Letitia James Could Face 'Jail Time' Over Fraud Allegations - Newsweek
By: Kate Plummer (Newsweek)

Yikes! This can't be good news for Ms. James. But she was always right, "Nobody is above the law!"

New York Attorney General Letitia James could face "jail time" after being accused of mortgage fraud, an academic has said.
James, a Democrat who has served as New York's attorney general since 2019, was this week referred to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). Its director, William J. Pulte, alleged in a letter that James falsified records to obtain a mortgage.
According to Pulte, James said on a mortgage application in 2023 that a house in Norfolk, Virginia, was her primary address, despite her position requiring New York residency.
The 1,450-square-foot single-family home in Norfolk was built in 1947 and has three bedrooms and one bathroom, per the deed. It was purchased for $240,000, with a $219,780 mortgage.
New York Attorney General Letitia James outside the courthouse during Donald Trump's New York civil fraud trial in New York on October 18, 2023. New York Attorney General Letitia James outside the courthouse during Donald Trump's New York civil fraud trial in New York on October 18, 2023. AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey
Pulte also said that in 2021, the New York attorney general falsely stated the number of units in a Brooklyn property she owned—saying it had four units, not five. He added that James purchased another property with her father as co-signer but listed them as husband and wife in 1983 and 2000.
Pulte alleged wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud and false statements to a financial institution.
While James has not been formally charged and has denied all wrongdoing, legal experts have suggested that she will be prosecuted, with one suggesting she could see jail time.
A spokesperson for the Office of the Attorney General told Newsweek : "Attorney General James is focused every single day on protecting New Yorkers, especially as this Administration weaponizes the federal government against the rule of law and the Constitution. She will not be intimidated by bullies—no matter who they are."
Speaking with Newsweek , Kyle Welch, an associate professor at George Washington University's School of Business who specializes in financial fraud, said the allegations about James could "carry jail time" and disbarment.
James gained national attention last year after suing Trump on charges of falsely inflating the value of his property. A New York judge ordered Trump to pay $454 million in the civil fraud judgment.
"The irony here is almost too on-the-nose," Welch said. "Letitia James built her 'nobody is above the law' brand by prosecuting Trump for inflating his financial condition—statements that came with disclaimers, involved banks that said they weren't harmed, and still resulted in a half-billion-dollar fraud conviction."
He continued: "Was Trump's case a 100 percent political prosecution? Yes. Now James is under scrutiny for allegedly misrepresenting her own finances to get a mortgage. No disclaimers. No ambiguity. Is this case also 100 percent political? Yes. Would either case have been brought against a nonpolitical civilian? Probably not. And that's the bigger problem for all of us.
"James and her defenders can't seem to see the carbon-copy nature of these cases. And unfortunately, New York Democrats and the DNC helped normalize this tit-for-tat legal targeting under the banner of 'accountability.' Well, the shoe's on the other foot now—and Trump's team is playing the exact same game.
"Here's where it gets surreal: Both cases involve felony-level allegations. Both could carry jail time. A conviction would likely mean disbarment for James. Will James, like Trump, turn this prosecution into a political asset?"
Former assistant U.S. Attorney Gene Rossi told Newsweek that the referral was likely to "be taken very seriously" and that if the allegations were true, they wouldn't be difficult to prove.
"People in glass houses should never throw stones," he said. "And for politicians, this adage can be deadly. Attorney General James faces mortgage fraud allegations that make the civil trial stones thrown at President Trump look conniving and hypocritical. If the allegations are true, the elements of her purported crime are not hard to prove. The issue for me is whether she is the victim of vindictive or selective prosecution; however, the irony of her defense would not be lost on the public. Nonetheless, under this Justice Department, the referral will be taken very seriously."
Matthew Mangino, a former district attorney in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, added that James would be prosecuted and that it would "have a chilling effect on opposition" to Trump.
"The attorney general of one of the largest states in the nation should not, if the allegations are true, be fudging the books to qualify for better borrowing rates, especially not one investigating the President of United States," he told Newsweek .
"But let me be clear—this a warning from the Trump administration: 'We are watching. Come after the President, and we are going to exact revenge.' The message is clear—if you're going to challenge Trump, you better be ready for the wrath of the United States government," Mangino continued.
He added, "This referral and 'inevitable' prosecution will have a chilling effect on opposition to President Trump, and that is exactly what it is intended to do."
Lawyer Norman Eisen, who served as the ambassador to the Czech Republic during the Obama administration, disagreed that a court would proceed on the allegations mentioned.
"This is more Trump administration weaponization, like his executive orders last week demanding investigations of officials from his first administration who had the temerity to criticize him," he told Newsweek .
Eisen continued: "The stale allegations here are blatant tit-for-tat and should not be dignified as if they were genuine issues. No court is going to proceed on allegations from 1983, for example. The AG has said she will not be bullied or deterred from her work by this retaliation. Good for her. Every American should reject the president's and his cronies' illegitimate use of government power to attack his enemies."
Bondi said on Wednesday that the Department of Justice was reviewing documents scrutinizing James' residence.
Kate Plummer is a Newsweek reporter based in London, U.K. Her focus is on U.S. politics and national affairs, and she is particularly interested in the impact of social policy decisions on people as well as the finances of political campaigns, corruption, foreign policy, democratic processes and more. Prior to joining Newsweek, she covered U.K. politics extensively. Kate joined Newsweek in 2023 from The Independent and has also been published in multiple publications including The Times and the Daily Mail . She has a B.A. in History from the University of Oxford and an M.A. in Magazine Journalism from City, University of London.
Languages: English.
You can get in touch with Kate by emailing k.plummer@newsweek.com, or by following her on X at @kateeplummer.
Writers Page Kate Plummer Investigative Reporter Newsweek Is A Trust Project MemberFOLLOW
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Y'all be cool now, ya hear?

