╌>

A Deal with the Devil

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  last year  •  156 comments

A Deal with the Devil
“I would like to make it clear here again: The war continues, the war will continue until we achieve all of our goals: to eliminate Hamas, Netanyahu said in a statement preceding the hostage deal agreement. “To return all our hostages, to ensure that the day after Hamas, Gaza will no longer be a threat to Israel, there will be no element in it that supports terrorism, that educates its children to terror, and who threaten the State of Israel.”

Link to Quote: Israel-Hamas truce begins as hostages are set to be freed (nypost.com)

A temporary 4 day pause in the fighting between Hamas and Israel begins today. Supposedly, both sides will exchange women and children. Hamas will give up the innocent hostages it took during their savage attack on Israel on October 7th and Israel will release Hamas criminals/fighters being held in Israeli jails. Fifty hostages for 150 prisoners. There is a delivery of supplies to the Palestinians who don't seem to know how to flee a war zone.

The "deal" was reached after weeks of "negotiations" that were driven primarily by Joe Biden and his pro-Palestinian State Department. The untrustworthy nations of Qatar and Egypt served as moderators. This was always the position that Hamas always wanted to be in when it took the hostages. Joe Biden reacted exactly as Hamas wanted by pressuring Israel for this pause for a hostage release. It gives Hamas time to take a breather and regroup. Hamas holds a lot of hostages, which means this process will most likely be repeated. The Prime Minister of Israel is a decent man. He wants to get the hostages home. At this time no exchange has taken place yet. Doing business with the savages is never straightforward.


And then there was this:

"Hundreds of migrants have reportedly been sexually assaulted while trekking through the deadly Darien Gap jungle in Panama on their way to the United States’ southern border — including a number of children abused in so-called “rape tents.”

Doctors Without Borders — a nonprofit also known as Médecins Sans Frontières — said in a new report that its members had treated nearly 400 victims of sexual assault in the Darien Gap in 2023 alone,  according to Border Report .

Much of the danger springs from groups of armed brigands who roam the wilderness, kidnapping, robbing and raping those who are attempting to pass through, the report said."

Children sexually abused in 'rape tents' while crossing deadly Darien Gap: report (nypost.com)

Of course, the important thing for the Biden administration is getting them into the country. 

Biden was on the minds of many Americans as they went shopping for their Thanksgiving food.  He delivered a speech on "stopping the rancor" in which he tells people how to ratchet up the animosity on Thanksgiving Day.  I just read it today.  It is frightening to think that he could be reelected.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    last year

I may be in the majority when I say that the best Thanksgiving meal is the leftover sandwiches the day after.

th?id=OSK.a9cf0828093413ab4af5f6c5c986fa41

I still like Turkey meat with plenty of Mayo & Pepper on fresh Scali bread.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2  Jeremy Retired in NC    last year
Hamas will give up the innocent hostages it took during their savage attack on Israel on October 7th and Israel will release Hamas criminals/fighters being held in Israeli jails. 

So Israel gets the hostages returned and Hamas gets their fighters back to do it all over again.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1  Kavika   replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2    last year
So Israel gets the hostages returned and Hamas gets their fighters back to do it all over again.

No, Israel is releasing women and children held in Israeli prisons. Currently, there are around 8,300 Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons. Some 3,000 are administrative detention which means they are held without charges sometimes for days, weeks, months, and years.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Kavika @2.1    last year
Some 3,000 are administrative detention which means they are held without charges sometimes for days, weeks, months, and years.

Bet they are in better shape than the hostages the animals took.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Kavika @2.1    last year
Currently, there are around 8,300 Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons. Some 3,000 are administrative detention which means they are held without charges sometimes for days, weeks, months, and years.

You don't really understand how the law of warfare works.  i think you are confusing civil law with military law.  There are stark differences, especially when it comes to those picked up as possible combatants.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.2    last year
You don't really understand how the law of warfare works.

That is one huge problem.

They want to hold Israel to higher standards than the terrorists. They want Israel to do all the things Hamas and Palestinians won't do.

Of course, they always fall back that Hamas isn't a real army and rules of war don't apply to them.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.3    last year
Of course, they always fall back that Hamas isn't a real army and rules of war don't apply to them.

They seem to forget the people of Palestine voted to put Hamas in power in 2006.  During that time they stood up their own forces.  So that argument is as void as much of their other arguments on, well, everything.

They are also crying about a "humanitarian crisis" and that other Arab countries won't take refugees despite a history of these "refugees" causing problems and their host countries expelling them.

In a nutshell, they brought this all on themselves.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1.5  Kavika   replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.2    last year
You don't really understand how the law of warfare works.  i think you are confusing civil law with military law.  There are stark differences, especially when it comes to those picked up as possible combatants.  

I understand it quite well, Jeremy and I'm confusing nothing those are the facts. You should research what ''administrative detention'' is and how it is applied under international law. 

Since 10/7 the vast majority of Palestinians arrested are from the West Bank, not Gaza

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1.6  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Kavika @2.1.5    last year
I understand it quite well, Jeremy and I'm confusing nothing those are the facts.

So your comment is really about nothing.  After dealing with prisoners from a battlefield, I've never heard of this so called "administrative detention".  That being said, I await your link from the Hague or Geneva convention.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.7  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.6    last year
I've never heard of this so called "administrative detention".

