╌>

Here is a running list of every one of Donald Trump’s fumbles, accidents, and confused moments from this year.

  
Via:  John Russell  •  last year  •  72 comments


Here is a running list of every one of Donald Trump’s fumbles, accidents, and confused moments from this year.
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks

From the Desantis War Room


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


You need to click on the word "thread", right below the DeSantis twitter handle. 

=


And Trump keeps referring to the Biden Administration as the “Obama Administration” — without catching himself. Here are four times Trump has done this in the last two months.
https://x.com/DeSantisWarRoom/status/1721591389631213727?s=20

This one is amazing. Trump say that the Obama administration has stats that admit he built 500 miles of wall. (The Obama administration totally predates any building of a wall by Trump.)  He also says the Obama administration said that they hope Israel isnt attacked from the north in the current war. 

If Biden made these sorts of gaffes we would never hear the end of it. 


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    last year
Desantis released, by far, his most brutal direct attack yet on Trump today, a string of 21 clips showing that Trump is cognitively impaired and unfit to be president. Story …
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year

Why arent these gaffes in the news every single day?  

Because the media wants a horse race. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

F-RRU8zW0AAv3aX?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

He forgot. He simply had a senior moment

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Silent
2.1.1  mocowgirl  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1    last year
He forgot. He simply had a senior moment

I am linking a video highlighting scientific studies about aging and mental decline.  The presenter states that no one over the age of sixty should be a world "leader" because of everyone's natural mental decline as we age.

While there may be some limited exceptions on mental capabilities, if a country does not have enough people under the age of 60 to be their leader, then WTF is wrong with the people who raised the next generation?  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  seeder  JohnRussell    last year
@DeSantisWarRoom
·
During one interview, Trump confused Kristi Noem and Nikki Haley, then confused George W. Bush and Joe Biden just 45 seconds later.
 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.1  Ozzwald  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year
During one interview, Trump confused Kristi Noem and Nikki Haley, then confused George W. Bush and Joe Biden just 45 seconds later.

And yet Biden is the one the right keeps complaining about.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    last year

The recent polling really has Democrats spooked. Realizing their :"Biden has more energy than his staff" offensive was just a little too much Kim Jong :Unish, even for Democrats, they've pivoted to Trump is just as senile and crazy as our guy!

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
4.1  George  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    last year

Amazing isn't it, Head to Head Biden can't beat trump in recent polls, So who do you think Kennedy and Williamson are going to draw votes from?  Maybe democrats can find a candidate who doesn't have dementia? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    last year

Trump is on camera, multiple times, saying that the Obama administration is still in office. If Biden said the Bush administration is still in office you guys would be crucifying him. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.2.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    last year

He's referring to the fact that Biden is Obama's third term...............connect the dots. What in the hell does Bush have to do with Biden so why would he?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.2.1    last year
He's referring to the fact that Biden is Obama's third term

LOL. How is that kool aid ? 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.3  TᵢG  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.2.1    last year
He's referring to the fact that Biden is Obama's third term

He is?   You know this how?   The context certainly does not make a case for this.

Why make excuses for Trump?   You want Haley so why do anything to assist Trump?   Trump is stopping you (and me, and others) from voting for someone we would consider to be fit to serve as PotUS.   

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.2.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  TᵢG @4.2.3    last year

He has said it before that Biden is being driven by Obama FFS. Keep up. JR even commented I it I believe when it was posted here. Do you know the definition of metaphor?

And what context? You're going on JR's say so. 

256

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.2.5  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.2    last year

It's reality flavor. YOu should latch on to some.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.6  TᵢG  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.2.4    last year
He has said it before that Biden is being driven by Obama FFS.

Yes, but that does not mean that every mention of Obama is simply his reference to "Obama's third term".    Especially if he cites facts that clearly are tied to Biden's presidency and make no hint whatsoever that he was playing his little name game.

And what context? You're going on JR's say so. 

What does JR have to do with this?    Calm down.   Emitting piss and vinegar when someone challenges one or your comments just illustrates the weakness of your claim.


Why make excuses for Trump?   You want Haley so why do anything to assist Trump?   Trump is stopping you (and me, and others) from voting for someone we would consider to be fit to serve as PotUS.   

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.7  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.2.5    last year

You think putting up a cartoonish photo of Obama controlling Biden is reality. jrSmiley_55_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.2.9  Hallux  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.2.1    last year
...connect the dots.

