╌>

Trump Treasury Chief Drops Absurd Dodge When Asked Point-Blank if Trump Spoke to Xi

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  john-russell  •  last year  •  23 comments

Trump Treasury Chief Drops Absurd Dodge When Asked Point-Blank if Trump Spoke to Xi

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T







Mediaite by  Tommy Christopher

1h










Treasury Secretary   Scott Bessent   dropped an absurd dodge when confronted about whether or not President   Donald Trump   has spoken with China’s President   Xi Jinping , and after evading another question about trade negotiations with China.

Trump has been jousting with Chinese officials over whether or not the Asian superpower has been seeking a deal to avoid the massive tariffs that have been escalating in recent weeks. China   claims there have been   no talks, while Trump has claimed there have —   and that   Xi has called him personally.

At Tuesday’s  White House  press  briefing , Bessent joined White House Press Secretary  Karoline Leavitt   for the second early session this week amid a PR offensive pegged to Trump’s first 100 days in office.

CBS News White House correspondent  Weijia Jiang   pressed Bessent on those claims, and among the evasions Bessent threw at her was a priceless note about White House job responsibilities:


WEIJIA JIANG: Thank you so much, Karoline. Thank you, Mr. Secretary.

The Chinese continue to say that the U.S. And Chinese are not engaged in any consultation or negotiation on tariffs. You recently said you’ve talked to your counterpart, but more about, quote, “traditional things, like financial stability.”.

So can you clarify, is the administration talking to Beijing specifically about tariffs or not?

SECRETARY SCOTT BESSENT: Well, we’re not going to talk about who’s talking to whom, but I think that over time we will see that the Chinese tariffs are unsustainable for China.

I’ve seen some very large numbers over the past few days that show if these numbers stay on, Chinese could lose 10 million jobs very quickly and even if there is a drop and the tariffs, that they could lose five million jobs.

Remember that we are the deficit country. They sell almost five times more goods to us than we sell to them. So the onus will be on them to take off these tariffs. They’re unsustainable for them.

WEIJIA JIANG: And they are saying you guys are not talking about it. So is that true?

SECRETARY SCOTT BESSENT: Look, they have a different form of government. They’re playing to a different audience.

So I’m not going to get into the nitty-gritty again of who’s talking to whom. But as I said, I believe for the Chinese, these tariffs are unsustainable.

KAROLINE LEAVITT:   Bloomberg . Go ahead.

WEIJIA JIANG: Very quickly, two days ago, you said you didn’t know if President Trump had spoken to Xi Jinping. Do you know now?

SECRETARY SCOTT BESSENT: Again, I would say Karoline and I have a lot of jobs around the White House. Running the switchboard isn’t one of them.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

No one can say with any level of confidence that what this administration says is true.  Not once in a while here and there, but every hour of every day. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year

Knowing what's being said and how it's being said and by whom at MY end of this issue, I'm convinced that China is dealing with this with an impenetrable "Great Wall".  China is NOT going to back down becaue it knows, just as most expert economists know, that it is the USA that is going to be hurt much more than China.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
2  Gsquared    last year

When he was first nominated as Treasury Secretary I had heard that at least Bessent was a highly intelligent, capable centrist type.  After observing his performance in office so far, the conclusion is he is weak and pathetic.

 
 
 
fineline
Freshman Silent
2.1  fineline  replied to  Gsquared @2    last year

Just another bag-licker wanna-be sidekick. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  fineline @2.1    last year

He has to be or he will be bounced

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3  Bob Nelson    last year

It's all perfectly comprehensible. Just start with the postulate that these people have no idea what they're doing and it all becomes clear.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4  Tacos!    last year

These incompetent morons are obviously lying. Negotiate now???? Why tf would anyone talk to us about a trade deal? We could have negotiated 100 days ago, but instead, that jackass opened with tariffs. We had trade deals all over the place, and he broke them. Trump, who is so fond of bragging about leverage and holding the cards or whatever, has destroyed any leverage we might have had. 

To make matters worse, Congress - which could and should stop it - is letting it happen.

We cannot be trusted, as a country. You would have to be a fool to make a deal with us now.