Then take a moment and learn about it rather than dismiss it as bullshit simply because you "have never heard" of it:

Although  international human rights law  permits some limited use of administrative detention in emergency situations, the authorities are required to follow basic rules for detention, including a fair hearing at which the detainee can challenge the reasons for his or her detention. Moreover, to use such detention, there must be a public emergency that threatens the life of the nation, and detention can only be ordered on an individual, case-by-case basis without discrimination of any kind. (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 9).

Article 9

1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.

2. Anyone who is arrested shall be informed, at the time of arrest, of the reasons for his arrest and shall be promptly informed of any charges against him.

3. Anyone arrested or detained on a criminal charge shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorized by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release. It shall not be the general rule that persons awaiting trial shall be detained in custody, but release may be subject to guarantees to appear for trial, at any other stage of the judicial proceedings, and, should occasion arise, for execution of the judgement.

4. Anyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings before a court, in order that that court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his detention and order his release if the detention is not lawful.

5. Anyone who has been the victim of unlawful arrest or detention shall have an enforceable right to compensation.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1.8  Kavika   replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.6    last year
So your comment is really about nothing.

If that is your view then you have and are missing the point. 

After dealing with prisoners from a battlefield, I've never heard of this so called "administrative detention".

Don't make the mistake that you are the only person on NT that has battlefield experience and has dealt with prisoners.

In an occupation, Article 78 of the Fourth Geneva Convention only permits an occupying power to employ administrative detention “for imperative reasons of security.”Oct 23, 2020
 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1.9  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.7    last year

From your 1st link:

 Israel uses three separate laws to hold individuals without trial:
  • Article 285 of Military Order 1651, which is part of the military legislation applying in the West Bank;

  • Internment of Unlawful Combatants Law (Unlawful Combatants Law), which has been used against residents of the Gaza Strip since 2005;

  • Emergency Powers (Detentions) Law, which applies to Israeli citizens.

On the issuance of "Administrative Detention Orders"

The issuance of an administrative detention order falls within the powers of the Israeli military commander of the area as well as within the powers of the Minister of the Israeli security detainees in Jerusalem. Israeli law grants the military commander the power to make any modifications to military orders relating to administrative detention for military necessity, without taking into account any international standards related to the rights of detainees. The origins of Israeli military laws related to the orders of administrative detention can be traced back to Mandatory Emergency Law Act of 1945.  The Israeli military commander bases his decision on secret information, which cannot be accessed by the detainee nor his lawyer in order to preserve the integrity of the sources of this information. The Israeli Supreme Court has in several cases said that the evidence cannot be accessed by the detainee nor his lawyer without taking into consideration the right of the detainee to fair trial procedures, which constitutes a violation of the right of administrative detainees to know the reason for his or her arrest. These procedures constitute a violation of Article 9(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights that recognizes the right of an individual who is arrested to “be informed, at the time of arrest, of the reasons for his arrest and shall be promptly informed of any charges against him.” The procedures are also a violation of Article 9 (1) of the same convention, which affirms that “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention” and states that “No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.”

By this all Israel has to do is tell them why they are detained and charge them accordingly.  That meets the requirements of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.  And that's if it is even reviewed.  In the last 20 years there has only been 1 review according to the link.

In a nut shell, and it this will make certain people cry, but, Israel can tell them that they see the prisoner as an enemy combatant and charge them accordingly.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.10  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.9    last year

Looks like you actually did try to do some research.   Good for you.

Israel can tell them that they see the prisoner as an enemy combatant and charge them accordingly.

And what if there are no legitimate charges that would qualify an individual as an enemy combatant?    If Israel were to use the lack of oversight to invent false charges, would you be in favor of that?   If not, then why would you object to Israel being honest?

You continue to not address what Kavika wrote:

Kavika@2.1No, Israel is releasing women and children held in Israeli prisons. Currently, there are around 8,300 Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons. Some 3,000 are administrative detention which means they are held without charges sometimes for days, weeks, months, and years.
 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.11  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.9    last year

Everyone expects Israel to act in a certain way but give the terrorists a free pass.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.12  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.10    last year

Let's be honest, some people think that if someone is Palestinian they are probably a terrorist. Therefore it is ok to lock them up without charges. 

We all beat around the bush too much. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1.13  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.10    last year
And what if there are no legitimate charges that would qualify an individual as an enemy combatant? 

As the links states, that's for the commander to decide.  Neither you or I are in any position in that chain so let those on the ground handle it as they see fit IAW laws.

You continue to not address what Kavika wrote:

And?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.1.14  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.11    last year
Everyone expects Israel to act in a certain way but give the terrorists a free pass.

As evident here.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.15  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.10    last year
Kavika @2.1 No, Israel is releasing women and children held in Israeli prisons. Currently, there are around 8,300 Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons. Some 3,000 are administrative detention which means they are held without charges sometimes for days, weeks, months, and years.

Let me pick up from the CNN article where Kavika left off:

"Around 8,300 Palestinian prisoners are currently held in Israeli jails, said Qadura Fares, head of the Palestinian Commission for Detainees and Ex-Prisoners’ Affairs.

More than 3,000 of them are being held in what Israel calls “administrative detention,” Fares told CNN, adding that this means they are being held without knowing the charges against them, and without an ongoing legal process.

Most of the prisoners are men, Fares said, adding that there are also about 85 women and 350 children in detention.

