GOP senators say Manchin bid would boost Trump, hurt Biden | The Hill
By: Alexander Bolton (The Hill)
Republican senators say a third-party presidential bid by centrist Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) likely would pull votes away from President Biden and help former President Trump win election to a second term if he wins the GOP presidential nomination.
Many Democratic senators agree and are stepping up their criticism of No Labels, a bipartisan political advocacy group that is planning to raise $70 million to put a third-party candidate on the ballot in all 50 states.
Manchin, a conservative Democrat who has repeatedly clashed with Biden, fueled speculation of a third-party run by appearing at a Monday town hall sponsored by No Labels in New Hampshire.
GOP senators say Manchin could send Trump back to the White House if he tries to run for president as a centrist, given Trump's solid grasp on the Republican base.
"The No Labels effort would elect Donald Trump," said Sen. Mitt Romney (Utah), a prominent Trump critic in the Senate GOP.
"I asked my chief strategist: 'What would a candidate have to be like in order to draw [voters] from Donald Trump as opposed to drawing from Joe Biden?' He said it would have to be someone to the right of Donald Trump," Romney said.
Any No Labels candidate — including Manchin — Romney said, would be to the left of Trump and would pull votes from Biden.
"And a poll would prove it," he said. "By the way, we do all this talking. Just run a poll. Run a poll: Biden versus Trump. Then run the same poll: Biden, Trump, Manchin — and see who is affected. I know the answer."
Trump is dominating GOP primary polls, leaving many Republicans thinking he will be the party's nominee.
A Quinnipiac University poll of 727 Republican and Republican-leaning voters nationwide published Wednesday showed Trump leading his closest rival, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, 54 percent to 35 percent.
The poll, which surveyed 2,056 adults, also showed 47 percent of respondents said they would consider voting for a third-party candidate.
Sixty-four percent of independents said they would consider voting for a third-party candidate, while 35 percent of Democrats and 38 percent of Republicans said they would consider a third-party option.
Biden won more votes than Trump in 2020 from independents and voters not affiliated with the Democratic Party or Republican Party. Independents favored Biden over Trump 52 percent to 43 percent.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who ran for president in 2016, agreed Manchin could pull votes from Biden but cautioned the political dynamics of a three-way race can be hard to predict.
"My guess is [Manchin] is probably moderate to liberal on social issues, maybe a little more fiscally conservative than many Democrats. Are there some Democrats who would go for that? Maybe — and the fact that he is a Democrat maybe pulls more [voters.]"
Paul said a Green Party candidate — Cornel West is running for the party's nomination — would also pull votes away from Biden.
"I would guess that Manchin would take more Democrat [votes], but if Trump is the candidate, there are a lot of establishment, I call them the pro-war caucus of the Republican Party, that worry that [Trump] won't be extreme enough on the military and all that stuff … that could vote for Manchin," Paul added.
The Kentucky senator, however, said Trump would keep his base voters.
Senate Democrats are worried a Manchin run for president would be very "dangerous" to Biden's reelection hopes.
"I think it's dangerous because whether they mean to or not, it could help the reelection of Donald Trump, which would be a disaster for our country," Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) said.
"Donald Trump's supporters are baked in," she said. "So the question becomes of those that do not support him, who do they vote for? You divide that vote. It certainly doesn't help."
Michigan was one of three key swing states — along with Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — that helped Trump defeat Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.
Biden then carried the state by 154,000 votes in 2020.
Manchin on Monday refused to rule out running for president next year on the ballot line sponsored by No Labels.
He said speculating about his presidential ambitions is "putting the cart ahead of the horse" and criticized both parties for drifting increasingly toward the fringes of the political spectrum.
"We're here to make sure that the American people have an option, and the option is can you move the political parties off their respective sides —they've gone too far right and too far left," he said at the town hall event at St. Anselm College.
Other Senate Democrats are alarmed about a potential third-party presidential campaign backed by No Labels.
"I think this presidential effort is very foolish," said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), who was Clinton's running mate in 2016.
"I've urged people that I know connected with No Labels: 'Stick with trying to find legislative common ground and don't split up the forces of democracy at a time when the real issue is not Democrats versus Republicans, it's pro-democracy versus pro-authoritarian.'"