And so the president, his press secretary, the cabinet, and all the Republicans in Washington, know they have fucked us all. Rather than learn from their fuck up and try to fix it, they are going to go around pretending that it’s working. 

And apparently, our journalists, and all the MAGA faithful, are just going to go along with these bullshit stories of ongoing negotiations as if any of it could plausibly be true.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
4.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tacos! @4    last year
And apparently, our journalists, and all the MAGA faithful, are just going to go along with these bullshit stories of ongoing negotiations as if any of it could plausibly be true.

Why would they lie?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1    last year
Why would they lie?

So morons will continue to support them.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
4.2  Bob Nelson  replied to  Tacos! @4    last year

I'm confused, too. Does anyone think it's smart to negotiate with a bully? Never! 

What nation would be wise to negotiate with Trump? None! 

So now these idiots have no solution.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5  Greg Jones    last year

"Well, we’re not going to talk about who’s talking to whom, but I think that over time we will see that the Chinese tariffs are unsustainable for China.

I’ve seen some very large numbers over the past few days that show if these numbers stay on, Chinese could lose 10 million jobs very quickly and even if there is a drop and the tariffs, that they could lose five million jobs.

Remember that we are the deficit country. They sell almost five times more goods to us than we sell to them. So the onus will be on them to take off these tariffs. They’re unsustainable for them."

None of the "experts" here on NT knows exactly what's going on behind the scenes. The glory days for China are coming to an end

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Greg Jones @5    last year
"None of the "experts" here on NT knows exactly what's going on behind the scenes."

I think I know more about what's going on in China, and I know that China intends to let the USA hang itself.

"The glory days for China are coming to an end."

A comment that is so "unsustainable" that it should be used as stand-up comedian material. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Hallux  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @5.1    last year

Mao put China through the egg, larva and pupa stages, Xi cracked open the chrysalis and what emerged to my eyes was a butterfly ... Americans saw Mothra.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Hallux @5.1.1    last year
what emerged to my eyes was a butterfly

I would imagine a totalitarian  regime that denies its own citizens basic human rights like the ability to speak freely and puts dissenters in concentration camps appeals to a lot of leftist.  Murder a few million here, a few million there.  It's just a statistic. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.1.3  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.2    last year
It's just a statistic.

Can you name a nation without blood on its hands? America damn well isn't in that group.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Hallux @5.1.3    last year

I see a difference between machine gunning thousands of your own citizens engaged in peaceful protest and arresting them, much like I can differentiate between jaywalking and mass murder.  False equivalences are a thing. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.1.5  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.2    last year

Imagination is not one of your strong points.

I know of no 'leftists' who think that way. Now I can't speak for the one true 'leftist' I met back in the1960s ... I believe he died from abject loneliness circa the advent of Disco.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5.1.6  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Hallux @5.1.1    last year
"Americans saw Mothra."

They have to.  They can't handle the competition.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5.1.7  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Hallux @5.1.3    last year

Every nation has its warts, and usually the histories are a lot worse than the present time.  I discount criticism of a country by a person who has never been there.  As Canadians, we're happy with our nation, and Trump is goading us into appreciating it more than ever. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5.2  Bob Nelson  replied to  Greg Jones @5    last year

The US is 15% of China‘s economy..

Think about it.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Bob Nelson @5.2    last year
The US is 15% of China‘s economy..

China is 13% of the US economy. Think about that. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5.2.2  Bob Nelson  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.2.1    last year

Do you imagine that I believe anything you post?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.2.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Bob Nelson @5.2.2    last year

People who believe in conspiracies often don't believe facts.  Those who believe in facts can easily verify what I said.  For people who don't have google:

According to U.S. statistics, imports from China fell from 21.6 percent of total U.S. imports in 2018 to 13.4 percent in 2024. The nominal value fell from $505 billion to $439 billion, a $66 billion decline.

https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2025/02/u-s-imports-from-china-have-fallen-by-less-than-u-s-data-indicate/#:~:text=As%20shown%20in%20the%20chart,billion%2C%20a%20$66%20billion%20decline.

 
 

Who is online