Israel has stepped up its arrests since Hamas’ attacks on October 7. Up to 2,070 arrests were documented in the occupied West Bank and Jerusalem in that month alone, according to the  Palestinian Prisoner’s Society, a non-governmental organization dedicated to addressing the concerns of Palestinian detainees in Israeli prisons. That figure includes 145 children and 55 women."

Who are the Palestinian prisoners on Israel’s list for potential release? (msn.com)


Israel is a democracy and Hamas is a terror group.  Let us stop putting them on an equal plane.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.16  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.15    last year
Israel is a democracy and Hamas is a terror group.  Let us stop putting them on an equal plane.

Who is equating Israel with Hamas?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.17  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.11    last year

Who is arguing to give terrorists a free pass?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.18  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.16    last year

You and Kavika.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.19  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.18    last year

Amazing that you have the gall to write that.

Show me where I equate Hamas and Israel.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1.20  Kavika   replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.18    last year
You and Kavika.

Another bald-faced lie, Vic. Please quote me where I said anything like that...

This is from my comment #7.   Israel has every right to defend itself and attacking Hamas is within those rights.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1.21  Kavika   replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.15    last year
Israel is a democracy and Hamas is a terror group.  Let us stop putting them on an equal plane.

Of course that is true, please show me where I said anything different. You can't of course so stop with the BS references.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.2  Jasper2529  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2    last year
and Hamas gets their fighters back to do it all over again.

True. The Hamas women were all convicted of terrorism in Israeli courts of law, and their so-called "children" are 17/18-year-old-men.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.2    last year

Somehow those NOT actually involved think that women and children can't be terrorists.  Must be nice to live in that kind of fansasy.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.2.2  Jasper2529  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.1    last year
Somehow those NOT actually involved think that women and children can't be terrorists.

They apparently don't know anything about the antisemitism and anti-American propaganda  that UN (UNRA) funded schools in Muslim nations teach.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.2.2    last year

Oh and don't call them on it.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.2.4  Jasper2529  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.3    last year
Oh and don't call them on it.

Delusional deniers, especially those who deliberately choose to remain ignorantly narrow-minded, aren't worth my time or effort.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.5  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.2.4    last year
especially those who deliberately choose to remain ignorantly narrow-minded, aren't worth my time or effort.

I was dealing with one of those below.  Just can't seem to grasp things even when it is given to them.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    last year

Good thing for the hostage families that you are 6 or 7000 miles from what is going on. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year
Good thing for the hostage families that you are 6 or 7000 miles from what is going on. 

What in the seed do you dispute exactly?

Or just a personal attack?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1    last year
Or just a personal attack?

What do you think?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.1    last year
What do you think?

I think it necessary to be very discrete right now.........lol.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4  Texan1211    last year

13 hostages released.

How many more times will this be repeated until Israel recovers all its people?

How long will the terrorists honor the ceasefire THIS time?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @4    last year
How long will the terrorists honor the ceasefire THIS time?

Just like every other "cease fire", it will last just long enough for Hamas to regroup and rearm.  Then the cycle of stupidity will continue - Hamas attacks Israel, the idiots cry and demand a cease fire because Hamas is getting their asses handed to them, the cease fire occurs, Hamas regroups and rearms, Hamas attacks Israel, the idiots cry and demand a cease fire because Hamas is getting their asses handed to them, the cease fire occurs, Hamas regroups and rearms...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @4    last year

Hamas cannot defeat Israel. Do you understand that?

The outcome of this war is predetermined. Something like 2/3 of the northern part of Gaza has been destroyed. The population has been driven out. There is a humanitarian crisis for the civilian population. Israel could cease fire for two months and it wouldnt change anything. If they could get the hostages back in that time period it would be well worth it. 

The political right in America, and Israel,  is just "kill, kill, kill". 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    last year
Hamas cannot defeat Israel. Do you understand that?

Yes, in theory that is true.

But when we have Palestinian cheerleaders calling for Israel to end all hostilities while ignoring Hamas, all things are possible.

The outcome of this war is predetermined.

So the Palestinians engaged in suicide missions like real terrorists, eh?

People want to molly-coddle Palestinians as though they have nothing to do with anything. I hold them at least partly responsible because they eat, sleep, work, play and pray with terrorists.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    last year
Israel could cease fire for two months and it wouldnt change anything. If they could get the hostages back in that time period it would be well worth it. 

[Deleted]  Or do you forget that this, yet again, was instigated by Hamas?

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
4.2.3  George  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2.2    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.2.4  Hallux  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.1    last year
I hold them at least partly responsible because they eat, sleep, work, play and pray with terrorists.

This is fundamentally the same argument that Al Qaeda used to 'justify' 9-11. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.5  Texan1211  replied to  Hallux @4.2.4    last year

I have to call bullshit on that.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.2.6  Hallux  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.5    last year

Call it whatever you wish to, the fact remains that terrorism makes no distinctions between the general population and armed forces of its 'enemy' and many commenting on this seed are tumbling into the same thought trap. As Nietzsche put it: "When you stare too long into the Abyss, the Abyss stares back at you." 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    last year

Time is on Hamas side. They committed an atrocity John and if they survive, they will do it again and again. They are a small part of Iran's ring of fire. 


If they could get the hostages back in that time period it would be well worth it. 

Beyond hostages taken to buy time for Hamas, there are 9 million Israelis who are facing extermination.


