╌>

Inflation increased 3.5% in March - ABC News

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  3 weeks ago  •  45 comments

By:   ABC News

Inflation increased 3.5% in March - ABC News
The fight to reduce inflation has struck a rough patch in recent months.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America

Well crap..........


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The fight to reduce inflation has struck a rough patch in recent months.

ByMax ZahnApril 10, 2024, 8:45 AM

Consumer prices rose 3.5% in March compared to a year ago, accelerating markedly from the previous month and reversing some of the progress achieved in a two-year fight to cool inflation, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data showed. The finding matched economists' expectations.

Price increases have cooled dramatically from a peak of about 9%, but inflation still stands more than a percentage point higher than the Federal Reserve's target rate of 2%.

A spike in housing and gasoline prices at the outset of this year has helped prolong the nation's bout of elevated inflation. Meanwhile, economic performance has been robust, boosting consumer demand and putting upward pressure on prices.

The latest finding indicated an uptick from the 3.2% annual inflation rate recorded in February.

Core inflation -- a closely watched measure that strips out volatile food and energy prices -- increased 3.8% over the year ending in March, holding steady from the previous month, the data showed.

More than half of the monthly increase in consumer prices owed to an uptick in gasoline and housing costs, the BLS said.

Offering relief for households, the prices of some grocery staples dropped over the year ending in March. The prices of breakfast cereal, rice and pasta each fell more than a percentage point over that period.

Prices also dropped more than 4% for breakfast sausage and ham over the past year. Apple prices fell more than 10% over that period.

Beef prices, however, increased at more than double the pace of overall inflation over the past year.

At a meeting last month, the Fed opted to keep rates highly elevated in response to stubborn inflation. The Fed Funds rate remains between 5.25% and 5.5%, matching its highest level since 2001.

"On inflation, it's too soon to say whether the recent readings represent more than just a bump," Fed Chair Jerome Powell told a business conference at Stanford University last week.

"Given the strength of the economy and progress on inflation so far, we have time to let the incoming data guide our decisions on policy," Powell added.

The Fed said last month that it still intends to make three interest rate cuts this year.

Interest rate cuts would lower borrowing costs for consumers and businesses, potentially triggering a burst of economic activity through greater household spending and company investment.

But the Fed risks a rebound of inflation if it cuts interest rates too quickly, since stronger consumer demand could lead to an acceleration of price increases.

Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome Powell speaks at the Business, Government and Society Forum at Stanford University in Stanford, Calif., April 3, 2024.Jeff Chiu/AP

In recent days, some business leaders and policymakers have voiced concern about the outlook for inflation.

In his annual shareholder letter on Monday, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon warned that a host of factors, including government spending and global trading shocks, could make the final leg of inflation's path down to normal levels much more difficult than many observers expect.

Speaking at a meeting of the Shadow Open Market Committee in New York City last week, Fed Governor Michelle Bowman said she sees "a number of upside risks to inflation."

The rough patch for inflation in recent months has coincided with strong economic performance, despite persistently high interest rates meant to slow economic activity.

Employers hired 303,000 workers last month, blowing past economist expectations of 214,000 jobs added, according to a report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics on Friday.

The hiring far surpassed the average number of jobs added each month over the previous year, suggesting an acceleration in performance for one of the key metrics used to assess the nation's economic health.

Last week, Powell referred to surveys of consumer and business sentiment that suggest inflation is widely expected to return to normal levels.

"The public does believe -- and it's a good thing, because it's true -- that inflation will go back down to 2%," Powell said. "That's very reassuring but that's partly because of the very strong action we took and also because of our ongoing commitment to actually return inflation to 2% over time."

"And that is our commitment," Powell added.


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed.

No Trump, Fascism References, Memes, Source Dissing.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    3 weeks ago

Rough patch? More like a washboard dirt road...................

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1  George  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    3 weeks ago

How can you possible say Bidens policies aren't working? 4 years ago my gas tank only held 30 dollars worth of gas, now it holds 75 dollars worth. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  George @1.1    3 weeks ago

LOL. 256

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.2  evilone  replied to  George @1.1    3 weeks ago
How can you possible say Bidens policies aren't working?

I cringe every time I hear "Bidenomics", but which policies are specifically not working? I don't give any Administration credit for market US forces. 

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.3  George  replied to  evilone @1.1.2    3 weeks ago
I don't give any Administration credit for market US forces. 

