╌>

Native American tribes dependent on fossil fuel resources rip Biden admin for double standard

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  2 years ago  •  4 comments

By:   Thomas Catenacci (Fox News)

Native American tribes dependent on fossil fuel resources rip Biden admin for double standard
Native American leaders said tribes nationwide continue to rely upon natural resources including fossil fuels to sustain their way of life despite attacks from the White House.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Native American tribes that rely on fossil fuel production across the nation reiterated their demand that the Biden administration allow them to develop the resources on their lands.

Tribal leaders and energy experts contacted by Fox News Digital criticized efforts to restrict oil, gas and coal production even as those resources sustain thousands of Native Americans's way of life. The Department of the Interior has repeatedly expressed support for boosting tribal sovereignty for Indigenous tribes, but has also pursued a climate agenda limiting fossil fuel production on federal lands and waters.

"Air, water and energy are so foundational to our economy. I believe in the right that all property owners have to develop what belongs to them in any way that they want," Daniel Cardenas, the chairman of the National Tribal Energy Association and a member of the Pit River Tribe, told Fox News Digital in an interview.

"That's why it's important to fight for. To make sure it doesn't get taken away."

A dragline excavator moves rocks above a coal seam at the Spring Creek Mine in Decker, Montana, in 2013. The mine is operated by the Navajo Transitional Energy Company.

Roughly 20% of the nation's total oil and natural gas reserves, 30% of domestic coal reserves west of the Mississippi River and additional natural minerals — altogether worth about $1.5 trillion — are on Native American lands, according to a 2014 study from think tank Property and Environment Research Center (PERC).

However, about 86% of Indigenous land with energy and mineral resource potential remain undeveloped and just 3% of domestic oil production comes from tribal land.

"Resource tribes depend on the development of their resources to create better tomorrows for our children," Conrad Stewart, the director of energy and water for the Crow Nation of Montana, told Fox News Digital in an interview. "It was basically a mandate in Indian policy to establish and develop our resources."

The Crow Nation's coal and resource assets are worth an estimated $27 billion, likely making it among the largest coal owners worldwide, according to PERC. Still, the tribe's unemployment rate is far higher than the national average and its annual return on coal is less than 1%.

But last year, the Biden administration let the Department of Energy National Coal Council charter lapse, effectively ending the 40-year-old coal production advisory panel which Stewart had served on. The administration has also pursued emissions standards and restrictions targeting the coal industry which tribes like the Crow Nation are dependent on.

"A war on coal is a war on Crow," Stewart added, criticizing the Biden administration's energy policies.

Workers lay pipeline in 2013 in Watford City, North Dakota. (Andrew Burton/Getty Images)

In addition, the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara (MHA) Nation, Osage Nation, Southern Ute Tribe and Navajo Nation are among several tribes nationwide that actively rely on oil and gas revenues to meet their budgets.

Land belonging to the MHA Nation — which is known also as the Three Affiliated Tribes — sits atop the Bakken Formation in North Dakota, a massive deposit of oil and natural gas resources. The tribe produces about 23% of the state's 1.1 million barrels of daily oil production.

MHA Nation Chairman Mark Fox said in June 2021 that it was his tribe's right to develop energy resources "so our children and grandchildren for the next 100 years have somewhere to live."

"The MHA nation has benefited tremendously from the oil and gas activity on reservation, primarily with employment," Ron Ness, the president of the North Dakota Petroleum Council, told Fox News Digital in an interview. "This is a reservation with a very low unemployment rate."

"It's created a tremendous amount of wealth and opportunity for the enrolled members of the tribe," he added. "And they've been building schools and building facilities for the benefit of their members, whether it be law enforcement facilities, drug and alcohol treatment facilities, rehabilitation facilities."

MHA Nation Chairman Mark Fox delivers the State of the Tribes address at the North Dakota State capitol on Jan. 5, 2021. (MHA Nation)

The Navajo Nation, a tribe with land in the southwest, has oil and gas revenues that are estimated to be upwards of $75 million per year, more than half of the tribe's annual budget, according to Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company CEO James McClure, who said fossil fuel development is "very important" for the tribe.

"The current administration has worked to support the Navajo Nation on most clean energy initiatives," McClure told Fox News Digital. "The same cannot be said of oil and gas development."

The DOI is soon expected to finalize a 20-year ban on oil and gas leasing near the Chaco Canyon historical site on Navajo land in northwestern New Mexico. Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez and the Navajo Nation Council have fiercely opposed the proposed rule.

There are currently 53 Indian allotments in the zone around Chaco Canyon that would be impacted by the ban that generate $6.2 million per year in royalties for an estimated 5,462 allottees, according to the Navajo Nation. There are an additional 418 unleased allotments in the zone that are associated with more than 16,000 allottees.

And earlier this year the Kaktovik Inupiat Corporation (KIC), a business group founded to serve the Inupiat people, joined a lawsuit challenging the administration's oil and gas leasing pause in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska. Native shareholders of the KIC represent the only village and private landowners in ANWR, according to the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority.

"We can't allow the federal government to arbitrarily shut down good-paying jobs for Alaska Native families and cut off revenue streams for local and state governments," AIDEA Board Chair Dana Pruhs said in March.

An oil drilling rig is pictured.

