theories have the power to inspire people to violence; the bizarre claims behind Pizzagate, QAnon and many more have been linked to attacks, kidnappings and targeted violence,” they said. “When candidates use their campaigns to elevate these fabricated ‘crises,’ they are exposing the public to dangerous lies and contributing to the mainstreaming of extreme beliefs.”

Adding that at least 45 candidates have “lent credence in some way to the QAnon conspiracy theory” or “posted QAnon-related social media content in 2020 or earlier,” the ADL charged that several candidates have continued to promote the conspiracy theory while running for office.

“In 2021, candidates tweeted QAnon’s WWG1WGA slogan, including Darren Aquino, a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives (R-FL), so-called election-fraud witness Mellissa Carone who is running for a seat in the Michigan House of Representatives, and U.S. congressional candidate (R-CA) Alison Hayden,” the ADL said.

They also warned that dozens of candidates have promoted “a range of disproven conspiracy theories including those related to the 2020 election, the January 6 insurrection, the deep state and the COVID-19 pandemic that have been associated with violence.”


Did you find a mistake in the article or inappropriate advertisement? Report to us



Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    2 years ago
They also warned that dozens of candidates have promoted “a range of disproven conspiracy theories including those related to the 2020 election, the January 6 insurrection, the deep state and the COVID-19 pandemic that have been associated with violence.”

Our country is in a degraded condition. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 years ago
Our country is in a degraded condition.

Look at who is in charge!

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Quiet
1.2  mocowgirl  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 years ago
Our country is in a degraded condition. 

I believe that most everyone in the US is concerned about the safety of US citizens.

Do you believe that open borders and having over 1.4 million gang members is a factor or is the majority of instability in the US caused by people of European descent trying to overthrow the government? 

Gangs — FBI Some 33,000 violent street gangs, motorcycle gangs, and prison gangs are criminally active in the U.S. today. Many are sophisticated and well organized; all use violence to control neighborhoods and boost their illegal money-making activities, which include robbery, drug and gun trafficking, prostitution and human trafficking, and fraud. Many gang members continue to commit crimes even after being sent to jail.

and an FBI website with pages of arrest records of gang members of just the last few months.

Gang News — FBI

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  mocowgirl @1.2    2 years ago

There has been extensive gang activity in the United States for decades. Somewhat the same for the border situation. 

So I guess the recent difference is the people of European descent trying to overthrow the government.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.2.3  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.1    2 years ago

You think what is going on at the border is the same old, same old? Try again.

Migrants were encountered 1.7 million times in the last 12 months, the highest number of illegal crossings recorded since at least 1960.

Joe Biden and his administration continue to turn a blind eye to the migrant chaos.

The latest projection is 1.85 million illegal border apprehensions for 2021, busting the previous record of 1.643 million in 2000.

“It won't be close, and the previous record is likely to be smashed by 200,000 or more,” said analyst Steven Kopits in a new Princeton Policy Advisors report shared with Secrets.

In a double whammy, he also projected that the fiscal year (October to October) record is on the verge of being crushed.

Living in denial is what the left does. Trump is all they have.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2.4  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.1    2 years ago

I live 6 blocks from the AZ/Mexico border fence and I can guarantee that things are not even close to what they have been in the past. It has gotten significantly worse! Only someone who lives nowhere near or on the border would think otherwise.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.2.5  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.1    2 years ago
There has been extensive gang activity in the United States for decades. Somewhat the same for the border situation. 

And take a close look at what Democrats have done for both of those situations. 

Gang activity - Democrat run cities have cut the budgets of the police force resulting in manning cuts and an increase in the violent crime rate.

Southern Border - Democrats have stopped construction of the border wall allowing thousands to cross the border.  Among those crossing the border are gang members (imagine that) that have brought increases in the drug problems in the US and increased violent crime (which is also attributed to the cuts of police budgets under the retarded "Defund the Police" bullshit pushed by the left).

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.6  Tessylo  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.5    2 years ago

"Gang activity - Democrat run cities have cut the budgets of the police force resulting in manning cuts and an increase in the violent crime rate."

PROVE IT.

I know you cannot.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  mocowgirl @1.2    2 years ago

What open borders?

Plus, John is right.  

You're incorrect.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.8  Tessylo  replied to  mocowgirl @1.2    2 years ago
"Gangs — FBI Some 33,000 violent street gangs, motorcycle gangs, and prison gangs are criminally active in the U.S. today. Many are sophisticated and well organized; all use violence to control neighborhoods and boost their illegal money-making activities, which include robbery, drug and gun trafficking, prostitution and human trafficking, and fraud. Many gang members continue to commit crimes even after being sent to jail."

What else is new?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.2.9  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.6    2 years ago

3.2.3  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.10  Tessylo  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.9    2 years ago

No proof.  No nothing.  As usual.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.11  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @1.2.3    2 years ago

Looked at the chart. There have been 18 years out of the past 30 years when the border crossings have been more than 1 million. 

Some numbers

2005  -  1,170,000

2004  -  1, 130,000

2001  -  1, 235, 000

2000  -  1, 600, 000

1999  -  1,500,000

1998  -  1,500, 000

1986  -   1,600,000

and more

There is NOT a tremendous disparity  between those figures and last year.  It is a lie to act as if current numbers are totally unprecedented.  Is it an issue? Of course its an issue that requires bi-partisan comprehensive action. Is it something that should cause Biden to be impeached? Ludicrous.  Unless we also impeached Reagan, Bill Clinton, and George W Bush for similar figures.  And those three presidents were re-elected for a second term despite having years of  + one million  illegal crossings. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.12  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.8    2 years ago
Based on law enforcement responses to the NYGS, it is 
estimated that in 2010, there were 29,400 gangs (2010) and 
756,000 gang members throughout 3,500 jurisdictions 
in the United States. Each estimate represents less than a 
5-percent change from 2009, and although this change is 
not statistically significant, these numbers underscore the 
seriousness of the continuing national gang problem

Highlights of the 2010 National Youth Gang Survey (ojp.gov)

That was 12 years ago.  The difference between 29,000 and 33,000 is not that significant. 

