╌>

Scientists Who Pushed Covid Hysteria Confess ‘Totalitarian’ Agenda to Control Populations with Fear

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  3 years ago  •  9 comments

By:   Kyle Becker

Scientists Who Pushed Covid Hysteria Confess ‘Totalitarian’ Agenda to Control Populations with Fear
The Covid pandemic response very much resembles the climate change agenda if applied for biomedical purposes. It is much more devastating to populations psychologically, however, as health is a much more personal issue and the resulting fear is much more appreciable. In 2020, the Annual State of Mental Health in America showed that anxiety and depression nationwide hit an all-time high, and was hitting ‘young people the hardest.’ Nations around the world are conducting psychological warfare...

Leave a comment to auto-join group Americana

Americana

This article is so exactly right on!  It’s great that some of the peeps are confessing to their sins and evil ways and telling us how they and the others manipulated us to grow blue totalitarian big brother government at our expense.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Scientists Who Pushed Covid Hysteria Confess ‘Totalitarian’ Agenda to Control Populations with Fear



by Kyle Becker about 3 hours ago


Scientists who were implemental in spreading Covid hysteria around the globe –nearly as fast as the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself – have now come forward to express regret over furthering a ‘totalitarian’ agenda.

The members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour, a group of British scientists, confessed that public health authorities are pursuing an agenda to control populations with fear.

“Scientists on a committee that encouraged the use of fear to control people’s behaviour during the Covid pandemic have admitted its work was ‘unethical’ and ‘totalitarian’,” the Telegraph reported.

“Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B) expressed regret about the tactics in a new book about the role of psychology in the Government’s Covid-19 response,” the report noted.

SPI-B warned in March last year that ministers needed to increase “the perceived level of personal threat” from Covid-19 because “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened.”

Gavin Morgan, a psychologist on the SPI-B team, revealed the political agenda.

“Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an ethical stance for any modern government. By nature I am an optimistic person, but all this has given me a more pessimistic view of people,” Morgan said.

Another scientist said the Covid pandemic response has been “dystopian.”

“In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down,” another scientist said. “There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear. The way we have used fear is dystopian.”


“The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable,” the scientist continued. “It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared.”

Another SPI-B member added: “You could call psychology ‘mind control’. That’s what we do… clearly we try and go about it in a positive way, but it has been used nefariously in the past.”


One scientist warned that “people use the pandemic to grab power and drive through things that wouldn’t happen otherwise… We have to be very careful about the authoritarianism that is creeping in.”

“Without a vaccine, psychology is your main weapon… Psychology has had a really good epidemic, actually,” another scientist said.

The Covid pandemic response very much resembles the climate change agenda if applied for biomedical purposes. It is much more devastating to populations psychologically, however, as health is a much more personal issue and the resulting fear is much more appreciable.

In 2020, the Annual State of Mental Health in America showed that anxiety and depression nationwide hit an all-time high, and was hitting ‘young people the hardest.’ Nations around the world are conducting psychological warfare against the own populations to further their ‘totalitarian’ agenda. It is beginning to have devastating effects.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    3 years ago
“The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable,” the scientist continued. “It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared.”

Another SPI-B member added: “You could call psychology ‘mind control’. That’s what we do… clearly we try and go about it in a positive way, but it has been used nefariously in the past.”

One scientist warned that “people use the pandemic to grab power and drive through things that wouldn’t happen otherwise… We have to be very careful about the authoritarianism that is creeping in.”

“Without a vaccine, psychology is your main weapon… Psychology has had a really good epidemic, actually,” another scientist said.

The Covid pandemic response very much resembles the climate change agenda if applied for biomedical purposes. It is much more devastating to populations psychologically, however, as health is a much more personal issue and the resulting fear is much more appreciable.

In 2020, the Annual State of Mental Health in America showed that anxiety and depression nationwide hit an all-time high, and was hitting ‘young people the hardest.’ Nations around the world are conducting psychological warfare against the own populations to further their ‘totalitarian’ agenda. It is beginning to have devastating effects.

https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/14703/scientists-who-pushed-covid-hysteria-confess-totalitarian-agenda-to-control-populations-with-fear
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    3 years ago
 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
1.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.1    3 years ago

I love how your only problem is with vaccines and not the plethora of other drugs Americans are taking. For a conspiracy theorist, you really do suck at being a conspiracy theorist. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Thrawn 31 @1.1.1    3 years ago

SPI-B warned in March last year that ministers needed to increase “the perceived level of personal threat” from Covid-19 because “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened.”

https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/14703/scientists-who-pushed-covid-hysteria-confess-totalitarian-agenda-to-control-populations-with-fear?g=60#cm1698901
 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2  Nerm_L    3 years ago

The scientific fear mongering has been all too obvious.  The community of scientific experts have relied upon two main tools of psy-ops warfare: fear and confusion.  In combination those tools of fear and confusion foster public fear of the unknown in an effort to establish blind public trust in those who claim to know.

The pandemic required a quick response to strengthen public safety and the scientific community no doubt saw psy-ops as the quickest way to achieve that.  But the scientific community completely ignored that fear and confusion are also the main tools used by politicians to gain blind public trust.  Politicians have subsumed the psy-ops efforts by the scientific community to pursue purely political objectives.  Politicians who 'trust the science' are following the advice of those who know and the public should blindly trust those politicians.

The scientific community politicized the pandemic by adopting the political tools of fear and confusion to direct public response to the pandemic.  Now it's too late to separate the science from politics.  Now the public will trust scientists as much as they trust politicians.  The scientific community released the kraken upon themselves.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Nerm_L @2    3 years ago

You got this right.  Way too much politics mixed in with the science and perverting the outcome 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
2.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  Nerm_L @2    3 years ago

No worries Nerm, its all the lizard people. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
3  Thrawn 31    3 years ago

Only had to read the title to know that is is one of the dumbest fucking seeds of all time. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Thrawn 31 @3    3 years ago

The seed is exactly right about the contents with in.  

 
 

Who is online




449 visitors