Already Distorting Events of Jan. 6, GOP Concocts Entire Counternarrative
By: Lisa Lerer and Nicholas Fandos, The New York Times
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Already Distorting Events of Jan. 6, GOP Concocts Entire Counternarrative
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) speaks during her weekly news conference in Washington on July 28, 2021. (T.J. Kirkpatrick/The New York Times)
In the hours and days after the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, rattled Republican lawmakers knew exactly who was to blame: Donald Trump. Loyal allies began turning on him. Top Republicans vowed to make a full break from his divisive tactics and dishonesties. Some even discussed removing him from office.
By spring, however, after nearly 200 congressional Republicans had voted to clear Trump during a second impeachment proceeding, the conservative fringes of the party had already begun to rewrite history, describing the Capitol riot as a peaceful protest and comparing the invading mob to a “normal tourist visit,” as one congressman put it.
Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times
This past week, amid the emotional testimony of police officers at the first hearing of a House select committee, Republicans completed their journey through the looking-glass, spinning a new counternarrative of that deadly day. No longer content to absolve Trump, they concocted a version of events in which accused rioters were patriotic political prisoners and Speaker Nancy Pelosi was to blame for the violence.
Their new claims, some voiced from the highest levels of House Republican leadership, amount to a disinformation campaign being promulgated from the steps of the Capitol, aimed at giving cover to their party and intensifying the threats to political accountability.
This rendering of events — together with new evidence that Trump had counted on allies in Congress to help him use a baseless allegation of corruption to overturn the election — pointed to what some democracy experts see as a dangerous new sign in American politics: Even with Trump gone from the White House, many Republicans have little intention of abandoning the prevarication that was a hallmark of his presidency.
Rather, as the country struggles with the consequences of Trump’s assault on the legitimacy of the nation’s elections, leaders of his party — who, unlike the former president, have not lost their political or rhetorical platforms — are signaling their willingness to continue, look past or even expand his assault on the facts for political gain.
The phenomenon is not uniquely American.
“This is happening all over the place; it is so much linked to the democratic backsliding and rising of authoritarian movements,” said Laura Thornton, director of the Alliance for Securing Democracy at the German Marshall Fund of the United States. “It’s about the same sort of post-truth world. You can just repeat a lie over and over, and because there’s so little trust, people will believe it.”
Behind the Republican embrace of disinformation is a calculus of both ambition and self-preservation. With members of the select committee hinting that they could subpoena Trump aides, allies on Capitol Hill and perhaps Trump himself, the counterfactual counterattack could preemptively undercut an investigation of the riot.
As videos shown during the hearing gave harrowing new reminders of the day’s violence, leading House Republicans claimed that Pelosi — a target of the mob — had been warned about the violence in advance but failed to prevent it.
From his private club in New Jersey, Trump suggested that Pelosi should “investigate herself,” yet again falsely insinuating that antifa and Black Lives Matter — not his followers — caused the destruction on Jan. 6 and that a democratically decided election had been stolen from him.
All the while, in the Senate, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the top Republican, who once led his party in condemning both the riot and Trump’s role in it, made no visible attempt to stop the flood of fabrications, telling reporters he had not watched the hearing and had little new to say about the most violent attack on the Capitol since the War of 1812.
House Republicans’ desire to bury the attack on their own workplace has created a dysfunctional governing atmosphere. Pelosi has increasingly treated them as a pariah party, unworthy of collaboration or trust, and has expressed disdain for Rep. Kevin McCarthy, the minority leader, whom she called a “moron” this past week.
“Anytime you mention his name, you’re not getting an answer from me,” she told reporters. “Don’t waste my time.”
Almost as soon as the police retook control Jan. 6, hard-core defenders of Trump in Congress began recasting the gruesome scenes of violence that left five people dead.
McCarthy, R-Calif., responded differently at first: He demanded that Trump stop the rioters, according to an account he gave fellow Republicans at the time. A week later, as the House moved to impeach Trump, McCarthy said that “the president bears responsibility” for the “attack on Congress by mob rioters” and called for a fact-finding commission.
But in the months since, that early resolve has given way to an out-and-out intent to bury the attack. McCarthy, who is trying to win back the majority in 2022, moved quickly to patch things up with Trump, gave latitude to far-right members of his caucus and worked furiously to block the creation of an independent 9/11-style commission.
This past week, just before the officers began to deliver anguished testimony about the brutality they had endured, McCarthy repeatedly laid blame not with Trump, the rioters or those who had fueled doubts about the election outcome, but with Pelosi, one of the invading mob’s chief targets.
“If there is a responsibility for this Capitol, on this side, it rests with the speaker,” McCarthy said.
Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., the recently selected House conference chair, went even further, saying Pelosi “bears responsibility” as speaker “for the tragedy that occurred on Jan. 6” and deriding her as “an authoritarian who has broken the people’s house.”
Pelosi is not responsible for the security of Congress; that job falls to the Capitol Police, a force that the speaker only indirectly influences. Republicans have made no similar attempt to blame McConnell, who shared control of the Capitol at the time.
Outside the Justice Department, meanwhile, a group of conservative lawmakers gathered to accuse prosecutors of mistreating the more than 500 people accused in the Jan. 6 riot.
Encouraged by Trump, they also echoed far-right portrayals of Ashli Babbitt, a rioter who was shot trying to break into the House chamber, as a patriotic martyr whose killing by the police was premeditated.
