╌>

Biden campaigned against Trump's Mexico border policy. Now he's relaunching it

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  4 years ago  •  18 comments

By:   Rick Jervis (MSN)

Biden campaigned against Trump's Mexico border policy. Now he's relaunching it
President Joe Biden's administration is poised to bring back the "Remain in Mexico" policy that denies asylum seekers safety in the United States.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Americana

Americana

Dumb ass shouldn't have stopped anything.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



NUEVO LAREDO, Mexico -- Oscar Aviles Ochoa, 32, fled Michoacan, Mexico, in August with his wife, Brenda Figueroa, 26, and their two sons Jose, 3, and Jesus, 1, after men brandishing long rifles showed up at the avocado farm where he worked and tried to extort money from him and threatened to kill him. They took a bus to Nuevo Laredo and have been waiting at a border shelter ever since, hoping to cross into the United States to legally request asylum.

Shortly after arriving, they watched as gunmen ordered a family of 10 migrants across from the shelter into vans and whisked them away, Ochoa said. They're too scared to venture outside of the shelter.

Load Error

Waiting in Nuevo Laredo, he said, is just as perilous as the danger they fled in Michoacan.

"If I could await my U.S. asylum case in a U.S. jail, I would go," he said. "It's safer in a jail than it is here."

Next month, the Biden administration is expected to relaunch a controversial Trump administration policy, known as "Remain in Mexico," that requires most migrants like Ochoa and his family to stay in Mexico while seeking asylum instead of waiting in the United States for their court hearing.

The policy shift has raised alarm from migrants, activists and other allies who point to the growing dangers migrants in Mexico face amid cartel violence, poverty and other difficult conditions. Human Rights First last year counted more than 1,500 cases of migrants kidnapped or attacked while in the program.

© Rick Jervis Pastor Lorenzo Ortiz, right, meets with migrants at one of the shelters he runs in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico. Ortiz worries that the return of the Trump administration's Remain in Mexico policy will put more migrants at risk.

President Joe Biden campaigned against such policies and halted Remain in Mexico shortly after taking office. But Texas and Missouri, both Republican-led states, filed suit against the Biden administration, claiming the abrupt policy reversal led to more migrants crossing the border.

A U.S. District Court judge in August ordered the Biden administration to restart the policy and the Supreme Court upheld that decision. The White House is appealing. On Oct. 14, a Biden official filed a court brief stating that the federal government plans to abide by the judge's order and relaunch the policy in mid-November in Laredo and Brownsville in Texas, pending approval from Mexico.

Biden's decision to restart the program has bristled immigrant advocates who, up until now, have worked closely with the Biden administration to implement policies considered more humane than those of former President Donald Trump. Earlier this month, a group of advocates walked out of a virtual call with top Biden officials in protest over the policy's relaunch.

Some advocates, already angered over Biden's continued use of Title 42, another Trump-era policy that allows border agents to quickly expel asylum seekers to Mexico without due process to prevent the spread of COVID-19, said they had lost faith in the Biden administration's stated goal of making fairer immigration rules.

"This administration continues with policies that they themselves denounced as cruel and inhumane," said Tania Guerrero, an attorney with the Catholic Legal Immigration Network based in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, across from El Paso.

Many of her clients in the Remain in Mexico program have disappeared or been killed while awaiting U.S. asylum hearings in Ciudad Juarez, she said.

"I'm exhausted," Guerrero said. "I can't go to another session where [Biden officials] thank us for our work, absorb all of our ideas -- and do nothing."

Besides exposing migrants to Mexican cartels, the Remain in Mexico program makes it difficult for asylum seekers to get access to legal representation, advocates said. Many U.S. lawyers won't risk venturing into dangerous Mexican towns to speak with their clients, making it harder for them to win asylum cases.

Of the more than 45,000 cases tracked by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University, a research group in New York that tracks U.S. immigration cases, only 10% had legal representation and only 733 -- or 1.6% -- resulted in asylum, according to the group's data.

In his court filing, Blas Nunez-Neto, Homeland Security's acting assistant secretary for border and immigration policy, laid out steps his agency is taking to shorten wait times for hearings and improve access to lawyers, including erecting temporary courts in Brownsville and Laredo in Texas at a cost of $14.1 million.

© Rick Jervis Pastor Lorenzo Ortiz greets one of the migrants staying at a shelter in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico. Ortiz worries that the return of the Remain in Mexico policy will put more migrants at risk.

But the policy remains a dangerous initiative designed to deter migration and places asylum seekers' lives at risk, no matter which administration is running it, said Eleanor Acer, director of Human Right First's Refugee Protection program.

"There's no way to make a program that is inherently unsafe, safe," Acer said. "It's not fixable."

In a statement, a Homeland Security spokesperson said the department is complying with the court's order to reimplement the policy and is in ongoing talks with Mexican officials to accept the expelled migrants.

"The Department remains committed to building a safe, orderly, and humane immigration system that upholds our laws and values," the statement said.

