╌>

Election Victories by Trump Allies Showcase His Grip on the G.O.P. Base

  
Via:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  33 comments

By:   nytimes

Election Victories by Trump Allies Showcase His Grip on the G.O.P. Base
Tuesday's primaries in Arizona and Michigan gave the former president a slew of symbolic triumphs.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Aug. 3, 2022, 5:27 a.m. ETAug. 3, 2022, 5:27 a.m. ET

Shane Goldmacher

Tudor Dixon, center, prepares to give her acceptance speech in Grand Rapids, Mich., after winning the Republican nomination for governor.Credit...Emily Elconin for The New York Times

PHOENIX —Primary victories in Arizona and Michigan for allies of Donald J. Trump on Tuesday reaffirmed his continued influence over the Republican Party, as the former president has sought to cleanse the party of his critics, install loyalists in key swing-state offices and scare off potential 2024 rivals with a show of brute political force.

In Arizona, Mr. Trump's choice for Senate, Blake Masters, won a crowded primary as did his pick for secretary of state, Mark Finchem, an election denier who has publicly acknowledged his affiliation with the far-right Oath Keepers militia group. The governor's race was virtually tied early Wednesday, even as Mr. Trump's pick, Kari Lake, was badly outspent.

And in a particularly symbolic victory for Mr. Trump, Rusty Bowers, the Republican speaker of the Arizona House who gained national attention after testifying against Mr. Trump at the Jan. 6 congressional hearings, lost his bid for State Senate.

In Michigan, a House Republican who voted to impeach Mr. Trump, Representative Peter Meijer, was defeated by a former Trump administration official, John Gibbs, and Mr. Trump's last-minute choice for governor, the conservative commentator Tudor Dixon, who has echoed his false claims of election fraud, easily won her primary.

Mr. Trump and his allies have been particularly focused on the vote-counting and certification process in both Arizona and Michigan, seeking to oust those who stood in the way of their attempts to overturn the 2020 election. The victory of Mr. Finchem, who marched on the Capitol on Jan. 6, was a key sign of how the "Stop the Steal" movement that was formed on a falsehood about 2020 has morphed into a widespread campaign to try to take control of the levers of democracy ahead of the coming elections.

ImageBlake Masters after making a victory speech to his supporters in Chandler, Ariz., Tuesday night.Credit...Adriana Zehbrauskas for The New York Times

Tuesday's primaries in five states — Arizona, Michigan, Missouri, Kansas and Washington State — kicked off a final six-week stretch of races that will provide the fullest picture of the Republican Party's priorities in 2022, how tight Mr. Trump's hold remains on the base and the extent to which his falsehoods about a stolen election in 2020 have infected the electorate.

In Washington State, Mr. Trump had backed challengers to two Republican House members who voted for his impeachment. But both of those incumbents appeared to be in strong positions to advance over Mr. Trump's preferred candidates — benefiting from the state's top-two primary system, though neither race had been called early Wednesday.

Many Republican strategists are eager to move beyond the primaries and this period of infighting to focus fully on defeating the Democrats this fall and to take advantage of President Biden's slipping support and growing voter frustrations about inflation and the state of the economy.

In a relief for national party strategists, Missouri Republicans rejected the political comeback attempt of Eric Greitens, the scandal-plagued former governor who ran for Senate. Party leaders had worried that Mr. Greitens would have jeopardized an otherwise safe Senate seat for Republicans. Mr. Trump had stayed out of that race until a bizarre last-minute dual endorsement on Monday of "Eric" — with no last name — a blessing that covered both Mr. Greitens, who finished in a distant third place, and Eric Schmitt, the state attorney general, who won the Senate nomination.

In Kansas, voters offered a warning sign to bullish Republicans, as a ballot measure on abortion showed the electoral potency and shifting politics of the issue in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling overturning Roe v. Wade. Voters there strongly rejected the effort to amend the State Constitution to remove the protected right to abortion.

ImageSupporters of Kansas' abortion referendum praying while waiting on election results in Overland Park, Kan., Tuesday night.Credit...Christopher (KS) Smith for The New York Times

Several of the marquee Republican contests on Tuesday were in Arizona, a top presidential battleground with an open governor's race, a contested Senate seat and multiple competitive House races in 2022.

In the contest for governor, Mr. Trump endorsed Ms. Lake, a telegenic former newscaster who had become an unabashed champion of Trumpism. Mr. Trump is seeking some redemption after struggling earlier this year in other governor's races, most notably failing in his attempt to oust the Republican governor of Georgia, Brian Kemp.

