╌>

The EU Just Declared War on Free Speech in America. It is Time to Fight Back

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  vic-eldred  •  2 months ago  •  22 comments

By:   JONATHAN TURLEY

The EU Just Declared War on Free Speech in America. It is Time to Fight Back
Below is my column in The Hill on the move of the European Union to force Elon Musk to censor X users, including political speech leading up to the 2024 election. The column discusses this Rockwell painting, which we often use in discussing free speech controversies. Here is the column: Eighty years ago, the U.S.…

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Below is my column in The Hill on the move of the European Union to force Elon Musk to censor X users, including political speech leading up to the 2024 election. The column discusses this Rockwell painting, which we often use in discussing free speech controversies.

Here is the column:

Eighty years ago, the U.S. government launched a war bond campaign featuring a painting by artist Norman Rockwell in the struggle against the authoritarian threat from Europe. The picture they chose was Rockwell's Freedom of Speech depicting a man rising to speak his mind at a local council meeting in Vermont. The image rallied the nation around what Louis Brandeis called our "indispensable right."

Now, that very right is again under attack from another European government, which is claiming the right to censor what Americans are allowed to say about politics, science and other subjects. Indeed, the threat from the European Union may succeed in curtailing American freedom to an extent that the Axis powers could not have imagined. They may win, and our leaders have not said a thing yet about it.

In my book "The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage," I discuss the inspiration for Rockwell's painting: a young selectman in Vermont named James "Buddy" Edgerton. The descendent of a Revolutionary War hero, Edgerton stood up as the lone dissenter to a plan to build a new schoolhouse over the lack of funding for such construction.

For Rockwell, the scene was a riveting example of how one man in this country can stand alone and be heard despite overwhelming opposition to his views. It was, for Rockwell (and for many of us), the quintessential American moment.

In the 1940s, people like Edgerton had to travel to small board meetings or public spaces to speak their mind. Today, the vast majority of political speech occurs over the Internet and specifically social media. That is why the internet is the single greatest advancement for free speech since the printing press.

It is also the reason governments have spent decades seeking to control speech over the internet, to regulate what people can say or read.

One of the greatest threats to free speech today is the European Digital Services Act. The act bars speech that is viewed as "disinformation" or "incitement." European Commission Executive Vice President Margrethe Vestager celebrated its passage by declaring that it is "not a slogan anymore, that what is illegal offline should also be seen and dealt with as illegal online. Now it is a real thing. Democracy's back."

In Europe, free speech is in free fall. Germany, France, the United Kingdom and other countries have eviscerated free speech by criminalizing speech deemed inciteful or degrading to individuals or groups. The result had made little difference to the neo-Nazi movement in countries like Germany, which is reaching record numbers. It has, however, silenced the rest of society.

According to polling, only 18 percent of Germans feel free to express their opinions in public. Fifty-nine percent of Germans do not even feel free expressing themselves in private among friends. Only 17 percent feel free to express themselves on the internet.

They have silenced the wrong people, but there is now a massive censorship bureaucracy in Europe and the desire to silence opposing voices has become insatiable.

Some in this country have the same taste for speech-regulation. After Elon Musk bought Twitter and dismantled most of the company's censorship program, many on the left went bonkers. That fury only increased when Musk released the "Twitter files," confirming the long-denied coordination and support by the government in targeting and suppressing speech.

In response, Hillary Clinton and other Democratic figures turned to Europe and called upon them to use their Digital Services Act to force censorship against Americans.

The EU immediately responded by threatening Musk with confiscatory penalties against not just his company but himself. He would have to resume massive censorship or else face ruin.

It was a case of the irresistible force meeting the immovable object. The anti-free speech movement had finally found the one man who could not be bullied, coerced or threatened into submission.

Musk's defiance has only magnified the unrelenting attacks against him in the media, academia and government. If Musk can be broken, these figures will once again exercise effective control over a large swath of speech globally.

This campaign recently came to a head when Musk had the audacity to interview former president Donald Trump. In anticipation of the interview, one of the most notorious anti-free speech figures in the world went ballistic.

European Commissioner for Internal Markets and Services Thierry Breton issued a threatening message to Musk, "We are monitoring the potential risks in the EU associated with the dissemination of content that may incite violence, hate and racism in conjunction with major political — or societal — events around the world, including debates and interviews in the context of elections."

While offering a passing nod to the freedom of speech, he warned Musk that "all proportionate and effective mitigation measures are put in place regarding the amplification of harmful content in connection with relevant events." In other words, be afraid, be very afraid.

