╌>

Biden Planning Student-Loan Announcement Wednesday - WSJ

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  3 years ago  •  145 comments

By:   Andrew Restuccia, Gabriel T. Rubin and Tarini Parti (WSJ)

Biden Planning Student-Loan Announcement Wednesday - WSJ
President has been weighing eliminating some debt, extending pause on payments

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



White House officials are planning for President Biden to make an announcement on Wednesday about his proposal for dealing with student-loan debt, according to people familiar with the matter.

The president and his senior aides have for months been weighing whether to cancel some federal student loan debt. Mr. Biden's top advisers have discussed several proposals, including eliminating $10,000 in federal student-loan debt for borrowers making less than $125,000 a year, the people said. The president's advisers have also discussed extending a pandemic pause on federal student-loan payments.

The White House has kept the details of the decision closely guarded. Only a small group of Mr. Biden’s top aides have been informed of his plans, some of the people said.

Mr. Biden is scheduled to return to the White House on Wednesday from Delaware, where he is on vacation with his family. The president has said he would announce a decision on student loans by Aug. 31.

The White House declined to comment on the specific timing of the announcement or provide further details. A spokesman reiterated that the president would make his decision before the end of the month.

A move to forgive $10,000 in student debt under certain income thresholds would fall short of progressive Democratic demands for full student-debt cancellation or for canceling $50,000 per borrower, but it could apply to the majority of the 40 million people who hold a total of $1.6 trillion in student-loan debt.

Republicans have opposed broad student-debt forgiveness, saying such a move would be unfair to those who have already paid off their loans or never went to college, and could worsen inflation.

A report released Tuesday from  the Penn Wharton Budget Model  estimated that a one-time maximum debt forgiveness of $10,000 per borrower with incomes of less than $125,000 a year would cost around $300 billion.

Last month, more than 100 Democratic senators and House members from across the party’s ideological spectrum asked Mr. Biden to extend the loan-payment pause beyond its Aug. 31 expiration, citing continued economic hardships. Mr. Biden cited similar reasoning for extending the pause previously,  most recently in April .

“Resuming student loan payments would force millions of borrowers to choose between paying their federal student loans or putting a roof over their heads, food on the table, or paying for childcare and health care,” the Democratic members wrote.

Republicans have opposed continuing the pause, arguing that it constitutes “de facto loan forgiveness.” Senior House Republicans unveiled a bill this month that would end the pause, as well as overhaul other aspects of the federal student-loan portfolio. The bill isn’t expected to go anywhere while Democrats control Congress and the White House.

The White House has left borrowers, loan servicing contractors and the Education Department itself in limbo as Mr. Biden mulled whether to extend the pause. Last month, the administration told loan servicers  to refrain from sending out billing notices  or other communications related to restarting payments.

Loan servicers are contracted by the federal government to manage student loan payments. They communicate with borrowers about how much they owe, where and how to send payments, and answer questions borrowers have about repayment programs. Typically, they send out billing notices at least 30 days prior to payments starting up, so that borrowers can plan ahead.

On Monday, a group of loan servicers urged the administration to come to a decision, and said that any move this close to the deadline raised the chances of “incidents of borrower miscommunication,” according to a letter seen by The Wall Street Journal.

“You should be aware that any announcement at this late date, less than ten days before the scheduled resumption of September 1, risks operational disruptions,” wrote Scott Buchanan, the head of the Student Loan Servicing Alliance, an industry group.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

"Republicans have opposed continuing the pause, arguing that it constitutes “de facto loan forgiveness.” Senior House Republicans unveiled a bill this month that would end the pause, as well as overhaul other aspects of the federal student-loan portfolio. The bill isn’t expected to go anywhere while Democrats control Congress and the White House."

Obviously this is a political move to make sure those with graduate degrees remember who to vote for.  Will it move the needle this November? I doubt it. There is way too much suffering going on.


Donald Trump is absolutely off topic.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1  Jack_TX  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 years ago

Announcement made.

