╌>

Gordian Knots

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  5 hours ago  •  72 comments

Gordian Knots
“We’ve dedicated the – almost the entirety of the president’s first hundred days in office at the highest levels possible to trying to achieve a peace here,” Rubio said. “And if it’s going to happen, we want to help. But if it’s not going to happen, we need to know now because we have other things we have to deal with.”

Link to quote: Running out of patience, Trump could abandon peace negotiations in Russia's war on Ukraine


The final term of the Trump Presidency has been dedicated to fixing the big problems, the ones that were kicked down the road. Some are really hard issues. At this point, which is only the beginning, Trump is up against a lot. The latest polling shows that the President is losing support because of it:

24themorning-nl-approval-ratings-jumbo-v2.jpg
The New York Times

I decided to take a look at the most difficult issues that Trump has taken on and seeing how he is faring 100 days into his final term.

The Ukraine war:   Sadly, this looks like one that couldn't be peacefully solved. Both sides would rather fight on than give up even on the most unrealistic of outcomes. Zelensky is talking about getting back the Crimea, which was taken from him in another war and possibly becoming a NATO member, which nobody wants. Putin on the other hand has obviously sought to drag out the negotiations conceding nothing. Europe has thus far paid lip service to stepping up and giving Ukraine an iron clad guarantee of security. The Secretary of State is right, and enough time has been spent on this. This is one that Trump cannot solve.

Trade Deals: This is another complex matter that the world is resisting. Trump wants fair trade deals and he wants what Obama said we could never have back - America's manufacturing sector. Trump set up some strong negotiation positions, but them gave countries a 90 day pause to negotiate terms. We are getting late into the 90-day window. On the positive side Scott Bessent has emerged as a widely respected negotiator and the voice of reason in the matter. He alone has been able to calm financial markets. Trump desperately needs a deal soon.

Legislation: As with his first term, congressional Republicans are taking a long time in enacting the President's agenda into legislation. The most important, politically, is preserving the Trump tax cut, which will mean so much for the economy. Many other important issues also need to be enacted into law. The longer it takes, the higher the stakes will be in the midterm elections. The verdict is still out on this one.

The Border: This is the one Trump delivered on immediately. The border is secure and only the matter of deportations is an issue. I expect Trump to easily win the problem he is having with District judges when the issue is taken up by the SCOTUS on May 15th. A majority of the Court has long told district judges to stop with the nationwide injunctions. Since Trump's inauguration, the injunctions have come in fast & furious. I expect the district judges to finally be have their authority limited to their districts.


In the news:

Go8bydQWIAAEhH1?format=jpg&name=360x360

"On Monday, the Department of Justice dropped two major indictments involving 27 members of Tren de Aragua on Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations charges. The alleged crimes range from sex and drug trafficking to racketeering to firearms crimes.

"Of the 27 defendants, 21 are in federal custody, including 16 who were already in federal criminal, immigration, or state custody and five who were arrested last night and today in operations in New York and other jurisdictions," a Monday  media release  from the Department of Justice read.

The indictment alleged that the gang's purpose included "[p]reserving and protecting the power and territory of TdA and its members and associates through acts involving murder, assault, robbery, other acts of violence, and threats of violence, including acts of violence and threats of violence directed at former members and associates of TdA who associated with a splinter organization known as Anti-Tren."

Pam Bondi Drops the Hammer, Begins Bringing RICO Charges

Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, said that the tariff levels between the U.S. and China were not sustainable.

Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois, the chamber's No. 2 Democrat, announced that he would not seek reelection next year.

President Trump blasted Vladimir Putin on Thursday and urged the Russian president to “STOP!” after Moscow launched its deadliest attack on Ukraine in almost a year.


 


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    5 hours ago

Good morning and welcome to the news.

From St. Peter's Square:

24themorning-nl-April3-zbkw-jumbo.jpg
Tomas Munita for The New York Times

The Pope wanted the very plain box for his coffin. He was after all a man of the left. May the new Pope be a man of the Church.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 hours ago
He was after all a man of the left. May the new Pope be a man of the Church.

pathetic ...

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.2  Tacos!  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 hours ago

What is it you think the church is supposed to be about that you think this is in opposition to it?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Tacos! @1.2    2 hours ago

seems to be a case of savior worship confusion ...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2  devangelical    5 hours ago

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @2    5 hours ago

We know. That is what we will hear from the leftwing media.

He tried for peace.

