Here's a game plan: Biden replaces Harris with Newsom and then resigns
By: Douglas MacKinnon, Opinion Contributor (The Hill)
Some friendly advice from 20 short months ago.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Tuesday delivered some clarity, confusion and mystery — better news for the Democrats than basically everyone expected. That said, the results came despite both President Biden and Vice President Harris being unpopular with a large segment of the electorate, including a number of Democratic pundits and voters.
It's not getting as much attention as I believe it should, regarding why the anticipated red wave never reached the shore, but I believe one of the main reasons is "Trump fatigue" and even hatred for former President Trump. As long as he is still considered a potentially viable candidate for 2024, or a political force by the left, that fatigue and hate will be enough to drive many Americans to the polls to vote against any Republican.
But, within that force-of-nature voter reflex is a warning sign for the Democratic Party. What if Trump is not a candidate in two years? (He has said he'll make a "very big announcement" on Nov. 15.)
I have written that I don't believe Trump will run but will drag out the anticipation for as long as possible to keep his "brand" in the news and the campaign donations flowing in. If he does declare that he will not be a candidate in 2024, how much energy will leak out of the Democratic vote machine? Potentially quite a bit.
That possibility, coupled with the drag that Biden and Harris are already attaching to the Democrats' chances to retain the White House in 2024, raises a critically important question of strategy for their party: Do Democrats jettison both Biden and Harris or keep them and more than likely lose to a strong Republican ticket of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and, perhaps, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley?
What Tuesday's voting demonstrated is that our country is still equally divided and deeply polarized, with no political healing on the horizon.
That reality speaks to the need for a proven vote-getter with lots of money and a logistical machine behind him. In Politics 101, California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) meets — maybe even exceeds — those qualifications.
Newsom won reelection easily and now has the luxury of turning his ambitious eyes completely toward the White House. The question then becomes, will his party turn its eyes toward him as the person who might save it from the Biden-Harris dilemma it is surely about to face?
If the answer is "yes," the "solution" is really not complicated at all. In one scenario, Biden could ask Harris to resign and replace her with Newsom, who then becomes the heir apparent for 2024. Or Biden could replace Harris with Newsom and then resign himself, making Newsom the president before 2024 and arming him with the full force of the Oval Office.
Republicans can write off Newsom all they want as the politician who "ruined" California. The fact is, he is a proven vote-getter and has a formidable Democratic machine behind him. More than that, he has demonstrated that he is no political wallflower and seemingly has no intention of "waiting his turn."
Might the Democrats leapfrog him into the Oval Office before 2024? It would be political malpractice for them not to consider the option.
Douglas MacKinnon, a political and communications consultant, was a writer in the White House for Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, and former special assistant for policy and communications at the Pentagon during the last three years of the Bush administration.
Tags
Who is online
517 visitors
“You go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time.” ― Donald Rumsfeld
Gee, Donald Rumsfeld understood DEI before it became a 'thing'. Of course Democrats have to say the same thing their own special way.
Desperate times call for desperate measures. --- Democrat Donors
What Donald Rumsfeld apparently didn't understand was You Go To War Because You Have To, Not For Some Bullshit Lies.
Don't be silly! Gavin Newsom is supporting Harris...
IMO Allan Lichtman should not be ignored. Although he does predict Harris to win the election, he said it would be more certain if she were the incumbent for the few months leading up to November 5th. He thinks Biden should quit and turn the presidency over to Harris now. Keep in mind Lichtman's predictions have been correct 9 times out of 10 and the only one he missed was Gore, but that was a debacle - hanging chads and the PotUS being appointed by the SCofUS instead of by the majority of national votes.
There was no way Harris would be passed over for a white male. The interesting question is did Harris fumble the Shapiro announcement or did Shapiro leak it to force Harris’s hand because it appears progressives are trying to push him off the ticket.