╌>

Que

Que

Thermodynamics Says There Is No "Hiatus "in Global Warming

  
By:  Que  •   •  9 years ago  •  8 comments

Thermodynamics Says There Is No "Hiatus "in Global Warming

During the 2008 Presidential Election, John McCain proposed a pragmatic national energy policy based upon good stewardship, good science, and reasonableness. George Will attacked his proposal, claiming that global temperatures have not risen in a decade. He claimed the hottest year on record was 1998 and no year since has been hotter. His argument was simple, easily understood, and very wrong. While 1998 was an unusually hot year, NASAs data shows that 2005 was warmer. George Wills claim resonated with those who wish to deny that the Earth is warming, so they extended the statement to the Earth hasnt warmed in 12 years, 15 years, and finally 17 years so far. Apparently truthfulness is not a criteria, as 2005, 2010, 2014, were warmer than 1998. Now they claim the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has confirmed their deception. Thats not right, either.

The IPCCs Fifth Assessment Report concluded that the global surface temperature has shown a much smaller increasing linear trend over the past 15 years [1998-2012] than over the past 30 to 60 years. The apparent slowdown was termed a hiatus and cheered by the Skeptics, although a smaller increasing linear trend is not a "hiatus". The apparent slowdown intrigued the climate scientists, who immediately set about trying to discover where the energy went.

Scientist knew the energy had to go somewhere because of the First Law of Thermodynamics, which says that energy is conserved. The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was still rising and, because of the greenhouse effect, the Earth was still absorbing more energy that it emitted. According to the conservation of energy, that extra energy has to go somewhere in the environment, and whether it warms the air, the land, the oceans, melts ice, or evaporates water the Earth was storing the energy somewhere. Claiming that global warming has paused, is badly misleading as the amount of energy in the Earths systems was still increasing. To claim a pause is to claim that the Law of Conservation of Energy is invalid. And, that is an extraordinary claim, requiring extraordinary proof. No Skeptic was up to that task.

What followed was a flurry of research by climate scientists, trying to figure out where the energy had gone. It turned out that it really hadnt gone anywhere, because the missing heat has been there all along. It was an artifact from how the ocean temperatures were measured.

According to a recent NBC news report ,Global warming has not stopped or even slowed in the past 18 years, according to a new federal study that rebuts doubters whove claimed that that heating trends have paused. Scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration readjusted thousands of weather data points to account for different measuring techniques through the decades."

Tom Karl, director of the National Centers for Environmental Information, is the lead author of the study published in the journal Science. He explained the discrepancy came from a change in how ocean temperatures were measured. Global ocean temperatures are estimated both by thousands of commercial ships, which record the temperature of the water entering their engines and by thousands of buoys. The buoys tend to get cooler temperature readings than the ships, likely because ships engines warm the water. Meanwhile, in recent years, buoys have become increasingly common. The result, Karl says, is that the oceans did not appearing to be warming as much because more buoys are now being used instead of ships. So Karls team adjusted the buoy data to make them line up with the ship data. The corrected data, in the graph below, shows that since 1998, the rate of warming is about the same as it has been since 1950: about two-tenths of a degree Fahrenheit (0.1 degrees Celsius) a decade.

124_blogs.jpg?width=505

The Skeptics, of course, were not happy that the missing heat had been discovered and their "hiatus" was a myth. So, they have now gone back to their familiar theme, that scientists adjust the data to get what they want. Saying that is certainly easier than disproving The First Law of Thermodynamics.

(C) 2015 Que

Tags

jrBlog - desc
[]
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger    9 years ago

Good article JC, but I doubt many of the 'science challenged' Right Wingers are going to be able to absorb and comprehend talk like;

Scientist knew the energy had to go somewhere because of the First Law of Thermodynamics, which says that energy is conserved. The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was still rising and, because of the greenhouse effect, the Earth was still absorbing more energy that it emitted. According to the conservation of energy, that extra energy has to go somewhere in the environment, and whether it warms the air, the land, the oceans, melts ice, or evaporates water the Earth was storing the energy somewhere.

It will be interesting to see what they have to say about that.

 
 
 
Randy
Sophomore Participates
link   Randy    9 years ago

Great article. Very well explained, researched and true. I do agree with Jerry however that the ideological right wing will mostly be able not to understand it and those that do, will deny it's truth. Still, great article!

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
link   Kavika     9 years ago

Great article.

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
link   Dean Moriarty    9 years ago
Things change nothing stays the same.vI love global warming and evolution will provide us with a way to adapt to the ever changing climate.
 
 
 
Dowser
Sophomore Quiet
link   Dowser    9 years ago

Excellent article! Thank you, very much, for publishing it!

 
 
 
Petey Coober
Freshman Silent
link   Petey Coober    9 years ago

The premise of the article (thermodynamics as an explanation) is a non-sequitur .

 
 
 
Jerry Verlinger
Freshman Silent
link   Jerry Verlinger    9 years ago

The premise of the article (thermodynamics as an explanation) is a non-sequitur .

Nice try Petey, but .........

Scientist knew the energy had to go somewhere because of theFirst Law of Thermodynamics, which says that energy is conserved.The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was still rising and, because of the greenhouse effect,the Earth was still absorbing more energy that it emitted. According to the conservation of energy, that extra energy has to go somewherein the environment, and whether it warms the air, the land, the oceans, melts ice, or evaporates water the Earth was storing the energy somewhere.Claiming that global warming has paused, is badly misleading as the amount of energy in the Earths systems was still increasing. To claim a pause is to claim that the Law of Conservation of Energy is invalid.And, that is an extraordinary claim, requiring extraordinary proof.

 
 
 
Petey Coober
Freshman Silent
link   Petey Coober    9 years ago

Using underlining must make it official ... and proves beyond a shadow of doubt that you understand thermodynamics LMAO !