╌>

Donald Trump Sentenced to 'Unconditional Discharge' for His Felonies. Here's What That Means

  
Via:  George  •  3 hours ago  •  32 comments

By:   New York (Yahoo News)

Donald Trump Sentenced to 'Unconditional Discharge' for His Felonies. Here's What That Means
The president-elect's historic sentencing on Friday, Jan. 10, did not result in any real penalty for his crimes

Leave a comment to auto-join group Over moderated

Over moderated


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The president-elect's historic sentencing on Friday, Jan. 10, did not result in any real penalty for his crimes


Kyler AlvordFri, January 10, 2025 at 3:08 PM UTC4 min read

Blondet Eliot/ABACA/Shutterstock

President-elect Donald Trump attends the reopening ceremony of Notre-Dame Cathedral in Paris on Dec. 7, 2024Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways

President-elect Donald Trump received a historic sentence on Friday, Jan. 10, from New York Judge Juan Merchan, dodging jail time and instead getting "unconditional discharge" for his 34 felony convictions.

He appeared virtually from Florida for his sentencing on Friday morning at the Manhattan Criminal Courthouse in New York City. The hearing was scheduled at the last minute so that the case could get closure before Inauguration Day, and Trump's frantic attempts to cancel his sentencing were rejected by the New York State Court of Appeals and U.S. Supreme Court.

Before the sentence was handed down, prosecutor Joshua Steinglass said that — while the Manhattan District Attorney's Office ultimately recommended unconditional discharge out of respect for the office of the presidency — he did not want to downplay Trump's "unsubstantiated attacks" on the rule of law and his "coordinated campaign" to undermine the jury's conclusion.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

Related: Supreme Court Refuses to Stop Donald Trump's Criminal Sentencing in 'Hush Money' Case

Trump — who will be sworn in as United States president for a second time on Monday, Jan. 20 — was previously found guilty by 12 jurors of falsifying several business records to conceal a plot to tilt the 2016 presidential election in his favor.

With the unanimous guilty verdict, he became the first sitting or former U.S. president to be convicted of a crime. His charges carried up to four years in prison at the court's discretion.

Related: Donald Trump Found Guilty on All Counts in Historic Criminal Trial, Making Him a Convicted Felon

ANGELA WEISS/POOL/AFP via Getty

Donald Trump and attorney Emil Bove appear virtually from Florida for the sentencing hearing on Jan. 10, 2025

What is unconditional discharge?


When Judge Merchan set Trump's sentencing date, he revealed that he did not intend to put the president-elect behind bars. Instead, the judge suggested, "unconditional discharge appears to be the most viable option to ensure finality and allow Defendant to pursue his appellate options."

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

Unconditional discharge is, in effect, a non-punishment — a way that New York courts can acknowledge someone's conviction as valid while simultaneously releasing them "without imprisonment, fine or probation supervision."

The sentence is allowed to be handed out in cases where there appears to be "no proper purpose" for imposing restrictions upon someone. Judges are required by New York law to provide reasoning for their decision if they choose to go that route.

At Friday's hearing, Merchan said, "Never before has this court been presented with such a unique and remarkable set of circumstance," calling it a "truly extraordinary case."

Considering Trump's imminent inauguration — and speculation that a sitting president's sentence would need to be paused during their time in office anyway — Merchan chose the path of least resistance with his sentence.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

Despite declining to give Trump a punishment, Merchan's final judgment is not exactly how the president-elect wanted things to play out: He is still a convicted felon.

Still, with a sentence now issued and the case closed, Trump can finally pursue a proper appeal of his verdict after seven months. His attorney said on Friday that he plans to.

Related: Donald Trump and Mike Pence Shake Hands During First Interaction in Nearly 4 Years

What did Trump get convicted for?


Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records on May 30, 2024, after spending more than six weeks on trial in Lower Manhattan.

The Manhattan District Attorney's Office brought an unprecedented case against Trump that aimed to prove he not only falsified financial records "with intent to defraud" — in this instance, to mask a $130,000 hush money payment made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the final days of his 2016 presidential election — but that he did so in order to conceal a second crime, which elevates the charges from misdemeanors to felonies.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

In falsifying the records, the DA's office argued, Trump was more broadly attempting to bury evidence of an illegal conspiracy to influence the 2016 election.

Related: Publisher David Pecker Testifies About Trump Team's Alleged Role in Burying Stories During 2016 Election

Colloquially called Trump's "hush money" trial, given that Daniels' hush money payment anchored the narrative, the Manhattan case went far beyond white-collar crime. It was the first of four criminal cases brought against the former president in 2023 — three of which hit on themes of election interference.

