╌>

New 'Biden Diet' Sweeps Nation: Pay The Same Amount Of Money But Eat 50% Less Food

  

Category:  Satire

Via:  gregtx  •  7 months ago  •  22 comments

New 'Biden Diet' Sweeps Nation: Pay The Same Amount Of Money But Eat 50% Less Food
US — With inflation showing no signs of slowing down, a new diet craze is sweeping across the nation. Known as the Biden Diet, the principle is simple; you spend the same amount of money on groceries as you were before, but you only get half the amount of food.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


US — With inflation showing no signs of slowing down, a new diet craze is sweeping across the nation. Known as the Biden Diet, the principle is simple; you spend the same amount of money on groceries as you were before, but you only get half the amount of food.

Google searches for "Biden Diet" have surged 3,000% in the last month, and nutrition experts say their phones are ringing off the hook with questions. "Hundreds of people call my office every day asking about the Biden Diet," said nutritionist Dr. Rich Simones. "For a long time everyone was into paleo, but really, who can afford meat these days?"

Simones says the ultimate strength of the Biden Diet is its simplicity. "You don't really have to do anything special to participate," he noted. "You just go to the grocery store and buy as much food as you can afford, and soon all those extra pounds just start melting away!"

Connecticut mother Denise Martelli said her whole family is having success on the Biden Diet. "We're spending the same amount of money on groceries each week, but my husband and I have each lost 10 pounds," she exclaimed. "Our kids used to be chubby too, and now all three are in the 10th weight percentile for their age group. I tell you, this Biden Diet is a miracle!"

At publishing time, the White House announced that President Biden has been nominated for a Nobel Prize in medicine for singlehandedly solving the obesity crisis in America.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
1  seeder  GregTx    7 months ago

512

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  Vic Eldred    7 months ago

That's why he keeps complaining about the Snickers bar getting smaller. Kind of like his brain.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3  Sparty On    7 months ago

It’s a new flation.    

Like Shrinkflation except it’s Bideflation

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
3.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Sparty On @3    7 months ago

Except its not, either of those

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Thrawn 31 @3.1    7 months ago

Sure it is and you’re smarter than saying it’s not.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
3.1.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.1    7 months ago

It isn't. Its inflation, and it was the inevitable result of the pandemic. Much of the world shut down for an extended period of time and that means manufactuerers pulled back considerably. Then, all of a sudden, everything opened back up at once, and demand was where it used to be. But supply wasn't. You can't just flip a switch and expect a factory to be back online 100% overnight. Those poor people in Vietnam that make all your shit moved to other factories or farms etc.  because they need the money. Price inflation is the inevitable result.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Sparty On  replied to  Thrawn 31 @3.1.2    7 months ago

Blaming only the pandemic is a very sophmoric analysis.     Biden has borrowed, taxed, spent and printed trillions of dollars and it wasn’t all pandemic related.

We are nearly four years down the pandemic road and the federal deficit is on track to double again from last year.    Why?    The promises of his Inflation Reduction Act have had the opposite effect of its title.    Inflation persists because of Biden’s money printing, spending and borrowing problem.

Inflation is on the rise again and will continue to rise unless Biden changes course.     The ONLY reason we aren’t in double digit inflation right now is because we have a Fed Chairman with real financial sense and the balls to use it.

Any first year economics major understands that if they are being taught the truth and not some gaslite, progressive version of it.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.4  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.3    7 months ago
Blaming only the pandemic is a very sophmoric analysis.

The pandemic was the clear trigger and its effect lingers.   But in economics there is rarely a single cause for an effect.   So of course the pandemic is not the only factor.   Government spending, a growing economy, wage increases, etc. are all factors too.

But without the pandemic, it is likely we would NOT have had such an abrupt change in the (running average) inflation rate.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.5  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.4    7 months ago
and its effect lingers.