Normally i would say the Speaker has more influence on domestic policy than the President, which has more control of foreign policy, but this administration has done more on the domestic front than most. IMO,

Immigration which is normally a foreign policy this administration has created a domestic issue do to their mismanagement, and now this piece of crap is saying he can fix it with a EO on Univision.

Also his insane green policies are effecting the marketplace, he needs to let the market drive this. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.4  Sparty On  replied to  evilone @1.1.2    3 weeks ago

You shouldn’t cringe.    Administration policy can and does affect inflation.    The biggest way this can happen is increasing the money supply faster than output.    

Make no mistake.    The current Admin has done little to bring inflation into check.    Biden should kiss Powell on the lips.    Without his aggressive rate increases we would be in double digit inflation right now.

No doubt about it.   

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.5  evilone  replied to  George @1.1.3    3 weeks ago
Immigration which is normally a foreign policy this administration has created a domestic issue do to their mismanagement,

This has nothing to do with our economic issues.

Also his insane green policies are effecting the marketplace

How? Other than China trying to flood the market with cheap solar panels what's going on as you see it?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.6  evilone  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.4    3 weeks ago
You shouldn’t cringe.    Administration policy can and does affect inflation.    The biggest way this can happen is increasing the money supply faster than output.    

I don't see the Biden Admin printing money.

Make no mistake.    The current Admin has done little to bring inflation into check. 

I don't. It's not his job to do so, even were he to try and take credit. Again the issue keeping interest rates high is the robust spending (and wage growth), record low unemployment, and the lack of housing. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.1.7  JBB  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.4    3 weeks ago

Meanwhile back in reality...

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.8  George  replied to  JBB @1.1.7    3 weeks ago

I see you failed to read the red box rules again. 

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.9  George  replied to  evilone @1.1.5    3 weeks ago
This has nothing to do with our economic issues.

Really, how can you honestly state this, You don't think the illegals are taking services from citizens? they aren't driving down wages in areas where they are? they aren't effecting housing?  Can you really not see how importing millions in cheap labor can't effect economic conditions?

Forcing manufactures to produce electric vehicles is not cheap solar cells, mandating higher MPG standards is not cheap solar cells, demanding fuel efficiency for military vehicles degrades their effectiveness, because you need to lose weight(armor) or you lose power, speed and maneuverability. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.10  Greg Jones  replied to  George @1.1.8    3 weeks ago

No one pays much attention to meme-man's trolling

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1.11  Ronin2  replied to  evilone @1.1.5    3 weeks ago

You don't think the cost of illegal immigrants is causing inflation?

The FAIR study, released in March last year, documented the financial toll of illegal immigration on the U.S., taking into account factors like emergency medical care, incarcerating illegal aliens in local jails, and federal budgets that pay out billions in welfare every year, pegging the net annual cost at $150.7 billion.

Arriving at the figure by subtracting the estimated $32 billion of tax contributions made by illegal immigrants, FAIR said the economic impact would have otherwise been $182 billion. In 2017, the U.S. spent roughly $116 billion on illegal immigration, suggesting that the problem is a growing one.

To contextualize the number, the $150.7 billion spent on illegal immigration last year is more than the total gross domestic product (GDP) of Mississippi ($146.7 billion in 2023), New Mexico ($131.5 billion), Idaho ($119.8 billion), and is more than the GDP's Wyoming and Vermont combined, at $50.74 billion and $43.38 billion, respectively.

With illegal immigration now costing $150.7 billion annually, the burden inevitably trickles down to the taxpayer. Individually, the FAIR study found that each illegal alien or their U.S.-born child costs the U.S. $8,776 annually.

Throwing an extra $150.7 billion (and rising each year Brandon is in office) into the system definitely causes inflation.

Also, left out is Brandon's attempt(s) to forgive college student debt (He is ignoring a Supreme Court ruling to try and buy votes for 2024). Since Congress never allocated the money to do this Brandon is definitely "printing money".

Since taking office, the administration has approved $146 billion in loan forgiveness for 4 million  public servants , defrauded students, disabled borrowers and other groups already entitled to cancellation   by adjusting existing relief programs. The new relief plan is Biden’s most significant attempt at large-scale student loan forgiveness since the Supreme Court last summer blocked his   2022 plan  to cancel more than $400 billion in student loans. That plan would have delivered up to $20,000 in loan cancellation for 40 million borrowers.