Through hard evidence and exhaustive witness testimony, Manhattan prosecutors painted a portrait of a former reality TV star who unlawfully tilted a presidential election in his favor by conspiring with powerful friends to suppress information from voters.

AdvertisementAdvertisement

Jurors' guilty verdict signaled that — beyond a reasonable doubt — the evidence presented to them supported the prosecution's story.

Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer.

Trump's three other criminal cases never went to trial, but in unrelated civil lawsuits since leaving the White House, Trump has been found liable of committing fraud while building his real estate empire as well as sexually abusing and defaming former Elle columnist E. Jean Carroll. Each of those cases carried substantial fines.

Read the original article on People

  • About Our Ads

Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off-topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, respond to themselves, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) you are replying to preserve the continuity of this seed. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion

No Fascism References, Source Dissing.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
George
Senior Expert
1  seeder  George    3 hours ago
No fine, No jail and no probation. It appears NY is a great place to commit multiple felonies
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  George @1    3 hours ago

All this means is that the left finally, though temporarily got to hang the tag "convicted felon" on him. The culmination of coordinated politically motivated cases against him.

Had this been anyone else but Trump the DOJ would have put a stop to it long ago.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1    3 hours ago

Too bad he couldnt defend himself with a claim he was innocent.  He always has to rely on procedural moves, delays and counter suits, and appeals to the SC which is stacked in his favor. 

Innocence is simply not an option for this guy. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1    3 hours ago
ugh temporarily got to hang the tag "convicted felon" on him.

That's all it was.  A politicized abuse of the system to get a label to attack Trump with. . It was so transparent it backfired, big time. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1    3 hours ago
All this means is that the left finally, though temporarily got to hang the tag "convicted felon" on him.

Temporarily????  He is still a 34 count "convicted felon", and always will be.  

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.4  bugsy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.3    2 hours ago

That is the only reason Merchan kept this farce going.

Mark my words.... He will be promoted to a higher judicial position within the next 12 months.

Don't want it to look too obvious.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.5  Greg Jones  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.3    2 hours ago

Not if it's overturned on appeal, which is very likely. I don't think Trump is very worried of any future legal or personal ramifications from this fiasco

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.6  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    2 hours ago
"He always has to rely on procedural moves, delays and counter suits, and appeals to the SC." 
Which is his right as it is for any other American citizen. That's how the legal system is supposed to work

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.5    2 hours ago
I don't think Trump is very worried of any future legal or personal ramifications from this fiasco

Yeah, everyone who isn't a committed Trump hater considers the verdict illegitimate and the only question for him is if he wants to spend the money to reverse it.  

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.1.8  Tacos!  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1    2 hours ago
The culmination of coordinated politically motivated cases against him.

Coordinated how? By whom? You probably assume the people responsible couldn’t find their ass with both hands, but you assign this extraordinary level of competency to them so they could perpetrate this conspiracy.

Had this been anyone else but Trump the DOJ would have put a stop to it long ago.

The DOJ doesn’t the jurisdiction to do that, and there would be no grounds for such action, even if they did.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.1.9  Tacos!  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.7    2 hours ago

The excuses never end. All hail the Felon-in-Chief.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.10  Ozzwald  replied to  bugsy @1.1.4    2 hours ago
He will be promoted to a higher judicial position within the next 12 months.

So you think the Trump administration will be corrupt enough to promote "favored" judges?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.11  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.10    2 hours ago

Don't they all? Why yes, yes they do...........

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.12  bugsy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.10    2 hours ago
So you think the Trump administration will be corrupt enough to promote "favored" judges?

The Trump admin won't do anything with him.

It will be Hochul who will give him a NY appellate court position.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.13  Sean Treacy  replied to  Tacos! @1.1.9    an hour ago
he excuses never end. All hail the Felon-in-Chief.

Lol.  The proof is in the pudding. All this political prosecution accomplished was damaging the reputation of New York, the idea of non partisan justice, the Democratic Party and the ideologues who championed this show trial as legitimate. Just another entry in the Democratic parade of destroying the reputations of the institutions of this country.  Well done!. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
1.1.14  Sparty On  replied to  Tacos! @1.1.9    an hour ago

Get it right.

That would be Misdefelon in chief.

A creation just for Trump by triggered lawfare liberals.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2  bugsy  replied to  George @1    3 hours ago

The punishment fit the "crime". 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.3  Snuffy  replied to  George @1    2 hours ago

Isn't it amazing. For all the talking from the left about how guilty he is, Trump is not punished at all for this. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Snuffy @1.3    2 hours ago
Isn't it amazing. For all the talking from the left about how guilty he is, Trump is not punished at all for this. 

