Illegal US Border Crossings Aren't Really Breaking Records - Bloomberg
By: Justin Fox (Bloomberg. com)
this article is from earlier this year, but all its information certainly still applies
The trajectory over the past decade doesn’t change much, but the comparison with the early 2000s does. There appear to have been fewer illegal border crossings in 2023 than in 2000, 2004 and 2005.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Federal agents used to catch only a third of those trying to enter the country unlawfully from Mexico. Now it's close to 90% as most simply turn themselves in.
Illegal US Border Crossings Aren’t Really Breaking Records
Justin Fox 8-11 minutes 3/20/2024
The number of people who are apprehended by US Border Patrol agents or voluntarily surrender to them at or near the border with Mexico has skyrocketed recently, setting records in each of the past three fiscal years — and exceeding last year’s numbers in each of the first four months of the fiscal year that started in October.
This is usually interpreted to mean that illegal immigration is also setting records, but that’s probably not the case.
The problem with the statistics on what the Border Patrol’s parent agency, US Customs and Border Protection, now calls Southwest land border encounters is that they leave out people who successfully evade the agency’s agents. In past decades, these were the majority of illegal border crossers. “Estimates are that only one out of three coming into our country are actually caught,” President Jimmy Carter said in 1977 . More precise — albeit still pretty uncertain — Department of Homeland Security estimates of the Southwest border apprehension rate in the 2000s range from 33% (in 2003) to 43% (in 2000 and 2009).
In recent years, the apprehension rate has been much higher than that. According to the most recent estimate by DHS (Customs and Border Protection’s parent department), it was 81% in the 2021 fiscal year. Going by monthly CBP “got away” estimates compiled by the Cato Institute’s David J. Bier , the apprehension rate was 79% in both the 2022 and 2023 fiscal years, and 92% in the first four months of the 2024 fiscal year. That rate has risen partly because the US-Mexico border is more tightly controlled than it used to be, with more Border Patrol agents, taller walls and fences and more extensive and advanced surveillance technology. But mainly it’s just that most of the people crossing the border illegally don’t want to sneak past the Border Patrol. Instead, they intend to turn themselves in and apply for asylum.
This wave of asylum applicants truly is unprecedented, overwhelming the US asylum court system and swamping cities with newcomers in need of shelter. My point here isn’t that everything is hunky-dory. But estimates of how many illegal border crossers don’t encounter US agents are an essential piece of the immigration picture, and they haven’t received nearly enough attention in the media and in political debate. So I’m going to give them some.
To start, here’s the — shocking — picture painted by the CBP’s Southwest land border encounters data and equivalent earlier statistics on “illegal alien apprehensions” along the border published by the Border Patrol.
Illegal Immigrant Border Apprehensions Are Breaking Records
Southwest land border encounters by fiscal year
Sources: US Customs and Border Protection; US Border Patrol
But again, in past decades far more people probably crossed the border illegally without getting caught. To estimate how many, DHS has used a statistical model based on surveys of recently turned-back border crossers conducted by El Colegio de la Frontera Norte , a Mexican government research center based in Tijuana, and some assumptions about their subsequent behavior. Doubts about the reliability of this model have been growing as the population of border crossers changes, and a pandemic-caused halt to surveys in 2020 and 2021 led DHS to skip making a model-based estimate for the 2021 fiscal year in its most recent Border Security Metrics Report . At the same time, though, increased electronic surveillance and more consistent standards have resulted in greatly improved CBP got-away reporting, which the DHS is increasingly relying on to produce apprehension-rate estimates.
Here’s what actual Southwest border crossings look like if you factor in model-based DHS apprehension estimates for 2000 through 2013, an average of the model-based and got-away-based estimates that DHS calls its “working estimate apprehension rate” for 2014-2020, the got-away-based rate reported by DHS for the 2021 fiscal year, and 2022 and 2023 got-away numbers released by the CBP in speeches, testimony and leaks to journalists.
Illegal Border Crossings Probably Aren’t Breaking Records
Illegal Southwest border crossings by fiscal year
Sources: US Department of Homeland Security; US Customs and Border Protection; Cato Institute
*Calculated using DHS estimates for 2000-2021; Customs and Border Protection "got away" numbers assembled by the Cato Institute's David Bier for 2022-2023.
The trajectory over the past decade doesn’t change much, but the comparison with the early 2000s does. There appear to have been fewer illegal border crossings in 2023 than in 2000, 2004 and 2005.
What about before 2000? As indicated by President Carter’s 1977 remarks, apprehension rates were probably similar to or lower than those of the 2000s. To provide a long-run view, I’ve (generously) assumed a 40% apprehension rate from 1960 through 1999, and expressed the inflows as a percentage of US population.
The Long View of Illegal Immigration
Illegal Southwest border crossings as a percentage of US population
Sources: US Department of Homeland Security; US Customs and Border Protection; US Census Bureau; Cato Institute
*Calculated using DHS estimates for 2000-2021; Customs and Border Protection "got away" numbers assembled by the Cato Institute's David Bier for 2022-2023.
By this measure, illegal crossings of the Southwest border were lower in 2023 than in most of the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. That doesn’t necessarily mean illegal immigration was lower, as individuals can show up multiple times in these statistics, and in past decades many Mexicans repeatedly crossed and recrossed the border illegally as work opportunities in the US waxed and waned or simply returned home to visit family. Then again, from March 21, 2020, to May 11, 2023, as the emergency Covid-19 health order known as Title 42 led the CBP to turn back even asylum-seekers, many tried repeatedly — and were counted multiple times in the border encounter statistics.
