John Durham investigation: Igor Danchenko, the primary source for Trump-Russia dossier, is acquitted | CNN Politics
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
John Durham, left, and Igor Danchenko Consolidated News Pictures/Getty Images Alexandria, VirginiaCNN —
Igor Danchenko, the primary source for the infamous Trump-Russia dossier, was acquitted Tuesday of four counts of lying to the FBI in an embarrassing defeat for special counsel John Durham.
Durham has taken two cases to trial, and both have ended in acquittals. After more than three years looking for misconduct in the FBI's Trump-Russia probe, Durham has only secured one conviction: the guilty plea of a low-level FBI lawyer, who got probation.
The jury returned not guilty verdicts on all charges against Danchenko, a Russian expat and think tank analyst who provided the bulk of the material for the anti-Trump dossier. Durham initially charged Danchenko with five counts of lying to the FBI, but a judge threw out one of the charges on Friday.
The verdict means jurors weren't persuaded by Durham's allegations that Danchenko lied to the FBI about his contacts with a Belarusian-American businessman who was a possible source for the dossier. The largely discredited dossier was a collection of unverified and salacious allegations compiled by retired British spy Christopher Steele, whose dirt-digging was indirectly funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign in 2016.
In many ways, the verdict is a direct blow to Durham, who personally handled most of the arguments and witness questioning. The proceedings were rocky at times for the special counsel, who lashed out at some of his own witnesses after they ended up providing testimony that helped Danchenko's defense.
Danchenko attorney Stuart Sears praised the result.
"We've known all along that Mr. Danchenko was innocent. We're happy now that the American public knows that as well," Sears told reporters outside the courthouse. "We thank these jurors for their hard work and deliberation in reaching the right decision."
In a statement, Durham said: "While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury's decision and thank them for their service. I also want to recognize and thank the investigators and the prosecution team for their dedicated efforts in seeking truth and justice in this case."
The week-long trial against Danchenko resurrected many of the 2016 election dramas.
FBI agents described their efforts to corroborate the Steele dossier, which ultimately came up empty. Jurors were shown portions of Steele's memos, which he has previously said weren't ever meant to become public. The dossier's primary allegation - that there was a "well-developed conspiracy of cooperation" between Donald Trump and the Russians - repeatedly came up throughout the proceedings.
Durham also used the case to put the FBI on trial, in what could be a preview of his upcoming final report. He zeroed in on the shortcomings and errors of the early Trump-Russia probe - specifically the bureau's overreliance on the dossier to propel forward some key parts of their burgeoning inquiry.
Danchenko is a Russian citizen but has lived in the US for years with his family. The FBI once scrutinized him as a possible counterintelligence threat, but later paid him as an informant. Durham pressed Danchenko's FBI handler about the possibility that he was a Russian spy. To the contrary, the witness said Danchenko was a treasured FBI informant and suggested that Durham hurt US national security by indicting him.
This story has been updated with additional details.
Tags
Who is online
417 visitors
Durham was doomed to fail because the CIA and FBI investigations into Trump's Russian dealings were legally predicated and predate the 2016 election. Beginning by at least 2014 and continuing right up to election day in 2016 Trump was in secret negotiations with clandestine agents of Vlad Putin's Russian State Intelligence Services to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. He even offered Putin a luxury penthouse as a bribe. Every Intelligence agency in the world was aware Trump was colluding with Russia in the leadup to 2016!
Let me set the facts straight here.
The investigations into Trump found NOTHING.
'Nuff said.
Senate committee concludes Russia used Manafort, WikiLeaks to boost Trump in 2016 | Reuters
That doesn't sound like "nothing" to me, but I suppose to someone who has their head shoved firmly up Trumps voluminous backside anything might be seen as "nothing".
You know, you may have a point.
Please link a source to where the Steele Dossier was proven correct, or where the investigations JBB is always talking about turned up something illegal done by Trump.
I am more than willing to look at any evidence you have on that.
As far as this quip goes:
Fuck off.
what biden needs to do now is declassify the mueller report and release the unredacted version in the next 2 weeks.
Too little, too late to help the Democrats in the midterms.
America has seen what the Biden Administration can do to hurt America.
Exactly, just in time for the mid-terms.
Not going to save the Democrats.
As Carville told y'all, "It's the economy, stupid!"
Lol. What a great example of how desperate Democrats are.
Imagine thinking information that Mueller didn't believe rose to the level of a crime and Democrats in Congress didn't even think merited impeaching Trump over (and we know how low of a bar that was) will somehow rescue the democrats next month.
It's been 3 and a half years. Mueller isn't coming to your rescue.
What's True in Trump-Russia Dossier? Key Parts Proved Over Last Year (newsweek.com)
Just how much is confirmed from the Christopher Steele dossier? (dailykos.com)
Yea, because repubs would never use someone like Hillary that way.... /eye roll/
Deal with it, both sides do it, no reason to cry about it.
Found nothing . . . unreal
Hillary Clinton retired from public service in January of 2013 yet the MAGA believe she caused Trump to be investigated by the FBI and CIA frim 2014 to 2016. They are nuts...
such a pity. the durham legacy has imploded. white supremacists and neo-nazis must be beside themselves.
How often do you see a prosecutor turn on his own witness. Durham failed utterly.
What was the legacy?
Durham's only legacy is failure and ignominy!
This definitely fills my heart with glee.
hopefully it will end the weekly dreck here concerning that has been.
I wonder if someone will change their photo avatar?
Some don't mind being associated with obvious losers.
I'm ready with a few unhelpful suggestions for an alternative avatar.
this one would be in the top 3 ...