Here is gang activity from 1996 -2010. It has been over 30,000 before and usually over 25,000 .  Usually.  The gang issue has existed at similar levels to today for decades. I am sure the levels for the 80's and 90's would look similar. 

800
 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.2.13  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.6    2 years ago
Democrat run cities have cut the budgets of the police force resulting in manning cuts and an increase in the violent crime rate "In New York City, Mayor Bill de Blasio said he would reinstate $92 million for a new precinct after scrapping the project last summer. The mayor of Baltimore, who led efforts as a city councilman to cut the police budget by $22 million last year, recently proposed a $27 million increase.

After attacks on Asian-Americans and a rise in homicides in Oakland, Calif., city lawmakers in April restored $3.3 million of the $29 million in police cuts, and the mayor is now proposing to increase the department’s budget by $24 million. Los Angeles’s mayor has proposed an increase of about $50 million after the city cut $150 million from its police department last year."

I n the days after George Floyd was murdered by a Minneapolis police officer in May 2020, protesters took to the streets across America. They urged cities to “defund the police”, and politicians listened. Eric Garcetti, the mayor of Los Angeles, called for his department’s budget to be cut by up to $150m. London Breed, San Francisco’s mayor, announced that she would “redirect funding from the sfpd to support the African-American community”. City councils in Oakland and Portland, Oregon, among other cities across America, approved budgets that cut police funding. That trend has reversed. Portland and Oakland increased police funding to hire more officers. The Los Angeles Police Department’s budget will get a 12% boost. Last month Ms Breed vowed to “take steps to be more aggressive with law enforcement” and “less tolerant of all the bullshit that has destroyed our city”. Why such a stark reversal, and what does it mean for the future of criminal-justice reform?"

Los Angeles

The city of Los Angeles cut its police department budget last July by $150 million, limiting overtime pay and reducing staffing to its lowest levels in over a decade. The cuts were made during a summer filled with protests against police brutality and followed an uproar over Mayor Eric Garcetti's original budget proposal to increase police spending to $1.86 billion from $1.73 billion the year before. Police reform advocates in the city called the cuts " a start ," but noted that police spending was still slated to make up over half the city's discretionary spending.
In particular, read through this CNN link. New York, Austin, Seattle as well as LA. 
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.14  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @1.2.3    2 years ago

There have been previous years that are close to the number of illegal crossings as last year. There have been years when the gang activity was similar to last year. 

What there hasnt been before is years when the political far right tried to overthrow a legitimate election or years when conspiracy nuts ran for office as Republicans in large numbers. 45 Q Anon adherents running for a seat in the US Congress ?  My god. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.2.15  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.10    2 years ago

So I'm right in line with your standards.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.16  Tessylo  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.15    2 years ago
No.  You never provide proof of anything.  
 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.17  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.12    2 years ago

I understand - it's quite deceptive to show data from 12 years ago - and realize there is no real significant difference.

What's that called - leaving out key information - a lie of omission?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2.18  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.11    2 years ago

Can you please provide a source for the above data?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.19  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2.18    2 years ago
 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.2.20  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2.18    2 years ago

Obviously not.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.2.21  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.16    2 years ago

3.2.3  

Your words.  Not mine.  I'm just following step.  

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2.22  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.19    2 years ago

I'm sorry but the attachment you provided is for gangs. It was the same one you posted above. It says absolutely nothing about illegal border crossing numbers. And even if it did, the statistics stop at 2010. The huge surge in numbers has only occurred only in the last decade or less.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.23  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2.22    2 years ago

Uh, I thought that was what you were asking about. The graph on the border crossings came from someone else. I just took a more extended look at it. 

As far as the number of gangs, high figures for that are not new.  As I showed, there were 30,000 plus figures for gangs going back to the 1990's. Although I havent looked it up yet, I have a strong feeling the figures were high for the 1980's too.  Remember the Death Wish movies ? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.24  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.23    2 years ago
 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.25  Tessylo  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.21    2 years ago

Why are you posting something from three months ago as proof of anything?  It's not  proof of anything.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  Tessylo    2 years ago

Still waiting on that proof which has not been provided.  

There are budget cuts everywhere, not just 'Democrat run cities'.  What nonsense.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
2.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @2    2 years ago

jrSmiley_115_smiley_image.png Right above your post. jrSmiley_115_smiley_image.png If you actually care to read. It really sucks to be wrong I know as I have been on occasion but to blindly close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears and yell LALALALALALA  will not keep the truth from existing.

The proof is in the very first paragraph. The biggest cities where crime is rampant. Democrat run.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tessylo @2    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3  Tessylo    2 years ago

Still waiting on proof which has not been provided.  

There are budget cuts everywhere, not just 'Democrat run cities'.  What nonsense.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @3    2 years ago

Show the class the crime stats and budget cuts from some cities that aren't Democrat run for comparison or give it up. [deleted]

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @3    2 years ago

Yes, budget cuts are everywhere. But they are highly predominant in Democrat run cities! Not nonsense at all.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @3.2    2 years ago
Still waiting on proof which has not been provided.  

There are budget cuts everywhere, not just 'Democrat run cities'.  What nonsense.  

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.1    2 years ago

And your point is?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4  Tessylo    2 years ago

[removed]

 
 

Who is online



Jeremy Retired in NC
Sean Treacy
Kavika
evilone


430 visitors