Abortion Activists Firebomb Another Pro-Life Office - Washington Free Beacon
Category: News & Politics
Via: sparty-on • 2 years ago • 67 commentsBy: Philip Caldwell (Washington Free Beacon)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Abortion activists firebombed a pro-life pregnancy center outside Buffalo, N.Y., the latest in a series of attacks on pro-life offices and churches since the leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade.
The pro-life organization CompassCare reported that early Tuesday morning, activists smashed windows and set fires in the group's Amherst, N.Y., medical office. The assailants graffitied the phrase "Jane Was Here" on the building, a tagline associated with a group called Jane's Revenge that has claimed responsibility for attacks on pro-life institutions across the country.
The attack comes as Supreme Court justices and pro-life advocates face heightened threats this month of leftwing violence over the Court's looming Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health decision. Jane's Revenge took credit for the firebombing of a pro-life office in Wisconsin last month. And anarchists who vandalized four churches in Washington State claimed association with Jane's Revenge. The Department of Homeland Security has warned law enforcement about potential violence against justices, clerks, and even clergy members in the wake of the Dobbs ruling. Pro-abortion violence is not the only kind tacitly supported by the left. The Washington Free Beaconreported on Tuesday how two Ivy League lawyers who lobbed a Molotov cocktail into a police car during the summer 2020 riots worked out a sweetheart plea deal last month with Attorney General Merrick Garland's Justice Department.
CompassCare CEO Jim Harden condemned the attack and called for Democratic New York officials to protect pro-life organizations.
"Because of this act of violence, the needs of women facing unplanned pregnancy will go unmet and babies will die," Harden said.
The Supreme Court is expected to overturn Roe's recognition of a right to abortion in the Dobbs case, returning the issue of abortion access to the states.
Published under:Supreme Court
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Who is online
66 visitors
Left wing terrorism on the move.
Time to get Sheriff Joe to set up some tent cities to house these criminals. Cots, dry baloney sandwiches and one channel TV’s tuned to The weather channel.......
sheriff joe, the trump pardoned criminal?
Yeah, the guy elected to be sheriff six times by his constituents.
Thats the guy.
How were the dry baloney sandwiches and pink skivvies?
I wouldn't know since I don't hang out with trump wannabe's.
[deleted]
pfft, everybody knows the federalist mackerel snappers all need to be taken out at the same time. /s
No, probably just a small number of deluded leftists 'know' that.
Yep but not probably.
For sure ......
First, he is preaching to the choir. [deleted] Maybe if we didn't have a partisan AG, FBI, and DOJ that were spending all of their time looking at Jan 6th; and conducting entrapment campaigns against the far alt right- they would have time to go after the very real active terrorists on the left.
[Second,deleted] They want as many of them dead as possible. With the new voting laws Democrats want in place illegal immigrants will be of far more value to them than any new US citizen that might have the temerity of voting against them.
so what if a bunch of unamerican theocrats that step across the establishment clause to take bodily autonomy away from women end up getting scraped off the walls and ceilings and mopped up off the floors. bfd.
That you endorse murdering people who disagree with you is the least surprising thing ever.
A post to remember when the leftists start complaining about January 6th.
Complete and utter nonsense.
Every yahoo is tough behind a keyboard. Kind of amazing no mention of thumpers was made!
And what is especially stupid about that line of what passes as 'thought' among some on the left is that the organization had zero to do with a SCOTUS decision.
[Deleted]
They are destroying pregnancy centers that aid expectant mothers. They don't care about women. They don't care about helping those who need it. It's all a pretense. They are just zealots who just want to destroy life.
Anarchists is the word you are looking for. They deserve no better than a tent city and an army cot to sleep on.
Hell, a good percentage of them already live in tent cities. They should be right at home
Your lack of concern for women is noted.
Thanks for making your true feelings known!
Pro abortion violence against Pro lifers has until the recent Supreme Court leak,
largely been limited to the 2009 murder of Jim Pouillon and the 2016 prolife
clinic arson in New Mexico.
You see anyone here cheering on anti abortion violence?
No ..... you do not.
No, but in spite of 40 plus years of violence by one side with what appears to
be remarkable restraint by the "victims and their ilk" of both assassinations,
bombings and arsons, I find the drama over 3 similar recent arson attacks
against the pro life side just a waste of time and another lame attempt
to bloviate about those who you believe to be your political enemies.
I also remember the articles and the videos of the arsonist perp who targeted
the Austin Democratic Party HQ and the demeanor of many here was that it was
just property damage by some crack pot.
No big deal at all.
