╌>

FBI Suspends Whistleblower Who Criticized Bureau's Handling Of January 6 Investigations: Report

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  2 years ago  •  49 comments

By:   The Daily Wire

FBI Suspends Whistleblower Who Criticized Bureau's Handling Of January 6 Investigations: Report

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The FBI has suspended a whistleblower who pushed back against the bureau's handling of investigations related to the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, according to House Republicans.

"The FBI SUSPENDED a whistleblower for refusing to carry out the Bureau's politicized investigations," Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee said in a Twitter post Tuesday.


The FBI SUSPENDED a whistleblower for refusing to carry out the Bureau's politicized investigations.

Can you imagine the media outrage if President Trump did this? pic.twitter.com/1dhB4nmnHz

— House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) September 20, 2022

The post contained screenshots of a letter Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), the top Republican on the committee, sent to FBI Director Christopher Wray the day before. The letter outlined allegations from an FBI whistleblower that the bureau has altered some of its processes to make domestic violent extremism (DVE) cases appear more prevalent throughout the U.S. than they are.

"The FBI's case categorization creates the illusion that threats from DVE are present in jurisdictions across the nation, when in reality they all stem from the same related investigation concerning the actions at the Capitol on January 6," the letter says. "Such an artificial case categorization scheme allows FBI leadership to misleadingly point to 'significant' increases in DVE threats nationwide."

A spokesman for Jordan's office told The Daily Wire that the FBI whistleblower whose allegations were detailed in the letter informed Jordan's office on Monday that the FBI had suspended him.

The whistleblower said that the FBI's Washington Field Office has directed FBI field offices across the United States to open up DVE investigations into "potential subjects" related to the January 6 riot. However, while another field office officially opens the case, the Washington Field Office maintains control of the investigation, performing and approving "all of the investigative work and paperwork for the casefile," the whistleblower said, according to Jordan's letter.

"This scheme allows you to continue to support on paper your assertion that '[t]he FBI is a field-based law enforcement organization, and the vast majority of our investigations should continue to be worked by our field offices,' while actually running the investigation from Washington," Jordan's letter said, quoting the whistleblower.

The whistleblower also alleged that the FBI was diverting resources from other investigative work to DVE cases. "The whistleblower recalled … being 'told that child sexual abuse material investigations were no longer an FBI priority and should be referred to local law enforcement agencies.'"


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    2 years ago

The far left's police force will be in the spotlight next year.

So far the FBI has been above the law.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 years ago

funny how the FBI suddenly went all to hell with that trump appointee as director ...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @1.1    2 years ago

He needed to pick someone outside the Department. My choice would have been Richard Allen Grenell.

Let us not forget that Michael Flynn originally intended to totally restructure the intelligence agencies and the FBI.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  devangelical @1.1    2 years ago

You need to pay attention.  It went to hell LONG before that.  Did you forget about the investigation into the Russia Collusion hoax?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.3  Sparty On  replied to  devangelical @1.1    2 years ago

Suddenly went all to hell?
You been living under a rock the last couple decades?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.3    2 years ago

so the FBI finally hit rock bottom then, with a trump appointee?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.5  Sparty On  replied to  devangelical @1.1.4    2 years ago

They’ve been bouncing up and down off the bottom for years.    

How easily you forget.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2  Ronin2    2 years ago

What are whistle blowers to expect when Garland has already stated the DOJ will violate the whistle blower law?

Garland needs to be impeached. It doesn't matter if Republicans only take the House. What Garland is doing needs to be exposed.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @2    2 years ago

Agreed. Three more months and it will feel like the Nuremberg trials.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
2.1.1  afrayedknot  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    2 years ago

“Three more months and it will feel like the Nuremberg trials.”

As the business of government grinds to a halt in purely political retribution. Cannot imagine the hacks that will head the committees…a rogues gallery of conspiracy theorists, apologists, and cultural, religious separatists. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.1    2 years ago

Oh, I know, Whenever the Republicans take power we hear about resisting political retribution.

NOT THIS TIME!

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.1    2 years ago

Democrats can STFU after everything they have put this country through for the last 6 years plus.

Democrats should be locked out of the process- just like Republicans were for the impeachment trials; and Jan 6th committee. Only those Dems subservient enough will be picked to serve by Republican heads.

As for the business of government- government has no business except for serving US citizens. It hasn't done that for a very long time. 

Those of us not on the left will settle for Republicans putting an end to Democrat BS for the remainder of Brandon's term!

 
 
 
dennissmith
Freshman Silent
2.1.4  dennissmith  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.1    2 years ago

Political retribution is exactly what the Dems have done for 6 years.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3  Greg Jones    2 years ago

Can't wait for the investigations into the China Joe crime family to begin.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Greg Jones @3    2 years ago

Thank God for C-Span!

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Greg Jones @3    2 years ago
Can't wait for the investigations into the China Joe crime family to begin.

Right after they're done with the Hillary investigations?  You've got her on the ropes, no time to stop now..../s

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.2.1  Ronin2  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2    2 years ago

Where is that Trump indictment? Still waiting.