Biden didn't.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    4 hours ago

putin wasn't going to listen to any american leader then or now. trump is only interested in saving putin and russia for selfish commercial reasons. trump and putin are equally untrustworthy. I already equate maga with russian collaborators.

russia ranks below mexico in GNP and putin has one foot in the grave. ukraine has done all the heavy lifting in decimating russia for europe and the west. they are our nation's enemy, their economy is in ruins, they have lost their military influence in the world, and now is the time to finish them off by letting their coming internal power struggle run it's course. their corrupt military leadership will sell all access to their nuke stockpiles for profit and to save their own skins.

ukraine gave up it's nukes for a guarantee of sovereignty from russia and they need to be held to that deal. russia will withdraw to the borders established when that agreement was made and then start reparation payments with their oil once sanctions are relaxed, or the US should resupply ukraine with a like number of nukes they gave up, preferably attached to cruise missiles.

maga is already on the wrong side of the pending constitutional crisis. they should go all in by taking the side of our 80 year enemy and then watch what happens next in this country ...

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
2.1.2  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    4 hours ago

This is not a left or right thing. It is a reality thing.

Biden understood that Putin is evil. Trump didn't.

Today, Putin did his worst bombing of Kyiv. Hundreds are dead.

You can't make peace with an evil man.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.2    4 hours ago

Even if Putin were a decent human being, there is no way that Zelensky is getting Crimea back or ever being a NATO member.

I hate Putin as well, but neither side has been reasonable.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @2.1.1    4 hours ago
ukraine gave up it's nukes for a guarantee of sovereignty from russia

Who did they make that deal with?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.5  Greg Jones  replied to  devangelical @2.1.1    3 hours ago
putin wasn't going to listen to any american leader then or now. trump is only interested in saving putin and russia for selfish commercial reasons. trump and putin are equally untrustworthy. I already equate maga with russian collaborators.

It's stupid and ignorant comment like this that has made the left a party of losers and whiners that won't win elections for the foreseeable future. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.6  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1.5    3 hours ago
a party of losers and whiners that won't win elections for the foreseeable future

looks to me like somebody in the white house has got that handled ...

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2.1.7  Tacos!  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    2 hours ago
That is what we will hear from the leftwing media.

Yeah, it sucks when someone tries to hold him accountable for the shit he says. Don’t these people know that the purpose of journalism is to promote the great leader in all things?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.8  devangelical  replied to  Tacos! @2.1.7    an hour ago

that definitely isn't trumpski's version of freedom of the press ...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  author  Vic Eldred    5 hours ago

"Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin is demanding  a company that deliberately sends sulfur dioxide into the air to combat global warming provide detailed information on its practices. Critics of the practice, which is called geoengineering, say it puts potentially harmful pollutants into the air and needs more oversight. 

The company Zeldin is scrutinizing,  Make Sunsets , sells “ cooling credits .” The credits pay to launch  weather balloons  made of biodegradable latex containing hydrogen and sulfur dioxide. According to the company, each $5 credit it sells offsets the warming impact of one ton of carbon dioxide for one year. "

EPA head demands answers from company putting sulfur dioxide into the air to address global warming | Just The News

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  author  Vic Eldred    5 hours ago

This from Wesley J Smith:

"The Canadian health care system is melting down — and yet the country still embraces  radical euthanasia policies .

Here’s a current example: A woman injured in an auto accident has waited  nearly two years  for a consultation with a spinal surgeon — despite now having to use a wheelchair. So, she wants to come to the U.S. for a simple diagnosis, which will cost $40,000! From the CBC  story :

A London woman injured in a car crash says she’s left with no choice but to pay to see a doctor in the United States after waiting almost two years for a diagnosis from an Ontario spine surgeon.

Sydney Gesualdi was rear-ended at a red light in July 2023, after which she was initially diagnosed with whiplash and tissue damage. In the weeks that followed, the 25-year-old lost the ability to walk, started having trouble swallowing and speaking, and had numbness in her face and limbs.

“None of these symptoms have gone away, and it’s been almost two years,” Gesualdi said. “I’m 25 and I can’t walk.”

She now has to use a wheelchair and wears a neck brace at all times. Gesualdi’s family physician has referred her to eight doctors at spinal clinics across the province, but so far, she’s been denied a consultation.

CBC News has seen the rejections from Toronto Western Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) and Trillium Spine Centre. Wait times and heavy caseloads are cited as the reason for not taking the patient, as well as the condition potentially being outside the scope of practice.

What a bitter tragedy. Ill and disabled Canadians with non-life-threatening but serious conditions have no assurance of prompt medical care, and some people wait in agony for many months — or, as in this case, years — to receive proper clinical services.