  • $10k cancellation for non-Pell Grant recipients.
  • $20k cancellation for Pell-Grant recipients.
  • Payments of remaining loans capped at 5% of income.
  • $125k/$250k income cap
  • Existing payment holiday extended through 12/31.
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jack_TX @1.1    3 years ago

Pelosi once said only congress could do it and yet Biden did it all by himself!

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  arkpdx  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    3 years ago

Biden does not care about the Constitution. He like Obama has a phone and a pen and he can do what he wants

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.3  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  arkpdx @1.1.2    3 years ago

And that seems to be where we are. Every democrat president simply gets to do whatever they want. Nobody even challenges it. That's why I say again: the Republic is dead.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    3 years ago

What authority does the President have to transfer the debts of citizens to other taxpayers? 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1.5  Jack_TX  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    3 years ago
Pelosi once said only congress could do it and yet Biden did it all by himself!

I was wondering about that.  I'm supposing this is going to be done by executive order?  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.6  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.4    3 years ago

None.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.7  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jack_TX @1.1.5    3 years ago

That's right. He's going to walk out there today an announce he is forgiving all this debt. Should it ever get to the SCOTUS, he will be stopped.

Will it go there? 

Who knows. State Legislatures didn't defend their sole right to make election rules in 2020.

Whatever happens, Biden will be able to use it for democrats in the midterms.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1.8  Jack_TX  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.7    3 years ago

He just said "under the power granted by Congress to the Dept of Education"....

I dunno.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.9  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jack_TX @1.1.8    3 years ago

LMAO...that's a good one!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.11  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jack_TX @1.1.8    3 years ago
He just said "under the power granted by Congress to the Dept of Education"....

He is citing it as an emergency via "the pandemic!"

That's our Susan Rice.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1.12  Jack_TX  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.9    3 years ago

It was one of many things he said that we'll call "disingenuous".

Supposedly, no family in the top 5% will benefit from the plan, but lots of those families (like mine) have kids with loans that the parents pay.  In our case, we knew my daughter would get $17,500 of loans forgiven because she's a math teacher in a Title I school, so we had her borrow enough to make sure we got the full forgiveness.  So this actually puts about $13k in my pocket.   Considering what I pay in taxes every year... not sorry.

He also said he's reducing the deficit by $1.7trillion, almost all of which is simply the expiration of pandemic relief spending....because we're not in a pandemic anymore.  If he had just done nothing, it would have been a $2.4 trillion reduction (CBO figures).

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.14  Sean Treacy  replied to  Jack_TX @1.1.8    3 years ago

Here's a pretty good primer on the claimed legal basis for the EO. To the surprise of no one, it requires a gross misreading of the legislation and can't be supported by an honest reading of the provisions at issue. 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1.15  Jack_TX  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.14    3 years ago

Thanks.

I just read this, as well.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
1.1.16  1stwarrior  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    3 years ago
Did you notice that the $20k was for those who had a Pell Grant? A Pell Grant is a form of aide that does not need to be paid back; hence the term GRANT! It’s not a loan!
Let’s not forget that POTUS does NOT have it within his power to eliminate debt. He does not hold the purse strings for the country; that belongs to Congress.
So, what exactly did gropey Joe promise? Nothing…..
And what are we gonna get????  Nothing but more words and very little, if any, action.
 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.1.17  Kavika   replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.16    3 years ago

You can have student debt even if you have a Pell Grant, two separate issuses. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.18  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.16    3 years ago

The $10,000 for individual borrowers would be real and involve 43 Million people.

He is claiming that the pandemic caused a "national emergency" that gave him the right to do this. Let us see if anyone challenges him.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.19  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.16    3 years ago
Did you notice that the $20k was for those who had a Pell Grant? A Pell Grant is a form of aide that does not need to be paid back; hence the term GRANT ! It’s not a loan!

I found this:

"Pell grants themselves don’t generally have to be paid back, but recipients typically take out additional student loans.