The political right in America, and Israel,  is just "kill, kill, kill". 

So, you wouldn't have fought against the Nazis.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.8  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.7    last year
Beyond hostages taken to buy time for Hamas, there are 9 million Israelis who are facing extermination.

From who? Israel's independence and survival is guaranteed by the United States of America. 

The idea that Hamas , or Iran, could exterminate Israel is ridiculous. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.9  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.8    last year
Israel's independence and survival is guaranteed by the United States of America. 

It is????? LMAO!   Biden is going to war with Iran over Israel????  He won't even defend American interests, never mind take on his beloved Iran.



The idea that Hamas , or Iran, could exterminate Israel is ridiculous. 

As soon as Iran has a nuclear weapon it will be fired at Israel.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.10  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.9    last year

You voice extremist far right positions. Hopefully they can be kept at bay, but who knows ? 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.2.11  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.9    last year

they already have one, courtesy of dick cheney and halliburton. look it up yourself...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.12  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.10    last year
You voice extremist far right positions.

From where you are sitting Bill Clinton must seem "right wing."

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.2.13  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hallux @4.2.6    last year
the fact remains that terrorism makes no distinctions between the general population and armed forces of its 'enemy'

Hamas also makes little distinction between the Gaza population and the IDF.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.2.14  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.9    last year
As soon as Iran has a nuclear weapon it will be fired at Israel.

Anything is possible but the probable reaction by Israel would be to unleash her 90+ plutonium nukes at Iran. The Iranian leadership might well be crazy, but that crazy? You really need to stop buying into all the fear being sold to you.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.15  Texan1211  replied to  devangelical @4.2.11    last year
they already have one, courtesy of dick cheney and halliburton. look it up yourself...

Shockingly enough, I found NOTHING saying Iran has a nuclear bomb.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5  Texan1211    last year

The Palestinian cheerleaders never seem to want to acknowledge that Hamas exists because Palestinians exist.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Texan1211 @5    last year

It’s fucking sickening 🤮

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.1    last year

Indeed.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2  devangelical  replied to  Texan1211 @5    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6  Nerm_L    last year

The pause really means nothing.  Biden has legitimized Hamas and thrown Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Authority under the bus.  Biden clearly wants Iranian (or Turkish) influence extended into the West Bank.  

The Palestinians are divided between Iranian and Arab influences.  There cannot be a two state solution as long as Palestinians remain divided.  At present Israel is fighting Iran's proxies.  For some reason Biden is attempting to legitimize Iranian influence with Palestinians.  Biden is actually destabilizing the region by legitimizing Hamas.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Nerm_L @6    last year

I think that is all true, but what I find ironic is that the younger voters in the democrat party think Biden has gone too far in supporting Israel.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6.1.1  Nerm_L  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1    last year
I think that is all true, but what I find ironic is that the younger voters in the democrat party think Biden has gone too far in supporting Israel.

Someone needs to ask the Hamas humpers why Thai hostages were taken.  That's the first group being released.  

Democrats whose identity is defined by their sexual activity really shouldn't be taken seriously.  They're just searching for the next fucking opportunity.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Hallux  replied to  Nerm_L @6.1.1    last year
Someone needs to ask the Hamas humpers why Thai hostages were taken.

War fog.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6.1.3  Nerm_L  replied to  Hallux @6.1.2    last year
War fog.

Palestinian terrorists initiated an attack on civilians, the elderly, and children at the time and place of their choosing and they were somehow distracted?

There wasn't any war fog.  The Palestinians were motivated by blood lust.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
6.1.4  Hallux  replied to  Nerm_L @6.1.3    last year
they were somehow distracted?

I have no idea and nor do you. What I do know of the Thais is that they were laborers on a kibbutz within Israel and in the helter-skelter of the moment it is highly unlikely that a kiosk to check papers papers would have been set up.

Any thinking that forces involved in an armed conflict will act rationally is irrational. Fog Nerm, it's all fog.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6.1.5  Nerm_L  replied to  Hallux @6.1.4    last year
Any thinking that forces involved in an armed conflict will act rationally is irrational. Fog Nerm, it's all fog.

They were Palestinian terrorists attacking civilians.  Not exactly an armed conflict.  And, somehow, the Palestinian terrorists avoided killing the Thai workers.  So now the Thai government can piss and moan about Israel putting the hostages at risk.

There wouldn't be hostages without the Palestinian terror attack.  Yet Israel is accused of violating international rules of war.  Poor, poor, Palestinians are too fucking stupid to understand law.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
6.1.6  Hallux  replied to  Nerm_L @6.1.5    last year
Yet Israel is accused of violating international rules of war.

Not by me, however, that some are is born of the fog of war and your blaming of Biden for all that falls in your path is born of the fog of unknowing that you wilfully march into. It is sad to watch.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  Hallux @6.1.6    last year

It's quite deplorable actually.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6.1.8  Nerm_L  replied to  Hallux @6.1.6    last year
Not by me, however, that some are is born of the fog of war and your blaming of Biden for all that falls in your path is born of the fog of unknowing that you wilfully march into. It is sad to watch.

Read my first comment again.  I'm blaming Biden for negotiating with terrorists.  Don't gloss over the fact that Biden has used the influence of the United States in global affairs to legitimize (and normalize) terrorist activities.  Iranian (and Turkish) influence has forced Biden to accept Palestinian terrorism as legitimate diplomacy.  