Between Brandon's two plans that would be $546 billion tossed onto the inflation fire. Congress hasn't approve a penny of it.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.12  Sparty On  replied to  evilone @1.1.6    3 weeks ago
I don't see the Biden Admin printing money.

Then you haven’t been paying attention.    

He supported adding 1.9 Trillion with the American Rescue Plan to the 2.9 trillion COVID Relief plan already approved.    And it wasn’t really needed.    The COVID Relief plan arguably was required as a response to the Pandemic.

He is printing money by increasing subsidies for things like Healthcare and Green Energy.    Student loan forgiveness is front and center again as well.   A pure money printing act if it happens.    Paying for his porous border policy, etc, etc.

Pay attention, it’s out there …

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.13  evilone  replied to  George @1.1.9    3 weeks ago
You don't think the illegals are taking services from citizens?

And that effect that has on the economy as a whole is negatable.

Forcing manufactures to produce electric vehicles...

That is not being done. That would be illegal. If you think any of the rest of that post is effecting the economy put up some links or numbers to support your position. It all sounds partisanly biased to me since I've not read anything from any economist (conservative or liberal that even comes close) to support this.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.14  George  replied to  evilone @1.1.13    3 weeks ago

Partisan based as he claims as he defends Biden and ignores reality, 8 million people imported during Biden admin that is more people than there are in 48 states, and more than there are in 8 of the list populist states combined.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.15  evilone  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1.11    3 weeks ago

Immigrations costs would be there no matter who was sitting in the oval office. We can agree the costs are higher now because of a higher influx of people but those costs are negatable when taking in the whole big picture. 

Also, left out is Brandon's attempt(s) to forgive college student debt (He is ignoring a Supreme Court ruling to try and buy votes for 2024). Since Congress never allocated the money to do this Brandon is definitely "printing money".

No, he's not "printing money". He's some cases he's using previously allocated money and in some cases (per Missouri) possibly stiffing loan companies. This new larger attempt hasn't happened yet so it has had NO influence on inflation. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.16  evilone  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.12    3 weeks ago
He supported adding 1.9 Trillion with the American Rescue Plan to the 2.9 trillion COVID Relief plan already approved.

2 years ago... Those costs have already been factored into the equation. 

He is printing money by increasing subsidies for things like Healthcare and Green Energy.    Student loan forgiveness is front and center again as well.   A pure money printing act if it happens.    Paying for his porous border policy, etc, etc.

You're just tossing things out there without siting any contributing information. I want to know HOW those are effecting inflation. Tell me how...

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.17  evilone  replied to  George @1.1.14    3 weeks ago
Partisan based as he claims as he defends Biden and ignores reality

I am NOT defending Biden. I'm trying to get you to prove your claims with some data. Perhaps I'll learn something if you did.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.18  George  replied to  evilone @1.1.17    3 weeks ago

In 4 years Biden has imported 8 million people that is more than the combined population of 8 states, 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.19  Sparty On  replied to  evilone @1.1.16    3 weeks ago
2 years ago... Those costs have already been factored into the equation.

That comment demonstrates a sophomoric understanding of Economics but I’m open to learn.    Feel free to explain how that nearly 2 Trillion dollars has been “factored in” and what “equation” is being used

He is printing money by increasing subsidies for things like Healthcare and Green Energy.    Student loan forgiveness is front and center again as well.   A pure money printing act if it happens.    Paying for his porous border policy, etc, etc.
You're just tossing things out there without siting any contributing information. I want to know HOW those are effecting inflation. Tell me how...

Be happy to explain it.    Right after you explain yourself above.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.20  evilone  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.19    3 weeks ago
Feel free to explain how that nearly 2 Trillion dollars has been “factored in” and what “equation” is being used

Funny... We are talking about the current increase in inflation. It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to see that spending 2 years ago has already been accounted for prior to... you know... this year.

Be happy to explain it.    Right after you explain yourself above.

Your turn.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.21  George  replied to  evilone @1.1.20    3 weeks ago
Funny... We are talking about the current increase in inflation. It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to see that spending 2 years ago has already been accounted for prior to... you know... this year.

So you don't understand how spending works, all that money wasn't spent in those first 2 years as of January of 2023 there was still almost 100 billion left.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.22  evilone  replied to  George @1.1.21    3 weeks ago
So you don't understand how spending works,

Maybe not. Can you show me when/where it was spent?