More MAGA nonsense. If he wasnt guilty he wouldnt have had a court appearance this morning. The judges back was up against the wall. It is not practical to give Trump ANY punishment at the present time.  The "no punishment" sentence simply serves to put Trumps criminal behavior on the permanent record. Which is the most the judge could do today. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.3.1    2 hours ago
The "no punishment" sentence simply serves to put Trumps criminal behavior on the permanent record.

That was always the goal.

IT WILL BE OVERTURNED!

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.3.3  Tacos!  replied to  Snuffy @1.3    2 hours ago

The normal procedures for holding him accountable are just not feasible, and this ends the matter for the trial court.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.3.4  Snuffy  replied to  Tacos! @1.3.3    an hour ago

I disagree. He was found guilty of felonies, time behind bars could have been the sentence. That is certainly feasible. Of course in ten days the sentence would have been held in abeyance in order for Trump to serve in the Oval Office, then restarted when his term ended. That is also legal. He could have been handed a fine.

But instead there was no punishment ordered for being convicted of all those felonies. Why is that? This gives the appearance that it was always political in the hopes of preventing Trump from winning the election and as the election has passed it's no longer feasible to impact the election. As it's very possible that this will be overturned on appeal, perhaps this was also an attempt to soften the image of the court and reduce the potential for blowback if the appeal is successful? 

Time will tell. But this was never the best case against Trump and I think this will backfire on both the judge and the DA, as well as the State of New York.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3  Greg Jones    2 hours ago

" ....but that he did so in order to conceal a second crime, which elevates the charges from misdemeanors to feloniess....In falsifying the records, the DA's office argued, Trump was more broadly attempting to bury evidence of an illegal conspiracy to influence the 2016 election."

No one is sure to this day of what that second crime was, and if all this devious lawfare wasn't attempts to influence an election, I don't know what would be. After January 21st this silliness will quickly be forgotten.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
3.1  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Greg Jones @3    2 hours ago
After January 21st this silliness will quickly be forgotten.

I wouldnt bet on that.

He does still have his appeals process available to attempt to get the convictions overturned, but thats afforded to anyone thats been convicted.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Greg Jones @3    2 hours ago
No one is sure to this day of what that second crime was,

It's underscores the whole illegitimate nature of the scheme. When prosecuting a President, everyone should be able to sum up and explain the crime.  Perjury.  Obstruction of Justice.  Extortion.  Even in the days AFTER the verdict, people on this site were posting completely mistaken summaries of the prosecution's theory. It's so convoluted that some people were posting new reports that actually got the summary correct and then still ended up botching it because they couldn't even understand their own links.   

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4  bugsy    2 hours ago

Where are all the leftists calling for Merchan's head for not sentencing Trump to prison?

You don't hear anything because even they know the trial was a farce.

They just wanted to call him a "convicted felon", and they got that wish.

Nobody cares. 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
4.1  Snuffy  replied to  bugsy @4    2 hours ago

Oh, I expect we'll hear from them should (and I expect it to happen) the appeals court overturn the conviction. At least now that can actually move forward.

I do find it rather ridiculous that for all the demanding to find him guilty, they then accept no punishment for this. It does seem to cement the idea that this was all political from the beginning and its only real purpose was to attempt to influence the 2024 election.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Snuffy @4.1    2 hours ago
I do find it rather ridiculous that for all the demanding to find him guilty, they then accept no punishment for this.

What was he going to do, sentence the president of the United States to home confinement in the White House or a 1000 hours of community service? 

He was convicted of a crime by a legitimate jury after a legitimate trial and the exposition of the evidence.  He 's guilty and the sentencing procedure verifies that. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.1    2 hours ago
He was convicted of a crime by a legitimate jury after a legitimate trial

LMAO!

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.3  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.1    2 hours ago
What was he going to do, sentence the president of the United States to home confinement in the White House or a 1000 hours of community service? 

He could have done anything he wanted if there was truly a crime.

Whatever he could have sentenced, he could have suspended the sentence until after Trump got out of office. 

The only reason why he did what he did is because he only wanted his leftist friends to be able to call Trump a "convicted felon"

Nothing more.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5  bugsy    2 hours ago

Jonathon Turley just said it best.

"Sentencing by soundbite".

That's all the left wanted.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6  Vic Eldred    2 hours ago

"Unconditional Discharge."

Eventually to be OVERTURNED!

 
 

Who is online

Tacos!
Dismayed Patriot


60 visitors