╌>

The Phony Populism of Trump and Musk

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  hallux  •  2 weeks ago  •  10 comments

By:   Tom Nichols - The Atlantic

The Phony Populism of Trump and Musk
They are plutocrats masquerading as ordinary Americans.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


A Donald Trump rally is always a strange spectacle, and not only because of the candidate’s incoherence and bizarre detours into mental cul-de-sacs. (Journalists have faced some criticism for ignoring or recasting these moments, but  The New York Times , for one, has finally  said  that the candidate’s mental state is a legitimate concern.) Trump’s rally on Saturday in Butler, Pennsylvania, was a hall-of-fame entry in  political weirdness : Few survivors of an attempted assassination hold a giant lawn party on the spot where they were wounded and someone in the crowd was killed.

The candidate’s tirades are the most obviously bizarre part of his performances, but the nature of the gathering itself is a fascinating paradox. Thousands of people, mostly from the working and middle class, line up to spend time with a very rich man, a lifelong New Yorker who   privately detests   the heartland Americans in his audience—and applaud as he excoriates the “elites.”

This is a political charade: Trump and his running mate, the hillbilly turned   multimillionaire   J. D. Vance, have little in common with most of the people in the audience, no matter how much they claim to be one of them. The mask slips often: Even as he courts the union vote, Trump revels in   saying   how much he hated having to pay overtime to his workers. In another telling moment, Trump beamed while talking about how Vance and his wife both have Yale degrees, despite his usual excoriations of top universities. (He always carves out a glittering exception for his own days at the University of Pennsylvania, of course.)

Trump then welcomed the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, to the stage. Things got weirder from there, as Musk—who, it should be noted, is 53 years old— jumped around  the stage like a concertgoing teenager who got picked out of the audience to meet the band. Musk then proceeded to explain how democracy is in danger—this, from a man who has turned the platform once known as Twitter into an open zone for  foreign propaganda  and has  amplified  various  hoaxes . Musk has presented himself on his own platform as a champion of the voiceless and the oppressed, but his behavior  reveals  him as an enemy of speech that isn’t in his own interest.

What happened in Butler over the weekend, however, was not some unique American moment. Around the world, fantastically wealthy people are hoodwinking ordinary voters, warning that dark forces—always an indistinct “they” and “them”—are conspiring to take away their rights and turn their nation into an immense ghetto full of undesirables (who are almost always racial minorities or immigrants or, in the ideal narrative, both).

The British writer Martin Wolf   calls   this “pluto-populism,” a brash attempt by people at the top of the financial and social pyramid to stay afloat by capering as ostensibly anti-establishment, pro-worker candidates. In Britain, former Prime Minister Boris Johnson   dismissed   the whole notion of Brexit behind closed doors, and then supported the movement as his ticket into 10 Downing Street anyway. In Italy, a wealthy entrepreneur helped start the “ Five-Star Movement ,” recruiting the comedian Beppe Grillo to hold supposedly   anti-elitist   events such as Fuck-Off Day; they briefly joined a coalition government with a far-right populist party, Lega, some years ago. Similar movements have arisen around the world, in Turkey, Brazil, Hungary, and other nations.

These movements are all remarkably alike: They claim to represent the common voter, especially the “forgotten people” and the dispossessed, but in reality, the base voters for these groups are not the poorest or most disadvantaged in their society. Rather, they tend to be relatively affluent. (Think of the January 6  rioters , and how many of them were able to afford flights, hotels, and expensive gear. It’s not cheap to be an insurrectionist.) As Simon Kuper  noted  in 2020, the “comfortably off populist voter is the main force behind Trump, Brexit and Italy’s Lega,” a fact ignored by opportunistic politicians who instead claim to be acting on behalf of stereotypes of impoverished former factory workers, even if there are few such people left to represent.

One of the pioneers of pluto-populism, of course, is the late Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, a rake and a grifter who stayed in office as part of staying out of jail. That strategy should sound familiar to Americans, but even more familiar is the way the Italian scholar Maurizio Viroli, in a  book  about Italian politics, notes how Berlusconi deformed Italian democracy by seducing its elites into joining the big con against the ordinary voter: Italy, he wrote, is a free country, but Viroli calls such freedom the “liberty of servants,” a sop offered to people who are subjects in a new kind of democracy that is really just the “court at the center of which sits a  signore  surrounded by a plethora of courtiers, who are in turn admired and envied by a multitude of individuals with servile souls.”

The appeals of the pluto-populists work because they target people who care little about policy but a great deal about social revenge. These citizens feel like others whom they dislike are living good lives, which to them seems an injustice. Worse, this itching sense of resentment is the result not of unrequited love but of unrequited hate: Much like the townies who feel looked down upon by the local college kids, or the Red Sox fans who are infuriated that Yankees fans couldn’t care less about their tribal animus, these voters feel ignored and disrespected.

Who better to be the agent of their revenge than a crude and boorish magnate who commands attention, angers and frightens the people they hate, and intends to control the political system so that he cannot be touched by it?