No doubt but the actions that Biden has taken since, have easily overtaken that as a cause.    Thinking anything less is intentionally disingenuous or simply obtuse.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.6  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.5    7 months ago
very sophmoric [sic] analysis
intentionally disingenuous
simply obtuse.

One sign of a non-argument is a mere claim supported only by insulting caveats like these.   Labeling someone obtuse if they disagree with you is not an argument.   Making vague claims "actions that Biden has taken" is not an argument.

An argument is a set of propositions that are, ideally, verifiable facts organized in a valid, logical structure to produce a sound conclusion.

Your claim is that Biden's actions is the main cause of inflation.   You have presented no argument to back that up.

My opinion is that government spending in response to the pandemic and the fundamental disruption in supply by the pandemic are the key factors that caused a spike in average inflation.   But other inflationary factors are at play as I mentioned.   Our growing economy and higher wages both contribute to inflation.

Professional economists debate the causes of economic metrics such as inflation.   Your comments ("simply obtuse") imply that global economics is easily understood by anyone who is just above being "obtuse".   Not persuasive.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.7  bugsy  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.6    7 months ago

[Deleted][]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.8  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.6    7 months ago
One sign of a non-argument is a mere claim supported only by insulting caveats like these.   Labeling someone obtuse if they disagree with you is not an argument.   Making vague claims "actions that Biden has taken" is not an argument.

Another sign is taking statements too personal and being overly argumentative.   And there is nothing vague about it based on Bidens actions to date.    Not if one is paying attention.

An argument is a set of propositions that are, ideally, verifiable facts organized in a valid, logical structure to produce a sound conclusion. Your claim is that Biden's actions is the main cause of inflation.   You have presented no argument to back that up.

The principles I’ve brought up are well established causes of inflation.    It’s a Biden admin check list.   Go back and reread my posts if a refresher is needed.  

My opinion is that government spending in response to the pandemic and the fundamental disruption in supply by the pandemic are the key factors that caused a spike in average inflation.   But other inflationary factors are at play as I mentioned.   Our growing economy and higher wages both contribute to inflation. Professional economists debate the causes of economic metrics such as inflation.   Your comments ("simply obtuse") imply that global economics is easily understood by anyone who is just above being "obtuse".   Not persuasive.

Opinions do vary and I find yours to be disingenuous at best.    Disingenuous because you don’t even mention the single biggest reason why we aren’t in much higher inflation right now and it ain’t Biden.    As I’ve clearly noted here already, that reason is Powell’s program of aggressive rate increases at the Fed.  

The Biden admin has done little to nothing to lower inflation.    Even Biden himself finally admits his signature legislation the “Inflation Reduction Act” has done little to nothing to lower costs to Americans.

Talk about a pervasive argument.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.9  Sparty On  replied to  bugsy @3.1.7    7 months ago

SOSDD

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.10  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.8    7 months ago
And there is nothing vague about it based on Bidens actions to date.

Another vague statement.

The principles I’ve brought up are well established causes of inflation.

As are those I brought up.   The difference is that you merely proclaim that Biden's "actions" are the cause of current inflation.  You made no argument, you just proclaimed that those who do not accept your claim are obtuse.

Disingenuous because you don’t even mention the single biggest reason why we aren’t in much higher inflation right now and it ain’t Biden. 

Because I was stating factors that trigger and exacerbate inflation.   Further I did not list all factors.   Mine was a comment, not a thesis on economics.

The Biden admin has done little to nothing to lower inflation.  

I have not claimed otherwise.   Your strawman is avoiding the point I made which is that the pandemic was the obvious trigger for our inflation and that subsequent government spending (in response to the pandemic) furthered the inflationary effect.   Then on top of that, our recovery to a booming economy and rising wages are also factors that contribute to inflation.   As I noted, many factors are involved with inflation but to not recognize the profound effect of the pandemic is a failure of analysis.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.11  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.10    7 months ago
Another vague statement.

Nope, it’s clear, concise and spot on.

