Donald Trump's Trial For Election Interference Set To Begin In Time To Interfere With Election
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The federal judge presiding over former President Donald Trump's trial on charges of election interference has set a trial date that will line up perfectly to interfere with the 2024 presidential election.
"This certainly is the most appropriate date," said U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan in her announcement. "Mr. Trump is not above the law, and holding this trial to determine if he is guilty of interfering in the 2020 election gives the federal government its best chance of interfering in the 2024 election."
The trial start date, March 4, falls just one day before the "Super Tuesday" primaries, which a spokesperson for the Department of Justice insists is only a coincidence. "Total happenstance," said the source on the condition of anonymity. "This was not, in any way, done to affect Donald Trump's ability to campaign during the crucial period of state primary voting. There is also no truth to the rumors that we did an extensive investigation into what date would be most ideal to harm Trump's campaign or cast him in a questionable light in the eyes of voters. Nope. Not at all. That would be election interference, and we do not do that. That's illegal."
President Trump did not accept the DOJ's claims of impartiality. "BOGUS TRIAL DATE!" he said in a post to his Truth Social account. "Another move by our CORRUPT Justice Department to try to hurt me in the primaries. Even if I'm sitting in a courtroom, I will SWEEP the primaries, something nobody ever thought possible, but it is with me. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"
At publishing time, The DOJ was reportedly hard at work scheduling all court dates to coincide with important election dates while claiming the coincidence was purely coincidental.
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Who is online
410 visitors
So are you implying that all criminal trials and proceedings should be scheduled around the defendant's job interviews?
No, they should coincide exactly with when they will do Trump the most harm; and Brandon the Human Fuck Up Machine the most good.
Garland needs to put out milk cartons with the pictures of the special counsels he assign to the Brandon investigations and Hunter investigation. Hur is MIA with his investigation; and Weiss has already relapsed back into the legal coma that consumed him for the last 4 plus years waiting for the rest of the statute of limitations to run out on Hunter's crimes.
Hur's investigation is so secret that not even government insiders know anything about it. Funny how leaks were abounding from Jack Smith's investigation on Trump- and charges were brought within mere months on both the documents and Jan 6th. Of course Hur hates Trump; and Garland knows that. There are no coincidences in the Democrat two tier justice system.
You can't have it both ways. Should they delay the criminal trial so Trump can try to get a job, or not?
Right, the timings all just a big coincidence....
No, I do not think this is a coincidence at all. These indictments are a proper and predictable (if justice actually works) response to the actions of Trump. In my judgment, Trump's decision to run was based on the likelihood that he might be dealing with indictments. Although, I doubt Trump expected the level of shit that would hit the fan.
I doubt Trump thinks he can win reelection. He would have been much better off (ego-wise) to keep playing the "I won the election ..." nonsense from the sidelines rather than risk losing again. But he very likely was planning on soaking his utterly naive, gullible followers to pay for his legal bills and that would certainly be a reason to run.
I think similarly....
No one takes him seriously. I blocked him a long time ago.
I noted a response to him the other day where he said something about Hunter Biden living in the White House. That's the first I heard of it.
I just looked it up - some CONservative said they thought he was but there was of course no evidence to support it.
It must be true then
No you do not, your comment @1.1.5, et.al. shows that you think our judicial system has indicted Trump because he is running for PotUS.
Do you think the charges are without merit?
I do not think this a coincidence at all..... please don't try to tell me what I think. As I said if you want to troll take it elsewhere.
Probably alot of the same hive attending.....
Always deflecting to the Clintons, since you obviously have nothing else.
K
Trump shouldn't even be running. If he wants to blame someone he should blame the Republican Party for letting him participate.
Right, cause those fuckers are to blame for everything...
Brandon shouldn't be running- we blame the mighty mental midgets that elected him; and Garland and Democrats that are keeping him in place.
Donald Trump started interfering with the election when he threw his hat in the ring way before it was appropriate, obviously kicking off his sole objective of pardoning himself of all the federal crimes he knew he was going to have to answer to.
Appropriate?....
Or perhaps he was anxious to get back in the fight since he felt like he got fucked over?...
Either way, that would be true.
Or perhaps he was anxious to get back in the fight since he felt like he got fucked over?...
What - sixty losing attempts to claim election interference wasn’t enough? Fuck his feelings.
Yeah, I don't really care about his feelings, or yours either for that matter. I was just saying that maybe that's why he declared before it was deemed appropriate by you.....
He would be delusional to believe that he was the legitimate winner of the 2020 election.
Either he:
Option 2 seems most likely to me.
That seems to be the popular choice among some posters here. How do you prove that in criminal court?
Why would you think that a conclusion that Trump is running to provide cover for justice must be proved in criminal court?
It is not criminal to run for PotUS regardless of the reason. And Trump has not been charged with running for PotUS as a crime.
There is a constitutional question as to eligibility based on his attempt to fraudulently steal a US election (among other things) but even that would NOT be concerned with the reason Trump is running.
Why do you say that? Be specific if possible.
It’s because he doesn’t comprehend the meaning of the word “appropriate”. For some reason he thinks I’ve implied illegality, which any thinking person could see that I haven’t.
Joe Exotic is also running for President. Not illegal, just wildly inappropriate.
Read 3.2.8. Try it!
Which all stems from comment 3, where the word “appropriate” is clearly visible. You know this.
There it is again - your slavish devotion to DT!
Of course, you [Deleted] hide behind vague comments and deflect. Take a stand, be clear.
More deflection. Not even a modest attempt to be clear.
In whose opinion? Yours? Much like someone else's opinion of "appropriate"? [Deleted]
Lol!
[Deleted]
Well, since you claim to not be a Trumpster then maybe you’re going to vote for Joe Exotic. I’m sure he’s appropriate in your mind.
[Deleted]
[Deleted]