╌>

Melania Concerned That Trump Will Be Unavailable to Attend Divorce Proceedings

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  hal-a-lujah  •  last year  •  70 comments

By:   Andy Borowitz

Melania Concerned That Trump Will Be Unavailable to Attend Divorce Proceedings
“ I know that stealing documents, falsifying business records, and subverting democracy are serious matters, but should prosecuting him mean—and, again, I’m just spitballing here—that someone should have to be married to him a day longer than she can stand?” she asked. “There’s a human cost to this.”

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


PALM BEACH ( The Borowitz Report )—Shortly after a Georgia grand jury indicted Donald J. Trump for trying to overturn the 2020 election, Melania Trump expressed concern that her husband’s mounting court dates could make him unavailable to attend “any divorce proceedings that might come up.”

Stressing that she was speaking “totally hypothetically,” Mrs. Trump said that the former President’s blizzard of court appearances would present scheduling challenges “if someone wanted to divorce him.”

“I know that stealing documents, falsifying business records, and subverting democracy are serious matters, but should prosecuting him mean—and, again, I’m just spitballing here—that someone should have to be married to him a day longer than she can stand?” she asked. “There’s a human cost to this.”

Mrs. Trump urged the judges overseeing her husband’s multiple trials to delay them until after any divorce proceedings are concluded. “I think that be best,” she said.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Hal A. Lujah    last year

She’s got a point.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1    last year

if she holds out just a bit longer she can turn his office at mar-a-lardo into an eastern block 1st lady cam-girl studio.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.2  cjcold  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1    last year

Since Donny will likely be out of town for awhile, she might just have to wait.

Sharing Mar-A Lardo with the pool boy shouldn't be too much of an inconvenience.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.1  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @1.2    last year

I wonder if the foot traffic in and out of her private residence at mar-a-lardo is caught on all the surveillance cameras there too ...

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  JBB    last year

Ha!

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3  Bob Nelson    last year

What will be her alimony payments to him?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.1  JBB  replied to  Bob Nelson @3    last year

Melania was the first First Lady I saw naked...

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JBB @3.1    last year

Thank god that Hillary was less comfortable with her body.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.1.2  seeder  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1.1    last year

It’s not about being comfortable with her body, it’s about being a money grubbing whore with no scruples.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.2    last year

I have no problem with whores. If she had just done it with a little integrity and then tried to hide it

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.2    last year

it’s about being a money grubbing whore with no scruples

The comment that I replied to was about a model and an assignment.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.1.3    last year

If she had just done it with a little integrity and then tried to hide it

Hide her modelling career in the internet age?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.6  cjcold  replied to  JBB @3.1    last year

Should have left off the first first. Funnier that way. Speaking as an editor.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.1.7  seeder  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1.5    last year

The last time I posted pictures from those assignments here they were removed because of how whore-ish they are.  Let that sink in.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.8  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.7    last year
The last time I posted pictures from those assignments here they were removed because of how whore-ish they are.

Who know why they were removed except for the moderator.  It's not like there is consistency there.

Let that sink in

Isn't the photographer in charge of directing the shoot?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.9  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.1.3    last year
If she had just done it with a little integrity and then tried to hide it

she was trying to start her carpet cleaning business back then...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.10  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @3.1.9    last year

As long as the rug matches the drapes it's all OK.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.11  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  cjcold @3.1.10    last year

Do NYC woman still have rugs?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.12  Texan1211  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1.11    last year

Please don't encourage them.

If this is their version of "intellectualism" it is a sad display.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.13  cjcold  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1.11    last year

Have never known a NYC woman. Some in Philly and KC still do.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1.14  Greg Jones  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.2    last year
"it’s about being a money grubbing whore with no scruples."

Yep, that's Hillary all right.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.15  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.12    last year

More like slut-shaming.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.1.16  seeder  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1.15    last year

384 Funny, I can’t find any similar photos for Hillary or other First Ladies.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.17  Texan1211  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.16    last year

I'm sure it isn't for a lack of trying.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.18  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.16    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.19  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.16    last year
Funny, I can’t find any similar photos for Hillary or other First Ladies.

Why the hell would you want to?           

256

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.1.20  seeder  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1.18    last year

Lesbians can be sluts too.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.21  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.20    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.22  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.2    last year
a money grubbing whore with no scruples.

penile accessory...