In Canada, Euthanasia Might Be Easier to Access Than Medical Care | National Review

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5  author  Vic Eldred    5 hours ago

"A Democratic New Mexico judge who had an alleged Tren de Aragua gang member living in his home has been permanently banned from the bench by his colleagues, according to state Supreme Court documents.

AA1Dt8sb.img?w=768&h=516&m=6&x=305&y=173&s=236&d=236

Jose “Joel” Cano resigned in March after agents from the US Department of Homeland Security arrested suspected TdA gang member Cristhian Ortega-Lopez at Cano’s home in February.

The discipline handed down by the Supreme Court of New Mexico makes it so: Cano “can never hold a judicial office again, be a candidate for a judicial office, and cannot exercise any judicial authority in the state.”

Dem Judge Joel Cano banned by New Mexico Supreme Court after alleged Tren de Aragua gang member arrested in his home

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    4 hours ago

meh, so much for presumed innocence thru due process, huh maga?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @5.1    4 hours ago

A judge hiding a criminal, huh the fucking left?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.1.1    14 minutes ago
A judge hiding a criminal

... you mean like SCOTUS did?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    4 hours ago

Lol. Perfectly encapsulates the current moment. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.2    4 hours ago

Yet another complex problem that Trump is trying to fix.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2.2  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.1    3 hours ago

... like he's fixing the US economy.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6  JohnRussell    4 hours ago
This is one that Trump cannot solve.

An interesting and pathetic concession. The claim he could end the war in one day was one of Trumps most prominent campaign promises. 

He could have done something if he had approached it as a necessity to extract concessions from BOTH sides.  But as the clueless subservient fool he is he took Putins part virtually to the exclusion of anything else.  Zelenskyy sees right through it, and stiffens his own position as a response.  Now Trump is left holding an empty water logged paper bag in his role as "peacemaker".  What if Ukraine would rather go down fighting than agree to national humiliation?  If and when that happens Trump's position as one of America and The West's greatest traitors will be set in stone. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @6    4 hours ago

Did you read?

Zelensky wants Crimea back!  He wants to be in NATO!  He is as bad as Putin.

Trump can't bring peace if neither side wants it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1    4 hours ago

Trump should have demanded a complete cease fire, and then facilitated negotiations over a period of time, most likely a long period of time.

He is in fact a terrible peace broker, because all he thinks about is his own immediate gratification. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.1    4 hours ago
rump should have demanded a complete cease fire, and then facilitated negotiations over a period of time, most likely a long period of time.

Why didn't biden just do that then?   If a President can control both sides and make them accept whatever terms he wants, what the hell was Biden doing for three years besides napping? 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
PhD Guide
6.1.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.1    4 hours ago
Trump should have demanded a complete cease fire, and then facilitated negotiations over a period of time, most likely a long period of time.

Unfortunately he lives in the real world and knows that would never fly with either side.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
PhD Guide
6.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @6    4 hours ago
Zelenskyy sees right through it, and stiffens his own position as a response.

Wow, blaming Trump for Zelensky being unreasonable.  That is quite the stretch.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.3  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @6    3 hours ago
"What if Ukraine would rather go down fighting than agree to national humiliation?"  
Well. let them!
Zelensky has pretty much shown he doesn't care about the Ukrainian people, as long as his reputation as a egotistical heroic leader remains intact. It's past time to end US involvement
 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.3.1  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @6.3    3 hours ago

trump is a russian asset ...

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
PhD Guide
6.3.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  devangelical @6.3.1    2 hours ago

And the Pee tape is real.  S/

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  JohnRussell    4 hours ago

[deleted][]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @7    4 hours ago
where ? 

Right where it says: IN THE NEWS

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8  JohnRussell    4 hours ago
President Trump blasted Vladimir Putin on Thursday and urged the Russian president to “STOP!” after Moscow launched its deadliest attack on Ukraine in almost a year.

maxresdefault.jpg

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @8    4 hours ago

Yup, Putin is 50% of the problem.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
8.1.1  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.1    4 hours ago

Hardly. He is 100% of the problem, since he was the one who invaded. And if he wins this one, he will move on to Poland. He has already hinted at it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @8.1.1    4 hours ago
since he was the one who invaded.

Then we must go to war with him?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8.1.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @8.1.1    4 hours ago
nd if he wins this one, he will move on to Poland. He has already hinted at it.

