╌>

Trump revokes security detail for Fauci | Fox News

  
Via:  George  •  2 weeks ago  •  15 comments

By:   Chris Pandolfo (Fox News)

Trump revokes security detail for Fauci | Fox News
President Donald Trump confirmed that he has revoked the security detail provided to Dr. Anthony Fauci by the National Institutes of Health at taxpayer expense.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Over moderated

Over moderated


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


closeVideo

Rand Paul: History will judge Fauci 'harshly'


Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., discusses President Donald Trump's decision to try and stop gain-of-function virus research on 'America Reports.'

President Donald Trump confirmed on Friday that he has terminated the security detail provided to Dr. Anthony Fauci at the taxpayer's expense.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) requested security for Fauci in 2020 to protect him from threats he received as the top health official and public spokesperson during the COVID-19 pandemic. But that detail was pulled on Thursday night, CNN first reported.

Trump was asked about the decision Friday while visiting Asheville, N.C., to tour areas impacted by Hurricane Helene.

"I think, you know, when you work for government, at some point your security detail comes off and, you know, you can't have them forever," Trump said.

"We took some off other people too, but you can't have a security detail for the rest of your life because you work for government," he added.

Trump earlier revoked the security clearances of 51 intelligence officials who had wrongly claimed that Hunter Biden's laptop had "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation," as well as the details provided to former national security advisor John Bolton and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

Asked if he would feel partially responsible if something were to happen to Fauci or Bolton, Trump said he would not.

"No. You know, they all made a lot of money. They can hire their own security," Trump said, adding that he knows several good security firms and "can give them some good numbers."

"Certainly I would not take responsibility," he said.

Former President Biden offered a preemptive pardon to Fauci on his way out of office to shield him from Trump's retribution. Though Trump had initially followed Fauci's recommendations at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, he began to criticize Fauci as the government's pandemic response and recommendations proved to be unpopular.

Fauci served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases from 1984 to 2022 and was the chief medical advisor to the president from 2021 to 2022. Trump awarded presidential commendations to Fauci and other members of Operation Warp Speed in 2021 for their work to quickly develop coronavirus vaccines.

This is a breaking story and will be updated.

This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.

Chris Pandolfo is a breaking news reporter for Fox News Digital. Send tips to chris.pandolfo@fox.com and follow him on Twitter @ChrisCPandolfo.


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off-topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, respond to themselves, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) you are replying to preserve the continuity of this seed. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion

No Fascism References, Source Dissing, No MAGA BS.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
George
Senior Expert
1  seeder  George    2 weeks ago

Good, he can pay for his own security.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 weeks ago
President Donald Trump confirmed on Friday that he has terminated the security detail provided to Dr. Anthony Fauci at the taxpayer's expense.

Why should he have a security detail?

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) requested security for Fauci in 2020 to protect him from threats he received as the top health official and public spokesperson during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Oh, I see.  He feared for his life after lying to everybody about Covid.  Now it makes sense.  Yeah, revoke it.

Former President Biden offered a preemptive pardon to Fauci on his way out of office to shield him from Trump's retribution. 

And there is the indication Faucci fucked up.

 
 
 
George
Senior Expert
2.1  seeder  George  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2    2 weeks ago

He was making a salary of over 419,000 a year in 2019, that doesn't cover any of the extra money he may have collected from the kickbacks and payoffs from drug companies and foreign governments for lying about using taxpayer money to fund biological warfare research, he can afford to pay for his own security.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.2  Kavika   replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2    2 weeks ago
And there is the indication Faucci fucked up.

Nope, it’s an indication that we have a five year old mental case in the WH threating retribution. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.2.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Kavika @2.2    2 weeks ago
Nope, it’s an indication that we have a five year old mental case in the WH threating retribution. 

Nope.  Not not playing your "what if" games or guesses.  

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.2.2  Kavika   replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.1    2 weeks ago

Great, your ‘’indication’’ is guess work as well. One for one.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3  Hal A. Lujah    2 weeks ago

Lol - as if Trump’s goal was to reduce public spending.  It’s clear what Trump wants, and this is his way of telling that to the violent felons he released from prison without having to say it out loud.  That is how he has always worked, according to those who have worked for him.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3    2 weeks ago

What about....

all the violent criminals that Biden pardoned?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    2 weeks ago
l the violent criminals that Biden pardoned?

Democrats spent four years implementing and celebrating policies that they knew would lead to thousands of violent assaults and deaths of american citizens and somehow this enrages them? Wish they cared about the Laken Rileys of the world this much. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.2  bugsy  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    2 weeks ago
all the violent criminals that Biden pardoned?

It's OK because most of them will probably vote D

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.1.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    2 weeks ago

Are you suggesting that the Bidenistas sought out their own private miltia by intervening the dregs of various prisons and freeing violent criminals into society?  Smart move.  Sounds like Bloods versus Crips.  How entertainingly American.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4  TᵢG    2 weeks ago

Apparently some do not recognize that this is not a cost-cutting policy to remove security detail across the board based on certain criteria such as duration, risk, etc. but rather targeted removals … focus on specific individuals all of whom are no longer in Trump’s favor.

This is a vindictive move by a childish, irresponsible asshole who is wholly unfit for office.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  TᵢG @4    2 weeks ago

I disagree with the “childish” part.  No mentally healthy child would ever do something this heinous to another family.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5  Ronin2    one week ago

Fuck Fauci and the rest of them.

They are rich enough to pay for their own security details.

Don't remember Democrats/leftists lamenting over Trump's greatly diminished security details during the election. And that was with credible threats from Iran that the FBI and Biden administration were fully aware of.

I remember a few leftists claiming "Trump wouldn't have anything to fear if he stopped pissing people off". 

Well, the shoe is on the other foot now. Seems those that worked for the Brandon administration pissed a lot of people off. Maybe they damn well shouldn't have done that. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1  TᵢG  replied to  Ronin2 @5    one week ago

Is it right to remove the security detail for select individuals?   The answer is 'no'.   If the reason was because the detail was no longer necessary or too expensive then that should have been handled with a blanket rule that removed the security detail based on specific criteria .... not by targeting individuals who are opponents of Trump.

 
 

Who is online



39 visitors