╌>

Jon Stewart trolls Fox News live on air and assures them Hunter Biden didn't tamper with vets bill - Raw Story - Celebrating 18 Years of Independent Journalism

  
Via:  Devangelical  •  2 years ago  •  55 comments

By:   Brad Reed (Raw Story - Celebrating Years of Independent Journalism)

Jon Stewart trolls Fox News live on air and assures them Hunter Biden didn't tamper with vets bill - Raw Story - Celebrating 18 Years of Independent Journalism
Jon Stewart trolls Fox News live on air and assures them Hunter Biden didn't tamper with vets bill

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads

republicans: "we support the military and the veterans"... bwah ha ha ha, yeah right...


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Former Daily Show host Jon Stewart stayed on the warpath on Friday in his efforts to get a bill passed that would secure health benefits for veterans who are suffering due to their exposure to toxic burn pits.

To make his case, Stewart went on the conservative Fox News to make a direct plea to its viewers that the legislation was worth passing even as Republican members of the Senate blocked it earlier this week.

During an interview with Fox News' Bill Hemmer, Stewart directly debunked what he described as "misinformation" about the legislation.

"No spending that is not related to veterans has been added to this bill," Stewart began. "No last-minute budget gimmicks have been added to this bill. This bill is purely based on toxic exposure health care and benefits to veterans."

He then encouraged viewers to read the bill at Congress.gov and see for themselves that there is no hidden agenda inside the legislation.

"Hunter Biden didn't sneak in and add unrelated spending in the middle of the night," he said. "This bill is exactly as it was, with the removal of one sentence that had to do with taxation and rural medical facilities!"

 


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1  seeder  devangelical    2 years ago

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2  seeder  devangelical    2 years ago

looks like senate republicans think dead veterans are a lot cheaper in the long run...

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1  Kavika   replied to  devangelical @2    2 years ago

Absolutely disgusting example of what they think of vets.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @2    2 years ago

I love Jon Stewart.

jrSmiley_93_smiley_image.jpg

So do the Veterans who he fights for.

Not the republicans/alleged conservatives/gop/gap who don't give a fuck about anyone but themselves

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    2 years ago

I wish Jon Stewart would run for president. He would be a breath of fresh air rarely seen in American politics. He is slightly liberal on most issues, but most accurately described as a centrist. 

He has already said he is not interested in running for office though, but if things continue deteriorating in this country at the rate they are now maybe he could be persuaded. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @3    2 years ago

With Stephen Colbert for VP.  

I'd vote for that ticket

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4  Greg Jones    2 years ago

"He  has already said he is not interested in running for office though, but if things continue deteriorating in this country at the rate they are now maybe he could be persuaded"

He would lose big time.....too liberal. A better choice would be Mike Rowe

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @4    2 years ago

He would win big time.  Jon that is

I think Rowe's a closet trumpturd supporter.  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.1  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @4.1    2 years ago

nah, rowe has been up front in his support of trumpster fascism for years.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @4.1.1    2 years ago

I stand corrected.  He's been out of the public eye the last couple years and I never really followed him.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
5  Drinker of the Wry    2 years ago

The Repubs say there objection isn't the funding for veterans suffering illnesses caused by exposure to toxic chemicals, but rather the reclassification of about $400B in unrelated VA spending from discretionary to mandatory accounts.  Mandatory spending doesn't require an annual appropriation by Congress.  

Mandatory spending has grown around two-thirds of the total federal budget in most years, and more in some years.  It was $5.2T or 72,9% in 2021.  Interest on the debt 4.3% leaving $1.6T or 22.8% that Congress voted on.

“It’s about a budget gimmick that’s designed to allow hundreds of billions of dollars in additional unrelated spending, having nothing to do with veterans,” said Sen. Patrick J. Toomey, R-Pa., who voted against the cloture motion.

On the Senate floor last Wed, Toomey  recommended to get rid of this mandatory funding shift by unanimous consent. "We can fix this tonight… once that’s done, this bill sails through this chamber."

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @5    2 years ago

Jon Stewart says Toomey is wrong. I think I'll believe Stewart. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
5.1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    2 years ago
Jon Stewart says Toomey is wrong

We should know in a few days.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    2 years ago

I believe Jon over those scum always

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6  Tessylo    2 years ago

As usual the scum repubkicans/gop/gqp/alleged conservatives prove they don't give a fuck about Veterans.  Only themselves and the almighty lining their own pockets

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @6    2 years ago

add another segment of americans trumpster's are happy to throw under the bus...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

The Senate, with overwhelming Republican support,  already passed the PACT  bill. The House altered the bill to  add  400 billion in additional spending, and the Republicans object to that.

Another example of how in the pocket of the Democrats partisan hacks like Stewart are.  They Democrats change a bill to add pork, refuse to pass the original bill solving the problem, and the lapdog media blame Republicans.  

If Democrats actually cared about helping veterans, and not capitalizing on the  PR  the fake narrative professional  liars like Stewart generate, they could have passed the bill already. 

 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
7.1  Snuffy  replied to  Sean Treacy @7    2 years ago
The House altered the bill to  add  400 billion in additional spending, and the Republicans object to that.

Additional spending?  Can you provide the text on that as I cannot find it.  All I can find is that the Senate Republicans voted against it when the House bill came back with an amendment where the why the money for the bill would come from.

Some members had objected because the federal government would pay for the bill’s $278.5 billion cost through mandatory rather than discretionary spending. 
 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
7.1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Snuffy @7.1    2 years ago
Additional spending?  Can you provide the text on that as I cannot find it.

I don't think that it identifies additional spending.  The way Toomey explained it on the Senate floor, it shifts around $400 B from current discretionary accounts to mandatory entitlements.  That provides room for future additional spending without bumping against the debt ceiling. 