He's spent three years trying to conquer Ukraine. How in the hell could he succeed against a much stronger country,even if NATO didn't get involved? 

 Ukraine has exposed how weak Russia is.  This was supposed to be a six week war. The last thing Putin's going to do is start a war with NATO after what has been a debacle for him in Ukraine. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.1.2    4 hours ago

meh, no need for war if we start doxing putin's friends in this country and let human nature run it's course ...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.1.5  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @8.1.4    4 hours ago
if we start doxing putin's friends in this country

That is an interesting comment. Have you got the personal info on those you consider Putin's friends?

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
8.1.6  charger 383  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.1.2    4 hours ago

No! Let Ukraine fight him for us.  Supply them and they will wear him down.  Our troops don't get shoot but Putin's do.  

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
PhD Guide
8.1.7  Right Down the Center  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @8.1.1    4 hours ago

He is 100 percent of the problem why the war started.  Since both sides seem to have deal breaker demands they are both the reason there will be no peace.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
8.1.8  charger 383  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.1.3    4 hours ago

Best time to support somebody already fighting your enemy is when the enemy is weak and wore down.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.1.9  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  charger 383 @8.1.6    4 hours ago

That was the strategy of the previous administration. Europe may now go on with it.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
8.1.10  charger 383  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.1.9    4 hours ago

What it costs us to break Russia will be well worth it

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8.1.11  Sean Treacy  replied to  charger 383 @8.1.8    3 hours ago

If we weren't broke, or if the Russian army were a threat to the US, I'd be more open to that. We spent a ton of money, more than the Marshall plan, to weaken the russian army.  Our strategic goal has been accomplished. 

Germany and the Eastern European countries should be borrowing money and sending as much aid they possibly can, not us. Russia is much more a threat to them, than us. The Russian army is as much a threat to the US as Pakistan's at this point. It can cause damage locally, but it's distinctly second tier.  

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
8.1.12  charger 383  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.1.11    3 hours ago

why lrt them recover? and get to be more of a threat

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.13  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.1.5    3 hours ago
Have you got the personal info on those you consider Putin's friends?

some people should be more concerned with what information they disclose on the internet ...

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
8.1.14  charger 383  replied to  devangelical @8.1.4    3 hours ago

So long as that does not have anything to do with members of this site

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.15  devangelical  replied to  charger 383 @8.1.14    3 hours ago

reading the personal information that others have disclosed on the internet isn't a crime ...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8.1.16  Sean Treacy  replied to  charger 383 @8.1.12    3 hours ago
hy lrt them recover? and get to be more of a threat

How would that be possible?  First, China is propping them up economically  and we can't stop them from doing that. But Ukraine is the last, desperate roll of the dice of a dying Russia. For the all the reasons Ukraine is in trouble, they apply just as much to Russia. It's a dying country with an aging and sick population. While in a better position than Ukraine, they can't afford the losses they've taken either.  They simply don't have the human capital to maintain an aggressive posture towards Europe. Russians, particularly ethnic Russians, are dying off and not replacing themselves. There simply won't be enough Russians to threaten Europe in a decade or two.

A Russian recovery to what Russia was in the say the 1980s, if it were to happen,  will take generations. It's so remote that worrying about is pointless.  At this point, the near term trends are irreversible.  It's such a desperate issue Russia is kidnapping kids because there is such a shortage.  All we have to do now is let the wounded bear bleed out and keep it from nuking anyone on the way out.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.17  devangelical  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.1.16    3 hours ago
There simply won't be enough Russians to threaten Europe in a decade or two.

... finish them off now while the opportunity is ripe.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
8.1.18  charger 383  replied to  devangelical @8.1.17    2 hours ago

That's what we should do

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
8.1.19  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  devangelical @8.1.15    36 minutes ago

But doxing is against this site. Just FYI

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
8.1.20  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.1.2    30 minutes ago
Then we must go to war with him?

We are not going to war with him. We are just supporting the other side. There was a time that the US was concerned about totalitarian states and that is what Russia is.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
8.1.21  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.1.11    27 minutes ago

You do realize that was what we thought when Germany marched into Poland. That didn't work out so well.

I agree that Europe should help pay, but we can't afford to let Russia gain Ukraine as they did with Crimea, and then regroup and go on to the next ex-USSR satellite state.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.22  devangelical  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @8.1.19    20 minutes ago

no worries, I can take care of my own interests ...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9  Sean Treacy    4 hours ago

If Ukraine doesn't like the proposal it can always keep fighting.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @9    4 hours ago

I think they will fight on. The question will be how does it end?