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
7  Kavika     last year

The idea of Israel eradicating Hamas is foolish at best. Hamas is not an Army it is an ideology and you can't destroy an ideology. Cut off one tentacle and it grows another. Is the Taliban or ISIS or dozens of other terrorist groups destroyed or eradicated? Hell no.  

Israel has every right to defend itself and attacking Hamas is within those rights. But, they will not destroy Hamas just like they will not destroy Hezbollah or other terrorist groups. Therein lies the problem, Israel thinks they have destroyed and leaves Gaza and within a few years or sooner everything is back to October 2023. This has been going on for centuries and it isn't going to change unless both sides find a solution and that solution has to be land, IMO that is what the wars are about, Religion is a sidebar

The US should have learned by now you can not occupy a land forever and expect the locals to accept it. It won't happen and from what we're seeing currently in the West Bank and Gaza is the result of that thinking. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1  Texan1211  replied to  Kavika @7    last year

Looking more and more like the idiots in Gaza should have never rejected a two state solution. but they did.

Oh, well.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1    last year
Oh, well.

is not an answer. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.1    last year

Yeah.

Probably make more sense if you read the WHOLE post.

smh

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1.2    last year
Looking more and more like the idiots in Gaza should have never rejected a two state solution. but they did.

Ok , there is the rest of your comment. What does it mean?  It seems to mean that Hamas, and the 2.5 million people that live in Gaza made their bed and now they will lie in it. Do you think that approach will solve anything?  There has been nationalistic struggle in "Palestine" for a century. The "answer" has yet to be found. Wiping out Gaza will not be the answer either. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.3    last year

What does it mean?

What part is not being understood by you?

Look, if you want to cheerlead for a bunch of terrorists, have at it.

I won't be a party to that crap.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1.4    last year
What does it mean?

I asked what it means. If you cant elaborate on what it means then maybe you shouldnt make such comments. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7.1.6  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1.4    last year

No matter how you try Palestinian does not equal Hamas...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1.7  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.5    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @7.1.6    last year

I don't give a fuck about terrorists or the people supporting them.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7.1.9  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1.8    last year

You do not seem to give a fuck for the hostages or for the innocent civilians or if the conflict can be abated either...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1.10  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @7.1.9    last year

I am not responsible for what it is you think.

Read the posts.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Kavika @7    last year
The US should have learned by now you can not occupy a land forever and expect the locals to accept it.

In other words, Israel must accept its own destruction.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2    last year

What is your answer Vic. Which one of the three "decisive" choices the far right in Israel wants to apply to the Palestinians do you prefer.

1. They leave the territory of Israel/Palestine

2. They accept second class status ruled by Israel

3. They resist and are destroyed as a people. 

Which of those three sound realistic to you? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.2  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.1    last year
Six years ago, Bezalel Smotrich, then a young Knesset member in his first term, published his “ Decisive Plan ” — a kind of “endgame” for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. According to the far-right lawmaker, who now serves as Israel’s finance minister and the government’s  West Bank overlord , the inherent contradiction between Jewish and Palestinian national aspirations does not allow for any kind of compromise, reconciliation, or partition. Instead of maintaining the illusion that a political agreement is possible, he argued, the issue must be unilaterally resolved once and for all.

The plan makes only passing references to Gaza, with Smotrich seeming content with Israel’s encagement of the enclave as an ideal solution to what he calls the “demographic challenge” posed by Palestinians’ very existence. Vis-à-vis the West Bank, however, he calls for annexing its entirety.

In the latter territory, demographic concerns will be ameliorated by offering the 3 million Palestinian residents a choice: to renounce their national aspirations and continue living on their land in an inferior status, or to emigrate abroad. If, instead, they choose to take up arms against Israel, they will be identified as terrorists and the Israeli army will set about “killing those who need to be killed.” When asked at a meeting, in which he presented his plan to religious-Zionist figures, if he also meant killing families, women, and children,  Smotrich replied : “In war as in war.”

The Israeli public has embraced the Smotrich doctrine (972mag.com)

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
7.2.3  Kavika   replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2    last year
In other words, Israel must accept its own destruction.

Best you don't assume what I said since you're way off base, again.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.4  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2    last year
In other words, Israel must accept its own destruction.

I think Israel must accept that it will deal with endless aggression no matter what it does.   It seems to be in a no-win situation.    I suspect many Israelis already know this all too well.

So Israel must constantly thread the needle ... trying to secure the safety of its people while balancing international politics.   It is a truly fucked up reality.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.5  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.4    last year
I think Israel must accept that it will deal with endless aggression no matter what it does.

That is certainly a possibility. But what is being done now has not worked and , it seems likely, will never work. The two state solution has never gotten off the ground. This may be the time for good actors in the national community to do everything they can to make it happen. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.6  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.1    last year

I preferred that the Palestinians live up to the Oslo Accords, but they kept electing terrorist groups like the PLO and Hamas to represent them.

Instead of talking about "a far right" in Israel, how about telling us what the Hamas Charter says?


What's wrong John, can't answer that one?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.2.7  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.5    last year

Palestinians refused a two state solution.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.8  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.4    last year
So Israel must constantly thread the needle ... trying to secure the safety of its people while balancing international politics.

Do you really believe that must be their lot?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.9  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.8    last year

Describe how they get free of that situation.

