Israel on alert as Iran launches drones, ballistic missiles toward Jewish state
Category: News & Politics
Via: vic-eldred • 8 months ago • 102 commentsBy: Bradford Betz Share (Fox News)
White House says US support for Israel is 'ironclad,' will 'support their defense' amid Iran attack
The White House vowed Saturday that the United States' support for Israel's security is "ironclad," pledging to stand with the Jewish state and "support their defense" after Iran launched an aerial drone attack towards the country Saturday afternoon.
Iran launched drones from its own territory toward Israel late Saturday, days after its Supreme Leader warned it would hit back in response to an airstrike on the Iranian consulate in Syria that left several generals dead.
"Iran has begun an airborne attack against Israel," White House National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson said in a statement Saturday. "President Biden is being regularly updated on the situation by his national security team and will meet with them this afternoon at the White House."
This is an excerpt of a story by Fox News Digital's Brooke Singman. Click here to read the full report.
Posted by Bradford Betz Share
This is a developing story.
The take away from the international crisis noe facing the entire world is that Iran and North Korea are emboldened by the gop surrender monkeys in the American Congress dropping drawers and bending over for Vlad Putin's Russia in The Ukraine. The best path now to stand up to Putin's Axis of Evil with Iran and North Korea is for The USA th Help Ukraine NOW!
This is no time for MAGA Madness...
So there is nobody in the White House?
Yes, He is on the job tonight. Where is His support in Congress?
What is he doing?
What has he done?
Everyone can see you entirely avoiding the facts of the matter and that the root cause is Vlad Putin and that the only way to address our current worldwide crisis is by stoplight Putin in Ukraine. Not just us, not only our President, but the Free World! President Biden is not responsible this mess but he is working on it. He is not just bitching, enabling Vlad Putin and blaming The United States of America and our President!
All he's done is enrich, embolden, and enable Iran so that they can unleash terror upon the Middle East, aimed at Israel.
Biden continues Iran’s access to $10 billion just weeks after its proxy killed three American soldiers (msn.com)
I see.
Why and how is Biden enabling Putin?
Of course the US is backing Israel against Iran, but Iran would not be pulling this shit if our MAGA Congress wasn't bending over for Vlad Putin by not giving Biden whet he needs for Ukraine. Putin is playing chess while Arizona Is Burning!
Thank GOD President Biden is at work leading the free world tonight! So, are you with America and our President against Putin, Little Kim and the Mullahs or should Americans surrender?
[removed][✘]
If Biden and Obama hadn't given them the money to do it, is what you should have written. Iran has no better friend than the last two Democratic Presidents.
Iran has been attacking Israel through proxies for the last six months. Biden rewarded Iran by waiving 10 billion in sanctions in March. We are literally funding Iranian terrorism thanks to Biden.
Biden is funding Iranian terrorism and Israel's defense. Thanks to Biden we are literally funding both sides of today's fighting.
But Biden is president?
While what you said in your comment may or may not be true (I'm not interested in discussing that..now), it has nothing to do with the reason why Iran launched this attack on Israel.
Can you be a little bit more explicit?
That would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
What do you think was the cause of this attack?
And more importantly, what if anything do you think Putin have to do with it?
He did return from his beach weekend early.
Yes.
But let's start with this:
I don't remember all the details but in today's news I read that some crazy in Australia had a knife and attacked a few people in a mall, killed at least one person, seriously wounded a few others (until someone-- I believe it was a security guard-- shot him and stopped the attack). I
Also, of course, a country with a large and powerful military (Iran) attacked Israel. Shooting a large number of drones and some missiles
So let's compare the two. Questions:
1. Which of those two incidents harmed more people?
2. Why?
Here let me fix that for you..
First off he was a fellow Australian who did the killing..
He murdered 6 people and also stabbed a 6 month old baby..many are still on hospital..
A lone police woman shot him dead thank goodness..
Not sure what this has to do with Israel and Iran??
The Iranian attack may continue, but it seems to be over. So why did the iranian attack harm so few Israelis?
Either A- The Iranians are totally incompetent militarily or
B- It wasn't designed to be militarily effective.
Can tick A and B..
Because Iran doesn't want the war in their backyard literally...
Not in their interests, the locals wouldn't like it and they know what the consequences will be if Israel really fires up...
They would rather see Gaza in ruins than Tehran...
