╌>

The evil among us, far left loons

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  3 months ago  •  96 comments

The evil among us, far left loons
“The name has changed at the top of the ticket, but the mission hasn’t changed at all,” Biden said.



I think we shall remind everyone of just how far left the current democrat candidate is. This is from an earlier article:


"For democrats she is a poor candidate and a simpleton, who when all else fails resorts to giggling. For the rest of American the more serious problem is that Kamala Harris isn't just a bad politician, she is a radical, Socialist, Marxist. Her record in that regard is well known. As a Senator she cosponsored a bill with Bernie Sanders that would provide Medicare for everyone. She sponsored a bill providing illegal aliens with legal representation. She promoted an agreement at COP28 which would phase out fossil fuels. She sponsored a bill requiring the DOJ to award grants to replace cash bail systems. She sponsored a bill to advance "the Green New Deal." She sponsored a bill that would ban DHS from using federal funds to build or expand immigration detention facilities. She signed a letter saying that Title 42 violated federal law.

Few of us will ever forget her support of the violent rioters who killed two dozen people during the 2020 riots. She promoted the MN Freedom Fund which posted bail for violent protestors who had been arrested. Her support came right after a Minnesota Police Department was burned to the ground. There was no House Committee investigating those riots, nor was there much FBI interest. She then informed the nation "They are not going to let up, nor should they let up."

As vice president she also praised the antisemitic demonstrators who took control of university campuses. Her role as "border czar" speaks for itself. Under her watch an estimated 10 million unvetted illegal migrants entered the country. Last but not least is the fact that she had weekly luncheons with Joe Biden. As dense as she is, even she had to know how far gone the president was. Yet she was part of the coverup."

The Vetting Of Kamala Harris And The "Big Boy News Conference." - Community | The NewsTalkers

Yesterday she spoke from Biden's old campaign HQ in Delaware (now her HQ).  She spoke to campaign staffers who were very enthusiastic about her being chosen as the new presidential nominee. Biden was removed because he wasn't motivating democrat voters. Harris is even less favorable than Biden and that is why the smartest democrat has held back his endorsement. Recently NBC took a look at new polling:




What it tells us is that there may be a major problem for democrats come their convention next month. Will there be a revolt against Harris?

Michael Bloomberg, the former New York City mayor, urged Democrats to “take the pulse of voters” and “determine who is best positioned to win.” Many democrat donors agree.

In the meantime, the Harris campaign is using Obama's old wing man, the dishonorable Eric Holder to find a running mate for her. Harris has secured the support of enough Democratic convention delegates to become the party's nominee.


In the news:

Two more hostages have died in Hamas captivity the Israeli military said.

Ukraine struck a deal with private creditors to restructure more than $20 billion in debt, freeing the country to spend more on its military.

Britain’s plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is estimated to cost $900 million.

Californians are frustrated with the rates of shoplifting and public drug use. In November, they will decide on tougher laws.

The heads of the Secret Service, FBI, and Homeland Security have all declined to testify in the House on the shooting of former President Donald Trump.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    3 months ago

Good morning.

Does anyone know if a pecan crunch cake with blueberries & cinnamon is healthy?

23themorning-nl-recipe-kqlc-jumbo.jpg

It seems to be good for a morning hangover.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 months ago

eeeek! a mixed race woman running for POTUS! it's the end of the white civilized world!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  devangelical @1.1    3 months ago

That's the problem. Some low information voters will be voting to make history just like they did for Hillary in '16. Just like they did Obama in '08 and '12. Instead of judging performance going forward.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  devangelical @1.1    3 months ago

No, it's not the mixed-race thingy, it's because she's a piss-poor candidate and a world class simpleton.

She carries the stink of Joe Biden and his record which can't be washed off.

Condy Rice would have been a good president but the lefties trashed her back in the day

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.3  evilone  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.1    3 months ago
Instead of judging performance going forward.

Then we should all be anti-Trumpers.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  evilone @1.1.3    3 months ago

Obviously you were wearing those glasses 2017-2020

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.5  evilone  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.4    3 months ago
Obviously you were wearing those glasses 2017-2020

I knew who Trump was when he was still considered a NY Democrat. 

original

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1.6  Ronin2  replied to  evilone @1.1.3    3 months ago

There is the "But Trruuummmmppppp" cry from those that can't defend their candidate based on their merit.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
1.1.7  Right Down the Center  replied to  devangelical @1.1    3 months ago

Funny how when the comments of her stances can't be refuted some go straight to race.  Is being a mixed race woman the only thing she has going for her?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.8  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.1.7    3 months ago

Well it is two boxes checked.......................and we all know a lot of Democrats love them some checked boxes.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.9  evilone  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1.6    3 months ago
There is the "But Trruuummmmppppp" cry from those that can't defend their candidate based on their merit.