Musk responded with "Bonjour!" and then suggested that Breton perform a physically challenging sexual act.

To recap, the EU is now moving to force censorship upon American citizens to meet its own demands of what is false, demeaning or inciting. And that includes censorship even of our leading political candidates for the presidency.

The response from the Biden administration was not a presidential statement warning any foreign government from seeking to limit our rights or even Secretary of State Antony Blinken calling the EU ambassador to his office for an expression of displeasure.

That's because Biden and Harris are not displeased with but supportive of letting the EU do what they are barred from doing under our Constitution. This administration is arguably the most anti-free speech government since John Adams signed the Sedition Act. They have supported a massive system of censorship, blacklisting and targeting of opposing voices. Democratic members have given full-throated support for censorship, including pushing social media companies to expand in areas ranging from climate control to gender identity.

So, after only 80 years, our leaders are silent as a European government threatens to reduce our political speech to the lowest common denominator, which they will set according to their own values. Not a shot will be fired as Biden and Harris simply yield our rights to a global governing system.

But we do not have to go quietly into this night. Free speech remains a human right that is part of our DNA as Americans. We can fight back and protect millions of Edgertons who want to express their views regardless of the judgment of the majority.

I previously called for legislation to get the U.S. government out of the censorship business domestically. We also need new legislation to keep other countries from regulating the speech of our own citizens and companies. While this country has long threatened retaliation in combatting market barriers in other countries, we need to do the same thing for free speech. We need a federal law that opposes the intrusion of the Digital Services Act into the U.S.

If free speech is truly the "indispensable right" of all Americans, we need to treat this threat as an attack on our very existence. It is not only the rawest form of foreign intervention into an election, but a foreign attack on our very freedoms. This is why we must pass a Digital Freedom Act.


05282015_66951-e1532723116454.jpg?fit=297%2C300&ssl=1

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. He is the author of " The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage " (Simon & Schuster).


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    2 months ago

Not a word from Biden or Harris.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 months ago

I wouldn't expect anything from them.  Remember this is the administration that did censor free speech already.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1    2 months ago

Yup, they are on the same page.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 months ago
Not a word from Biden or Harris.

Can you provide a link to Trump directly addressing this?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2    2 months ago
Can you provide a link to Trump directly addressing this?

"Deflection screens engaged, sir!"

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2    2 months ago

Joe Biden is president and Harris is vp.  Why would anyone else be addressing this?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.2    2 months ago
Joe Biden is president and Harris is vp.  Why would anyone else be addressing this?

So you are saying that no one has addressed this. 

Why did Trump meet with Netanyahu?  Biden is President and Harris is VP, so what was Trump doing?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.2.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.3    2 months ago

Catching up with an old friend perhaps? Discussing the future perhaps?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.5  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.3    2 months ago
Why did Trump meet with Netanyahu? 

I don't know.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 months ago

How the hell does the 'EU' have any say over our Freedom of Speech?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @1.3    2 months ago

They threatened Musk, didn't they?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 months ago

I don't trust anything from someone who states 'the left went bonkers'

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 months ago

about what?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.5.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @1.5    2 months ago

The threats from the EU

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    2 months ago

I'm not even sure the UK is an actual democracy anymore.  Does voting matter if you can't speak freely? 

They are literally opening prisons and releasing violent felons to make room for people who criticize the government.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3  Texan1211    2 months ago

We should tell them to go to hell.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    2 months ago

"There is an irrepressible desire for censorship in this battered contemporary left, post-communist or liberal; it no longer makes any difference. They are terrified of freedom of expression, allergic to opinions that are not aligned with their mainstream, and inquisitors of anyone who does not submit to their suffocating cloak of conformism. Their false do-goodism now struggles to hide their true nature”

The Italian PM's party issued a great statement. At least some get it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  JohnRussell    2 months ago

Can we get Turley to make all his articles about Europe so we dont have to listen to him badger America anymore? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @5    2 months ago
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @5    2 months ago

Why not just censor him?

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
6  Hallux    2 months ago

So, what is Turley's solution? When in Rome do as Floridians do? One gets the feeling Turley is running out of corners to paint himself into ... 8 years of supporting a shrill shill has a tendency to do that.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1  Tessylo  replied to  Hallux @6    2 months ago

Ya, really!  Who cares?

 
 

Who is online

devangelical
Drinker of the Wry


392 visitors