I'm talking big picture where Iran is Putin's ally and proxy.
US weapons and US dollars are vital to Israel and Ukraine.
I was responding to Vic about Biden who I support in both.
Um, not blocked aid to Israel, like the GOP has done.
Bring back the Trump sanctions!
What an asinine statement. In the US system, the President is the dominant power in foreign relations and he's spent the last month publicly attacking Israel and signaling a disconnect between our two countries. He's emboldened Hamas to reject cease fire after cease fire and made himself (and our country) look incredibly weak in the process.
And again, his warning of "don't" was completely ignored by Iran. As soon as Biden publicly tells a country "don't" do something, be assured they will. It's embarrassing.
[removed]
But that has absolutely nothing to do with the reason why Iran launched this attack...
This is a result of a weak president that has pandered to Iran by dropping the sanction Trump had in place; and releasing billions of dollars that the US had locked up. In the vain hope Iran would play nice with it's ME neighbors, and stop developing nukes. Brandon was wrong on both accounts.
By the way. you left China, the real threat to the world, off your Axis of evil. Stop listening to Brandon China is not just our "competitor".
Typical Democrat/leftist stuck on Russia, Russia, Russia. Even though Russia has been proven to me no threat to NATO. But keep poking the bear and maybe Putin will use the only thing Russia really has; and the whole world will glow in the dark for centuries.
Iran is so well off it is able to sell Russia drones, munitions, and weapons and still supply their terrorist groups and militias across the ME. Guess whose fault that is?
But it is cute you think Putin, who is beholden to China propping them up economically and militarily now is the leader of the new "axis of evil".
FAST FACTS
Israel's military says Iran has launched drones from its own territory toward Israel
IDF spokesman Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari said it will take several hours for the aircraft to arrive
The IDF says Israel is "prepared and ready" with defensive and offensive actions
The attack comes weeks after Iran blamed Israel for a deadly strike on its consulate in Syria that killed a top commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps' overseas Quds Force
The attack mark the first time Iran has launched a full-scale assault on Israel despite more than four decades of hostilities
Full scale assault?
WTF!
They launched a lot of drones and a few missiles.
And unless Netanyahu does something stupid, that's the end of it!
P.S: If it really was a "full scale assault" as you stated-- how come it wasn't accompanied by any Iranian ground attack?
That's all, huh?
But they were told "don't."
Can they project ground forces 1,5000 miles across Iraq, syria, Jordon, and Lebanon?
Well during the Iraq War the U.S. projected ground forces into Iraq--- and we had to cross an ocean first!
The shortest route from Iran would be to cross Iraq, then Jordan, then Israel.
True, we did it in 1990 and in 2003, but that's us not Iran.
The point is-- they felt they had to attack Israel-because Israel attacked them:
Iran has launched drones and ballistic missiles toward Israel weeks after a deadly strike on the Iranian consulate in Syria.
After Israel attacked their consulate (and IIRC killed a high ranking Iranian figure?) they would lose face if they didn't retaliate. They felt they had to retaliate, they had to attack Israel. (Or else be seen as weak-- not a good thing in the Middle east!).
But the problem was-- they knew if they attacked Israel, Israel would attack Iran back-- with great force. And they don't want that.
So what to do?
Well, if they didn't want to start a war with Israel, but they didn't want to be seen as weak (by not attacking)-- the answer was to attack Israel, but make it so they really didn't harm Israel greatly, so there were few casualties.
Yes, shooting drones and missiles. But apparently the drones were mostly for show. Lots of drones, but few missiles.
Exactly, their “Righteous Machismo" demands an honor attack.
Because any Iranian ground attack would need to go through several countries; would take several days; would be easily tracked by US and Israeli drones and satellites; and dealt with before it ever reached Israeli soil.
Iran rucked up. It should have stuck to using it's proxies to launch attacks against Israel. Bibi now has carte blanche to retaliate against Iran directly. Not a damn thing Brandon can do to stop them.
Why did Israel attack the Iranian consulate?
So if, as that comment implies, this is a "full scale attack"-- roughly speaking, how many Israeli casualties can we expect?
Israel was attacked. American forces have been attacked.
Why is Iran streets safer than ours?
Not if you're a woman (one who refuses to wear a head-covering-- or engages in dancing, etc)
The U.S. is on standby for further action by Iran, and from within the region via its proxies, a U.S. official told CBS News.