Okay, and using the same 'logic', Obama was Bush's 3rd term.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.2.10  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.7    last year

As real as the NT member who is forever recycling Internet memes.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.2.11  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Hallux @4.2.9    last year

You are fucking kidding me right?  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.12  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.2.1    last year

oh my ass he is!

Just anything to justify the butt dirt that comes out of this moron's pie hole

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.2.13  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.12    last year

Three days late and a dollar short. Yes he is. [deleted]

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4.2.14  MrFrost  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.2.1    last year
Biden is Obama's third term

And trump would be Hitler's Third Reich. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5  Ed-NavDoc    last year

Guess it's a good thing I refuse to vote for Trump anyway. I also refuse to vote for Biden.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
5.1  George  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @5    last year

And some idiot will tell you that not voting for either is throwing your vote away.......And then complain about the horrible choices we have, not even realizing how hypocritical they sound.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.1  bugsy  replied to  George @5.1    last year

And some will tell you that you should vote for Biden simply to keep Trump out of office, especially if it looks as if Trump will win, then in a second breath, claim they do not support Biden.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.2  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @5.1.1    last year

You state my oft stated position and then try to spin it to make it look like my position is contradictory.   Either you cannot comprehend my position or you are engaging in intellectual dishonesty (both?).

I do not support Biden for PotUS because he is too old for the office and his running mate is a poor choice for PotUS.   I do not want Biden to be PotUS;  I wish the D party would convince him to step down and promote a viable alternate candidate.

Now, read the above sentence so that you understand it for next time.

Going further, my position is that Trump should NEVER be given the opportunity to be PotUS.   He is a traitor who has demonstrated that he will throw the CotUS and the nation itself under the bus simply to spare his fragile ego.   I have explained this in detail numerous times so if you do not get it by now you never will.

Given Trump should never be PotUS, I will use my vote the best I can to ensure he is not.   Thus, if there is a chance Trump will be PotUS, and Biden is the D nominee, I will vote for Biden as the strongest possible way to use my vote against Trump.

To wit:

  • If Biden IS the nominee and Trump is NOT the nominee and instead Haley (or similar), I will absolutely vote for Haley (or similar).
  • If Trump IS the nominee and has a reasonable chance to win, I will almost certainly vote for the D nominee (even if it is Biden).

There are other possibilities but I am not going to enumerate everything.   I will determine who I vote for depending upon the eventual circumstances.


In short,  I do NOT support Biden for PotUS.

I will, however, vote for Biden as a vote against Trump if Trump is the GOP nominee and he has a chance to win.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.3  bugsy  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.2    last year

That's a hell of a long rebuttal for something where I never mentioned you.

Must be a case of guilt trip.

Be that as it may, you state "Thus, if there is a chance Trump will be PotUS, and Biden is the D nominee, I will vote for Biden as the strongest possible way to use my vote against Trump."

It is coming more and more obvious that Trump will beat Biden in a head to head, therefore, using your own words...you support Biden.

Pretty childish to vote for someone simply to keep another out of office.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.4  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @5.1.3    last year
That's a hell of a long rebuttal for something where I never mentioned you.

Regulars on this forum know who you were referring to and you damn well know it.

It is coming more and more obvious that Trump will beat Biden in a head to head, therefore, using your own words...you support Biden.

Amazing that you cannot grasp this.   I do not want Biden for PotUS, I do not support him for PotUS, but I will vote for him if I must to help keep Trump from occupying the office.

Pretty childish to vote for someone simply to keep another out of office.

Childish?  LOL   That is the best you could come up with?   Well let's just test this.   

If Biden is the nominee, would you vote for Trump to help keep Biden from securing a second term?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.5  bugsy  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.4    last year
If Biden is the nominee, would you vote for Trump to help keep Biden from securing a second term?

I will be voting for the republican nominee, no matter who it is, not to be childish and only to keep "orange man bad" out of office, but because the Republican party follows the same beliefs and values that I embrace.

Next....

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.6  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @5.1.5    last year
I will be voting for the republican nominee, no matter who it is,

Exactly as I expected.   Blind partisanship.   Even if your party nominates a traitor and potentially a convicted felon, you will vote for him.

I doubt anyone is surprised by this.

