VA funding plan passes House with more controversial provisions
By: Leo Shane III (Army Times)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
House Republicans responded to President Joe Biden's veto threat on their Veterans Affairs appropriations bill by adding even more controversial social issues into the measure, further complicating negotiations on how to fund veterans programs into next year.
On Thursday, the chamber advanced a $320 billion funding measure for the Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal 2024, which would give the agency its largest budget ever. The final 219-211 vote was along party lines, with only Republicans backing the plan.
The cost of the spending plan matches what White House officials requested earlier this year and has not been a sticking point in negotiations. Rather, Democrats objected to amendments included in the bill which would bar VA officials from providing any abortion services, severely limit health care options for transgender veterans, and bar department facilities from displaying the LGBT pride flag at any time.
"VA Is a place where all veterans should feel welcomed, included, and cared for," said Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., and ranking member of the House Appropriations Committee's panel on veterans issues, ahead of the vote. "All veterans means all veterans. And what this bill does is shameful."
On Monday, the White House issued a veto threat on the appropriations bill, the first to be voted on by the House this year. Officials cited the "partisan policy provisions with devastating consequences" included in the measure as the reason for the president's opposition.
But the threat only served to embolden House Republicans, who added several other amendments opposed by Democrats ahead of final passage.
They included provisions barring VA leaders from changing the department's motto to gender-neutral language; eliminating the department's Office of Resolution Management, Diversity and Inclusion; loosening gun ownership restrictions for veterans found incapable of managing their estates; and prohibiting VA from enforcing any COVID-19 mask mandates.
Republican lawmakers said the moves are needed to rein in partisan policies put in place under the current administration. They also praised the overall package as critical to fulfilling the nation's promise to its former military members.
"This bill makes good on that promise by fully funding veterans health care while ensuring our veterans get the medical treatment and benefits they deserve," said Rep. Kay Granger, R-Texas and chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee. "The bill also prohibits funding to be used for biased and controversial programs."
The measure now heads to the Senate for consideration, but Democratic leaders there have already said that they'll oppose many of the provisions that led to the presidential veto threat. That leaves the future of the appropriations plan in doubt.
The Veterans Affairs bill — which also includes several billion dollars for military construction projects — is the only one of the 12 appropriations bills that Congress must adopt by Oct. 1 to fully fund the federal government.
Lawmakers are scheduled to go on a six-week recess starting Friday. When they return, they'll have fewer than 20 legislative days to reach agreement on a long-term or short-term budget deal or risk triggering a partial government shutdown.
No personal insults
No death wishes of any individual
All of NT's rules apply
Tags
Who is online
643 visitors
And in true Democrat fashion NONE of them voted to take care of our Veterans up to and including the Coward in Chief in the WH.
It's always amazing with right wingers.
When a bill is pushed through by republicans, the democrats vote against because they are against supporting our troops, according to those right wingers.
However, when a bill is pushed through by democrats, the republicans only vote against it because of the unidentified pork that republican swear is in it, according to those same right wingers.
So both sides do the same exact things.
Wow, what a revelation.
So, based on your rant, you can't justify why democrats are voting against funding the VA and supporting our veterans. All you want to do is play whataboutisms.
Based on your comment, you never bothered reading the actual article. Go read it, then get back to me.
Fucking retard comment and you know it. Simple fact of the matter is these bills are never actually about vets. They are just another way politicians use us to try to push their political agendas.
And before you try to start, both sides are just as guilty so shut the fuck up about one side being better than the other.
Simple fact none of the Democrats voted for it. In fact when it does come to Veterans and our military they Democrats are quick to drop trowser and shit on both.
McCarthyites are defunding VA healthcare for our women and LGTBQ veterans to appease the flat earth intolerant throwbacks in the gop...
Do you have a shred of proof that veteran women and members of the alphabet group are not receiving treatment?
Just point out what in the bill specifically excludes these folks from getting treatment.
I am sure you can prove your claim.
Defunding? From the seed:
Ah, you forgot about that new-fangled lib math.
Budget increases are really decreases, we have been told.
You can't reason with folks who won't tell the truth!
Amazing how that works. The department asks for $50K increase, GovCo says we will increase it $35K and Dems think that is a cut cuz they didn't get what they wanted. THEN they go out and blame those nasty old Republicans for cuts. It's ludicrous. Talk about mis/dis information.
Math is hard!
I tire of the most outlandish claims being made with no evidence.
I suppose we were to believe the talking points.
Try reading the article BEFORE posting stupid shit you can't back up.
[DELETED] Probably because I am correct...