I've looked for the specific legislative language, but haven't found it.   

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
7.1.2  Snuffy  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @7.1.1    2 years ago

Thanks.  That's what I understood it to be also.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
7.2  afrayedknot  replied to  Sean Treacy @7    2 years ago

“…the fake narrative professional  liars like Stewart.”

And what does the ‘professional liar like Stewart’ have to gain here. His bona fides on this topic appear beyond reproach…unless of course one is short-sightedly and singularly focused on the messenger. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
7.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  Sean Treacy @7    2 years ago

What additional spending? 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.3.1  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Thrawn 31 @7.3    2 years ago

meh, he likes the idea that funding for sick vets can be used as a GOP blackmail tool every year into perpetuity...

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
7.3.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @7.3.1    2 years ago

Exactly, why should Congress vote and approve the annual spending, that’s just crazy talk.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
7.3.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @7.3.2    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
7.3.4  afrayedknot  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @7.3.3    2 years ago

“Just can’t handle the relevant truth?”

Ha! This could preface every single comment of yours. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
7.3.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  afrayedknot @7.3.4    2 years ago

deleted

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
7.3.6  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @7.3.1    2 years ago

Exactly, we don’t need no stinking appropriation bills, put the rest of the budget on mandatory spending and be done with it.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
7.3.7  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @7.3.1    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
7.3.8  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  afrayedknot @7.3.4    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
7.3.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @7.3.1    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
7.3.10  GregTx  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @7.3.9    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
7.3.11  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @7.3.1    2 years ago

Exactly, debating and voting on Appropriation Bills is so last century.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
7.3.12  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @7.3.1    2 years ago

One track mind.

[deleted]

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
7.3.13  Thrawn 31  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @7.3.12    2 years ago

Bunch of deleted shit, but what spending?

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
8  Thrawn 31    2 years ago

 Vets are just another group the GOP despises it seems. But of course I have been calling them out on their bullshit lipservice to vets for over a decade.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
8.1  afrayedknot  replied to  Thrawn 31 @8    2 years ago

“Vets…”

Need to be delicate here.

While we appreciate the service, that service does not give anyone an automatic pass or make their views any more relevant. If that be the case, their service is diminished by the views they take, ignoring what they were actually fighting for. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
8.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  afrayedknot @8.1    2 years ago

Oh I never said that, I have also said many times that a lot of the dumbest people and biggest assholes I know are people I served with. That being said, I have called out the GOP, even before my enlistment ended, for using vets as stage props and then promptly fucking us over every chance they get. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.2  seeder  devangelical  replied to  afrayedknot @8.1    2 years ago
their service is diminished by the views they take, ignoring what they were actually fighting for

... every vet that still supported trump after 1/6/21.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
8.1.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @8.1.2    2 years ago

Exactly, they can’t be very bright or they wouldn’t be Vets to begin with, right?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
8.1.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @8.1.2    2 years ago

Agreeing with you has turned into trolling.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
8.1.5  Thrawn 31  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @8.1.3    2 years ago

Fuck off.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
9  igknorantzrulz    2 years ago

GOP playing retribution politix me the fck off. The bill was a DONE DEAL, till Turtle boy got played by Manchin who has been  playing the Dems since the election Trump claims he won, and the Republicans, of which there are120 + who refuse to admit as much, were playing payback for them getting played at the cost of Hedalthcare for our Veterans. Nice job Dickheads. 

  Women, Children, Sick Veterans, and gullible suckers are all being played and used by the G uttless  O ffensive  P ricks 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
9.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  igknorantzrulz @9    2 years ago

The bill will likely pass before recess, especially if amended.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
9.1.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @9.1    2 years ago
The bill will likely pass before recess, especially if amended.

The bill WOULD have been passed before story time, if Manchin had stayed his mainly Republican coarse, too many find fine, and THAT is WHY the GOP voted AGAINST OUR VETERANS ! Our Veterans, as U r quite aware, do not need to be used as political pawns by pols, as they suffer daily, these PRICKS are about to take a month long recess. Perhaps they should be suspended for the suspension of vets care and detained in detention in detention centers for multiplying the division in math classless acts by classless actors in DRAMA Schooling for controlling the ignorant and fooling, no fooling...?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
9.1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  igknorantzrulz @9.1.1    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
9.1.3  Raven Wing  replied to  igknorantzrulz @9.1.1    2 years ago

Totally agree, Iggy. Well said.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
9.2  al Jizzerror  replied to  igknorantzrulz @9    2 years ago

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
10  Drinker of the Wry    2 years ago

There is some irony in so many deletions for trolling in a seed entitled “Jon Stewart trolls…”

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
10.1  JBB  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @10    2 years ago

No, more like the word "Troll" in a title triggers trolls.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
10.1.1  Raven Wing  replied to  JBB @10.1    2 years ago
the word "Troll" in a title triggers trolls.

Actually, the Trolls here on NT really don't need any specific word(s to 'Trigger' them, as that is all they are here for to start with.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
10.1.2  JBB  replied to  Raven Wing @10.1.1    2 years ago

Need? No, it is relentless unpleasantness.

What my Mama would call, "Charm Free"...

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
10.1.3  Raven Wing  replied to  JBB @10.1.2    2 years ago
What my Mama would call, "Charm Free"...

Your Mama is right. A great term and fits perfectly.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
10.1.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JBB @10.1    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
11  al Jizzerror    2 years ago

Several Retrumplicans celebrated fucking over the sick veterans after they blocked the healthcare bill.

Here is Ted Cruz (who avoided military service) fist bumping Steve Daines (another chicken hawk) after they successfully filibustered the bill.  Daines pretends to be a huge supporter of veterans which, of course, is a fucking lie.

 
 

Who is online



Sean Treacy
jw
Snuffy


81 visitors