By the way, you have the option to vote for every other R on your ballot if you wish.   You could support your party without helping to elect a traitor as PotUS.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.7  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.6    last year

Not everyone thinks he is a traitor, that is just a matter if opinion.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.8  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.7    last year
Not everyone thinks he is a traitor, that is just a matter if opinion.

Not everyone thinks the planet is a spheroid.   Not everyone thinks evolution is the biological process that produces new species.   

Irrelevant.


Traitor = "one who betrays another's trust or is false to an obligation or duty"

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Do you believe that Trump's Big Lie con-job was preserving, protecting, and defending the CotUS or an attempt to violate it?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.9  bugsy  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.6    last year
By the way, you have the option to vote for every other R on your ballot if you wish. 

[deleted]

I clearly stated that I would vote for whomever is the Republican nominee, that includes the other candidates running.

I, like some, do not subscribe to blind partisanship by childishly voting for someone simply to keep another out of the White House.

There are those that claim to be independent that have, through a partisan lens,  repeatedly stated they would vote for Biden ONLY to keep Trump out of the White House.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
5.1.10  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.8    last year
Irrelevant.

It's completely relevant.  If a person doesn't believe he's a traitor, then the whole "how could you vote for a traitor" idea is meaningless.

defending the CotUS or an attempt to violate it?

Why would it necessarily be either?  There are several other possibilites.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.11  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.8    last year

the fact that you think he is a traitor is just as irrelevant or does that make too much sense?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.12  Texan1211  replied to  Jack_TX @5.1.10    last year
It's completely relevant

Of course it is relevant.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.13  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @5.1.10    last year
If a person doesn't believe he's a traitor, then the whole "how could you vote for a traitor" idea is meaningless.

What is irrelevant (and this should have been clear given what I wrote) is the observation that not everyone thinks Trump is a traitor.   So what?   Not everyone thinks evolution is the biological process for speciation.   Does that mean it is not true?   No.  

The question on whether or not Trump is a traitor is based on facts and the meaning of the word 'traitor'.   

Personal opinion is irrelevant in a question of truth.

Why would it necessarily be either? 

Well when you are PotUS and you engage in fraud, coercion, lying and incitement to steal a US presidential election, I would like to hear your argument as to why this is not in violation of the CotUS.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.14  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.11    last year
the fact that you think he is a traitor is just as irrelevant or does that make too much sense?

Correct, Texan, my opinion on whether of not Trump is a traitor is irrelevant.

What matters is the truth determination based on what I wrote in the second part of @5.1.8

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.15  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.13    last year

So because YOU have deemed Trump a traitor, that's it?

No one else can have a different opinion than you?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.16  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.15    last year

Read @5.1.14

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.17  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.14    last year

right. your opinion doesn't matter any more than anyone else's.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.18  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.17    last year

Correct.   And I have not suggested otherwise.

What is your next strawman argument?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.19  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.16    last year

[]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.20  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.18    last year

No strawman.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.21  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Jack_TX @5.1.10    last year

Donald Trump approved of a plan to have Mike Pence, after some machinations related to the swing states electoral votes, declare him the winner of the election, even though he lost by 7 million votes. 

And he sat on his hands while the riot was going on, because he wanted the riot to succeed in stopping or delaying the count. 

he's a traitor. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.22  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.18    last year

It is long past time to expect than any of these people is going to do the right thing and vote to keep Trump out of office. They are a lost cause. We have to make sure that all the anti Trump voters go to the polls, because it may come down to who has the better turnout. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.23  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.22    last year

At his rally tonight , during a segment where he was praising the worlds authoritarian leaders, Trump confused Kim Jong Un of North Korea with Xi Jinping, the leader of China. 

Senile ol Trump got two of his favorite dictators mixed up. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.24  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.22    last year

Both Jack and Texan have publicly volunteered that they will not vote for Trump.   Bugsy has volunteered that he will vote for Trump.

If you are wondering why those who will not vote for Trump spend so much time defending anything negative against Trump, then I will say that this is a good question.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.25  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.24    last year
Both Jack and Texan have publicly volunteered that they will not vote for Trump.   Bugsy has volunteered that he will vote for Trump.