Funny how that works...
Opinions on that do vary .... greatly in this case.
Actually your tacit acceptance of these recent attacks, by characterizing them simply as bloviation, is telling.
Telling as hell.
Neither is acceptable. Period. Full stop.
I know, verifiable facts versus your feelings.
I could have predicted your answers
My tacit acceptance?
No I was merely pointing out your outrage at these few recent events
as opposed to your lack of outrage when it happened to people of the
pro-abortion crowd over the last 4 decades, at least one decade of which you had
ample opportunities to post about here and elsewhere and have not.
Never met anybody who was pro-abortion.
Pro-choice is a whole different thing.
Semantics.
Yes, verifiable facts which you consistently evaluate in an irrational manner. That, is a VERY predictable result.
Delicate sensibilities aren’t my thing. That’s the lefts thing and they get displayed here every day. Look no further than this seed for that or most seeds for that matter.
Your attempts at denial are very cute ....
Show me where I’ve done that. Otherwise stop lying.
Your what-aboutism defense of these pro abortion terrorists is duly noted; and rejected.
They need to be found and held to the full extent of the law- just like the anti abortion terrorists were.
Too bad our overly partisan FBI, AG, and DOJ seem to be stuck going after far alt right only.
The decision hasn't even been made (as far as I know). It's all freak out over a draft.
[deleted]
it's the duty of every patriotic american to help expedite those ignoring the 1st amendment establishment clause of the US Constitution get to the front of the jesus meet and greet line.
And what steps have you actually taken in that direction, or are you all talk?
You mean like you?
I think you meant that for someone else.
I'm not sure how operating a clinic ignores the 1st amendment, but I do appreciate your making my point about the Holy War.
Oops I did. That was for devangelical. Sorry. I am having a hard time seeing and reading since my stroke last month.
You mean those like you?
Damn sure you won't ever get in that line thank God.
Not a problem. Hope you make a full recovery.
Everything is OK but a bit weaker on left side and my vision issues
Lol ..... sez folks on the left who regularly cherry-pick other people “acceptable” 1st amendment rights.
Free speech is easy when you agree with it. It only gets hard when you don’t.
Yep, reasoning with fundamentalists like that is like reasoning with a rabid dog with a marrow filled bone.
Kill those with a different opinion - you're a classic.
I guess you forget that those of us that oppose abortion and those that are religious are Americans and have the right to petition their government and to have their grievances addressed and have the right to protest.
Not at all
Not at all.
Although the constitution clearly favors a separation of church and state and
wants no particular religion to determine the laws based on religious reasons.
By the same token, I would say what if we all agree to end abortion in this
country and become 100% pro birth,
will you also agree to amend the second Amendment to eliminate all semi auto
weapons and fully auto weapons and anything deemed a WMD?
I will take a guarantee of life if it extends past the birth canal by 21 years.
Why would I do that? Fully automatic weapons are already regulated and you need a special permit and pay a tax to own one and WMDs are not allowed to be owned by citizens already.
[deleted]
Hope you continue to get better
LOL, swing and a miss...
But it was an out of the park grand slam home run on the second pitch.
Now, now folks, these radical pro-choice leftists are just picking up where the radical 'pro-life' rightists left off. But hey, how neat that y'all got a new squirrel to chase. Keep it up and American exceptionalism will become known as American hypocrisy. And before you go there, no I do not support violence against 'pregnancy centers' no matter how vile I may find them.
Ah, the old two wrongs make a right gambit coming from our little brother to the north.
[Deleted]
I walk the streets of my city of some 3 million without fear ... it's a good thing.
So do I, so do most Americans. You point is moot.
Your squirrel - the story was about PRO-life getting bombed.
No story is complete when only one side is looked at.
Any other day y’all would scream ‘deflection’.
The anti-choice fanatics bombed their own place for the insurance and the spin.
"The anti-choice fanatics bombed their own place for the insurance and the spin."
Now you're on to it - vast rightwing conspiracy.
And of course you have no proof for that dumbass claim.
He said that's what happened. That's all the proof he needs, his imagination.
To which we are given ….. the Jan 6th commission.
Well that is only one side.
That was my point
I thought so but wasn't sure
I was just thinking that if Roe vs Wade is overturned, the next step the Republican/conservative States may take is to legalize man on woman rape and charge women who have not produced at least one child by the age of 30 with a criminal offence. They would probably be backed up by their SCOTUS. Take a lesson from El Salvador where a woman who miscarries or in the event of a stillbirth the woman can be charged with an abortion offence.
American Republican/conservative "evolution"....