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.23  George  replied to  evilone @1.1.22    3 weeks ago
 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.24  evilone  replied to  George @1.1.23    3 weeks ago

First, thank you for providing me some real numbers. Per your link it says on 1/1/23 2% remained unspent. How does that factor into this current rise in inflation? It wasn't long ago we were reading inflation was lowering, but now because spending is still high, but housing is still low we are seeing an increase. Where does that money 2023's Covid relief factor in?

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.25  George  replied to  evilone @1.1.24    3 weeks ago

That is the Federal government spending, they didn't spend it directly, they gave it to states and entities that then spend the money. so states and cities are still spending Covid money that they received on capitol improvement projects. the 1000 dollar unemployment bonus has been spent but other funds are still out there.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.26  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  George @1.1.25    3 weeks ago

Speaking of Covid funds...........

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.27  evilone  replied to  George @1.1.25    3 weeks ago
...they gave it to states and entities that then spend the money. so states and cities are still spending Covid money...

So not Biden's policies per se? More like a whole bunch of interconnected issues with many fingers in many pies?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.28  evilone  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.26    3 weeks ago

I hope they build new prisons to put on top of these people.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.29  Tessylo  replied to  evilone @1.1.13    3 weeks ago

You will get nothing to support the allegations.  Absolutely nothing.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.30  Sparty On  replied to  evilone @1.1.20    3 weeks ago

lol …. You explained nothing.    What “equation” was used?    Etc ….  Never mind, this appears to be way over your head.    I suggest a good college Economics course.

That said, a simple explanation of inflation is that it is a compounding item.    Like compound interest in your bank account but in the opposite direction.    So money spent years ago can still negatively your spending power based on what inflation rates came before.    While it’s good when inflation rates are down month to month or year to year, they still persist if positive and compound, negatively affecting your spending power.   Just like is happening right now.    

How many things that you spend money on have gone down is cost in the last two, three years ago?    The answer is almost nothing.    Most have gone up significantly faster because of inflation.    Which demonstrates the compounding effect of inflation on numerous levels.    Even though inflation has been down, costs are up.    Inflation.     That 5 trillion in government spending doesn’t just magically disappear.

Have you ever taken an Econ course?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.31  evilone  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.30    3 weeks ago
lol …. You explained nothing.

For all the words you've typed you haven't explained anything either. You keep going off on tangents and deflections. Explain how Biden's policies have increased the costs of housing and (some) food which per the article is the cause of our current rise in inflation.

Perhaps a case can be made (which I don't think it's true) that the low unemployment and wage growth is Biden's doing - which is, in part, is contributing to the persistent inflation. 

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.32  George  replied to  evilone @1.1.27    3 weeks ago

You should make another comment about partisanship. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.33  Sparty On  replied to  evilone @1.1.31    3 weeks ago

Alrighty then, that’s what I get for taking the time to give advice and explain something here that is clearly not understood.

My mistake …. won’t happen again.

Enjoy your type of bliss …..

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.34  evilone  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.33    3 weeks ago

Go ahead and bail. I expected it.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.35  evilone  replied to  George @1.1.32    3 weeks ago
You should make another comment about partisanship. 

Because I don't toe the line that everything that every happens in the country is to the fault, the praise, of a President is partisan I get shit?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.36  Sparty On  replied to  evilone @1.1.34    3 weeks ago

lol …..

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.2  Sparty On  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    3 weeks ago

No worries …. It’s just transitional ……

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
1.3  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    3 weeks ago

In that case gird ones loins, remove dentures and tighten bra straps.,.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
2  Drinker of the Wry    3 weeks ago

You can kiss a June interest rate cut goodbye.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.1  evilone  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2    3 weeks ago
You can kiss a June interest rate cut goodbye.

I thought that same thing when the jobs report came out. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    3 weeks ago

Rates are going to have to go back up. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1  Sparty On  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    3 weeks ago

Powell’s aggressive rate increases is about the only reason they aren’t still there.    Sadly, that has given Biden a false confidence to keep spending.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4  Jeremy Retired in NC    3 weeks ago

White House Announces Inflation Doing Great If You Hold The Chart Upside Down

"Problem solved," White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said. "We know the American people are very concerned about rising prices on goods and services, but as you can clearly see in this helpful graph when you turn it upside down, the arrow is actually going down. So from that perspective, inflation is actually dropping rapidly. You're welcome, America."
 
 

Who is online





George
Drinker of the Wry
Krishna
Gordy327
JohnRussell


51 visitors