Unlike Mr. Kemp, the Republican governor of Arizona, Doug Ducey, who earned Mr. Trump's ire by supporting the results of the 2020 election, was term-limited and not on the ballot himself. Mr. Ducey put his support behind Karrin Taylor Robson, a wealthy real estate developer who spent more than $18 million on her run and who also had the backing of Mike Pence, Mr. Trump's former vice president.

Ms. Lake, who has made voter fraud a centerpiece of her candidacy, declared victory at a moment when she was actually behind in the vote counting. "We won this race," Ms. Lake said at her election-night party. "Period." She later took the lead for the first time, but that contest remained too close to call.

In the Senate race, Mr. Masters, a 35-year-old political newcomer, won the Republican nomination to face Senator Mark Kelly, a Democrat, who is seeking a full six-year term after ousting a Republican in 2020. The race is expected to be among the most contested of the fall midterms.

The primary victory represents the second major win for Peter Thiel, a venture capitalist and major Republican donor who co-wrote a book with Mr. Masters. Mr. Thiel put $15 million of his own money into a super PAC backing Mr. Masters and another $15 million into a separate super PAC supporting J.D. Vance, who won his Senate primary in Ohio this spring.

ImageSupporters of Blake Masters and Kari Lake at a campaign event in Phoenix on Monday.Credit...Adriana Zehbrauskas for The New York Times

Mr. Masters defeated Jim Lamon, a businessman who pumped $14 million of his personal fortune into his campaign, and Mark Brnovich, the Arizona attorney general who Mr. Trump had attacked repeatedly for not investigating his baseless theories of voter fraud.

Holly Law, a 53-year-old who lives in Phoenix, said the determining factor in her votes for Ms. Lake and Mr. Masters was the former president's blessing.

"The Trump endorsement — that's it," she said on Monday at a pre-election rally. Ms. Law insisted, despite the lack of evidence of fraud, that the 2020 election was stolen from Mr. Trump and said she had stopped watching Fox News entirely because it was the network that first called her state for Mr. Biden.

"Newsmax — 100 percent," she said of her current viewing habits, referring to the conservative news network.

In Michigan, Mr. Trump had delivered a late endorsement to Ms. Dixon, who easily won theRepublican nomination for governor after two top rivals were tossed from the ballot for turning in fraudulent petitions. Among those on the ballot and among those defeated on Tuesday was Ryan Kelley, who led in an early poll after he was arrested in June by the F.B.I. and charged with trespassing and other crimes connected to the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6. Mr. Kelley was in fourth place early Wednesday.

The Democratic primaries on Tuesday for statewide offices were less drama-filled. In Arizona, Secretary of State Katie Hobbs won the Democratic nomination for governor, and in Michigan, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer formally became her party's nominee for a second term.

Michigan did have some intense Democratic House primaries, including an expensive one in the Detroit suburbs where Representatives Andy Levin and Haley Stevens were drawn into the same district. Ms. Stevens won with the heavy financial support of the new super PAC arm of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, among others.

But the highest profile House race in Michigan was Mr. Meijer's re-election bid. His primary rival received a surprise late boost from the political arm of House Democrats, which spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on television ads because Mr. Gibbs was seen as easier to defeat this fall in a swing seat.

"I'm proud to have remained true to my principles, even when doing so came at a significant political cost," Mr. Meijer said in a statement conceding defeat.

Mr. Trump personally called Mr. Gibbs to congratulate him.

"Yes, sir, your endorsements have a really, really good record," Mr. Gibbs told him.

"I'm very proud of you. That's a great job," Mr. Trump said.

ImageRepresentative Peter Meijer waiting for results in Grand Rapids, Mich., on Tuesday night.Credit...Brittany Greeson for The New York Times

The meddling by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee for a pro-Trump candidate has earned backlash from fellow Democrats, who saw such involvement as undermining the party's overall message that election deniers are a threat to democracy.

"I'm disgusted that hard-earned money intended to support Democrats is being used to boost Trump-endorsed candidates," Representative Dean Phillips of Minnesota said last month, calling Mr. Meijer "one of the most honorable Republicans in Congress."

For the other two Trump impeachers, Washington State's top-two primary system was poised to help them survive, drawing a larger crowd of candidates and splitting the vote among their Republican rivals.

Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler was ahead of her Trump-backed challenger Joe Kent, a retired Green Beret, with more than half the vote counted. Mr. Kent, whose wife was killed by a suicide bomber in 2019 in Syria, first met Mr. Trump at Dover Air Force Base when he went to view his late wife's remains.

Representative Dan Newhouse, another Republican who voted to impeach Mr. Trump, counted among his challengers Loren Culp, a Trump-supported candidate who ran for governor in 2020 and refused to concede that race despite losing by a wide margin. Mr. Culp was not among the top two candidates with roughly half the votes counted.

