Possible work stoppage at Canada's two largest railroads could disrupt U.S. supply chain next week
Category: News & Politics
Via: perrie-halpern • 2 months ago • 5 commentsBy: By The Associated Press
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
DETROIT — Canada's two largest railroads are starting to shut down their shipping networks as a labor dispute with the Teamsters union threatens to cause lockouts or strikes that would disrupt cross-border trade with the U.S.
Both the Canadian Pacific Kansas City and Canadian National railroads, which haul millions of tons of freight across the border, have stopped taking certain shipments of hazardous materials and refrigerated products.
Both are threatening to lock out Teamsters Canada workers starting Thursday if deals are not reached.
On Tuesday, CPKC will stop all shipments that start in Canada and all shipments originating in the U.S. that are headed for Canada, the railroad said Saturday.
The Canadian Press reported that on Friday, Canadian National barred container imports from U.S. partner railroads.
Jeff Windau, industrials analyst for Edward Jones & Co., said his firm expects work stoppages to last only a few days, but if they go longer, there could be significant supply chain disruptions.
"If something would carry on more of a longer term in nature, then I think there are some significant potential issues just given the amount of goods that are handled each day," Windau said. "By and large the rails touch pretty much all of the economy."
The two railroads handle about 40,000 carloads of freight each day, worth about $1 billion, Windau said. Shipments of fully built automobiles and auto parts, chemicals, forestry products and agricultural goods would be hit hard, he said, especially with harvest season looming.
Both railroads have extensive networks in the U.S., and CPKC also serves Mexico. Those operations will keep running even if there is a work stoppage.
CPKC said it remains committed to avoiding a work stoppage that would damage Canada's economy and international reputation. "However we must take responsible and prudent steps to prepare for a potential rail service interruption next week," spokesman Patrick Waldron said in a statement.
Shutting down the network will allow the railroad to get dangerous goods off of its network before any stoppage, CPKC said.
Union spokesman Christopher Monette said in an email Saturday that negotiations continue, but the situation has shifted from a possible strike to "near certain lockout" by the railroads.
CPKC said bargaining is scheduled to continue on Sunday with the union, which represents nearly 10,000 workers at both railroads. The company said it continues to bargain in good faith.
Canadian National said in a statement Friday that there had been no meaningful progress in negotiations and it hoped the union "will engage meaningfully" during a meeting scheduled for Saturday.
"CN wants a resolution that allows the company to get back to what it does best as a team, moving customers' goods and the economy," the railroad said.
Negotiations have been going on since last November, and contracts expired at the end of 2023. They were extended as talks continued.
The union said company demands on crew scheduling, rail safety and worker fatigue are the main sticking points.
Concerns about the quality of life for rail workers dealing with demanding schedules and no paid sick time nearly led to a U.S. rail strike two years ago before Congress intervened and blocked a walkout. The major U.S. railroads have made progress since then in offering paid sick time to most rail workers and trying to improve schedules.
Windau said the trucking industry currently has a lot of excess capacity and might be able to make up some of the railroads' shipping volumes, but, "You're not going to be able to replace all of that with trucking."
Tags
Who is online
394 visitors
You know, it feels kind of strange living in a country where work stoppages don't happen, and everything just keeps smoothly rolling along.
Are workers allowed the freedom to strike where you live?
Didn't see this because you didn't post it as a reply to my comment. OF COURSE they can strike, but then they'll have to look for a job elsewhere.
This makes me think of a situation where a very good friend who was also a client (many of my clients were also good friends) who owned a very successful industry related to construction, and he was a father figure for his employees, was exceptionally kind to them, had hired many people who had trouble getting jobs elsewhere, like ex-cons, always helped them if they had problems. One day they decided to become unionized (for what reason I sure as hell never knew). My friend told them that if they did that he would sell his business to a large conglomerate, where they might not be treated the same. They were stubborn and joined a union. He did what he threatened, and not long after the employees realized that they had made a really big mistake.
I think he was right with what he did, and maybe that's because he was very much like my father was. My father had a small industry that had 18 employees. He also was a father figure, treated every employee like they were family. When one got into trouble he went to court to plead for his employee. He did tell me that if his employees would decide to bring in a union he would simply lock the factory door and walk away, but fortunately he never had to do that, his employees knew what was best for them.
I think you might get the right idea that I'm not exactly a union supporter. IMO there is enough pro-employee legislation in civilized countries to protect workers. However, I can't say the same for China, and I know of at least three examples close to me that cause that opinion.
Caused by the Precision Scheduled Railroad management idea that has infected railroads. It is not what it's name suggests, it is short term way to suck cash and assets out of the railroad leaving a mess for later, force an impossible 50% operating ratio and cut all costs below what is needed to run the trains safely and provide good service
That makes me think of Boeing as well. Bottom line rules, fuck safety. Capitalism does have its warts - makes it kind of hypocritical to criticize different forms of economic governance.