I voted for Nikki Haley in the WI Primary. My candidate lost... I'm left with 2 choices - Trump or not Trump. I'll pick not Trump every time.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.10  Sparty On  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.2    3 months ago
Condy Rice would have been a good president

Woulda voted for her in a heartbeat.    That’s the problem.    The system is so screwed up high quality individuals like her won’t run.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.11  Sparty On  replied to  evilone @1.1.9    3 months ago

Agreed but substitute Harris for Trump.    Harris is a step down from Biden.   Which would be disastrous for this country.    

Catastrophic actually. 

 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.12  evilone  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.11    3 months ago
Harris is a step down from Biden....Catastrophic actually. 

Sure... She will not be worse than the last 4 years, which overall has been pretty stable. Certainly not catastrophic.

Jobs, wages, personal spending and the stock market are up. Crime is down. I don't credit any of that to Biden, of course, but that doesn't look catastrophic. I expect more of the same.

Only Congress can fix the border issues and they don't want to.

Government spending will go up no matter which candidate wins.

And lastly the Republicans are the ones that want to infringe on the rights of women and LGBTQ+ people - the libertarian in me abhors those ideas. 

I'll stick with my NOT Trump choice, unless you know something that the rest of us don't.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.13  Sparty On  replied to  evilone @1.1.12    3 months ago
She will not be worse than the last 4 years,

Lol and the spin begins.    

Harris and Biden are much different.    Harris ranked as one of the most liberal Senators in the Senate.    Much further left than Biden.    Right in there with Bernie Sanders left.    Biden was much closer to the middle.    Sure, Biden took a left turn when he became POTUS because that is how his puppet-masters pulled his strings.    But still not as left as Harris will likely be.

That said I could highlight higher gas prices, higher food prices, higher energy prices, higher mortgage rates, higher inflation, higher household debt, etc, etc.     Then when Trump left office but I know it will fall on deaf ears.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.14  Greg Jones  replied to  evilone @1.1.12    3 months ago
"Only Congress can fix the border issues and they don't want to."

Biden and the Democrats are ignoring existing law in order to let the illegals stream over the border. It's doubtful they would enforce any new laws.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.15  devangelical  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.13    3 months ago
higher gas prices, higher food prices, higher energy prices, higher mortgage rates,

... and tell us again, which party do the leaders of those industries typically support in elections?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.16  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  evilone @1.1.12    3 months ago
Only Congress can fix the border issues and they don't want to.

And to think Biden didn't go to congress to fuck up the border.  All the doddering idiot had to do was sit back and enjoy his pudding.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.17  Sean Treacy  replied to  evilone @1.1.12    3 months ago
nly Congress can fix the border issues and they don't want to.

That's simply not true. Congress already delegated substantial power to the President, and the current has administration has, until recently, used all it's discretionary power to abet illegal immigration. Biden/Harris did everything in it's power to make things worse and there's no handwaving that away by blaming Congress. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.18  devangelical  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.1    3 months ago
Some low information voters will be voting to make history

you mean like voting for the first convicted felon POTUS candidate in american history?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.19  evilone  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.14    3 months ago
Biden and the Democrats are ignoring existing law in order to let the illegals stream over the border.

If Congress got off their ass and funded more immigration holding and court personnel we could take them in and ship them back out in weeks rather than fuck around with this bullshit politics, but hey the left/right partisans love them some wedge issues...

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.20  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  devangelical @1.1.18    3 months ago

Nope like voting for the prestige of voting for the first woman of color for PotUS. It's historic I tells ya...........just like Hills would have been. Hopefully it will turn out the same as it did for her.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.21  Sparty On  replied to  devangelical @1.1.15    3 months ago

The ones who pay for the ones who don’t

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    3 months ago

Good job trying to equate Kamala Harris with the far right conspiracist, diseased thinking, Trump -praised lunatic Laura Loomer.  The right must have a suicide wish for this election if they are going to tactics like that. 

Oh by the way , Trump said about Loomer earlier this year - "you want her on your side".

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
2.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 months ago
Good job trying to equate Kamala Harris with the far right conspiracist,

Was anything about her record stated above incorrect?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1    3 months ago

Nope and crickets you will hear.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 months ago
Good job trying to equate Kamala Harris

Do you recall when Harris compared ICE agents to the KKK or when she lied about the border agents on horseback?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2    3 months ago

They/she will have to lean into the race card gambit hard because they have so little of substance to run on.    And people who fall for it are fools.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.1    3 months ago

She did come into any of this properly.