Continue reading the main story


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
In Arizona, Mr. Trump's choice for Senate, Blake Masters, won a crowded primary as did his pick for secretary of state, Mark Finchem, an election denier who has publicly acknowledged his affiliation with the far-right Oath Keepers militia group. The governor's race was virtually tied early Wednesday, even as Mr. Trump's pick, Kari Lake, was badly outspent. And in a particularly symbolic victory for Mr. Trump, Rusty Bowers, the Republican speaker of the Arizona House who gained national attention after testifying against Mr. Trump at the Jan. 6 congressional hearings, lost his bid for State Senate.

Masters, Finchem and Lake are all election deniers. There is something seriously wrong with the Republican voters in Arizona. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

Actually, it wasn't that good a night for Trump:

"And then there were the three House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump. One of them, Meijer, lost in Michigan. But in Washington, Reps. Jaime Herrera Beutler and Dan Newhouse were both in position to survive their primaries if early returns hold."

AND:

"Republicans dodged two bullets on Tuesday. In Missouri, Eric Greitens, the disgraced former governor, finished far behind in his Senate primary bid. And in Michigan, Tudor Dixon emerged from a gubernatorial primary full of more hard-line contenders many Republicans feared would be a drag on the party in November.

That’s good news for the GOP. And it’s a departure from where the party appeared to be heading in many of its early primaries — picking candidates who seem dangerously prone to getting in the way of the good political environment for Republicans.

In Pennsylvania, physician Mehmet Oz, the Republican nominee for Senate, has been polling so poorly   Republicans are discussing alternative paths to the Senate majority . Republicans all but conceded the gubernatorial race in heavily-Democratic Maryland after nominating Dan Cox, the Trump-endorsed state lawmaker who organized buses to Washington for the rally preceding the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021."

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1    3 years ago

It wasnt a great night for Trump but it was good enough to keep him on track to run for president again. 

How do you propose for the Republican Party to deny him the nomination?  All he needs is multiple opponents and he can win the primaries with 30%, maybe even 25% if there are enough opponents. And of course there will be at least 4 or 5. Every national politician in the country dreams of running for president one day. 

If Trump runs he will be the nominee. One reason is the multiple opponent thing, another is that he will lie about his GOP opposition , to whatever extent it takes, and the MAGA sheep will believe him. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    3 years ago
How do you propose for the Republican Party to deny him the nomination?

If he makes it there John, he will have a real challenge from Ron DeSantis. You guys are supposed to indict him before then.

Either way John, the democrats are dead.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.3  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.2    3 years ago

Trump will destroy DeSantis, albeit likely through unethical tactics. I dont believe Trump fears DeSantis at all. And what makes you think DeSantis will be the only opponent?  There will be 4 or 5 in the early primaries and the momentum Trump will obtain from them will make him impossible to beat. 

Your belief that the Democrats are "dead" is mere wishful thinking. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.3    3 years ago
And what makes you think DeSantis will be the only opponent?

Because his support level is rising. He is the caretaker right now of all the Trump policies. Nobody else will run if Trump runs and nobody else is close in the polling as Trump & DeSantis.


Your belief that the Democrats are "dead" is mere wishful thinking. 

The dems had their chance to rule and they were terrible rulers. Nobody will forget because the suffering will continue for a long time to come.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.5  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    3 years ago
... and the MAGA sheep will believe him

Demonstrated repeatedly.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.6  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.4    3 years ago
Nobody else will run if Trump runs and nobody else is close in the polling as Trump & DeSantis.

Mike Pence is running. Ted Cruz will run. That gets you to four. Pence and Cruz will take votes away from DeSantis, not Trump. There will likely be a few more. 

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Senior Quiet
1.1.7  afrayedknot  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.4    3 years ago

“…they were terrible rulers.”

It is not about ‘ruling’, vic. It is about governing, a lost art it seems when both parties are more concerned with the next election instead of tackling the tough issues. Gaining and maintaining power is the end all motivation, comfortable in taking turns and irreverently kicking the can down the road. We, as the electorate, are but ’pawns in the game of life.’

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.6    3 years ago
Mike Pence is running.

Where was that announcement?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.9  Vic Eldred  replied to  afrayedknot @1.1.7    3 years ago
It is not about ‘ruling’, vic. It is about governing,

They RULED, lawlessly!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
1.2  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

Seriously.  Every election denier belongs behind bars as far as I'm concerned.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
"The Trump endorsement — that's it," she said on Monday at a pre-election rally. Ms. Law insisted, despite the lack of evidence of fraud, that the 2020 election was stolen from Mr. Trump and said she had stopped watching Fox News entirely because it was the network that first called her state for Mr. Biden. "Newsmax — 100 percent," she said of her current viewing habits, referring to the conservative news network.

