Lies, Damned Lies and Trumpflation
Big worries — and some investment advice
Krugman has retired from the NY Times, but is now on Substack.
He's still the most incisive writer on current events.
And therefore still the most hated. 
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
If a pandemic breaks out, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, on orders from the White House, refuse to publish data on its spread, will it still kill people?
Yes, of course. And that's why I would be very cautious about buying TIPS — Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities.
I'll explain the apparent non sequitur later. First, let me note that concerns about suppressed data on infectious disease aren't hypothetical.
We currently have a major outbreak of bird flu, with serious concerns that it may already have spread to humans. Normally we'd be learning about the evolving risks from the CDC's flagship research publication, the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. But Donald Trump's appointees have politicized the historically independent report, telling it what and what not to cover. And the agency is already suppressing reports on bird flu.
OK, I am not an expert on epidemiology, although I've heard enough from people who are to be very nervous. I remember Trump's initial response to Covid, in which he showed no interest in trying to control the disease but was very eager to hold down the reported numbers — and he has much more power to suppress bad news this time around.
But while I'm not an epidemiologist, I do know something about inflation. And I'm getting very worried, not so much about the next few months as about what will happen a year or two down the road.
Wednesday's report on consumer prices came in hot, although Thursday's report on producer prices was more encouraging. And the Fed focuses on yet a third measure, which the people I follow expect to come in fairly benign. Monthly data are volatile, so you shouldn't overreact to any of this. And it's too soon to give Trump either blame or credit.
But inflation has been sticky enough that the Federal Reserve isn't likely to cut interest rates soon, if at all, a problem for Trump, who demanded rate cuts just hours before that consumer price report:
Interest Rates should be lowered, something which would go hand in hand with upcoming Tariffs!!! Lets Rock and Roll, America!!!
Beyond that, during the campaign Trump didn't just promise to reduce inflation; he promised that he would bring prices down. In August, standing in front of a table of packaged goods, he declared
Grocery prices have skyrocketed. When I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on day one.
Well, things aren't looking good on that front:
And almost everything Trump is doing or threatening to do to the economy will cause higher, not lower inflation. I don't know what if anything is going on in his mind when he asserts that tariffs will reduce prices, but tariffs are in fact sales taxes on imported goods, and does anyone think that sales taxes make stuff cheaper?
Then there are plans to deport large numbers of immigrants. Trump is reportedly angry that deportations aren't moving faster and has reassigned top officials at Immigration and Customs Enforcement. If he manages to pressure them into rushing things and we see large-scale roundups of immigrants — I'm not specifying illegal immigrants, because a rushed, pressured effort is likely to sweep up many legal immigrants too — the economic impact could be devastating. Grocery prices would be hit especially hard, because both agriculture and food processing, especially meatpacking, rely on immigrants for much of their work forces.
The one piece of Trump's economic agenda that at least sounds as if it could reduce inflation is his promise to increase energy production, presumably by eliminating environmental regulations so that fossil fuel companies can "Drill, baby, drill!"
So let's talk about why that won't work.
Basically, any large decline in energy prices would lead to a fall in production, driving prices right back up. In today's world, U.S. shale oil drillers are the marginal producers — the producers whose decisions set both a floor and a ceiling on overall oil prices. As I write this, the benchmark price of U.S. crude oil — the West Texas Intermediate price — is just over $70 a barrel.
And here's the thing: any substantial decline in prices from this point would make drilling new wells unprofitable in many U.S. oilfields:
This doesn't mean that production would stagnate; it would decline, as older fields get exhausted.
So even if you believe, wrongly, that regulation is a major barrier to energy production, there's no way Trump can engineer a major decline in prices.
Trump, then, obviously won't deliver on his promise to reduce prices, which was never credible. He won't even reduce inflation — the rate at which prices are rising. Instead, it seems highly likely that inflation will rise on his watch. This in turn means that the Fed won't cut interest rates, as he has been demanding, and may even raise them if the inflation picture gets ugly enough.
What happens then?
Right now the Fed is a quasi-independent institution run by technocrats, who set interest rates based on their assessment of what the economy needs rather than taking instructions from the executive branch. But Fed independence rests on political norms rather than any strong legal foundation. Given the fact that Trump has already shut down USAID, a blatantly illegal move, and effectively shuttered the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which also looks illegal, it's surely possible that he can find a way to force the Fed to cut interest rates even in the face of rising inflation.
Critics will point to the example of Turkey, whose authoritarian leader, like Trump, insisted that rates should go down, not up, in the face of rising inflation; the Erdogan regime didn't reverse course until inflation was above 80 percent. But Trump surely won't listen.
There's also another thing populist regimes do when inflation runs hot: lie about it. While Trump isn't a "populist" in the sense of caring about the working class, he does have a populist-style disdain for expertise. And one way to deal with bad economic numbers is to order the statistical agencies to produce better numbers. Most famously, in 2014 Argentina admitted that it had been deliberately understating inflation for the past 7 years.
Anyone who says "But they wouldn't do that!" has clearly been living under a rock the past few weeks. We're already seeing efforts to suppress bad news about infectious disease. Why assume that the same can't happen to bad news about inflation? I'm just waiting for the day when Elon Musk declares that everyone who works at the Bureau of Labor Statistics is a Marxist who hates America.
Which brings me to TIPS. These are U.S. government bonds whose future repayments are indexed to the Consumer Price Index, just like Social Security checks. So TIPS protect investors against future inflation, which can erode the purchasing power of ordinary bonds.
But let's be more precise here: TIPS protect you against future inflation that the U.S. government admits is happening . That has never been an issue in the past, because despite claims from right-wing conspiracy theorists, America has never cooked its economic books.
But there's a first time for everything.
