╌>

Republican Group Launches $50M Anti-Donald Trump Ad Campaign

  
Via:  John Russell  •  9 months ago  •  43 comments

By:   International Business Times

Republican Group Launches $50M Anti-Donald Trump Ad Campaign
A GOP PAC has launched a $50 million campaign that calls on voters to drop their support for Donald Trump, the Republican presidential frontrunner set for a rematch with incumbent Democratic

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Then-US president Donald Trump was impeached by the Democratic-majority House of Representatives in 2021 for inciting an insurrection but was acquitted by the Senate.AFP

KEY POINTS

  • The PAC said the people who provided 100 videos for the campaign agree that Trump should "never hold office again"
  • Many of the former Trump supporters pointed to the deadly Jan. 6 capitol riot as their reason for turning away
  • One voter said he can no longer stand Trump's cheating, lying, and "illegal activities"

A group of Republican supporters who once backed ex-president Donald Trump have launched a multi-million-dollar ad campaign to convince American voters across the country to not vote for the business mogul in his third presidential run.

The group, called Republican Accountability PAC, noted that while every voter who put their faith in the business mogul in 2016 and 2020 have different reasons for turning against him this time, "they all agree on one thing: he must never hold office again," as per the group's website.

"Former Republicans and Republican-leaning voters hold the key to 2024, and reaching them with credible, relatable messengers is essential to re-creating the anti-Trump coalition that made the difference in 2020," said Sarah Longwell, president of the GOP PAC in a press release Tuesday that announced the $50 million campaign.

"It establishes a permission structure that says that - whatever their complaints about Joe Biden - Donald Trump is too dangerous and too unhinged to ever be president again," she added.

The PAC released 100 videos this week that featured anti-Trump Republicans who explained why they were no longer backing him this time around.

Beth, a voter from Virginia who voted for Trump both in 2016 and 2020, said she would "never" put her vote on him again, citing the January 6 capitol riot which, for her, "was kind of like a sucker punch." She added that there are "so many things" she's concerned about if Trump takes the presidency again.

Louisiana native Eric, a 2016 Trump voter and "life-long Republican," had a similar reason as Beth. "We all watched it [the capitol riot] as a country. We all know what it was," he said.


Eric from Louisiana is a former Trump voter who will never vote for him again:
"Biden versus Trump 2.0. I don't think that's most people's dream race, but it is the easiest choice I've ever had, and I was a long-time Republican who never considered voting Democrat." pic.twitter.com/g5h9eYCpfj

— Republican Voters Against Trump (@AccountableGOP) March 13, 2024

Ethan, from Wisconsin, said he will vote for Biden this time as the Jan. 6 insurrection was "the end of Donald Trump for me." He said the business magnate is "dangerous" for the American people.


Ethan from Wisconsin voted for Donald Trump in 2020 but will support Joe Biden in 2024 because he believes Donald Trump is not fit to be president:
"January 6 was the end of Donald Trump for me." pic.twitter.com/O1WlStOec5

— Republican Voters Against Trump (@AccountableGOP) March 13, 2024

"I am a conservative Republican, but I cannot stand the lying, the cheating, the illegal activities that Trump has perpetuated," said Dave from Pennsylvania.


Dave is a two-time Trump voter from Pennsylvania who will never vote for him again because of his actions after the 2020 election:
"I am a conservative Republican, but I cannot stand the lying, the cheating, the illegal activities that Trump has perpetuated." pic.twitter.com/4GgeUCTPhU

— Republican Voters Against Trump (@AccountableGOP) March 13, 2024

Trump and Biden are set for a rematch of their turbulent 2020 battle for presidency in November this year.

Read moreTrump Criticizes Biden For Expressing Regret Over Labeling Laken Riley's Alleged Killer As 'Illegal'Biden, Trump Officially Clinch Nominations: Contrasting Strategies And Challenges Ahead


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    9 months ago

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @1    9 months ago

I understand and agree with the perspective of these individuals.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Sophomore Quiet
1.1.1  Igknorantzruls  replied to  TᵢG @1.1    9 months ago