Other Democrats are calling on the group to reveal its list of donors. It is not required to do so as an advocacy group classified under section 501(c)(4) of the tax code.
Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who represents a state Biden carried by just more than 10,000 votes in 2020, said a third-party No Labels bid isn't "good for our democracy."
"This is a few rich guys that are putting dark money into our political process, so I'm not fond of this idea. I don't think it's good for our democracy to have undisclosed wealthy donors funding an organization, which is clearly not a political party," he said. "I don't think it makes our democracy any healthier."
Former Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), the founding chairman of No Labels, told "The Julie Mason Show" in a recent interview he doesn't feel any ill will toward Biden.
"As a matter of fact, I like him very much. I admire him," he said. "We at No Labels think that America deserves a better choice, which is a third line — maybe."
No Labels can claim until the cows come home that the voters want a third choice, but the fact is a Manchin candidacy, or any No Labels presidential candidate would hurt Biden more.
No Labels claims they will be in it to win it, but they have no chance to win. A No Labels candidate would have no shot at any of the biggest blue states, NY , Illinois or California, and without winning any of those No Labels would then have to win at least a few red states. There is even less chance of them winning a red state than there is of them winning a big blue state. No labels could win all the swing states and still not have enough electoral votes.
So without a path to win, No Labels would by definition be a spoiler. The country cannot risk the effect of a spoiler candidate in 2024.
No one knows who “no labels” would hurt more, but it’s fun to see the self declared democracy defenders do everything they can to prevent people from having a choice on the ballot.
If the gop nominates Donald Trump Biden will win his well deserved second term!
No one "knows" if the sun will come up tomorrow, but we can make a good educated guess. The appeal of No Labels is self admittedly to moderates. Biden is far more likely to have moderates in his camp to start than Trump is.
So your claim is biden is so much more extreme than trump that it’s undoubted he has a more tenuous hold on moderates.
a moderate will hurt the more extreme candidate.
Maybe if he can stay awake and not mumble incoherent shit...................but doubtful. Perhaps they should put him back in the basement rather than being filmed.
[Deleted]
You should remind your friend that smoking is dangerious to his own and others health.
A moderate will hurt the candidate with the less extreme supporters.
Trump?
Awe....What a shame!
Joe Manchin has two choices if he wants to continue in politics. He can run as a Senator in WV and most likely lose or he can run for president as a third party candidate and hope most people don't like either of the alternatives. I don't recall the democrats telling other third party candidates that they had no chance. I thought the democrats prepared for everything? They changed state election laws, used taxpayer funds to get out every democratic voter, silenced any and all news that might hurt Biden and have prosecuted their main political opponent. Maybe the media will destroy Manchin or Manchin might just get even with those who stabbed him in the back on that risiculous spending bill?
Very well put.
Joe Machin will not challenge President Biden...
Joe Manchin may very well challenge Brandon and possibly Trump for the right to be president. What does Manchin have to lose at this point?
Democrats don't want him and are going to primary him; and he is from a conservative area of WV- so there is no possibility of running as an independent there and winning.
Leftists are scared shitless that Manchin will split moderate Dems; centrist Independents; and remove never Trumpers from the Brandon voting block. Without them Brandon stands no chance of winning.
Of course not ....Joe won in a landslide / S
Joe Biden Has a Cornel West Problem
The long-shot Green Party candidate is a persistent object of concern for Democrats.
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/eQFhAHMLHpd1IwCG1mQunbng9i0=/0x0:3824x2151/828x466/media/img/mt/2023/07/GettyImages_538495578_copy/original.jpg 828w, 960w, 976w, 1952w" src="https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/j7R3MBMFMksQr8uIOq4V8GRntX8=/0x0:3824x2151/960x540/media/img/mt/2023/07/GettyImages_538495578_copy/original.jpg" width="412" height="232" >Pull up a sticky green lawn chair, everyone. It’s time for another round of Mounting Democratic Jitters, cherished summer pastime from Wilmington to the West Wing. Today’s installment: Cornel West, unlikely MAGA accessory.