DOI spokesperson Melissa Schwartz, though, told Fox News Digital that the administration supports Native tribes in the "exercise of their sovereign powers" to manage their lands.

"Tribes should have the ability to determine whether, when and how to develop energy resources on their lands," DOI Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs Bryan Newland said during his confirmation hearing last year.

Shortly after taking office, President Biden signed an executive order pausing all new federal oil and gas leasing. After facing intense criticism from tribes including Ute Tribe in Utah, the DOI clarified that the policy wouldn't impact fossil fuel development on Indigenous land.

Still, experts said the Biden administration could do more to incentivize energy production and increase compensation for resources on tribal lands.

"Overall, oil and gas, like casinos, is important where those revenue sources can be tapped," said Terry Anderson, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution who authored the 2014 PERC report laying out energy resources on Indigenous lands.

"Federal policy for the last 180 years is — Justice John Marshall said the relationship between Indians to the United States is 'like that of a ward to his guardian.' Under that relationship, the federal government says, 'we need to make sure you don't make mistakes and therefore constrain you on what you do,'" he continued.

"All climate change has done is add to the trusteeship constraints and regulations that make it far more difficult for tribes to tap their resources," Anderson said.

Since the early 1800s, the federal government has made itself the trustee of lands and natural resources on Indian reservations, according to the Native American Rights Fund. Under the arrangement, the government largely oversees resource development.

President Biden gestures during a White House ceremony with Interior Secretary Deb Haaland on Oct. 8, 2021. ( AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Shawn Regan, the vice president of research at PERC and a co-author on the 2014 paper with Anderson, said many of the hurdles facing tribes that seek to boost energy development come via the permitting process with the DOI's Bureau of Indian Affairs.

"Tribes now find themselves in this place, in this position, where some of them are interested in tapping those resources, but face a whole bunch of regulatory challenges to doing that," Regan told Fox News Digital.

"When tribes have tried to develop resources, they've often encountered this really complex federal bureaucracy that makes it difficult to fully capitalize on those resources"

He noted the trustee arrangement, adding that tribes have the right to use their land, but only with the approval of the federal government.

Because the federal process for approving every lease and agreement on Native American lands is notoriously slow, energy companies have actively tried to avoid projects on such properties, according to Regan.

Interior Secretary Deb Haaland meets with young people from the Rosebud Sioux Tribe on July 14, 2021. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)

Cardenas, from the National Tribal Energy Association and who supports all energy production on native lands, said the Biden administration has failed to explain to tribes how traditional energy jobs would be replaced by promised clean energy jobs.

"When the administration says, 'we're going to create all these millions of jobs if we just switched over [to renewable energy] today,' they haven't shown us the fine print that says where those jobs are coming, which region, doing what," he said. "When you start questioning them there, then they start getting defensive."

And Stewart, from the Crow Tribe, lambasted the administration for relying on foreign sources of energy over Native American-produced energy.

"What I don't understand is why they bring in foreign oil and gas resources from someplace else that has regulation that we would not stand for here in the United States," Stewart said. "Then, they turn around and point fingers at the Native Americans and they say, 'your resources are too dirty.'"

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Thomas Catenacci is a politics writer for Fox News Digital.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    2 years ago

Stewart doesn't understand it.

Welcome to 2020.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2  Jasper2529    2 years ago

Biden's and Democrats' progressive policies have already lost them scores of Black, Hispanic, Asian, and white votes for 2022 and 2024. It looks like they might very well lose the votes of Native Americans, too.

Even a new mother quickly understands that when her infant consistently spits out spinach or squash, she's not going to be able to force the baby to eat them and chooses more palatable alternatives.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3  Kavika     2 years ago

The closer was scheduled in 2017, nothing new there. The complaint that the Biden administration allow them to develop resources on their land is misleading since the laws governing this date back a hundred years or so. 

It's also worth noting that the Navajo Nation purchased three bankrupt coal mining companies and their operation in Wyoming in 2019.

Under US/Indian law the federal government (interior department) controls the resources on tribal land and has the ability to say yes or no to any use of the land whether it be mineral/oil/lumber extraction or an outside business such as service or manufacturing wanting to locate on tribal land. 

This of course can be traced to the Marshall Trilogy from SCOTUS. 

The feds have generally made a mess of this authority and that includes both parties. A glaring example would be Cobell v Salazar where the Feds through hook or crook deprived the tribes of billions of dollars of revenue estimated to be in the range of $20 billion to $30 billion dollars. The feds lost at every level of our judicial system and finally settled for $3.5 billion. That is one of but many lawsuits that we have won with regard to the inept and many times illegal acts of the government.

Currently, there are many tribes that are developing their lands using renewable types of energy. 

Natives DO NOT own the land on their reservations that is controlled by the Feds and our land is held ''in trust'' by the feds.

Then there are the physical disasters that the feds create when they have leased out this land. The uranium mines in the Navajo nation are still be cleaned up and the largest toxic spill in US history at Church Rock. A super fund site that still is completed from the 1970s.

I agree with those in our community that want control over our own lands, but the reality is that we are ''dependent domestic nations'' and therein lies the stumbling block.

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
4  squiggy    2 years ago

How would any of these resources be vectored if transportation is met with perpetual roadblocks? Hey, if there's a pipeline, there's a party.

 
 

Who is online



JohnRussell
Tessylo
George


409 visitors