“This additional relief for Pell borrowers is also an important piece of racial equity in cancellation,” said Kat Welbeck, Civil Rights Counsel for the Student Borrower Protection Center. “Because student debt exacerbates existing inequities, the racial wealth gap means that students of color, especially those that are Black and Latino, are more likely to come from low-wealth households, have student debt, and borrow in higher quantities.”

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1.20  Jack_TX  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.19    3 years ago
"Pell grants themselves don’t generally have to be paid back, but recipients typically take out additional student loans.

Biden is attempting to make a significant distinction here.  By giving an additional $10k if your family was poor enough that you qualified for a Pell Grant, he's attempting to help accelerate the rise out of generational poverty.  

That's admittedly the most utterly optimistic view of things, but that's what all politicians use when they're buying votes.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
1.1.21  1stwarrior  replied to  Kavika @1.1.17    3 years ago

True - and Biden/crew KNOW the difference but have used the "Pell GRANT" terminology to muddy the story?

I entered law school in 2010 - University of Tulsa, School of Law - and graduated in 2015 with emphasis/specialty in Federal Indian Law.

I paid $36K for tuition/books/supplies/etc and was rewarded with, to me, an excellent educational program with ample opportunity for helping the Native American community with all the trials/tribulations they have to go through/put up with from the Feds/State governmental institutions.

I began repayment of my loans in 2015 - for a total payoff of $36K.

However, I was "forced" to retire due to a massive cardiac arrest which the doc said would be in my future, again, as a result of the stress/travel, so I was only able to "work" for four months before "retiring".

When doing taxes for 2021, I received my 1099 (college interest payments) showing a balance/payoff of $34,600 after having paid over 6 years on the student loan with a Fed interest rate of 6 3/4%.  So, in essence, I have paid $28,800 ($400.00/month) on a $36K note and have been given a payoff "date" of May, 2035.

Based on my "fuzzy" math, that kinda adds up to having paid over $90K for a $36K loan.

And, those are just the Fed's figures.

Interestingly, Tulsa has dropped the Federal Indian Law program and increased tuition an average of 5% per year since 2015.

Things that make you wanna say "Hmmmmm".

Nope, my "employer", the Dod, did not assist in the funding for law school - and, for awhile, I was the only Federal Indian Law grad they had (which they so desperately need).

Ah well, eh?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
1.1.23  Sparty On  replied to  Jack_TX @1.1.20    3 years ago

Not sure what they are now but when I got them in the 70’s Pell Grants tended to be small and we’re not intended to cover all tuition or other costs.    A small subsidy as it were but every little bit helped.

Trying to put myself back in those times I probably would have applauded what Biden is doing here but I didn’t know what I didn’t know back then.    Biden is counting on that with this generation as well.

His problem is the many millions of us that came before and have paid our loans off or never went to college.    We far outnumber the folks who will support this.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.1.24  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.22    3 years ago

Perhaps next he will forgive US Federal debt.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 years ago

finally, a windfall to some of those smart enough not to become republicans...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @1.3    3 years ago

You mean whites with Graduate degrees...the democrat base.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.3.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  devangelical @1.3    3 years ago

Forcing poor minorities to subsidize rich whites… the Democratic Party never changes.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.3.4  arkpdx  replied to  devangelical @1.3    3 years ago

Well democrats do tend Toward Being layabout who think everything they want should be provided for them by others. This and your comment just proves it

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.3.5  arkpdx  replied to  devangelical @1.3    3 years ago

Yes Republicans are responsible citizens who pay their debts

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.3.6  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  arkpdx @1.3.4    3 years ago
Toward Being layabout who think everything they want should be provided for them by others

Evidence the 2020 election and the very loose availability of mail in ballots.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.7  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3.1    3 years ago

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.3.8  JohnRussell  replied to  devangelical @1.3.7    3 years ago

That guy is a national treasure. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
1.3.9  Sparty On  replied to  devangelical @1.3.7    3 years ago

Lol ..... a comedian?    Guess his MBA didn’t work out .....

