House vote passes Defense bill after clashes over 'wokeism'
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Ken TranUSA TODAY
WASHINGTON — House Republicans passed the National Defense Authorization Act after GOP leadership made several concessions to the right flank of the party in a big gamble.
The legislation passed 219-210.
Members of the House Freedom Caucus, some of the most conservative lawmakers in the chamber, pressured McCarthy to hold last-minute floor votes on several contentious amendments, ranging from targeting the Pentagon's abortion policy to reeling back climate change initiatives. Despite the infighting, House Republicans managed to push through the NDAA without much Democratic support.
The amendments endangered final passage of the legislation, a must-pass defense bill that sets the Pentagon's policy agenda and authorizes how the Defense Department uses federal funding. The NDAA has traditionally passed with bipartisan support, but some conservative amendments have alienated Democratic lawmakers from supporting the final version this year.
"I shy away from appease, assuage and all this stuff," Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, told reporters Wednesday, dismissing the idea the amendments could have scared away crucial votes. "Every member of the body has the right to offer amendments."
What amendments were House conservatives trying to push?
Among some of the pain points for House conservatives:
- Abortion: An amendment offered by Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Texas, would dismantle a Pentagon policy reimbursing out-of-state travel for service members who receive abortions. This is one of the most popular amendments among House conservatives, with over 70 co-sponsors. Republicans passed the measure on a mostly party line vote of 221-213.
- Ukraine spending: A vocal minority of House GOP lawmakers who have expressed skepticism about continued U.S. assistance to Ukraine have filed amendments aimed at restricting military aid. The majority of lawmakers in both parties support sending funds to Kyiv. An amendment from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., that sought to pull back $300 million in funding to Kyiv was defeated by a bipartisan vote of 89-341.
- Anti-trans provisions: Some amendments target transgender health care policies in the Pentagon. Rep. Matt Rosendale, R-Mo., offered an amendment limiting gender-affirming care for transgender service members. Republicans passed this on a mostly party line vote of 222-211.
Senate to vote on own version of defense bill
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announced on the Senate floor Tuesday the upper chamber will vote on its own version of the NDAA.
Both versions of the legislation include President Joe Biden's proposed 5.2% pay raise for federal workers and military members. The two bills also are close to Biden's recommended budget of $886 billion for the Department of Defense.
The House's version, which reels back the Pentagon's abortion policy, will likely be a key point of negotiation between the two chambers as they seek to consolidate their versions of the bill.
Conservative House members reel back Pentagon abortion policy
A key victory for the House's most conservative lawmakers was the passage of an amendment dismantling the Pentagon's abortion policy reimbursing travel expenses for service members who travel out-of-state to receive abortions.
Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee told the Washington Post Monday he had specific concerns about "extreme right-wing amendments that have been filed, specifically those related to abortion, guns, the border, and social policy and equity issues."
Even Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., one of the most outspoken lawmakers on the right, said earlier before the abortion vote he had doubts as to whether the amendment would make it in the bill.
"I don't believe we have a pro-life House," Gaetz told reporters Thursday, adding he still thought it was important to have lawmakers vote on the record on the policy.
Why is the NDAA so important?
The NDAA is a common battleground for policy debates, but this time around House conservatives heavily pushed to see their demands met. Since the House passed the debt ceiling deal brokered between McCarthy and Biden earlier this year, far-right lawmakers have threatened to stall legislative action.
"What's the rush?" Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., chair of the House Freedom Caucus, told reporters Tuesday night on the timing of final passage, adding that he did not see a reason why the NDAA had to be finished the week lawmakers returned to Capitol Hill.
The NDAA does not provide funding, but authorizes how money can be spent. Officials from the Department of Defense for several years have urged Congress to act timely to maintain national security. The NDAA is a first-step towards new funding for the military - something Congress will have to deal with later in the year.
"The best way that Congress can ensure our strategic advantage is with an on-time appropriation," Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told the Senate Armed Services Committee in May.
Tags
Who is online
516 visitors
We finally got something corrected!
Who is 'we'? And what exactly was corrected?
Some culture war nonsense that 'apparently' made American warriors weaker than their Russian counterparts.
No. US soldiers are not and have never been 'weaker' than their Russian counterparts.
And the 'GOP's culture wars' are utilized only to satiate the American underbelly who because of their own ineptitude have never been able to partake in the opportunities enjoyed by many Americans.
The rational people.
And what exactly was corrected?
The meddling with the military.
So something contrary to their anti-wokeness
Sad the democrats have brought their social war to the military.
Is that what you call it when the gop loads up defense appropriation bills with far rightwing social agenda items opposed by the military?
GTFOOH!
Breaks my Marine Corps heart …..
Part of this thread was removed for no value.
The fetus worshippers are insane. America's enemies are taking note.
They are taking more notice of a US military that now cares more about using proper identifying pronouns; leftist revisionist history; and check the box promotions over merit.
They are also taking note of the moronic Brandon administration that has weakened the US military to the point they are having to recall 3000 former service members to Europe to guard chicken shit NATO countries that refuse to keep a military to defend themselves (another waste of US taxpayer money); because our military is not even coming close to meeting recruitment goals.
That has weakened the US combat readiness by funneling advanced weapons systems, munitions, and financial aid to Ukraine. Not only do we not have the troops to fight a real war; we don't have the weapons/munitions to do so.
Who the hell would want to serve in Brandon's army?
I believe Putin and his allies have a strong disagreement with your opinion. Of course you can volunteer to join them and prove your point.
It's a feel good moment for right wing populists (and the only way McCarthy could keep his gavel), but most of this will die in the Senate. Before, during and after the bill gets signed into law both sides will fully use it to spread partisan talking points and raise election cash.
You are about 20 minutes early today. The bill will be there should Republicans take over the Presidency & Senate in 2024.
I can't say you don't have optimism.
So long
I completely agree with your assessment.