As John Imbriale used to say, "Too close to call!"

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1    4 hours ago
The question will be how does it end?

Nothing's ever certain, but there seems to be no reasonable reason to believe it gets better for Ukraine. Russia continues to grind Ukraine up and advance foot by foot.  They enjoy the manpower advantage and with ongoing support from  China and North Korean there's no reason to expect an economic or logistical collapse that would allow Ukraine to launch a successful offensive.  Just more dead Ukrainians, just more lost land and more of their country destroyed.  All of those things make rebuilding much more difficult.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.1    3 hours ago
but there seems to be reasonable reason to believe it gets better for Ukraine.

If Ukraine does come out of it on top, they will emerge as the most powerful military nation in Europe.  I do wish them well.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
9.1.3  charger 383  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.2    3 hours ago

and It would be good to be with the winning side

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.2    3 hours ago
ey will emerge as the most powerful military nation in Europe.  I do wish them well.

I don't think that's possible. There aren't that many Ukrainians left and those that remain aren't having kids. As long as human soldiers matter, countries that are in population death spirals are going to have a very hard time maintaining strong armies.   An independent Ukraine will likely be a client state of Germany and Poland. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10  author  Vic Eldred    3 hours ago

"Parting is such sweet sorrow"

GpOLSD0a4AAnCPv?format=jpg&name=small

I'll be back in a few

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
11  Nerm_L    3 hours ago

On this 94th day of the 2nd Trump term, what have we learned so far? 

We've learned that Joe Biden dragging the United States into another European quagmire was a really, really stupid thing to do.  Ukraine cannot win.  Vladimir Putin wants a stalemate.  And NATO wants the US taxpayers to pay for everything.  The progressive left has harped about Russian aggression to cover their own duplicity and waste of taxpayer money.  When did Russia invade Ukraine?  Was it 2022, 2014, or 1992?  All this started when Bill Clinton occupied the West Wing.  And we're just enjoying another Clinton dividend.

We've learned that the progressive left has flipped 180 on labor.  The progressive left is now telling us that manufacturing won't come back because the progressive left demanded higher wages, more benefits, and support for labor unions.  The progressive left is telling manufacturing cannot come back to the United States because of the progress left.  What an eye opener.  Here's the next question for the progress left:  If the US can't afford to manufacture then why are we wasting so much taxpayer money on science and innovation?  R&D expenditures are supposed to benefit our economy but, according to the progressive left, that's impossible because we can't afford the labor costs.  That's even more stupid than dragging US taxpayers into a European quagmire to score political points.

In three short months we've learned that US taxpayers have been carrying the interconnected global order piggyback since Bill Clinton signed NAFTA.  And the progressive left has confirmed that was the plan from the beginning.  Without free money from the United States the entire world collapses.  Germany is replacing the United States with increased deficit spending.  Shouldn't the tell us something important?  China faces economic collapse because it has been denied access to American consumers.  Shouldn't that tell us something important?  Without the United States every threat to humankind, from climate change to pandemic, becomes existential.  Shouldn't that tell us something important?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
11.1  devangelical  replied to  Nerm_L @11    3 hours ago

it's going to be hilarious when maga catholics and evangelicals are finally reduced to worshiping under tents and in large shipping containers, with services being led by a volunteer that has a real job the other 6 days a week ...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
11.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  devangelical @11.1    3 hours ago

You mean, when the followers of Allah have become the dominant faith in America?

That is their long-term goal as exemplified by the growing antisemitic movement in the US

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
11.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @11.1.1    2 hours ago

it won't matter to me which sect of thumpers attempt to breach the establishment clause of the constitution ...

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
11.1.3  Nerm_L  replied to  devangelical @11.1    an hour ago
it's going to be hilarious when maga catholics and evangelicals are finally reduced to worshiping under tents and in large shipping containers, with services being led by a volunteer that has a real job the other 6 days a week ...

I suspect that even you don't know what that means.  Are you turning into a Reagan Republican?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
11.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Nerm_L @11.1.3    an hour ago
Are you turning into a Reagan Republican?

why would I idolize a child molesting, cocaine distributing, war criminal and traitor?

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
11.1.5  Nerm_L  replied to  devangelical @11.1.4    58 minutes ago
why would I idolize a child molesting, cocaine distributing, war criminal and traitor?

That seems to be what grifters do to butter their bread.  Didn't Jeffrey Epstein cater to the progressive left?  

 
 

Who is online



Jack_TX


65 visitors