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.10  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @1.3.7    3 years ago

You can't turn what is egregiously unfair into something that is compassionate. Not even the old wordsmith could do it.

What you could have done back in 2010 was to tell Obama not to get the US government into the student loan business. That was really incentivized the colleges to raise tuitions. I would have rather seen senile Joe put a cap on how high a tuition can be.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.3.11  arkpdx  replied to  devangelical @1.3    3 years ago

It is more of a windfall for Democrat leeches who are to irresponsible to pay their just debts. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    3 years ago

As Charlie Cooke put, a giant middle finger to America.

If this is true, it would represent a giant middle finger to America. It would represent a middle finger to the Constitution, which vests legislative power in Congress, not the president. It would represent a middle finger to Congress, which has not given the executive branch the authority to give $10,000 each to millions of college students. It would represent a middle finger to the Department of Education, which found last year that it “does not have statutory authority to provide blanket or mass cancellation, compromise, discharge, or forgiveness of student loan principal balances, and/or to materially modify the repayment amounts or terms thereof.” Nancy Pelosi confirmed last summer that “the president can’t do it — so that’s not even a discussion.” “Not everybody realizes that,” she said, “but the president can only postpone, delay but not forgive.” Biden’s response? A middle finger.
At the level of the electorate, it would represent a middle finger to voters without college degrees, who have much higher unemployment rates than voters with college educations, and who will now be on the hook for loans they didn’t take out and didn’t benefit from. It would represent a middle finger to voters who chose not to go college — voters who will, as Nancy Pelosi has put it , be “paying taxes to forgive somebody else’s obligations.” It would represent a middle finger to voters who are currently paying back loans taken out for other purposes (their small businesses, say). It would represent a middle finger to voters who have paid off their student loans already, to voters who made sacrifices to prioritize paying off their student loans early, and to voters who deliberately chose colleges that required them to borrow less money. And, because there is no plan or reform attached — it would be a one-time deal — it would represent a middle finger to voters who will take out student loans tomorrow. Sorry, guys. You didn’t time your birth properly to the 2022 midterms.

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/joe-biden-illegally-canceling-student-loans-would-be-a-middle-finger-to-america/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=right-rail&utm_content=corner&utm_term=second

He should be impeached for it. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    3 years ago
He should be impeached for it.

I'm counting the minutes!

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
2.1.1  arkpdx  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    3 years ago

The only bad thing about impeaching him is "president" Kamela (Camel Hairless) Harris or possibly "president" Nancy Pelousy

 I am not going to hold my breath until after the midterms and we get a reasonable and sane Congress back in control. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.1    3 years ago

It will have to be a double impeachment.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.4  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.3    3 years ago
Impeached for what?

Treason & moral malfeasance.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.1.7  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.4    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
2.2  arkpdx  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    3 years ago
He should be impeached for it. 

And for much, much more!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

"Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers has some advice for the Biden Administration as it weighs whether to cancel student loan debt for millions of people: Beware of offering “unreasonably generous” relief, because it could contribute to inflation." 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4  TᵢG    3 years ago
A report released Tuesday from    the Penn Wharton Budget Model   estimated that a one-time maximum debt forgiveness of $10,000 per borrower with incomes of less than $125,000 a year would cost around $300 billion.

Reckless spending.  

I would support a program that enabled disadvantaged but driven kids the opportunity to get a higher education (or trade) by partial scholarship or reasonable loans.   That would be positive for the nation (encouraging and enabling people with the aptitude and desire to get a higher level education and then contribute to the nation).   But they need to get the grades to continue the support.

One time debt-forgiveness is a band aid on a healed / partially-healed wound.   The money is better spent on making education within reach of the deserving but less financially fortunate.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
4.1  GregTx  replied to  TᵢG @4    3 years ago

One time debt forgiveness is an appeal or attempted bribe to a demographic that increasingly disapproves of the Biden administration

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
4.1.2  GregTx  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.1    3 years ago

Not just me..