As a matter of fact, the only debate I recall her in, aside from when she called Biden a "racist," was one in which Tulsi Gabbard gave her a spanking.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.3  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.2    3 months ago

For the first time in US history, it appears we will have a Presidential candidate, that was not elected by the people to run for POTUS.

Not good, not good at all.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.3    3 months ago

It is going to get worse for them.

A new poll:

Donald Trump Is Crushing Kamala Harris Among Younger Voters - Newsweek

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.5  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.4    3 months ago

The Misdefelon is ahead in polls?

Say it ain’t so, Joe.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.6  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.5    3 months ago

Do you know what this could mean?

A huge battle at the DNC

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.7  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.6    3 months ago

It will be must see TV.    Didn’t watch the RNC but I will watch this one.     That is if no ball game is on ……

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.8  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.7    3 months ago

I'll be watching too and don't forget with a DNC convention you may also get to watch a riot.

Wouldn't miss it for the world.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.9  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.8    3 months ago

Let’s see …. Will that be deemed an insurrection by our friends on the left if it happens?    Ya think?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.10  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.9    3 months ago

The government office building in the Capitol was taken over by pro-Palestinian protestors yesterday. Nancy Pelosi didn't say a thing about it, and it was barely covered by the media, if that answers your question.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.11  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.10    3 months ago

Insurrection, traitors, traitors ….. hang em all!

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
3  George    3 months ago

It's curious how democrats plan to save democracy by removing a democratically elected person from the ballot. The democrat party platform has to be built on hypocrisy and lies.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  George @3    3 months ago

[deleted][]

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
3.1.1  George  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    3 months ago

No, are you that this is the democrats have to offer? 3 days ago you were touting how Great Joe was, and non-partisans were telling you he was mentally incompetent. He has now been removed against the will of the people, is it because he is senile or because the democrat overlords decided he wasn't a viable candidate? 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2  Ozzwald  replied to  George @3    3 months ago
It's curious how democrats plan to save democracy by removing a democratically elected person from the ballot.

You mean the person voted to be the nominee during the Democratic National Convention?

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
3.2.1  George  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2    3 months ago

So what you are saying is the vote of the people is meaningless in the democrat party and you are okay with the ruling elites deciding for you......Got it!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.2.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2    3 months ago
during the Democratic National Convention

When was that? Missed it I guess.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2.3  Ozzwald  replied to  George @3.2.1    3 months ago
So what you are saying is the vote of the people is meaningless in the democrat party and you are okay with the ruling elites deciding for you......Got it!

Vote of the people????  You're supporting a candidate who won the presidency in 2016 DESPITE the "vote of the people".  Or did you forget that little tidbit?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.2.4  Sparty On  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.3    3 months ago

Two words:    Electoral College.

Find it, read it and try to understand it.

Next…..

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.2.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.3    3 months ago
Or did you forget that little tidbit?

The Electoral College is established in the Constitution.  Since then, the 12th Amendment, the expansion of voting rights, and the States’ use of the popular vote to determine who will be appointed as electors have updated this process.

Since the Electoral College process is part of the Constitution, elimination and use of a straight popular vote would require  a Constitutional amendment.

Don't forget that lil' tidbit.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.2.6  Hallux  replied to  Sparty On @3.2.4    3 months ago
Electoral College.

Was that anachronism disbanded? She will face it come November and if history toys with repetition a number of fake electors will descend to tell you who the people 'really' voted for.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.2.7  Sparty On  replied to  Hallux @3.2.6    3 months ago

lol …. I disagree comrade.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
3.2.8  George  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.3    3 months ago

So what you are saying is either you don't know how elections work or you are deflecting from the fact that the democrats have just disenfranchised millions of voters.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
3.2.9  George  replied to  Hallux @3.2.6    3 months ago

The only time i remember electors changing their vote was when progressives found Hillary so unpalatable that the changed their votes. Can you site another time electors changed their votes?

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
3.2.10  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.2.5    3 months ago

Thats not stopping them from drifting that way , i point to the national popular vote initiative ., which will likely be judged unconstitutional if ever enacted .

 
 
 
bccrane
Freshman Silent
3.2.11  bccrane  replied to  Hallux @3.2.6    3 months ago
if history toys with repetition a number of fake electors will descend to tell you who the people 'really' voted for.