Alysha Welsh, an attorney with Human Rights First who has represented asylum seekers in the Remain in Mexico program, said she expects migrants to face the same challenges in accessing legal help as they did under Trump.

A family she represented in Nuevo Laredo last year saw her just once for 30 minutes at a temporary tent courthouse in Laredo. Her organization wouldn't allow her to go across the border to meet with her clients in person. The day of their hearing, the court tent was filled with around 40 asylum seekers, she said. She and another attorney were the only lawyers there. Her client's asylum claim was denied.

Welsh said she and other advocates have been disappointed that the Biden administration has extended Trump-era policies, even after advocates pointed to Remain in Mexico and Title 42 as the top two policies that needed reversing.

© Rick Jervis Families of migrants eat lunch in front of makeshift bunkers at a shelter in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, across the border from Laredo, Texas. Many of the families never leave the shelter for fear of being targeted by cartels.

"This administration came into a very large mess of things to clean up," she said. "It's a year later and Title 42 is still happening and MPP is restarting. Disheartening is a great word for it."

Lorenzo Ortiz, pastor of El Buen Samaritano Migrante church in Laredo, was ebullient when the Biden administration earlier this year halted the Remain in Mexico policy and many of the migrants who had been stuck in Nuevo Laredo for months under the program were allowed into the United States to await their immigration hearings.

For a while, immigration flows at the international bridge returned to normal and even those expelled under Title 42 were processed through, he said. But all that came to a halt around June and migrants began filling his shelters again. Then the news of the return of Remain in Mexico reverberated through his shelters.

"We thought we were past that," Ortiz said.

On a recent afternoon, he loaded his van with a cooler filled with 20 pounds of frozen chicken, water bottles, hand sanitizer and 2x4 wood planks to build extra beds, then drove across the border into Nuevo Laredo.

The cartels know he's sheltering migrants but don't bother him, Ortiz said. Many of the migrants have paid some fee to the gangs to stay at the shelters, he said.

"It's sending people to the cartels so they could be kidnapped," said Ortiz of the Remain in Mexico policy. His shelters, with a capacity of 150 people, are already overflowing with more than 340 migrants. "It's going to put a lot of people at risk," he added.

At one of the shelters, toddlers in diapers scampered across an open patio as their families ate chicken soup. Men and women approached Ortiz, asking for updates on asylum rules or seeking his advice. Children squealed, "Pastor!" and ran up for hugs. Women and children crowded into makeshift outdoor bunkbeds.

The shelter -- a two-story concrete building adjoining an open-era patio -- normally holds around 50 people. On a recent afternoon, around 220 people were staying there.

© Rick Jervis Sandra Garcia and her daughter, Fatima, 10, had been living at a shelter in Nuevo Laredo for more than a month after fleeing their home in Michoacan, Mexico, when gangs threatened to kidnap Fatima. She never leaves the shelter for fear of being targeted by cartels.

Sandra Garcia, 34, of Michoacan, Mexico, had been living at the shelter since September with her 10-year-old daughter, Fatima Hernandez. The two fled their hometown last month when criminal gangs kidnapped her 17-year-old son and threatened to snatch Fatima next.

They went to the international bridge to seek asylum in the United States but were rebuffed by U.S. immigration agents, she said, so they retreated to the shelter.

She's been afraid to leave the shelter's concrete walls for fear of being picked up by members of local cartels. Last week, a man was dumped at the shelter, beat up and bleeding. The shelter's workers ordered everyone inside the two-story building. Two weeks ago, a gunfight broke out down the street.

Remain in Mexico would prolong their stay in this dangerous border town, she said.

"We left danger and now we're in more danger," Garcia said. "We thought the United States would help us."

Ortiz said he recommends patience to the migrants who approach him, pleading their case. In a few weeks, he told some of them, we may know more.

Truth is, he doesn't know when or if the situation will improve, he said. If Remain in Mexico is relaunched, Ortiz said he expects more people in his shelters -- and more targets for the cartels.

"These are people running away to save their lives," he said. "They should be in the U.S. awaiting their case."


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    4 years ago

Wasn't so fucking bad now was it Brandon?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  Vic Eldred    4 years ago

The best policy the US has ever had on the southern border was the Remain-in-Mexico policy established by President Trump. The Biden administration is restoring it only because a federal judge ordered them to do it. Thus far they are dragging their feet.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3  Ronin2    4 years ago

This is what Biden and the Democrats get for ringing the dinner bell all during their primaries; and then Biden taking every action possible to encourage illegals to come to the US.

All of the illegals in the two caravans coming to the US now say the same thing- "Biden wants them to come". 

Biden and the Democrats created this situation. It will be US citizens and the illegal immigrants that will suffer for it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @3    4 years ago

I think the Republican President and Republican Congress should pass comprehensive reform in 2024. First order of that will be to deny anyone who ever entered this country illegally citizenship. Then, since Biden open the flood gates, we should complete the wall and enact a 25 year moratorium on all immigration.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    4 years ago

I can agree with completing the wall- even if it is just a virtual wall for detection purposes. I would also beef up the border patrol and give them access to drones, personnel carrier helicopters, and better all terrain vehicles to enable them to go to where the illegal crossings are taking place faster. BPS main priority should always be US border security; not processing and caring for an endless line of illegals. A buffer organization between BPS and ICE needs to be put in place to handle the transition.