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
4.2  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @4    3 years ago

Spot on.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.3  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @4    3 years ago

Yes and that's one thing wrong with it.

The unfairness is the other part:

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.3.1  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3    3 years ago

Agreed, it is ill-conceived.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
5  Snuffy    3 years ago

Are we not in this situation because the federal government got involved in the first place?  Once the federal government started to guarantee student loans, the colleges took it upon themselves to raise tuition and fees must faster than inflation, only because the loans were guaranteed and there was no agency watching the other side to insure that colleges played fair.  If this is allowed to happen, what will the downstream effects be for future students trying to go to college?  Will colleges continue to raise their tuition and fees at a rate much faster than inflation, and will students take out more and more loans, all in the hope that the federal government will step in again and bail them out?  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Snuffy @5    3 years ago
Once the federal government started to guarantee student loans, the colleges took it upon themselves to raise tuition and fees must faster than inflation, only because the loans were guaranteed and there was no agency watching the other side to insure that colleges played fair.

Can't be said enough. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
6  Sparty On    3 years ago

Nothing good will come from this.    It will do nothing to lower inflation and most likely will just increase it.    And it incentivizes colleges to increase already out of control costs.

Hopefully the net effect will push more kids to online learning and less to bloated bricks and mortar colleges.

Dismantling the oligopoly colleges currently have .... forcing lower college costs.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @6    3 years ago

Here's a question that you might know the answer to:

What about veterans who joined the military to get their tuition paid for? 

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
6.1.1  charger 383  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1    3 years ago

Cheats them like many others

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  charger 383 @6.1.1    3 years ago

Yup!  Is thing he is about to do even legal?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
6.1.3  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1    3 years ago

Yep, see 6.1.1.

Basically it’s no longer a special benefit for joining the services.    And recruitment numbers will continue to drop precipitously.

Our enemies don’t have to do anything if Dems stay in control.    All they have to do is wait us out.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
6.1.4  arkpdx  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1    3 years ago

I wonder if people like me who either paid their way for college as they went or have already repaid their loans will get reimbursed? My guess is that Biden will just say"SCREW YOU!"

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.5  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @6.1.3    3 years ago

You mean the educational incentive is gone?

The masculinity thing is being destroyed...What's left?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.6  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  arkpdx @6.1.4    3 years ago

I'm afraid so. Then hell play...


 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
6.1.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1    3 years ago
What about veterans who joined the military to get their tuition paid for? 

Damn right.  I want my money back!!!!!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.9  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @6.1.8    3 years ago

There is a lot of anger on this. It is extremely unfair and it's really illegal. He really has no right to do this.

About 50% of those who owe on student loans have Graduate Degrees. The rest of us are bailing them out????

And you know what the colleges are going to do, right?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
6.1.10  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.5    3 years ago
You mean the educational incentive is gone?

It was a targeted benefit for those chose to serve.    It’s still a benefit for them but now shotgun Joe wants it to go to everyone making less than 125k.

So much for that special benefit ....

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.11  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @6.1.10    3 years ago

We are lucky enough to have 0.4% of the population willing to serve. Joe keeps screwing with that.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
6.1.12  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.9    3 years ago
There is a lot of anger on this. It is extremely unfair and it's really illegal. He really has no right to do this.
About 50% of those who owe on student loans have Graduate Degrees. The rest of us are bailing them out????

Oh it's a liberals wet dream.  They're back to leeching off the taxpayer getting their "free" shit.

And you know what the colleges are going to do, right?

There's a long list of things that the colleges can do: Raise tuition, Decrease class sizes, Decrease the number of degrees they offer programs for,

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.13  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @6.1.12    3 years ago

The democrats and education are a bad mix. This just keeps feeding the monster.

And in the process, they've really abused the president's emergency powers to do just about anything.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
6.1.14  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.11    3 years ago

And it’s shows as recruitment numbers continue their precipitous decline.