West, the famed academic and civil-rights activist, is a Green Party candidate for president. He probably will not win. Not a single state or, in all likelihood, a single electoral vote. But he remains a persistent object of concern around the president these days.
I’ve talked with many of these White House worrywarts, along with their counterparts on Joe Biden’s reelection team and the usual kettles of Democratic anxiety who start bubbling up whenever the next existential-threat election is upon us. Even with the nuisance primary challenger Robert F. Kennedy Jr. polling in the double digits, West inhabits a particular category of Democratic angst, the likes of which only the words Green Party presidential candidate can elicit.
You can understand the sensitivities, given the history. Democrats still recoil at the name Jill Stein, the Green Party nominee in 2016, whose vote total in key battlegrounds—Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania—wound up exceeding the margins by which Hillary Clinton lost in those states. What’s Dr. Stein doing these days, anyway?
“She is my interim campaign manager,” Cornel West told me this week in a phone interview. Not a joke, as Biden would say. Or an acid flashback. Apparently Ralph Nader was not available. Not Dennis Kucinich, either (already snapped up to run RFK Jr.’s campaign). It might be kind of funny if the stakes didn’t involve a return Trump ordeal in the White House.
“The fact that Jill Stein is running his campaign is a little on the nose,” one senior Democratic campaign strategist told me.
Read: The first MAGA Democrat
West has repeatedly denied that he might play a spoiler role. “I would say that most of the people who vote for me would not have voted for Biden,” he told me. “They would have probably stayed home.” In a recent CNN appearance, West dismissed the two parties as a “corporate duopoly” and professed “great respect for my dear brother Ralph Nader and great respect for sister Jill Stein.” This did nothing to assuage Democratic jitters.
I asked West whether he would campaign all the way to Election Day 2024, or if he might reconsider his venture at some point. “My goal is to go all the way to November,” he said, but allowed that circumstances could change and so could his plans. “I’m trying to be a jazzlike man,” he said. “Trying to be improvisational.”
In his campaign-launch video , West promised that his candidacy would focus on core progressive issues such as health care, housing, reproductive rights, and “de-escalating the destruction” done to the Earth and our democracy. “Neither political party wants to tell the truth,” West said, by way of explaining why he is running as a third-party candidate.
Notably, West has asserted that NATO was as much to blame for Russia’s war in Ukraine as the Kremlin. He has railed against the coalition as an “expanding instrument” of Western aggression, which he says is what provoked Russia’s onslaught. “This proxy war between the American Empire and the Russian Federation could lead to World War III,” he wrote in a social-media post calling for diplomatic talks. West also dismissed as a “sham” a House resolution—passed Tuesday—that affirmed U.S. support for Israel. “The painful truth is that the Israeli state—like the USA—has been racist in practice since its inception,” West wrote on Twitter.
Several Democrats were eager to tell their own truths about West’s endeavor, expressing uniform exasperation.
“This is not the time in order to experiment. This is not the time to play around on the margins,” warned Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison during a recent appearance on MSNBC. “What we see is a lot of folks who want to be relevant and try to be relevant in these elections and not looking at the big picture.”
“Too little attention is being paid to this,” David Axelrod, the former top Barack Obama strategist, told me. Axelrod recently gave voice to the gathering Democratic freak-out when he tweeted out some basic historical parallels. “In 2016, the Green Party played an outsized role in tipping the election to Donald Trump,” he wrote. “Now, with Cornel West as their likely nominee, they could easily do it again.”
In our interview, Axelrod noted that the 2020 race between Biden and Trump, in which neither Stein nor West was on the ballot, underscores how slim the Democrats’ margin of error remains. “When you have three states that you won by 41,000 votes combined, you just cannot afford to bleed votes, even a few of them,” Axelrod told me.
Ben Wikler, the Democratic Party chair of one of these states—Wisconsin—said he expects Trump allies to help prop up any third-party effort as a way to undermine Biden. “Regardless of the motivations of third-party candidates themselves, they can have the effect of delivering net votes to Trump next year,” Wikler said, “especially if a Trump-aligned super PAC pours money into targeted messages,” he added. “And those are exactly the kind of cynical games you have to expect.”