I dont believe any of them. "Conservatives" and much of the mainstream media, have been trying to normalize Trump for the past 8 years. They arent going to stop now. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.26  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.16    last year

already did, of course.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.27  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.25    last year

I believe Bugsy when he declares that he will vote for Trump if he is the nominee.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.28  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.24    last year
If you are wondering why those who will not vote for Trump spend so much time defending anything negative against Trump,

Actually, I have been wondering why you keep talking about Trump so much.

You have volunteered that you are considering voting for Biden under special circumstances.

And?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.29  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.22    last year
It is long past time to expect than any of these people is going to do the right thing and vote to keep Trump out of office.

I vote FOR someone, not against someone. I consider that to be rather stupid.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.30  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.28    last year
You have volunteered that you are considering voting for Biden under special circumstances.

What is the point of you repeating that I will vote for Biden if we have Biden v Trump?  

I have made that crystal clear.   What, exactly, are you trying to accomplish?

Actually, I have been wondering why you keep talking about Trump so much.

Because he is a traitor who is likely to be the GOP nominee and he has a chance to actually be the PotUS.

You do not think that puts him front and center in the new cycle?   Get a clue, Texan.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.31  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.29    last year
I consider that to be rather stupid.

Explain how it is 'stupid' to use one's vote in the most effective way possible to help ensure Trump is not elected PotUS.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.32  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.31    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.33  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.30    last year
What is the point of you repeating that I will vote for Biden if we have Biden v Trump?  

What is your point repeating who I won't vote for?

I have made that crystal clear.   What, exactly, are you trying to accomplish?

My position was equally as clear, what, exactly, were you trying to accomplish?

Get a clue, Texan.

Buy a vowel, TiG.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.34  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.30    last year
You do not think that puts him front and center in the new cycle? 

Just go right ahead and tell me what I think.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.35  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.33    last year
What is your point repeating who I won't vote for?

I responded in context to JR's post.   It was not a repeat, it was unique.

In contrast, you are repeating my position (most of the time with spin) across multiple articles.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.36  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.31    last year
Explain how it is 'stupid' to use one's vote in the most effective way possible to help ensure Trump is not elected PotUS.

Why on earth would you ask me to explain your rationale for voting for Biden?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.37  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.35    last year
It was not a repeat, it was unique.

Well, it damn sure ain't the first time I have seen my name in your posts saying I wouldn't vote for Trump.

More than once IS a repeat--not unique at all.

In contrast, you are repeating my position (most of the time with spin) across multiple articles.  

If I misstate your position, let me know.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.38  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.37    last year
More than once IS a repeat--not unique at all.

Prove it.

If I misstate your position, let me know.

I do, every time you do it.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.39  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.38    last year

Let it go.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.40  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.38    last year

As Shakespeare said, they doth protest too much. 

I would rather see them say that they understand that he tried to overthrow the government, which none of them unequivocally do. A conservative who wont admit Trump tried to steal the election and overthrow the government is likely to vote for him when the time comes. 

And just as much of a tell, when someone thinks that the only thing wrong with Trump is that he made "a few mean tweets" , they are likely to vote for Trump no matter what they say beforehand. Lets not coddle such people. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
5.1.41  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.40    last year

FYI John - the actual quote is "The lady doth protest too much, methinks," and it is one of those lines from Shakespeare that is so very simple, but expresses enormous complexity of thought and emotion. It is spoken by Prince Hamlet’s mother, Gertrude, in Act 3, Scene 2 of the play, Hamlet.

Jist sayin' :-)

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1.42  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.40    last year
tried to steal the election and overthrow the government

What drama..................overthrow the government LMAO............... not a snowball's chance in hell.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5.1.43  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.24    last year

See post #5 above.😏

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.44  Texan1211  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.1.42    last year
What drama..................overthrow the government LMAO............... not a snowball's chance in hell.

Of course not.

Hasn't stopped all the chicken little shenanigans, though.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.45  TᵢG  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @5.1.43    last year

I read that originally, but I already knew your position since you have stated it before.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.46  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.2    last year
Either you cannot comprehend my position or you are engaging in intellectual dishonesty (both?).

Both for 1000, Alex

And you know you will continue to try and explain this to the thickheaded amongst us. You're a better person than me because by now I would have shouted fuck off and then gotten a nice vacay

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.2  TᵢG  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @5    last year

Trouble is, it seems enough people plan to vote for Trump to put him within reach of the presidency.

 
 

Who is online


Thomas


407 visitors