As if to show how anti-democratic episodes are pingponging around the globe, President Vladimir Putin of Russia in June seized on Babbitt’s killing — calling it an “assassination” — to deflect questions about his own country’s jailing of political prisoners.
Some senior Republicans insist that warnings of a whitewash are overwrought.
“I don’t think anybody’s going to be successful erasing what happened,” said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. “Everybody saw it with their own eyes, and the nation saw it on television.”
For Cornyn and other lawmakers, continuing to talk about the attack is clearly an electoral loser at a time when they are trying to retake majorities in Congress and avoid Trump’s ire.
Most Republican lawmakers instead simply try to say nothing at all, declining even to recount the day’s events, let alone rebuke members of their party for spreading falsehoods or muddying the waters.
Asked how he would describe the riot, in which a hostile crowd demanded the hanging of Vice President Mike Pence, his brother, Rep. Greg Pence, R-Indi., responded curtly, “I don’t describe it.”
Yet the silence of party stalwarts, including nearly all of the House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump for his role in the attack and the Republican senators who voted to convict him, has created an information void that hard-right allies of Trump have readily filled. And they have found receptive audiences in a media environment replete with echo chambers and amplifying algorithms.
In a July poll by CBS News, narrow majorities of Trump voters said they would describe the attack as an example of “patriotism” or “defending freedom.”
That silence follows a familiar pattern: Rather than refute false allegations about a stolen election and rampant voter fraud, many leading Republicans have simply tolerated extremist misinformation.
Perhaps no one’s silence has been more significant than that of McConnell, who criticized Trump and his party in the immediate aftermath of the attack, denouncing it as a “failed insurrection” fueled by the former president’s lies.
Since Trump’s impeachment acquittal by the Senate in February, when McConnell declared him “practically and morally responsible,” the minority leader has all but refused to discuss Jan. 6.
The quiet acquiescence of party leaders has effectively left Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois as the only two Republicans still willing to speak out against a majority of their party.
“Clearly there were security failings at the Capitol, but there was a mob that tried to prevent us from carrying out our constitutional duty,” Cheney said in an interview. “It’s very hard for me to understand why any member of Congress of either party would want to whitewash that.”
Cheney has already paid a price: Republicans ousted her this spring from their No. 3 leadership position, replacing her with Stefanik.
Now House hard-liners want to expel her and Kinzinger from the Republican conference altogether, portraying them as “snitches” and “spies” in league with Democrats.
The message is clear: Adherence to facts cannot overcome adherence to the party line.
© 2021 The New York Times Company
Tags
Who is online
460 visitors
Any riots are off topic
additional proof that republicans are able to justify to themselves any illegal activity they undertake.
It was a [deleted] that got out of hand.
This failed coup/insurrection by the Turd Reich and his mob - the supporters are just making shit up as they go along.
So, as long as we don't refer to Jan 6 as a riot, we are good?
I'm referring to those who like to deflect, project, and deny - by bringing up the BLM protests, whenever the failed coup/insurrection by the Turd Reich is brought up.
It is now up to "the middle" to save our country, because the right has largely succeeded in getting the false message out that "both sides" are equally at fault for what has happened in America over the past 5 years, and it is not possible, without the commitment of the "middle", to ostracize and remove the anti-American Trumpism cult political right. And the mainstream media has not embraced the desperate call from our nations ideals to forcefully oppose "post truth" right wing ideology. The media has largely been missing in action during this prolonged and growing crisis.
Did Pelosi use sorcery to make the insurrection happen? The details of how she is responsible are very lacking on the right. Being that the target audience for their verbal diarrhea already thinks that Pelosi is running a global pedophile ring, sorcery would be a perfectly reasonable accusation.
McConnell folded like a wet rag.
She did, did she? I call bullshit on that. I thought that it was an impromptu gathering that turned into a violent mob. Sure wish the right wingers would make up their damn minds
I think it is FAR more likely that we are going to find out in the coming weeks and months that Trump withheld protection from the Capitol on Jan 6th than it is we will find out that Pelosi did.
What protection would that be?
Several levels of law enforcement had prior intelligence and info that there would be a protest.
The Capitol police and other LE were totally unprepared
Funny how the Turd Reich supporters are placing the blame everywhere but where it belongs, on the Turd Reich.
I'm still disappointed that the NG didn't have at least 4 50cal's on the building with overlapping fields of fire.
The Turd Reich told them to stand back and not to stand by.
I was thinking of 4 Humvees with M134's.
It's all her fault. She didn't use her power to protect us...
It was a peaceful group, they were not there to cause harm...
I'm so dizzy my head is spinnin, like a whirlpool it never ends...
Isn’t it obvious that she’s a straight up gangster? She’s even throwing up gang signs in the article photo.
Proof that she is actually a Vulcan...
The only way one could keep up the bizarre and dizzying level of DAILY bamboozling is to not have any shame whatsoever. In that sense Trump taught his cult well, many of them are willing to say literally anything , no matter how stupid or dishonest it makes them look.
[deleted]
Nah, we are just use to a first lady that had her face pulled so tight she couldn't move it.
You mean Hillary?
she held a tiny mushroom in her lips when they stitched the pleats at her temples...
Two identical tickets for comment 6.2.6
Please remove one.
I may have removed more than one, lol.
nobody will notice...
[deleted]