There are documents proving the allegations made. I have seen them in other articles like THIS one . Trump's revenge? Perhaps. But if she really did those things, and it looks like she did, then she will have to face the music and hold herself to her mantra that, "Nobody is above the law."
Given I think I have a rather good understanding of how you think, I see your comment as rational and fair.
Others, who called Trump's case a witch hunt and deemed the charges to be nit-picking and legal technicalities will likely find this to be perfectly reasonable for James. It would be something if those in question were to claim that this is also 'lawfare'.
Funny how that works, eh?
Indeed....funny...
As I said, she was right..."Nobody is above the law!" Not Trump and not her.
Do you buy her response so far that the allegations are "baseless"? I think the evidence has been established and provided so it certainly can't be called "baseless". She has a lot more 'splaining to do. Hypocrisy grinds my gears, I think you know that about me.
I have not looked at the evidence but this certainly seems easy to adjudicate.
If she committed fraud then she should pay the price.
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
I wonder why the evidence is already made public? The language of Pulte reeks of retribution
The 1983 and 2000 loans on a $200 home were based on appraisals, FICO scores and the ability to repay the loan by both applicants. While the paperwork should reflect reality there is no advantage gained by misrepresenting the relationship if it was done intentionally. ( To my knowledge I never underwrote a loan in Virginia ) What is the difference to an underwriter if it is father and daughter or a married couple? Obviously they were able to refinance in 2000 so who was harmed?
Likewise it has been a long term issue when underwriting a multi unit property whether to count the owners suite as a rental unit if it is owner occupied. Normally it would not be counted as income producing when calculating the risk. So 4/5 seems not all that strange. If she was living somewhere else it would only make sense to report as much rental income as possible, a 5/5.
Again, not a big deal, who was she cheating, herself? Certainly not the lender or the state or municipality.
I'm just hearing the wind, no storm here.
I was a refi/Lending tree affiliated underwriter in Cherry Hill New Jersey, once upon a time many years ago...
Well you have to build a strong case in order to refer it to the USAG for further action. It reeking of retribution has nothing to do with the facts of the case and Ms. James accountability. Would you prefer the facts/truth remain buried, or would you want them to be exposed as they were in Trump's case? Fraud is fraud and it should be exposed IMHO.
The article I linked to above explains in detail the fraud that was committed with respect to two different properties and why it should matter to the lenders and to the rule of law. Certainly not to the same monetary level as Trump's misdeeds, but willful fraud nonetheless. And I agree with Ms. James, "Nobody is above the law."