I guess we'll see which side employs that tactic this time around.  Michigan concerns me this time around, democrats control the governor, legislature, AG, and SOS and if Trump wins in Michigan will the state government allow Trump the electors or will the state cast its vote and send the electors for the "D" in the general.  The EC was set up not only to give the people of differing populations in the states a say, but also the states cast their vote too.  The president is the representative of the people and the states.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.2.12  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.3    3 months ago
You're supporting a candidate who won the presidency in 2016 DESPITE the "vote of the people".

It's cute when you show you don't know how the Presidential election works. [Deleted - unnecessary roughness.][]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
3.2.13  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2.12    3 months ago

[deleted][]

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2.14  Ozzwald  replied to  Sparty On @3.2.4    3 months ago
Two words:    Electoral College.

Two words:  Off topic.

But you would understand that if you'd look at the comment thread before butting in.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2.15  Ozzwald  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.2.5    3 months ago

Don't forget that lil' tidbit.

That's not what George was talking about and not what I was replying to.  Read the damn thread before making your idiotic comments.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2.16  Ozzwald  replied to  George @3.2.8    3 months ago
So what you are saying is either you don't know how elections work or you are deflecting from the fact that the democrats have just disenfranchised millions of voters.

No, what I am saying is that your comment was EXTREMELY hypocritical [deleted][]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.2.17  Sparty On  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.14    3 months ago

You got one of the words correct.    Topic.    

Problem is, you blew it on the second one.    You brought up the popular vote.    I countered with how presidential candidates actually get elected.   The Electoral College.    

Denial may get you somewhere here but that dog don’t hunt in the real world.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2.18  Ozzwald  replied to  Sparty On @3.2.17    3 months ago
You brought up the popular vote.

If you would bother looking at the comment string you would see that George was specifically commenting on the "vote of the people".  So I specifically responded to his statement about the "vote of the people".

I was NOT commenting on Presidential elections, the electoral college, or anything other than his specific statement about the "vote of the people"

You have a problem with that, you need to bring it up with George.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.2.19  Sparty On  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.18    3 months ago

lol …. Keep spinning ….

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.3  Sparty On  replied to  George @3    3 months ago

Well, at least they didn’t disenfranchise 14+ million voters ….. mostly …,, 

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4  charger 383    3 months ago

   
   "Britain’s plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is estimated to cost $900 million."

and that is why a country should not let foreigners just show up and think they have to be let in.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.1  Sparty On  replied to  charger 383 @4    3 months ago

Most don’t

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
5  George    3 months ago

[deleted][]

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
5.1  George  replied to  George @5    3 months ago

[deleted][]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  George @5.1    3 months ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.1.2  Hallux  replied to  George @5.1    3 months ago

Seeing as how easily you sink into it, the mire would like to date you.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
5.1.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hallux @5.1.2    3 months ago

The time to hesitate is through
No time to wallow in the mire

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5.1.4  Sparty On  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @5.1.3    3 months ago

Try now we can only lose

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1.5  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Sparty On @5.1.4    3 months ago

And our love become a funeral pyre

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
6  George    3 months ago

The DEI appointment to run the Secret Service has resigned in shame......She would be a perfect VP choice, it's going to be hard to find someone more incompetent than Kamala so this is a godsend.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
6.1  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  George @6    3 months ago

I dont think she left herself any choice , especially after she quoted Truman , during 7/13s events that the buck stopped with her .

 of course yesterdays events with congress only cemented things .

Her position is one of serves at the pleasure of the president , and is not subject to congressional approval.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
6.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  George @6    3 months ago
it's going to be hard to find someone more incompetent than Kamala so this is a godsend.

There's always AOC.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.2.1  Sparty On  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @6.2    3 months ago

She impressed me for the first time in that Cheatle hearing.    
I nearly pooped my pants.

jrSmiley_9_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
6.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sparty On @6.2.1    3 months ago

I was floored when she called out Cheatle for not providing ANYTHING that was ask of her.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
7  Hallux    3 months ago

"Britain’s plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is estimated to cost $900 million."

And that was just for 4 people, British conservatives, like their counterparts, are so frugal ... /s

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8  Sean Treacy    3 months ago

She was the most far left member of the senate  while there.  Farther left than the literal socialist.  It’s crazy how extreme the Democratic Party has gotten and she’s at the extreme edge of the party. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
8.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Sean Treacy @8    3 months ago

Then it should be no problem to defeat her, huh?  Weird how terrified Trump is now.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9  author  Vic Eldred    3 months ago

VP Harris will boycott Netanyahu's speech to Congress tomorrow bowing to the democrat party's antisemitic wing.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
9.1  evilone  replied to  Vic Eldred @9    3 months ago

Making stuff up again? The news article I read said she has a prior engagement and will meet with him later. Sound so much more realistic than your conspiracy laden post. Also the Times of Israel is reporting that Harris will continue to back Israel, and the JPost reports that the Jewish politicals of J Street have endorsed Harris and her nuanced approach to Israel.