Cedric Richmond, a former Democratic congressman and White House adviser who recently signed on as co-chair of the Biden campaign, called West a “substantive person.” But Richmond argued that Biden has earned the support of the left through his record on the environment, health care, gun reform, and other progressive causes. “They also know that [Biden] could have done a hell of a lot more if not for this hostile Supreme Court,” Richmond told me. “And they know they got this hostile Supreme Court because ‘Hillary wasn’t good enough,’ because ‘we weren’t happy and we wanted to support Jill Stein’ or whatever the reason was at the time.” Now that voters have experienced a Trump presidency, he said, the cost of casting a protest vote with a third-party candidate should be much more apparent. “I think people have seen this movie, and they know the ending,” Richmond said.
In recent days, the putative-centrist outfit No Labels—which many Democrats have been quick to label as a pro-Trump collaborator—has been the main source of third-party hand-wringing. The group is trying to recruit a so-called unity ticket that would appear on ballots across the country, possibly led by Senator Joe Manchin, the West Virginia Democrat.
Read: Joe Lieberman weighs the Trump risk
“The idea that a third-party candidate won’t hurt the Democratic nominee is preposterous on its face,” Matt Bennett, executive vice president of Third Way, a center-left policy think tank that lately has been focused on stopping No Labels, told me. Recent polls show that in a head-to-head race between Trump and Biden, Trump is more likely to benefit when a third-party candidate is added to the mix. Likewise, an NBC survey from last month revealed that 44 percent of registered voters would be open to a third-party candidate—and there were considerably more Democrats saying this (45 percent) than Republicans (34 percent).
But Bennett explained that if No Labels does not recruit a serious candidate to actually run, the group will remain a largely hypothetical menace. West, meanwhile, is definitely running. The Green Party has an organizational structure in place in many states that will ensure the nominee’s position on general-election ballots. West has deep roots on the left, and is better known than Stein was in 2016. Like Clinton, Biden has faced uncertainty about how much enthusiasm he can expect from his own party, especially young progressives.
“Dr. West has a huge following among college-age voters and a lot of folks who are more interested in social movements than they are in supporting Democratic or Republican candidates,” Basil Smikle, a Democratic strategist who was the executive director of the State Democratic Party of New York from 2015 to 2018, told me.
West was a vocal supporter of Senator Bernie Sanders’s presidential campaign in the 2020 Democratic primary. He has said that he wound up voting for Biden in the general election because “a fascist catastrophe is worse than a neoliberal disaster.” He also dubbed Biden “mediocre” and “milquetoast” (a tepid endorsement, let’s say).
Supporters of Biden are hopeful that the blessing of progressive allies such as Sanders, who endorsed his reelection in April, will insulate the president from the threat of West-inspired defections to the Green Party. “What Bernie can do is say, ‘Look man, we thought the existential threat of Trump had waned, but it’s still here,’” Smikle said. “We need you to show up again.”
Another prominent Bernie booster from 2020, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, endorsed Biden during a recent appearance on the podcast Pod Save America . The host Jon Favreau asked a follow-up about what she thought of West. Ocasio-Cortez appeared to tread carefully but sounded deferential. “I think Dr. West has an incredible history in this country,” she said. “What he gives voice to is incredibly important.” She went on to slam No Labels as a source of great concern, given “the sheer amount of money and bad-faith actors involved with it.”
“Not all third-party candidacies are created equal,” Ocasio-Cortez summarized. But she landed on a pragmatic point. “The United States has a winner-take-all system, whether we like that or not,” she said, adding that the cost of messing around could be fascism. “We have to live with that reality,” she said. Live with Joe Biden, in other words. Because the alternative is far worse—not a joke.
West could peel a handful of votes from Biden from "the left". If this only swung one state to Trump it would be too many.
Donald Trump is mentally ill. His social media over the past 2 1/2 years, (not to mention the previous six) proves it. But not only mentally ill, he is self obssessed, vindictive and ignorant. A Bond villain minus the intelligence.
The only real priority the nation should have is keeping him out of office.