These statistics also don’t count smugglers and others who cross the Southwest border but turn back, of whom there were an estimated 174,320 in the 2021 fiscal year; those who enter the US illegally at places other than the Mexican border, whose numbers are usually small outside of exceptional events like the 1980 Mariel boatlift ; or the hundreds of thousands of legal visitors who overstay their visas every year. But overall, the actual rise and fall and rise of illegal immigration to the US over the past six-plus decades has probably followed a trajectory roughly similar to the one depicted above.
One aspect of that trajectory that doesn’t seem to be widely understood is that illegal immigration rates were at their lowest in half a century in the 2010s. In fact, they were probably negative on net, with the Pew Research Center estimating based on Census and other data that the US unauthorized immigrant population fell from a record 12.2 million in 2007 to 10.2 million in 2019.
Illegal Southwest border crossings began to rise again during Donald Trump’s presidency, with the estimated number more than doubling from the 2016 to 2019 fiscal years before falling with the arrival of Covid-19. They’ve nearly tripled from that 2019 total since, and the most recent estimate I’ve seen of the unauthorized immigrant population, from the Center for Immigration Studies, puts it at 12.8 million as of October.
As already noted, it’s a much different sort of illegal immigration than that of the 1980s to 2000s. Rather than mostly Mexicans trying to get past border agents, it’s people from all over the world turning themselves in and hoping they’ll be allowed to stay. “A lot of them do have genuine asylum claims,” said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy director of the American Immigration Council, “but there are also people who arrive at the border never having heard of asylum but thinking the US has open border laws.” He added, “We don’t have a functioning system that exists right now to distinguish who is who.”
Whether this is better or worse than the illegal immigration that prevailed from the 1980s to 2000s is a question I’m not going to attempt to answer here. But I’m at least pretty sure it’s not any larger in scale.
Tags
Who is online
328 visitors
Interesting observations. I would guess probably more true than not, once you remove politically generated hysteria.
Not if one actually lives right on the Southwestern border.
I appreciate your anecdotal opinions, but all I can do is go by what I see in the media.
"..., but all I can do is go by what I see in the media."
That does necessarily mean that what is put out by many in the the media is in fact accurate.
The graph clearly shows that the crossings went up dramatically in 2020 when Biden was elected. There is no credible reason to believe they will go down if Harris wins.
I would expect the crossings to increase, perhaps dramatically, if Harris is elected.
She will no doubt cave in to the far left and rescind Biden's orders (the ones imitating Trump's orders--and actually effective) to start the flow.
Biden will rescind them the day after the election, win or lose.
It's been obvious for years he'd crack down the months before the election to show progress.
Miss Cleo called. She wants you to get out of her lane...
The record-breaking, so far, is complete. Now it is a matter of whether it's Harris or Trump. And I think we all know what happens if either of them is elected. One will be a threat to migrants, while the other will be perceived as Mother Theresa.
If this is true, why are cities panicking and borrowing/spending hundreds of millions for normal amounts of immigrants?
How much do they normally spend?
Less.
Why aren't immigrants self-supporting?
Way less. Here in Denver untold millions are being spent to take care of these "newcomers" who have greatly increased the homeless population. Give them all kinds of freebies and benefits, and of course they will keep coming.
No, street kids and homeless migrated to Colorado for legal weed. Unemployment is nill for Colorado immigrant workers.
Democrats don't understand the ramifications of their own disastrous policies.
Well, then, why is Denver spending millions of dollars on immigrants?
MAGA are in denial that immigration and abortion are not the trump cards they were. Roe is overturned! Unemployment is non-existent. Refugee immigration has slowed to a trickle...
Everything is coming up roses in Kamala Harris' America!
As soon as she vanquishes Trump it is Happy Days Again!
Lol. That's too silly to even be propaganda.
I need a link proving they are specific to immigrant refugees!
The homeless population in Downtown Denver are American.
Sure, I CAN and DO back MY claims up.
Denver has spent more than $33M to support immigrants in the last year, more aid needed - CBS Colorado (cbsnews.com)
Illegal immigrants cost up to $340M across Denver metro | Local-government | coloradopolitics.com
15,000 immigrants cost Denver $23 million so far | News | denvergazette.com
Denver is scaling back its spending on migrants : NPR
There you are.
Now, can YOU explain why we are spending any money on immigrants, and why they are not self-supporting?
Absolutely no point in responding to my post in that manner. Could you at least ATTEMPT to link it to something I wrote?????
You have been provided the links requested. I will take your silence as capitulation.
You make it sound like they are spending a lot more than usual, but you don't even know how much the normally spend? Can't you even back up your own claim?
I assume that some northern cities are receiving higher numbers of migrants than they have ever experienced before because they were being sent there by Abbott. When thousands of people arrive in a short period of time they require emergency housing , and other services , which costs a lot of money .
America has to either decide, by law, that migrants can no longer claim "asylum", or expand the capability to process such people in a timely way. Right now we are in a twilight zone of neither alternative.
Why should we pay for them?
do not ask me any questions. if you have an opinion on the topic give your opinion.
Ok, my OPINION is that we shouldn't be paying for immigrants, they should be self supporting.
thats better
But those northern cities proclaimed they were sanctuary cities and would welcome the illegals. One would think that if they were going to be prepared for them to come there regardless of how. Why do citizens have to provide housing and services for illegals that is even better than they give to those born here?
Works for me. They should request asylum at the US embassy in their own country or the first country they enter.
I still want an answer to Texas's question in 3.2.1.
No one ever answers that one, they pretend it doesn't exist.