 None of that sound anti-semitic to me. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  evilone @9.1    3 months ago
The news article I read said she has a prior engagement and will meet with him later.

I read it too. Do you really believe that?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
9.1.2  evilone  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.1    3 months ago
I read it too.

But you decided to make up some conspiracy anyway?

Do you really believe that?

Unless you have actual evidence to the contrary I'll go with Occam's razor. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  evilone @9.1    3 months ago
The news article I read said she has a prior engagement

She's the VP and the President is incommunicado.  She has one literally one constitutional duty and she's ducking it because a Jewish leader is speaking.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
9.1.4  Sparty On  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.3    3 months ago

It is incredible what they think they can get away with.    And their useful idiots keep slurping it up with a serving spoon

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
9.1.5  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.3    3 months ago
She has one literally one constitutional duty

And it does not appear to include attending joint sessions of congress other than for 'truing' the vote.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
9.1.6  evilone  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.3    3 months ago
She has one literally one constitutional duty and she's ducking it...

That's a valid critique. 

...because a Jewish leader is speaking.  

That's jumping to conclusions without evidence. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  evilone @9.1.6    3 months ago
hat's jumping to conclusions without evidence. 

The evidence is she's not fulfilling her constitutional duty to preside despite doing so for every other joint session of Congress during Biden's tenure. In fact, other than for designated survivor purposes, I'm not sure who the last VP was who failed to preside over a joint session.  It's obviously an intentional insult.   

Needlessly insulting allies.  Isn't that what Trump was accused of doing? 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
9.1.8  evilone  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.7    3 months ago
The evidence is she's not fulfilling her constitutional duty to preside despite doing so for every other joint session of Congress during Biden's tenure.

I expect the situations during those other joint sessions of Congress didn't require her to all of a sudden mount a Presidential Campaign, but sure, she should be there. She is meeting with him later, so I don't see all that much of a snub. Sounds more like mountains vs molehills. 

It's obviously an intentional insult.   

Again conjecture without evidence. If you have anything other than leaping to conclusions...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1.9  Sean Treacy  replied to  evilone @9.1.8    3 months ago

expect the situations during those other joint sessions of Congress didn't require her to all of a sudden mount a Presidential Campaign

so party over country is the excuse,  Shirking duties for personal reasons is the excuse. 

Again conjecture without evidence.


The evidence is her absence as well as participation in the administrations snubbing him upon arrival.   Do you not know what circumstantial evidence is? 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
9.1.10  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  evilone @9.1.8    3 months ago

How long have we known about him addressing a joint session?

Evidently she knew what was coming otherwise, why would she not go. The campaign could have waited since she has only been the nominee for 24 hours. Strange.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1.11  Sean Treacy  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @9.1.10    3 months ago
The campaign could have waited since she has only been the nominee for 24 hours. Strange.

And I believe, though I'll let others spend time confirming it if they want, that Harris informed Israel she wouldn't preside over the session on July 15th, before she was nominee. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1.12  Sean Treacy  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @9.1.10    3 months ago
hy would she not go

Her excuse is a sorority meeting.  Lol.  

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
9.1.13  evilone  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @9.1.10    3 months ago
How long have we known about him addressing a joint session?

We? I learned about it when Vic posted it. You? 

The campaign could have waited since she has only been the nominee for 24 hours. Strange.

As I said, she should be there. I'm not jumping to conclusions as to why she won't be other than what we've already been told. Maybe she is snubbing Bibi, maybe not. He may be out of a job and on trial soon anyway.

A drumbeat of protests demanded that he stay home and focus on a ceasefire deal with Hamas to free Israeli hostages. “Until he has signed the deal that's on the table, I do not see how he picks up and flies across the Atlantic to address the American political chaos,” said Lee Siegel, one of the family members who has come out to demonstrate. His 65-year-old brother Keith is a captive in Gaza.
 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
9.1.14  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  evilone @9.1.13    3 months ago
We? I learned about it when Vic posted it. You? 

By we I meant GovCo and therefore, her.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
9.1.15  evilone  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @9.1.14    3 months ago
By we I meant GovCo and therefore, her.

Fuck if I know. It doesn't really apply so much to my original point of Vic making shit up either.

 
 

Who is online






Sparty On
Dig


387 visitors