I would also enable US embassies to process asylum and immigration requests. That way immigrants could stay in their country of origin; or in another country to wait the decision. Anyone caught entering the US illegally is automatically expelled with no chance at a VISA or citizenship.

Not so sure about the 25 year moratorium on all immigration. Those that are trying to enter the country legally should still get their chance. Also, the US owes anyone that helped us abroad (such as those allies in Afghanistan) that is a special VISA or Green Card holder entry into the US.

I am not against legal immigration. I am for sensible immigration.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @3.1.1    4 years ago
I can agree with completing the wall- even if it is just a virtual wall for detection purposes. I would also beef up the border patrol and give them access to drones, helicopters, and better all terrain vehicles to enable them to go to where the illegal crossings are taking place faster. BPS main priority should always be US border security; not processing and caring for an endless line of illegals. A buffer organization between BPS and ICE needs to be put in place to handle the transition. I would also enable US embassies to process asylum and immigration requests. That way immigrants could stay in their country of origin; or in another country to wait the decision. Anyone caught entering the US illegally is automatically expelled with no chance at a VISA or citizenship.

Agreed and all of that needs to be codified in new immigration legislation. Legislation that Conservatives need to write.


Not so sure about the 25 year moratorium on all immigration. Those that are trying to enter the country legally should still get their chance. Also, the US owes anyone that helped us abroad (such as those allies in Afghanistan) that is a special VISA or Green Card holder entry into the US.

You are a good man Ronin. I'm not so forgiving. In 9 months everybody and everything has been allowed to cross the border. Millions have come across. ICE has been emasculated and the border patrol overwhelmed. We are paying millions not to build a wall. The left has to pay for all of that. Let us take advantage of their radical brutal rule and gets us back to where we should be. I also want those millions now living here to be gradually deported.


I am not against legal immigration. I am for sensible immigration.

Good Post, Ronin.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.2    4 years ago
You are a good man Ronin.

Thank you. I am sure there are many on NT that wouldn't agree with you.

I'm not so forgiving. In 9 months everybody and everything has been allowed to cross the border. Millions have come across. ICE has been emasculated and the border patrol overwhelmed. We are paying millions not to build a wall. The left has to pay for all of that. Let us take advantage of their radical brutal rule and gets us back to where we should be.

I understand the anger. Believe me I am angry as well. We need to rebuild what is broken; but we cannot be draconian about it. We cannot use the same tactics the left have. If the left has ideas that will work and can be incorporated into rebuilding they must be listened to; and the plans modified. I don't pretend to have all the answers. There are those on the left that have experience that extends beyond what Republicans and conservatives serving in government have. We have to all focus on the same thing; that we all want legal immigrants that deserve to be in this country. We can work out the numbers allowed in to help out businesses and those needing amnesty; while not taxing our social and physical infrastructure.   

I also want those millions now living here to be gradually deported.

That is a must. No one should be allowed to violate our immigration laws and be allowed to remain in the country. It is the only way that future illegal immigrants will be discouraged from coming.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @3.1.3    4 years ago
I am sure there are many on NT that wouldn't agree with you.

There are those that should be ignored.


We cannot use the same tactics the left have.

That's the big question. Do we fight fire with fire and step down to their level or do we set the example and hope that others will learn from it. I've kind of lost faith in the latter.


 We have to all focus on the same thing; that we all want legal immigrants that deserve to be in this country. We can work out the numbers allowed in to help out businesses and those needing amnesty; while not taxing our social and physical infrastructure. 

Immigration is supposed to benefit the host country. In the history of the US, immigration was only encouraged when the nation needed workers or new lands to be settled. Right now the massive immigration we have legal + illegal is of no benefit to the US.


That is a must. No one should be allowed to violate our immigration laws and be allowed to remain in the country. It is the only way that future illegal immigrants will be discouraged from coming.

Most of us know it. We need to get our elected officials on board.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
4  Ed-NavDoc    4 years ago

Then watch Biden and Harris try to take all the credit for bringing back said border policy.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @4    4 years ago

You know they will.  Just like they attempted to take credit for many other items from the previous administration.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.2  XXJefferson51  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @4    4 years ago

That’s the way they do things.  

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    4 years ago

There’s so much politics and fake outrage tied up in this issue anymore. I mean, you can have a low opinion of Trump personally, and that’s fine, but there’s nothing wrong with trying to control the flow of people crossing into your country. Most of the resistance to his efforts on that front have been purely political and have nothing to do with the goals themselves.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tacos! @5    4 years ago

They've go to increase their sagging voter base somehow...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
7  Greg Jones    4 years ago

And the influx will  continue.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
7.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  Greg Jones @7    4 years ago

Texas is taking measures to staunch the flow.  

 
 

Who is online


Igknorantzruls


66 visitors