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
7  squiggy    3 years ago

The kid who paid his way through welding school can pay for these freeloaders, too.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
8  charger 383    3 years ago

If the borrowers are not repaying the loans, was the student loan program worthwhile and properly set up in the first place?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  charger 383 @8    3 years ago

It was 2010 that Obama got the government into the student loan business. Universities began raising tuitions immediately!

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
9  Ronin2    3 years ago

Whoever said "Democrats are better than Republicans about debt, deficits, and inflation" should be forced to literally eat their words. Republicans suck at it; but Democrats are in a league of their own- even with a two party system.

Attempting to buy midterm votes at taxpayer expense by executive fiat.

Imagine the screaming by Democrats and leftists if a Republican PoTUS had pulled this stunt.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @9    3 years ago
Attempting to buy midterm votes at taxpayer expense by executive fiat.

The funny part is that this openly political stunt may not even have a payoff. The NAACP has already condemned it as not going far enough:



Joe Manchin cannot like this after he went along with the recent boondoggle.

Last but not least, where does Biden get the authority to do it?   It's not a national emergency?   Why does he get away with it?

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
9.2  arkpdx  replied to  Ronin2 @9    3 years ago
Whoever said "Democrats are better than Republicans about debt, deficits, and inflation" should be forced to literally eat their words

Why should they? They were absolutely correct! Democrats are better at those things. Better at raising them. Don't forget how good they are at raising taxes either. The just love to spend and give away other people's money. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
11  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

"President Biden announced  Wednesday that he will cancel $10,000 of federal student loan debt for certain borrowers making less than $125,000 per year, and up to $20,000 for Pell Grant recipients, while extending the pause on federal student loan payments through the end of the year. 

"In keeping with my campaign promise, my Administration is announcing a plan to give working and middle class families breathing room as they prepare to resume  federal student loan payments  in January 2023," Biden tweeted. 

Biden is expected to give remarks on the plan Wednesday afternoon."




 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
12  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

Fa8FsNwWAAAaLWG?format=jpg&name=medium


 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
13  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

"Biden’s illegal move is grotesque classism. In his eyes, those who’ll end up paying are the tradesmen, the riff-raff, the great unwashed, the background noise, the dirty-handed types, whose role is to aid the self-dealing clerisy his party calls its base."

nwaBcWle?format=jpg&name=240x240


 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
14  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

Dumb ass is speaking now

FavbaQQX0AAvu2s?format=png&name=small

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
14.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Vic Eldred @14    3 years ago

256

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
14.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @14.1    3 years ago

McConnell: Biden student loan forgiveness a "wildly unfair redistribution" of wealth

Fa8sWgxWQAAEI_j?format=jpg&name=small


https:// trib.al/EDLb76D

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
15  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

Joe is telling us a long story of his going to school.....It's endless. A rambling story!

He's definitely juiced up on Prevagen.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
16  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

What's truly amazing is that when he began, (He's in close contact with COVID positive Jill Biden), he took his mask off and immediately coughed into his hand. Twice. I wonder if he'll seek to shake somebody's hand?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
17  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

He says that college is just too expensive. He doesn't bother to tell us how it happened....back in 2010

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
18  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago
I guess it's okay for you though. 

It's like gambling...the 99% fail miserably, but Vic Eldred is living large.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
19  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

That's all folks!

th?id=OIP.kb29nKk-qmbEUGdIPPRA-QHaEF&pid=Api&P=0

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
20  Sunshine    3 years ago

512

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
21  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

Well, as Alan Freed used to say when it was time to sign off:

"This isn't good-by, it's only good night."

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
23  Sean Treacy    3 years ago

Daily laugh..  Finally, Harvard Law Students catch a break...

Laurence Tribe
@tribelaw
 · 9h
Good news for thousands of my former students. I’m grateful on their behalf, Mr. President. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
PhD Guide
24  Right Down the Center    3 years ago

256

 
 

Who is online

Ronin2


58 visitors