Deranged MAGA. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 years ago

Just another example of confirmation bias.   It is basically stubborn ignorance.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Senior Quiet
2.1.1  afrayedknot  replied to  TᵢG @2.1    3 years ago

“It is basically stubborn ignorance.”

And fear. 

When effective change and societal growth become bogeymen, it is but a road to perdition. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.2  TᵢG  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.1    3 years ago

The example of a woman leaving Fox News because they announced the Biden win of her state on election night is a shining example of confirmation bias.   This is one of seemingly many who seek those who will tell them what they want to hear.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3  JBB    3 years ago

The gop is nominating a batch of unelectable twits!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JBB @3    3 years ago

They might be electable in Arizona. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @3    3 years ago

Then you didn't pay attention.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4  Ronin2    3 years ago
In Michigan, a House Republican who voted to impeach Mr. Trump, Representative Peter Meijer, was defeated by a former Trump administration official, John Gibbs, and Mr. Trump's last-minute choice for governor, the conservative commentator Tudor Dixon, who has echoed his false claims of election fraud, easily won her primary.

You can thank fucking stupid Democrats for running attack adds against both Dixon and Gibbs in Michigan for their winning. One thing conservatives and Republicans hate is fucking Democrats interfering in our elections. Running attack adds against both in their primaries had the exact opposite of the intended effect. Or maybe it didn't since Michigan is an open primary and who knows how many Democrats crossed over to influence the Republican vote? Since Democrats were running as incumbents at key positions in Michigan I am sure the crossover was great. Meijers outspent Gibbs by a ton- but Democrat attack adds on Gibbs outspent Meijers. Dixon wasn't even on anyone's radar until Democrats shut out 5 Republican candidates for governor; and started running attack adds against Dixon. Guess time will tell if Democrats are just election criminals- or fucking stupid assholes that deserve what they get at midterms.

So fuck off assholes on the left. You all need to tell your fucking party to sit down and shut the fuck up; and stop interfering with opponent's primaries.

 
 
 
bccrane
Freshman Silent
4.1  bccrane  replied to  Ronin2 @4    3 years ago

That's the way I took it, kind of a reverse psychology thing, come out with attack ads prior to the "primary" to get some of the republicans to vote the way you want and with help from crossover democrats you get the one you have the best chance of beating.  I voted Rinke (spelling) but now I am all in for Dixon and she best not count on her primary showing for chances at the general election, because those democrats that came out to vote for her will not in the general.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @4    3 years ago
Running attack adds against both in their primaries had the exact opposite of the intended effect.

How do you come up with that? The Democrats wanted Gibbs to win because he is a weak general election opponent, and he did. 

 
 
 
bccrane
Freshman Silent
4.2.1  bccrane  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    3 years ago

So you agree with and support that strategy of getting the worst possible republican candidate to run against and then blame and shame the republicans for trying to elect them in the general election.  So again, who is actually to blame if and when these candidates do win?

As to your question of #4.3, why yes, yes I would.   Remember "policies".

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  bccrane @4.2.1    3 years ago

The democrats use those methods. It's disgusting.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.3  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  bccrane @4.2.1    3 years ago
So again, who is actually to blame if and when these candidates do win?

Thats a no brainer - the people who voted for them. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.4  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  bccrane @4.2.1    3 years ago

These ads do not say "vote for so and so." They say so and so is very conservative and MAGA and subservient to Trump. Apparently Republican voters are impressed with those credentials. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    3 years ago
he Democrats wanted Gibbs to win because he is a weak general election opponent, and he did

Democrats  almost completely  funded the campaign of an "election denier" who now has a decent shot at wining election.

Never, ever feign outrage about the threat to democracy people like Gibbs supposedly are.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.6  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2.5    3 years ago

The blame, if that is the word, for Gibbs success falls entirely on the people who voted for him.  The ads dont tell anyone to vote for him, they just emphasize his super MAGA qualities and the Trumpsters go for it. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.7  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2.5    3 years ago

Running ads saying how right wing a candidate is does not constitute "funding" them. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2.8  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.7    3 years ago

Of course its funding .  The Democrats purchased advertising to help Gibbs win the election.   That was the entire point of the ad buy. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.3  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @4    3 years ago

You managed to type a couple hundred words without addressing the point of the article. Election deniers will be on various state ballots in November.  Would you vote for one? 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
4.3.1  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @4.3    3 years ago

Typical MO.  Deflection.

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
5  SteevieGee    3 years ago

So...  How do they know they won?  Wasn't there massive rampant fraud?  Have they recounted the ballots several times including by hand?  Has there been a republican directed partisan audit lasting for several months?  Have all the lawsuits been judged?

I only ask because 2020 election went through all of these and they still don't believe that Joe Biden is the President.

 
 

Who is online



228 visitors