It is great to see some people able to realize and admit, hey, I fckd up, but now, realize the error in my weighs US All DOWN, "I unfortunately did once vote for the Orange clown, but now see what i should have seen as his mind is not sound, herd mentality is watt has been found, so my test ament is to test a Cull this herd as i depart from this herd after hearing what i heard from an Orange POS (Point Off Course) as he took US for All he could manage the first time, about time, the rest rinse off the Orange slime who like a creamsicle, truly is stuffed with all white power, that is blatant as can be, asz he has brought out the worst in our 'United' states while denying the denial , like a young girl he did defile, under R, for he thought it was his "right", just asz he stated, he can grab em buy the pussy he did, butt better plug that kisser fore his Orange asz skin is now in play, and he has been required to pay, yet if elected , does anyone really think he will abide by what N E COURT, even one Supreme,did say? cause i'd say get off that pipe , and WAKE UP, as more than a bad dream , asz too many too extreme to maintain our founders dream, and they need to Wake the FCK UP, asz these citizens have, B 4 we are all country-men, who have NOT....

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2  Ronin2    9 months ago

A non vote for Trump is a vote for Brandon the Human Fuck Up Machine; and condoning the last 8 years and counting of what Democrats put this country through.

TDS is the Democrat's and Brandon's only hope in 2024.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @2    9 months ago

Republican Accountability PAC

it is not a Democratic group

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    9 months ago

Cripes! It says so right in the title! How can anyone think it's a Democratic PAC....unless they didn't read the article and/or title or just don't give a shit

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @2    9 months ago
On January 6, 2021, the United States Capitol was attacked by radical Trump supporters who were attempting to overturn a  fair election.

The attackers were directly incited by Trump and the overwhelming majority of Republicans in Congress who had been falsely claiming, for months—and in the immediate moments before the attack—that the election had been stolen from Trump.

This was the lie that motivated the attack on the Capitol. We cannot allow it to persist. It erodes Americans’ faith in the integrity of our electoral system. It creates more opportunity for violence from radical actors who have been told by elected officials that the election was stolen from them. And it threatens the very democracy we all cherish.

Republicans would like to simply move on. But without accountability there is no clear path forward. That is why we’ve launched the Republican Accountability Project.

To that end, the Republican Accountability Project will:

  1. Support Republicans in Congress who, at great personal and political risk, are defying party leadership and defending the institutions of our republic;
  2. Work to unseat those who have tried to overturn a legitimate election and supported impunity for political violence, including by strategically recruiting and promoting primary challengers through our PAC;
  3. Push back against lies and conspiracy theories about widespread voter fraud and “rigged” elections.

If you’d like to join our effort, please sign your name to stand with us for accountability. If you’re able, please consider making a donation to help us ensure we have the resources we need to defend those defending our democracy.

About - Republican Accountability

 

Accountability matters.

If you’re a Republican politician who supported the Big Lie that there was widespread fraud in this election, if you objected to the certification of legitimate Electoral College votes, or otherwise pretended that Congress could overturn the will of the American people, you will be held accountable.
 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.3  MrFrost  replied to  Ronin2 @2    9 months ago

Blah blah "TDS", "Brandon"...  Like arguing with a 7 year old. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    9 months ago

Ah yes, the conservative Obama voting Republicans. I know when I think true blue conservatives, I think of guys who gave 7 figures to Obama PACs. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    9 months ago

To me, anyone who truly ascribes to the principles of the GOP prior to Trump would find Trump to be an anathema.   The former GOP was conservative and based on family values, rule of law, adherence to the CotUS, etc.   Trump's character alone violates these principles.   But his actions as PotUS where he demonstrated that he cares more about himself than the nation (e.g. trying to downplay the COVID pandemic for fear of a psychological negative effect on the economy) illustrate that his character will manifest in his official actions as PotUS.   

The coup de grâce was his behavior post his election loss.   It continues to amaze and disappoint to see that the majority of the GOP will vote for a demonstrable traitor — a vindictive, irresponsible, narcissist, demagogue asshole who is the only PotUS in our history to try to steal a presidential election through fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement.   An individual who could very well be a convicted felon by inauguration day given his indictments which notably include:

  • conspiracy to defraud the U.S.  (18 U.S.C. § 371)
  • conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding  (18 U.S.C. § 1512(k))
  • obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding   (18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2) , 2)
  • conspiracy against rights   (18 U.S.C. § 241)

It is a profound failure of reason for the GOP to even consider such a scoundrel, much less flock to him.   This vindictive, cash-challenged, morally bankrupt individual with the powers of the presidency would be terrible for the nation.