The U.S. is positioned to be able to shoot down incoming drones from Iran via assets in Iraq and Syria, three U.S. officials told CBS News. The U.S. also has fighter jets that are now on standby.
The U.S. assets above are in addition to Navy destroyer USS Carney staying in the Central Mediterranean to provide additional protection if needed instead of heading West, and the destroyer USS Arleigh Burke remaining in the Eastern Mediterranean where it has been for a while.
The U.S. preference is for the Israeli government to wait and assess the impact of the Iranian reprisal before responding to it. The U.S. preference is for a calibrated response. The expectation is that the Israelis will calibrate based on whether it successfully intercepts Iranian incoming and whether or not there are any casualties.
Iran launches drones toward Israel in retaliatory attack (msn.com)
Expect both the Iraqi and Syrian governments to tell US forces again to "get the fuck out". For Syria it will be about the billionth time since we have been in the country illegally since the Obama administration.
UN secretary-general condemns Iranian missile attack on Israel
"I strongly condemn the serious escalation represented by the large-scale attack launched on Israel by the Islamic Republic of Iran this evening. I call for an immediate cessation of these hostilities," United Nations chief Antonio Guterres said in a statement.
"I am deeply alarmed about the very real danger of a devastating region-wide escalation. I urge all parties to exercise maximum restraint to avoid any action that could lead to major military confrontations on multiple fronts in the Middle East. I have repeatedly stressed that neither the region nor the world can afford another war."
What, now somebody cares what the United Nations has to say? Usually, most of the commentary on NT is about what a feckless waste of money the organization is. Recently, a lot of right-wing hyperbole has been spent on claiming the UN is anti-Israel and pro-arab. The underlying reason for the genesis of the UN and its predecessor the League of Nations was to quell nascent conflicts before they grew into larger conflicts.
Morning.
Doesn't appear to be a great deal of damage to Israel and Iran has now supposedly concluded their response..
Iran has to do something to appease the masses and save face otherwise their would be massive upheaval within the country...and the Ayatollah can't have that...
🇮🇱 🇮🇱 🇮🇱
Yes.
And that was deliberate on the part of Iran.
Reading the comments here-- it appears you are the only one who is understanding what's going on!
Arvo Krishna..to me it was rather obvious..
Iran wants/needs a war with Israel like a hole in the head..
It has to be seen to retaliate for the sake of saving face with its own people..
Iran wants others to do its dirty work for them..eg Hamas and they are happy to pay for them to do it....
But when it all goes pear shaped and how, they are not seen for dust...and plead "wasn't us" as they throw their hands up in mock horror...
Trouble is Hamas and the Palestinian people are to stupid to realise that as they get pounded into the dirt..and where is Iran?
Meanwhile in Gaza........
Exactly!
I couldn't have explained it better myself!
Although I tried-- see my comments #3. 1. 5. & #3. 1. 6., above
I don’t believe for one second that this appeases “the masses” in Iran nor do i believe it was intended to.
Wouldn't it be the PERFECT example of Karma if an Iranian missile demolished the Al Aqsa Mosque?
Karma would be the US leveling Tehran.
In response to the number of casualties this attack caused?
(BTW-- do you know how many Israeli casualties have there been so far-- from this horrendous "all out attack"??)
It only takes 1 to get through. So, everyone should curl up in a defensive shell and say the missiles didn't do much damage?
That is a very odd idea. It is almost like Joe Biden's idea of not harming Iran.
I think that one Israeli girl was wounded by intercept debris.
Iran remains dangerous but inept.
OK-- don't you curl up in a defensive shell and say the attack did no damage,
In fact, I am curious to know how much damage you are aware that this "full scale attack" has caused?
Well based on that, one reasonable conclusion would be that Iran is inept.
However, there is another possibility....
And that is-- Iran was deliberately avoiding harming the Israelis too much-- because they knew if they did, Israel would counter-attack ferociously! (Look what Israel is doing to Gaza after Hamas' brutal attack on israel).
So Iran had to attack Israel (to show they weren't afraid to retaliate for israeli attack on their consulate), but they also had to do the attack in a way that wouldn't piss the Israelis off.
Then they could have their Falafel-- and eat it to! (To coin a phrase).
Could be, they fine tuned their guidance systems to miss.
Love some good Falafel. Had it for the first time in college when Israel was kicking Arab ass in the Yom Kippur war.