I am confident they would love to have an answer.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.2.10  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.6    last year

Israel should do whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas  and protect itself.

Screw "world opinion"

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.11  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.5    last year
This may be the time for good actors in the national community to do everything they can to make it happen. 

That has always been the problem. All of the agreements that the Palestinians didn't like were forced on them and Israel by the US. 

I think the US should best tend to protecting its troops.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.12  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.6    last year

Hamas cannot "exterminate" Israel . It will never happen. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.13  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @7.2.10    last year
Screw "world opinion"

ABSOLUTELY!

(The world that already hates Israel, starting with the democrat party in the US)

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.14  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.5    last year
But what is being done now has not worked and , it seems likely, will never work

Nothing seems to work.    And the reason is that this is not a rational situation.   This is irrational hatred that is baked into the culture.   It is a culture that creates generations of individuals who believe Israelis must be eliminated.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.15  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.13    last year
ABSOLUTELY!

What, then, do you think Israel should do to secure a lasting peace?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.16  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.14    last year

Do you think "endlessly threading the needle" is an acceptable prospect for the future of Israel?  Its been 100 years or more already. Some people say that the Palestinians have no legitimate claim to any land in the geographical region. For the god's sake, the United Nations recognized a legitimate claim way back in 1947 when they drew up partition plans. And that was back when the UN was a respected arbitrator of world affairs. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.17  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.9    last year

I happen to think the current Prime Minister was doing a fairly good job. He was making friends with many of his neighbors, most notable was the forthcoming relations with Saudi Arabia. The Abram Accords was also a reality.

The big thing of course, was that Iran had been stymied by the restrictions that President Trump had on them, which have all been temporarily waived by Joe Biden who wants to restart the infamous Iran Deal. Iran's oil sales are almost back up to where they were before Trump was President.

I hate to say it TiG but "elections have consequences!"

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.18  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.15    last year
whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas  and protect itself.

As stated in 7.2.10:

 whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas  and protect itself.

And NOTHING short of that.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.19  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.16    last year
Do you think "endlessly threading the needle" is an acceptable prospect for the future of Israel? 

No.   I stated the situation they face, not a solution.

I wish there was a solution which allowed Israel to exist in peace.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.2.20  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.1    last year

For starters, Palestinians could reject terrorists.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.21  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.17    last year

Responding to my post is not the same as answering the question it contains.

What, then, do you think Israel should do to secure a lasting peace?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.22  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.18    last year

"Whatever is necessary" is vague bullshit.   Don't make references to magic, state an actionable plan.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.2.23  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.18    last year

Exactly.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.24  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.21    last year

You didn't accept the answer. Israel must continue building relationships with its neighbors.

The Abraham Accords normalizes relations between Israel and 4 Arab countries.

Do you recall how close Israel and Saudi Arabia were to an agreement?  Some believe it was the reason Iran unleashed Hamas.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.25  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @7.2.20    last year

Bullseye!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.26  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @7.2.23    last year

Good grief, more 'magic'.

"Whatever is necessary" is a bullshit cop out.

Hamas could be defeated by blowing up the Gaza strip.    They (and everyone else there) would be dead.

Of course, Hamas itself will not be dead because there are always new terrorists available to fill the void.

What is your solution?   Specifically.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.27  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.24    last year
You didn't accept the answer. Israel must continue building relationships with its neighbors.

You think it is possible for Israel to build relationships that would prevent terrorist groups from attacking them?

How, exactly, do relationships counteract generational hatred for Israelis?   This is not a rational situation, this is driven by irrational beliefs deep in the culture.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.2.28  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.26    last year
Good grief, more 'magic'.

Hmm. Describe this magic.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.29  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.24    last year

The problem within Israel is not Saudi Arabia, it is how to co-exist with 7 million Palestinians. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.30  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.22    last year
"Whatever is necessary" is vague bullshit.   Don't make references to magic, state an actionable plan.

Not vague in the least and a very actionable plan.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.31  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.27    last year
You think it is possible for Israel to build relationships that would prevent terrorist groups from attacking them?

No.


How, exactly, do relationships counteract generational hatred for Israelis?

They don't. However, the opponents of Israel become fewer with time. Think about the state sponsoring of terrorism. You have only one and it is Iran. There are still failed states in the middle east that are havens for terrorists, but a country like Egypt is unlikely to go to war with Israel again, as a matter of fact it was Egypt that gave Israel its only warning of the Oct 7th attack.


This is not a rational situation, this is driven by irrational beliefs deep in the culture.

In Gaza the children were taught to give up their lives in the fight against Israel. In some places the funding for such schools comes from the UN.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.32  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.29    last year
This is not a rational situation; this is driven by irrational beliefs deep in the culture.

The 7 million Palestinians had their chance. They could have co-existed with Israel.  

The Palestinians refused to recognize Israel.  They are to be relocated in Syria or Lebanon. Good riddance.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.33  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.30    last year

"whatever is necessary" is an actionable plan?    

Okay, general, you are in charge of the Israeli army.    You devise an actionable plan to defeat Hamas and protect Israeli citizens.   You then announce this plan to those in your charge:

My plan is that you should all do whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas and protect Israeli citizens.

That is it.   Get to work.

Brilliant plan, general.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.34  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.31    last year
However, the opponents of Israel become fewer with time.