Musk, for his part, is the perfect addition to this crew. Rich beyond imagination, he still has the wheedling affect of a needy youngster who requires (and demands) attention. Like Trump, he seems unable to believe that although money can buy many things—luxury digs, expensive lawyers, obsequious staff—it cannot buy   respect . For people such as Musk and Trump, this popular rejection is baffling and enraging.

Trump and those like him thus make a deal with the most resentful citizens in society:   Keep us up in the penthouses, and we’ll   harass your enemies   on your behalf. We’ll punish the people   you want punished .   In the end, however, the joke is always on the voters: The pluto-populists don’t care about the people cheering them on. Few scores will truly be settled, and life will only become harder for everyone who isn’t wealthy or powerful enough to resist the autocratic policies that such people will impose on everyone, regardless of their previous support.

When the dust settles, Trump and Vance will still be rich and powerful (as will Musk, whose fortune and power transcends borders in a way that right-wing populists usually claim to hate). For the many Americans who admire them, little will change; their lives will not improve, just as they did not during Trump’s first term. Millions of us, regardless of whom we voted for, will have to fend off interference in our lives from an authoritarian government—especially if we are, for example, a targeted minority, a woman in need of health care, or a member of a disfavored immigrant community.

This is not freedom: As Viroli warned his fellow citizens, “If we are subjected to the arbitrary or enormous power of a man, we may well be free to do more or less what we want, but we are still servants.”


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Hallux    2 weeks ago

Fellini would have had a field day with this cast of characterless characters. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Hallux @1    2 weeks ago

256 Check out the photo of Musk in the 90s and that hairline!

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2  Dismayed Patriot    2 weeks ago
A Donald Trump rally is always a strange spectacle, and not only because of the candidate’s incoherence and bizarre detours into mental cul-de-sacs.

trump-insists-his-weave-is-oratorical-genius-v0-ndax42msqmnd1.jpeg?auto=webp&s=efcca60468ae500863ba0137c641c4d8f564ea6c

One of the pioneers of pluto-populism, of course, is the late Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, a rake and a grifter who stayed in office as part of staying out of jail. "Italy," scholar Maurizio Viroli wrote "is a free country" but Viroli calls such freedom the “liberty of servants,” a sop offered to people who are subjects in a new kind of democracy that is really just the “court at the center of which sits a   signore    surrounded by a plethora of courtiers, who are in turn admired and envied by a multitude of individuals with servile souls.

It's sad, but I see evidence of those "servile souls" worshiping Trump daily. They regularly carry water for a vile lying narcissist, but they're so blinded by their bitter hatred for their fellow Americans they can't even see it. Trumps followers hate liberals and progressives with such an unmitigated passion they would rather bow down to this fat false God they have created than to admit that liberals and progressives are as American as they are. They have empowered Trump and without this base of abject moron boot lickers Trump would have no power.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2    2 weeks ago

You exaggerate. I don't hate liberals and progressives, many of whom are very fine people. But I get along with them because I respect their views even though I don't agree with them. But I despise the views and agendas of liberals and progressives as a whole because they seem intent in destroying our representative republic.

It's silly to call everyone who votes for Trump as abject moron boot lickers....it's half (or more) of the electorate, for heaven's sake. For those people, to vote for Harris would be irrational, irresponsible, and unpatriotic.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    2 weeks ago
don't hate liberals and progressives,

And study after study has shown it's progressives who are much more consumed by hate for Republicans than vice versa. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.1    2 weeks ago
And study after study has shown ...

Got links? Pew Research does not say so.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    2 weeks ago
they seem intent in destroying our representative republic

Yet they weren't the ones violently attacking the capital in an attempt to overturn election results because they lost.

it's half (or more) of the electorate, for heaven's sake.

It's not half by a long shot, Trump has never and never will get half of American voter's support. He loses by millions of votes in every national election he's been in. And yes, anyone choosing to vote for a convicted felon over a qualified candidate for President either doesn't care about our nation, has no shame or is a gullible simpleton who has been fooled by a lying conman.

For those people, to vote for Harris would be irrational, irresponsible, and unpatriotic.

Then clearly, they don't understand the meaning of rational, responsible or patriotic. Or, giving them the benefit of the doubt, they're blind deaf and dumb and don't understand what an election is or what they're voting for.

In November we will find out that once again, the VAST MAJORITY of Americans by millions, will not vote for dirty Donald, they know who he is and what a fucking stupid criminal loser he is. Sadly though, we'll also find out whether a bitter minority of Americans will get to decide the President and might pick that stupid loser and the rest of us will have to suffer through four years of until we can finally shut the door on this tragic period in American history where a minority saddled our nation with the most disgusting sack of shit our nation has ever produced.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3  Trout Giggles    2 weeks ago

Musk jumping around on that stage....is he a socially awkward animal or is he on the autism spectrum?

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    2 weeks ago

That's his inner gadfly pupating. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.2  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    2 weeks ago

it's the ketamine side effects ...

 
 

Who is online



Sparty On
Trout Giggles
Just Jim NC TttH
JohnRussell
Tacos!
Hallux
MonsterMash
Kavika
Drakkonis


331 visitors