╌>

Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg Agrees to Postpone Trump's Sentencing

  
Via:  John Russell  •  5 months ago  •  8 comments

By:   Josh Fiallo (The Daily Beast)

Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg Agrees to Postpone Trump's Sentencing
It's the latest victory for the former president, who's fought tooth and nail to have each of his criminal trials drag on until after the 2024 election.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


DELAY, DELAY, DELAY

It's the latest victory for the former president, who's fought tooth and nail to have each of his criminal trials drag on until after the 2024 election.

Updated Jul. 02, 2024 11:46AM EDT / Published Jul. 02, 2024 11:33AM EDT

Reuters/Sam Wolfe


Donald Trump was gifted yet another big win Tuesday morning after Manhattan prosecutors agreed to postpone his criminal sentencing so Judge Juan Merchan can weigh whether Monday's immunity ruling by the Supreme Court may render his conviction moot.

The decision to officially postpone the sentencing lies with Merchan, but he's likely to do so with both sides asking for yet another delay.

Trump has fought tooth and nail to have each of his criminal trials pushed back until after the 2024 election—a once-lofty goal that appears to be inching toward reality after a favorable Supreme Court ruling.

The former president was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in New York—crimes related to a coverup during his 2016 presidential campaign that sought to hide an alleged affair with porn star Stormy Daniels.

Trump's case in New York did not pertain to his presidency or official acts, which the Supreme Court ruling provides explicit immunity for, but involved his personal activity during his campaign. Still, his lawyers argued Monday that prosecutors had built their case partly on evidence from his time in the White House and that he should now be immune from a conviction.

The Manhattan District Attorney's Office wrote a letter to Merchan on Tuesday to indicate they didn't oppose Trump's request to delay the sentencing, even though they firmly believe Trump's conviction should still stand.

"Although we believe defendant's arguments to be without merit, we do not oppose his request for leave to file and his putative request to adjourn sentencing pending determination of his motion," wrote the assistant district attorney Joshua Steinglass, according to CBS News.

Trump was scheduled to be sentenced on July 11, with him looking at up to four years in prison. Legal experts told The Daily Beast his previously-clean criminal record means he'll likely not be sent to prison, however, and is more likely to be slapped with probation.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    5 months ago
Trump has fought tooth and nail to have each of his criminal trials pushed back 

hardly the actions of an innocent man

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @1    5 months ago

Yeah, innocent people hate due process,

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1    5 months ago

No, just Democrats.

Due process gets in the way of their "justice". Which has nothing to do with the Constitution or the law.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1    5 months ago

Yeah, but it's legal and part of due process. But Bragg was really stretching the limits of credibility to somehow find that some obscure misdemeanors magically expanded to 34 felonies. in a blatant case of political persecution and election interference

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.2.1  Ronin2  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    5 months ago

In third world countries run by tinhorn dictators they call it a kangaroo court. 

The judge made sure of the outcome of that trial from the beginning to the TDS driven jury's verdict in the end.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Sophomore Quiet
1.2.2  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    5 months ago
a blatant case of political persecution and election interference

why can't you guys ever just admit Trump is a lying traitorous criminal pos >?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1    5 months ago

Even malicious, Soros backed DAs know they have to abide by Supreme Court rulings.

They should delay sentencing until the verdict goes through the appeal process.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2  Tacos!    5 months ago
Trump has fought tooth and nail to have each of his criminal trials pushed back until after the 2024 election

All while insisting that he has done nothing wrong and has nothing to hide. He doesn’t want his day in court. Because every time someone gets a chance to hold him accountable in court, he loses. And he knows it.

Trump's case in New York did not pertain to his presidency or official acts

This. There should be a hearing based on the SCOTUS ruling, but it shouldn’t be a hard question as to whether he was acting as president.

 
 

Who is online



Snuffy
Dig


650 visitors