Not much of a plan, Vic.   Israel works to develop relationships with the hope of reducing its diplomatic opponents in a reality where the various cultures surrounding Israel continue to have generational hatred.

As Hamas has shown, it takes just an extremely tiny minority of irrational, savage individuals who care more about their cause than their own lives to wreak havoc with Israel.

Israel will perpetually be subject to attack as long as this generational, cultural hatred exists.   I do not believe anyone has ever found a solution to generational, cultural hatred since it is founded in irrational beliefs.

Israel could mass kill everyone who currently holds irrational hatred against them and this will simply trigger a new generation of hatred and this time it can be fortified by the recent mass killing.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.35  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.32    last year
The Palestinians refused to recognize Israel.

Irrational generational hatred.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.36  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.22    last year
"Whatever is necessary" is vague bullshit.

Opinions will vary.

state an actionable plan.

I did.  Just because YOU don't think it's not actionable doesn't mean it can't be done.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.37  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.34    last year

We can only hope. Does time really heal all wounds?

The only other option is for the Israelis to flee their homeland and the middle east all together. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.38  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.36    last year
I did. 

Your "actionable plan" is "do whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas and protect Israeli citizens".

That is not a plan and it is not actionable.

It is like Miss America offering an "actionable plan" for world peace of "everyone just be nice to each other".

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.39  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.37    last year
Does time really heal all wounds?

This hatred has been around for centuries, Vic.

The only other option is for the Israelis to flee their homeland and the middle east all together.

That is not a solution to the stated problem.   The stated problem is how the state of Israel can exist without constant aggression.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.40  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.33    last year

I recommend you take this time to look at how military operations are drawn up and executed. 

On a side note, Israel's operations to do "whatever is necessary" seem to be working fine.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.41  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.32    last year
They are to be relocated in Syria or Lebanon. Good riddance.

Never gonna happen. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.42  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.40    last year
I recommend you take this time to look at how military operations are drawn up and executed. 

More bullshit.   Show us clear, convincing evidence that a military would put forth a document that only has in it ...

"Do whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas and protect Israeli citizens"

... and label this document a plan, much less an actionable plan.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.43  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.41    last year

Maybe not, but it is what I would do. Pack them up and move them to one of those two ungoverned countries.

Perhaps they can finally find a prosperous life there.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.44  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.42    last year
I recommend you take this time to look at how military operations are drawn up and executed. 

Once again, I recommend you take this time to look at how military operations are drawn up and executed. 

Here, use this LINK as a start point to look it up for the US Army.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.45  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.39    last year
The stated problem is how the state of Israel can exist without constant aggression.

Unfortunately, you didn't recognize the solution. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.46  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.43    last year

You are going to forcibly relocate 7 million people?  LOL. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.47  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.46    last year

If I could I would.

And I send most of our university professors with them.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.2.48  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.41    last year

Never gonna happen. 

Right. Their Arab brothers don't really care and are't suicidal enough to import massive amounts of aliens.  

Lucky they have this place called "Gaza" where they rule and  exported all the Jews from so they don't have to deal with them.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.49  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.44    last year

Deliver a real military plan that is considered an "actionable plan" which is as vague as:

"Do whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas and protect Israeli citizens"

Go ahead, Jeremy, attempt to back up your ridiculous claim.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.50  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.45    last year
Unfortunately, you didn't recognize the solution. 

Your "solution" does not solve the problem.

And that is no surprise.   It is unlikely that Vic on NT would come up with the brilliant solution to this problem when all the well-informed minds since the formation of Israel have been unable to devise one that works.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.51  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.50    last year
Your "solution" does not solve the problem.

It is the solution that the Israeli Prime Minister is pursuing.

You are the one who simply stands there and implies that there is no solution as long as there is a state of Israel.  How about you at least condemn Iran and its proxies and call it a day.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.52  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.51    last year
It is the solution that the Israeli Prime Minister is pursuing.

Attempting to forge relationships is a good thing.   And it certainly is part of an aggregate solution.   But it is NOT the solution in and of itself for the reasons I gave.

You are the one who simply stands there and implies that there is no solution as long as there is a state of Israel.  

And of course you totally misrepresent my position.   My position is that nobody has devised a solution to the irrational, generational hatred that drives this problem.   And it does not look likely that we will.   Diplomacy has been an ongoing pursuit and it is quite unlikely that it ever will be the solution to the problem.   Reasoning with the irrational does not work.   Unlike you, I do not pretend to have a solution.   

How about you at least condemn Iran and its proxies and call it a day.

I condemn Iran and all its proxies.   Too bad that does not solve the problem.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.53  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.49    last year

You have homework.  See 7.2.44.  Let me know when you understand the process from Commanders Intent to execution.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.54  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.53    last year

No, Jeremy, you have been challenged to deliver a genuine military actionable plan that is no more detailed than:

"Do whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas and protect Israeli citizens"

You obviously cannot do so and instead ask me to go on a wild goose chase.    Deflection.

There is no way on this planet that any military would put forth an actionable plan that is merely:  "Do whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas and protect Israeli citizens".

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.55  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.52    last year
 Unlike you, I do not pretend to have a solution.   

Yes, we've proven that haven't we?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.56  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.55    last year

Nothing to prove, I stated it.   I TiG on NT do not have a solution for how the state of Israel can forge a reality where they exist without the constant fear of aggression from those who possess a cultural, generational, irrational hatred for them.