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.1.23  Bob Nelson  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.7    last year
 they were removed

Very prudish here.

How about giving us a link, though?  jrSmiley_82_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4  Trout Giggles    last year

Is it possible to divorce someone by proxy?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    last year

inmates wind up divorced after incarceration all the time...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
4.1.1  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @4.1    last year

I've even drawn blood for paternity tests on inmates.

The hits just keep on coming for some folk.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    last year

didn't she have someone sleep with him by proxy?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @4.2    last year

wasn't there a poisonous mushroom story published here recently?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.2.2  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @4.2    last year

plenty of brain dead bimbos willing to volunteer at his rallies...

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.3  bugsy  replied to  devangelical @4.2.1    last year
wasn't there a poisonous mushroom story published here recently?

Probably.

It was about your dumb ass president's treasure secretary being served magic mushrooms to here when she was in China.

Wonder what your dumb ass president did about it s/

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @4.2.2    last year

really and speaking of brain dead . . .

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.2.5  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @4.2.4    last year

derp.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5  Texan1211    last year

Might want to slap a satire tag on this lest people think it is real!

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
5.1  seeder  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Texan1211 @5    last year

You mean like the one that is listed under “tags”?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.1    last year
You mean like the one that is listed under “tags”?

Judging by the comments here, apparently everybody missed it!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.1    last year

he only reads the headline...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  devangelical @5.1.2    last year
he only reads the headline...

Your comment is incorrect.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.1    last year

OMG not again. Every one by now should know what the Borowitz report is

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.4    last year
Every one by now should know what the Borowitz report is

Hopefully the comments will soon reflect that.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.6  devangelical  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.5    last year

don't like it? [deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.7  Texan1211  replied to  devangelical @5.1.6    last year

just pointing many comments here lead me to believe not everyone knew this was satire.

Think I'll stay a while.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1.8  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.7    last year

Seems he "f'n left" instead.........

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.1.8    last year

looks like it.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
5.1.10  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @5.1.6    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5.1.11  Bob Nelson  replied to  devangelical @5.1.2    last year
he only reads the headline...

If that.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5.1.12  Bob Nelson  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.4    last year

Yes, but the problem is that the Borowitz Report is more accurate than the Usual Suspects' habitual "news" sources.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.13  Trout Giggles  replied to  Bob Nelson @5.1.12    last year

It's funnier than that other one that gets seeded here. What's the name of that unfunny satire site?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.14  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.13    last year

are you talking about those satire seeds that average comment numbers in the low single digits and time out after about 75 minutes on the front page?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.15  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @5.1.14    last year

those would be the ones

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.16  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.15    last year

yeah, that particular brand of humor even falls short of slapstick...

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5.1.17  Bob Nelson  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.13    last year

Fox News 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.18  bugsy  replied to  devangelical @5.1.14    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.19  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @5.1.16    last year

... far short.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6  Buzz of the Orient    last year

Is the author kidding?  This isn't satire?  I wonder next to what golf hole in the rough Melania will eventually find herself buried like Ivana is, ignored and goodbye.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1  Texan1211  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @6    last year

read 5.1

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6.1.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1    last year

Oh, never checked a tag before so obviously I missed it.  However, I don't think the rest of my comment is out of place. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @6.1.1    last year

from the earlier comments it is apparent you were not the only one

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
6.1.3  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.2    last year

So I've now noticed.  I have now learned to check the "tags" every time I read an article or seed.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8  Trout Giggles    last year

I would like to point out to those that think our comments "don't seem to mesh with the satire in the article"....

...one must use satire and sarcasm to understand satire. If you can't see that, you have major problems in reading comprehension

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
8.1  seeder  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Trout Giggles @8    last year

I think there’s only one moron here who is consistently not making that connection.  It’s completely expected with that one.  I purposely cropped the image for this seed to include the publication and author, in addition to tagging it satire, and it still was immediately questioned.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @8.1    last year

Because some have to come into seeds to troll. That is their only purpose in life.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @8.1    last year

... all the way down the contrarian rabbit hole.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.3  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @8.1.1    last year

it's kind of like when thumpers crash your party...

 
 

Who is online










195 visitors