Democrats have no room to spout anything after the last 6 years plus.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ronin2 @3.2.1    2 years ago

It took less time to investigate 9-11.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2.2    2 years ago

It took less time to investigate 9-11.

Speaking of which.  How is John Durham doing these days?  Those indictments still right around the corner???

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.2.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.3    2 years ago

Funny you mention it, he does have a trial starting next month.  Imagine being able to do an investigation and actually charge somebody with what the investigation was about.  You know, kind of unlike the Russia Collusion Hoax, the partisan Jan 6 Committee...

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2.5  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2.4    2 years ago
Funny you mention it, he does have a trial starting next month.

One?  That's it?  After all this time?  It took less time to investigate 9-11.

After he lost the one with Sussman, I thought he was done.  But maybe he will have better luck with Danchenko.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.6  Tessylo  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2    2 years ago

We're still waiting on those indictments of the entire Obama adminstration!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.2.7  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.5    2 years ago
One?  That's it?

It's more in that short time than the Democrats / left have had in, what, 7 years now?  It starts with 1.  But you wouldn't know about that with all the failures the Democrats have fed you.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2.8  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2.7    2 years ago
It's more in that short time than the Democrats / left have had in, what, 7 years now?

If you're going to state a lie, at least make it harder to refute.

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team indicted or got guilty pleas from 34 people and three companies during their lengthy investigation.

And the best part is that Mueller (lifelong republican), was working under Trump's own republican administration and appointed by Trump's republican AG.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.2.9  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.8    2 years ago

All process crimes that had jack shit to do with Trump himself. FAIL.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.2.10  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.8    2 years ago

Meuller's "indictments" were for everything EXCEPT what he was supposed to be looking into.  They were "process indictments".  Not for the hoax he was supposed to be looking into.  But don't let that stop you spewing out talking points that Meuller's "investigation" already disproved.

was working under Trump's own republican administration and appointed by Trump's republican AG.

And another falsehood told by the left.  He was working for the Democrats in the midst of a massive temper tantrum that they lost the election.  The claims made by the Democrats, were in fact true right up to the point of WHO was in contact with the Russians.  Or did you forget that it was the Democrats that made the contact with them and ran with a hoax?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.11  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.2.9    2 years ago

"All process crimes that had jack shit to do with Trump himself. FAIL."

You don't even know what that means.

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.2.12  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.11    2 years ago

Just because you don't doesn't mean others don't.

Here. Just for you so you can know too.

  1. Process crime

    In United States criminal procedure terminology, a process crime is an offense against the judicial process. These crimes include failure to appear, false statements, obstruction of justice, contempt of court and perjury. Process crimes are sometimes a basis for a "pretextual prosecution", in which prosecutors bring process crime charges against a defendant in order to punish them for another crime for which a conviction is more difficult to obtain.

You're welcome. Now, any of the indictments or prosecutions meet that criteria? You damned right. They all did.

Next??

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2.13  Ozzwald  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.2.9    2 years ago

All process crimes that had jack shit to do with Trump himself. FAIL.

moving-goalpost.gif

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.2.14  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.13    2 years ago

Nope

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.15  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.2.12    2 years ago

I can look shit up in the dictionary too.

You all spout 'process crimes' like it means something here.

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.16  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.2.14    2 years ago

Yup

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.17  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.15    2 years ago
I can look shit up in the dictionary too.

Glad to hear it. Please let us know what deflection means.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.2.18  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.17    2 years ago

Probably should have looked it up before spouting off......................

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.19  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.2.18    2 years ago

Um-hum

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.20  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.17    2 years ago
de·flec·tion
/dəˈflekSH(ə)n/
noun
  1. The action or process of deflecting or being deflected.
    "the deflection of the light beam"
    Similar:
    turning aside/away
    diversion
    drawing away
    deviation
    divergence
    declination
    aberration
    turn
    veer
    swerve
    slew
    straying
    twist
 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.21  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.19    2 years ago

Nuh uh

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.22  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.20    2 years ago

Ok, those are the only times the word should be used, not when somebody has made a valid point.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.23  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.22    2 years ago

I have never seen a valid point made by him or you 'here'

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.24  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.2.18    2 years ago
"Probably should have looked it up before spouting off......................"

Ya!  You should have ..........................

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.25  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.23    2 years ago
I have never seen a valid point made by him or you 'here'

The last person who said that hasn't been heard from since the 15th.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.3  Hallux  replied to  Greg Jones @3    2 years ago
Can't wait for the investigations into the China Joe crime family to begin.

You'll have to wait for the China-Justin investigation to wrap up first ... /s

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.3.2  Ronin2  replied to  Hallux @3.3    2 years ago

Want some more migrants in Canada- we have more than enough for several countries.

Start filling us some of those wide open spaces.

I only wish I was being sarcastic.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
5  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 years ago

I guess whistleblower laws are thrown out when it comes to exposing the left, Democrats and their gestapo.  

 
 

Who is online






1stwarrior
Tessylo


418 visitors