This is not the GOP of Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan or either Bush.   This is a bizarre cult that has adopted outrageous lying and cheating as their modus operandi.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @3.1    9 months ago

There is an old saying something like "in for a dime in for a dollar", which I think means that once you start down a certain path sometimes it is hard to get off that path. A lot of these people started out in 2016 seeing trump as a breath of fresh air, so to speak, in politics (even though in my opinion it was ridiculous even at that time,) and as the years went by and his monumental character defects became more and more obvious they were already in, and now it's hard to get out and still justify their original faith in him. So now they are just in a daily state of denial

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @3.1    9 months ago

I don't consider a person who's been married 3 times to be the Face of Family Values.

But I believe in that whole "until death do you part"

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.3  TᵢG  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.1.2    9 months ago

Nowadays, divorce seems to be much less of a concern regarding politicians.   Infidelity, sexual attacks, vulgar incendiary language, lying, cheating, etc. used to be campaign killers.   But now, with Trump, even violating the CotUS and specific laws as a sitting PotUS is not a concern.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.3    9 months ago

I can see one divorce especially if a couple married young. But after number 2 it's time to do some introspection.

I think cheating on a spouse is heinous.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.1.5  JBB  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.1.4    9 months ago

Remember what Elizabeth Taylor Hilton Wilding Todd Fisher Burton Burton Warner Fortensky said about her husbands and marriage...

"NEXT!"

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @3.1    9 months ago
e, anyone who truly ascribes to the principles of the GOP prior to Trump would find Trump to be an anathema.

but giving money to Barack Obama  is consistent with the principles of the GOP?

This is a grift. It's no different than if I started a PAC calling it for Democrats against Biden. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  TᵢG @3.1    9 months ago
  • conspiracy to defraud the U.S.  (18 U.S.C. § 371)
  • conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding  (18 U.S.C. § 1512(k))
  • obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding   (18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2) , 2)
  • conspiracy against rights   (18 U.S.C. § 241)

You forgot insurrection...................oh wait.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.8  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.6    9 months ago
but giving money to Barack Obama  is consistent with the principles of the GOP?

What are you talking about?

This is a grift. 

If they actively pursue a campaign against Trump, it is not a grift.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.9  TᵢG  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.7    9 months ago
You forgot insurrection...................oh wait.

Do you have a point?

Jack Smith did not charge Trump with insurrection.   That does not mean he did not engage in insurrection.   From what I have read, Smith focused on charges that had less need for judgment calls (e.g. words like insurrection are not defined in law).

Do you agree / disagree with my post or are you simply deflecting?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.10  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.8    9 months ago
What are you talking about?

This seed 

 actively pursue a campaign against Trump, it is not a grift.

It is when Democrats call themselves Republicans.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.11  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.10    9 months ago

What is your evidence that these are Democrats?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.12  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.9    9 months ago
Jack Smith did not charge Trump with insurrection.   That does not mean he did not engage in insurrection. 

No I think Jack Smith doesn't feel comfortable going down that rabbit hole. Pure and simple. That is my point. You and others have tried and convicted him in the court of public opinion. Period and THAT holds no water whatsoever.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.13  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.12    9 months ago

People who have read the evidence think that he's guilty, people who have not read the evidence think he may be innocent

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.1.14  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.6    9 months ago
Barack Obama

ODS ODS!!!!!!!

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Sophomore Quiet
3.1.15  Igknorantzruls  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.13    9 months ago

Why would anyone wish to know the full story, when it will cause them pain having to admit their Trumper, is basically an insane in the membrane insurrectionist gone wild, like a spoiled conceited child.  

No sane thinking person would believe Trump is innocent after looking at ALL of the evidence, for it is pretty damn obvious when all of the context is taken in. Well at least to thinking individuals.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.16  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.13    9 months ago

Must be Cracker Jack Jack didn't read it then......................

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.17  TᵢG  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.12    9 months ago
No I think Jack Smith doesn't feel comfortable going down that rabbit hole.

How is this different from what I typed?:

TiG@3.1.9From what I have read, Smith focused on charges that had less need for judgment calls (e.g. words like insurrection are not defined in law).

You and others have tried and convicted him in the court of public opinion. Period and THAT holds no water whatsoever.