Do you still think that you, Vic on NT, have the solution to the above problem?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.57  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.56    last year
Do you still think that you, Vic on NT, have the solution to the above problem?

I still believe that the course set by the current Israeli PM is the correct one. Forge alliances with neighbors and dismantle Iran's ring of fire.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.58  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.57    last year
I still believe that the course set by the current Israeli PM is the correct one.

I am also in favor of ongoing diplomacy.   That is not the point.   You are claiming that this alone will solve the problem of irrational, cultural, generational hatred of Israelis.   

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2.59  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.58    last year

Generational hatred is not impossible to overcome. In the US we had a problem in the south and today I don't think we could fill Joe Biden's Delaware home with the number of white racists that still exist in this country. I admit that the middle east is a more severe case, since the hate is literally being taught in classrooms, but that is where it needs to be stopped. I'm sure we can find the better angels in the middle east. Who knows, one day we may even have a second democracy pop up there.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.60  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.54    last year
You obviously cannot do so and instead ask me to go on a wild goose chase.    

No wild goose chase.  I gave you everything you need to understand the process and how it's applied. I gave you everything you need to educate yourself and you refused it.  And once again, you refuse to accept the answer and to learn something.  And, once again, not my problem.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.2.61  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.59    last year
enerational hatred is not impossible to overcome

Of course. Passing familiarity with  history   tells us that.  

The comanche aren't still trying to exterminate the apache. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.62  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.2.59    last year
Generational hatred is not impossible to overcome.

Thus far, for the Israelis, that has not shown to be true in any way.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.63  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.60    last year

As usual, you make false claims rather than deal with a challenge:

Deliver a genuine military actionable plan that is no more detailed than "Do whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas and protect Israeli citizens".


It is no doubt obvious to every reader that you cannot substantiate your ridiculous claim.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.64  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.63    last year
As usual, you make false claims rather than deal with a challenge:

Challenge accepted and answered. 

do whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas  and protect itself.

 That's called "Commander's Intent".  In the little game you wanted to play, it starts with that.  You'd know the rest but you refuse to educate yourself.  

Have fun with that.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.65  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.64    last year

Deliver a genuine military commander's intent that is no more detailed than "Do whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas and protect Israeli citizens".

You apparently do not understand what a commander's intent entails.   It is not a single sentence, wide-open, vague statement of outcome.   A statement of outcome is part of the commander's intent just like an objective like "be the xxx market leader" is part of a corporate strategic plan.  But the commander's intent (as with a corporate strategic plan) is substantially more detailed.

You have and will continue to fail to deliver an actionable military plan that is no more detailed than "Do whatever is necessary to defeat Hamas and protect Israeli citizens" because you are obviously wrong.

Your bullshit remains as bullshit.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.66  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @7.2.65    last year

Educate yourself.  Then we'll talk.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.2.67  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.66    last year

If you had an answer, you would type it.

You have offered nothing other than bullshit.

This is like engaging in a religious debate and having one's interlocutor tell you to "read the Bible and then get back with me".

Your tactic is feeble and obvious.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.2.68  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.29    last year

Israel can exist just fine if Palestinian terrorists stop trying to annihilate them.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.2.69  bugsy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.66    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7.2.70  JBB  replied to  bugsy @7.2.69    last year

God forbid you inform yourself! Huh?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.2.71  bugsy  replied to  JBB @7.2.70    last year

When I post here, I post facts,

Not my fault some are exempt from expressing those same facts, or try and express a losing battle via memes.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
7.2.72  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @7.2.70    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
8  Kavika     last year

Exactly what is an actionable plan, has any been proposed and does it include nuclear weapons? Drive them from Gaza into the sea and let them drown? Deport them to the moon or just go in and kill them all?

When is it going to be understood that occupation doesn't work and you cannot kill an ideology and after Gaza you have the West Bank same thing there?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Kavika @8    last year

The Palestinians could have accepted the many generous deals that would have allowed for a co-existence, but they rejected every one of them. They want a one state solution.

THEY ARE NOT VICTIMS.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
8.1.1  Kavika   replied to  Vic Eldred @8.1    last year

I never said they were victims, Vic. I have been pointing out over numerous articles/comments the history of both sides, the history of various peoples involved, and most of all that you cannot kill your way to a solution nor can you occupy 3 million people forever, the British found that out the hard way. Do you remember the King David Hotel bombing by the Stern Gang and Haganah, Vic?

Occupation and killing in the end never works in this type of situation. Americans should have learned that lesson as well since we have fallen into the trap more than one time.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Kavika @8.1.1    last year
the history of various peoples

That is what gives it away.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
9  Kavika     last year
That is what gives it away.

Gives what away, Vic? Do you have any idea at all about what you're talking about? 

It is interesting how you are unable to take in the complete comment and choose to pick out a few words or a sentence and try to make something it isn't. It would seem that is your only response to facts. 

Do you have any idea of the various people I was talking about? Probably not or you wouldn't have made such a ridiculous comment. Let me help you out with that, Vic. 

The three groups I've covered thus far are the Bedouins, Druze, and the Circassian, all citizens of Israel and all in the IDF. I have a few more groups to go, you should tune in you could improve your knowledge of Israel and the ME. 

 

 
 

Who is online


Sparty On
Hallux
Jack_TX
Ozzwald
Sean Treacy
JohnRussell
Greg Jones


655 visitors