I read that a 10 year old Bedouin boy in a Bedouin village was seriously injured.
So the Israelis finally care about the Bedouins now.
Guess they finally found a use for them.
What a ridiculous comment. I said nothing about whether or not the Israeli's care about the Bedouins, and as it happens Bedouins serve in the IDF so your comment is nothing but conjecture.
You think karma would be to kill 8.7 million Iranians in Tehran?
Despicable though Iran's attack was that would karmic overkill.
I find it amazing that we have Jewish members here who are strangely silent.
Oh well, have a good night.
Let's hope they are not amongst the massive number of casualties this attack caused!
Probably.
Unless, of course, they realize that Iran's attack was just for show-- and that they really didn't want to do much damage. (Didn't want to piss israel off too much-- not a good idea to do that as Hamas found out after their horrific attack on Israel)
Persian precision.
Maybe they preferred to post on the article on the same topic that Gsquared posted a few hours before you posted yours.
Iranian missile and drone attacks were launched at Israel from positions in Iran, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen. Given the varying distances from launch sites and the varying speeds between the missiles and drones, If Iran wanted to overwhelm Israeli AMD, they needed to do a better job of synchronizing the launches.
Perhaps Israel will show them how it is done.
IMO Israel could humiliate Iran by not retaliating, in other words acting as if Israel treated Iran like a fly landing on its arm and brushing it away as if it were meaningless, since Iran's 170 drones, 30 cruise missiles and 100 ballistic missiles accomplished almost nothing.
Ideally yes... But they should use this as a reason to destroy Iran's command and control in yemen, syria, lebonan, gaza etc.
I am not sure Israel has the resources to take on such an initiative. They are stretched pretty thin right now. But if they could nullify enemy command and control without triggering more repercussions then that would be sensible.
This is a very complicated business. Right now, I think Israel needs to focus on Gaza.
Neither of us are war planners, but i am a warrior, and the worst kind. I believe in total war. I believe the enemy should be so completely crushed that they can never present a threat again. Or they know what happens.
To accomplish that, the prevailing force must have the means. It does not seem to me that Israel is in such a position.
With US backing they have the means.
That is true.
Something we agree on …. 100%.
Have this kind of commitment or don’t go to war.
Period.
CENTCOM was there for Israel, not only our weapon systems but coordinating with Jordan and Europe. Israel needs to in return, be very selective in what that attack in Iran and only with our permission.
A good target might be their military-industrial infrastructure that manufactures cruise and ballistic missiles.
I volunteered at 17. Went to boot a week after graduatioin. I went to war.
First tour was 2006, whejn was yours?
agreed. But they muist and will respond
Wipe out all known hezzbollah targhets in lebanon.
Absolutely, and since last night was such an Iranian failure, Israel can take a little time to be choosy and prepare a synchronized plan to maximize success.
I volunteered at 18 but like many who served only one hitch, never went to war.
At least you tried. You get more respect there.
You served, that’s what is important.
Desert Storm was the only combat operation that I saw. It’s almost embarrassing to call it combat. We deployed around 470,000 across all Services and the Britts added 50,000 to face around 300,000 Iraqis in Kuwait. We lost about the same to non-hostile action while losing less the 150 to combat while killing around 35,000 Iraqi military.
Highway 80 (AKA Highway of Death) was nothing but an air power turkey shoot. From about 20 miles west of Kuwait City to the border, almost 3,000 vehicles were destroyed.
This short, war taught me the value of endless training and complete preparation.
Goddamn US air defense tech is awesome.
Iran’s attack of three hundred drones and missiles missed their targets but hit their own currency as the exchange rate of the rial falls.
100% accuracy in that regard
Ancient Persia now Iran, lead the world in science, math, chemistry, etc. Now they can’t hit the broad side of Israel in 320 tries.
Islam happened.
A very peculiar kind of Islam.
Indonesia, majority Muslim country, was teetering on the of disaster at the end of the last century. Corruption, poverty, no history of democracy, the country was ready to split apart. Now, 25 years later, it is a stable democracy and its economy is growing rapidly. Smart, energetic people are solving their problems while Iranians are busy creating problems.
Funny isnt it? Thimgs get better when religioin is remives
Iranians celebrate their great victory over Israel:
A good thing for Israel to do would be not attack Iran but say this causes them to finish with total victory in Gaza.And tell all the protesters Iran caused them to do so.