More DOGE hijinks: In yesterday's post I noted that the whole condoms-for-Hamas thing came from DOGE staffers who confused Gaza province in Mozambique with the Gaza Strip. Well, as one commenter pointed out, the thing about 150-year-old Social Security beneficiaries may be another comical error. Apparently in COBOL — obsolete in the business world but still used in government — a missing date of birth is registered as 1875. Commenters on X and Threads say the same. So the only "fraud" here is the pretense that Musk's child programmers have any idea what they're doing.
Whatever
Tags
Who is online
61 visitors
Trump is in a race. His buffoonery pleases his base... but will ultimately hurt it badly. So which will last longer... ??
He's still the most incisive writer on current events.
Truly he's incomparable. No one else but the most partisan pundit in america could favor us with such incisive commentary as this Nostradamus like analysis from 1998 : “The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in ‘Metcalfe’s law’—which states that the number of potential connections in a network is proportional to the square of the number of participants—becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet’s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine’s.”
Way to go back 27 years to find something to bitch about.
14 years ago Trump pitched a fit about Obama not being born in Hawaii even though the state of Hawaii had already by that time twice stated that officials had personally examined Obamas original birth certificate in the state archives.
That will be a great rebuttal if I ever call the Trump the most honest person in the world.
You do realize that you're demonstrating my proposition...
Trump lies the way others draw breath. Did you see his facial expressions and tone when a reporter asked if he was involved in dropping charges against Adams? It was identical to when he was asked about paying off Stormy Daniels, where he pivoted to “Michael Cohen is my lawyer, you’d have to ask him.” He said he didn’t even know it happened. This is the most shameless human on earth.
... And his adorators adore him all the more..
His base still refuses to understand he truly hates them.
He hates they didn't come out in large enough numbers to vote and give him a landslide over Biden for a second term.
His base caused him the embarrassment of asking for 11k plus votes and Raffensberger confirmed there was no voter fraud, Trump just lost.
Then the "stop the steal" campaign to discredit his genuine loss was total garbage.
Trump is vindictive to a fault, so payback to his base is coming and taking everyone else down is collateral damage and icing on his cake.
Excellent post.
How many people showed up for the first Trump inauguration? The second?
A million football fans took off from work yesterday to celebrate an NFL football team's Super Bowl victory.
During the prior administration, the CDC was informing us that there was little risk of a pandemic from the bird flu. And the CDC does not concern itself with the health of livestock.
Tariffs will not increase the cost of various types of insurance, education, childcare, health care, and rent & housing. These are the bigger drains on family pocketbooks. Tariffs won't have a dramatic impact on costs of telecommunications, entertainment, and recreation; although the tariffs may limit buying the next new thing. These are the 'luxury' expenditures that eat up a large portions of disposable income.
Krugman, it seems, is grasping at straws. (And, no, we do not need to import straw.)
Alas all of those entities live in the real world and as consumers will also have to play in the Tariff Minefield Herr A-hole is bent on deploying.
Tariffs only apply to imported goods and services. Are you telling me that the United States is now importing insurance? Or childcare?
The claim that tariffs will have an overwhelming impact on consumer pocketbooks proves, beyond rebuttal, that the United States has been betrayed by free trade. Free trade has weakened the United States and threatened the security and sovereignty of the United States.
The era of free trade and monetary policy is being replaced by a return to strategic trade and industrial policy.
Tariffs are going to affect the costs of doing business, because businesses need supplies regardless of what they provide. Before you know it our old friend “supply chain issues” will be the ubiquitous catch all excuse why everything under the sun is more expensive (legit or otherwise), and the issue will center on added expense in said supply chain. Fact is, if people are suffering the effects of increased inflation, they will increase the prices that are under their control to make up for it whether that’s fair or not. Trump’s pig can wear whatever lipstick you are trying to slather on it, but it (and he) is still a pig.
Yup
No, what I am telling you is those services and people who work for them will still need imported goods and they will of necessity pass the higher costs on.
Why would insurance services need imported goods? Workers, as consumers, are spending large portions of their income on goods and services that will not be significantly impacted by tariffs.
The tariffs shouldn't affect domestic grain products like corn syrup, corn starch, wheat flour, or liquor. The tariffs shouldn't affect domestic meat products. The tariffs shouldn't affect domestic vegetables and fruits.
The tariffs shouldn't have a significant impact on construction but they will simply because our domestic production has been offshored. (Hint: That's one of the things tariffs are supposed to correct.)
Because the people who work for insurance companies drive cars built from imported parts that run on often imported fuels and batteries and communicate on imported cell phones and work on imported computers in offices largely constructed from imported elements. You really don't get it, do you?
Cars and trucks made in Mexico or Canada? Potentially a 25% increase in pick up trucks across the board?
The stupid steel and aluminum used to make the stupid cars regardless of where the cars or trucks are built?
JFC! The tariffs and the closure of USAID is fucking farmers in the butt, right now, today. Trump's freeze includes all of the IRA contracts made with farmers to make certain improvements to the farms and access.
Those payments are being witheld by the current Administration.
Business 101 class, you, the farmer just lost $100K profit and access to overseas markets; are you going to throw in the towel and declare bankruptcy or raise the price for whatever grain y'all have left.
What does that even mean? Construction uses iron, steel and aluminum. Laborers will be in short supply.
Construction costs have already risen.
Oh, I get it. I'm just not buying what you're selling.
There aren't tariffs on used vehicles. The biggest buyers of new vehicles are rental car agencies. Government agencies also buy up a large portion of new vehicles; look at all those police cruisers. How often do individual consumers buy new cars?
Why does all this make me think of the movie "Life is Beautiful"?
Comedy is tragedy + time?
I think of it as similar to painting lipstick on a pig.