First of all, none of us can try and convict him.   That is done by a court of law.   What we can do is look at the evidence and draw a conclusion.   The conclusion is obvious.

Do you believe Trump did NOT engage in?:

  • conspiracy to defraud the U.S.  (18 U.S.C. § 371)
  • conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding  (18 U.S.C. § 1512(k))
  • obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding   (18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2) , 2)
  • conspiracy against rights   (18 U.S.C. § 241)

Do you think that attempting to violate the CotUS through fraud, lying, coercion and incitement should be overlooked ... that Trump NOT be held accountable for his actions after his loss?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.18  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.8    9 months ago
Republican Voters Against Trump
@AccountableGOP
·
: "One of the main tactics of autocrats is to exhaust people...You break through by not getting exhausted. This is the time for Joe Biden and his campaign to roll out 1,000 surrogates to go on offense against Donald Trump and say you do not want this guy."
===============
Sarah Longwell  is an American political strategist and publisher of the centrist news and opinion website  The Bulwark . A member of the  Republican Party , she is the founder of  Republican Voters Against Trump  (now the Republican Accountability Project), which spent millions of dollars to defeat  President Trump  in 2020.  According to  The   New Yorker , Longwell has "dedicated her career to fighting Trump’s takeover of her party."
 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4  JBB    9 months ago

Meanwhile President Biden is raising record amounts of campaign donations on his own account from everybody, except MAGAs...

This as the gop's brokeass MAGA committee (The RNC) is almost bankrupt and losing donors as they pay Trump's huge legal bills!

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Sophomore Quiet
4.1  Igknorantzruls  replied to  JBB @4    9 months ago

Trumps greed and in need, of that donor cash, will greatly diminish the GOP's ability to finance lower tier campaigns, and thus increase the likelihood of the house flipping,imho. So you go Lara, you go girl

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2  TᵢG  replied to  JBB @4    9 months ago

One can only hope that failures like this will continue and cause Trump to fail.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.2.1  JBB  replied to  TᵢG @4.2    9 months ago

All one can do? No, one can also donate, raise money, organize, volunteer and drive voters to the poll if necessary to reelect President Biden and ensure Trump and every other MAGA syncophant running get their butts whooped badly on Nov 5th!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.2  TᵢG  replied to  JBB @4.2.1    9 months ago

My words do not connote "all one can do".   I stated that "One can only hope that failures like this will continue and cause Trump to fail.".   Meaning:   hopefully failures like this will lead to Trump losing.

BTW, once I read this article I donated to the RA PAC.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.2.3  JBB  replied to  TᵢG @4.2.2    9 months ago

I was merely implying that "One" can, could and in my opinion should be more enthusiastic in supporting President Biden!

2024 is no time for political half heartedness! One's choices are not equally good or bad. The differences are stark...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.4  TᵢG  replied to  JBB @4.2.3    9 months ago

You will need to settle for me being enthusiastically against Trump.   That, JBB, is my honest view.    I think it should be sufficient given I am, in result, working to ensure Trump fails and am going to vote for your candidate.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.2.5  JBB  replied to  TᵢG @4.2.4    9 months ago

IMO lukewarm sucks whether it be coffee, a bath or politics... 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.6  TᵢG  replied to  JBB @4.2.5    9 months ago

I am not going to lie about my position, JBB.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @4    9 months ago
e President Biden is raising record amounts of campaign donations on his own account from everybody, except MAGAs.

Since they've become the party of Wall Street, Democrats have always raised more money than Republicans. It's not new, and not really Trump related though his appeal to working class voters has probably exacerbated it. . Democrats swim in corporate donations and dark money. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.3.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.3    9 months ago
his appeal to working class voters

trump couldn't care less about the working class

someone like AOC cares about the working class

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.3.2  JBB  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.3    9 months ago

You mean since the gop became a bunch of MAGA nutters?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.3.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @4.3.1    9 months ago
like AOC cares about the working class

Lol. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5  Greg Jones    9 months ago

The lefties are losing it big time. They've gone all in on defeating Trump by any means possible, private or public, legal or not. 

The wider electorate continues to ignore them.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1  TᵢG  replied to  Greg Jones @5    9 months ago
They've gone all in on defeating Trump by any means possible, private or public, legal or not. 

The problem is not them.  It is those who are voting for Trump.

 
 

Who is online


187 visitors