The principles I’ve brought up are well established causes of inflation.
As are those I brought up.   The difference is that you merely proclaim that Biden's "actions" are the cause of current inflation.  You made no argument, you just proclaimed that those who do not accept your claim are obtuse.

More disingenuous nonsense.    All points I’ve made are well accepted drivers of inflation    All points I made have been practiced, some heavily, by the Biden administration     The denial at play to not acknowledge that is, sizable.

Disingenuous because you don’t even mention the single biggest reason why we aren’t in much higher inflation right now and it ain’t Biden. 
Because I was stating factors that trigger and exacerbate inflation.   Further I did not list all factors.   Mine was a comment, not a thesis on economics.

lol …. I see.    How convenient.

The Biden admin has done little to nothing to lower inflation.  
I have not claimed otherwise.   Your strawman is avoiding the point I made which is that the pandemic was the obvious trigger for our inflation and that subsequent government spending (in response to the pandemic) furthered the inflationary effect.   Then on top of that, our recovery to a booming economy and rising wages are also factors that contribute to inflation.   As I noted, many factors are involved with inflation but to not recognize the profound effect of the pandemic is a failure

More disingenuous bullshit.   I clearly acknowledged the pandemic as a driver of inflation before you entered the fray.

The insistence some have to cherrypick comments here, to push an agenda, is just one more example of how sophomoric this place can be.   Weak  weak sauce …,

And here comes the protection ticket ….

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.12  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.11    7 months ago

All you offer is nuh'uh.   

My key point was that the pandemic is the trigger for modern day inflation.   We both have stated that it is (obviously) more than that but I am emphasizing that the pandemic remains a major factor.  Your deeming Thrawn's spot on note that the pandemic was the trigger and his note as to chain reaction that ensued as sophomoric is simply an antagonistic quip without a supporting argument.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.13  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.12    7 months ago
My key point was that the pandemic is the trigger for modern day inflation.

You keep bringing that up.    Not sure why.    Probably just to be argumentative.   Which would be     SOSDD

  We both have stated that it is (obviously) more than that but I am emphasizing that the pandemic remains a major factor.

And I emphasized that it is no longer the major factor as noted.    Aren’t opinions great!

 Your deeming Thrawn's spot on note that the pandemic was the trigger and his note as to chain reaction that ensued as sophomoric is simply an antagonistic quip without a supporting argument.

My comment wasn’t intended as an insult towards him and I don’t think he took it that way but it is nice he has someone here to come to defense.

I’m sure it’s much appreciated.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.14  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.13    7 months ago
My comment wasn’t intended as an insult towards him  ...

Of course not.   196

 
 
 
Robert in Ohio
Professor Guide
4  Robert in Ohio    7 months ago

436410393_25612202688370988_2103373059213810115_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_s640x640&_nc_cat=104&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=5f2048&_nc_ohc=1PbAA8pi0q0Ab6veRRD&_nc_ht=scontent-ord5-2.xx&oh=00_AfDbayEI1OIxnjHNq3zq3B-T0YvQ_Hg6bArfpaLIHVTsNQ&oe=6620592D

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
5  Thrawn 31    7 months ago

You probabl;y invested in Trump's media company too?

Fighting like hell now to just break even...... but of ciourse as the price keeps diving down . way ptast what you bought it for... and you realize the only guy making any money is the guy who put up no money at all, and cashed out.  ....I wil never understand this. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1  TᵢG  replied to  Thrawn 31 @5    7 months ago

I doubt they realize that Trump risked nothing and is the largest shareholder and that their enthusiastic desire to invest in Trump is simply yet another way in which Trump is exploiting their naivety.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  TᵢG @5.1    7 months ago

The lifelong conman/thug/grifter/thug/thief/crook risked nothing and fucked over everyone else.

Other than kompromat, etc, ignorance, hate, I cannot understand why anyone supports this utterly flawed example of a human being - absolutely nothing redeeming about the 'man' child.  

 
 

Who is online

George
JohnRussell
Vic Eldred


322 visitors