╌>

Internet backs Jesse Watters after he questions claim that unmailed ballots in Nevada were shown as counted due to glitch - MEAWW News

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  2 months ago  •  12 comments

By:   MEAWW News

Internet backs Jesse Watters after he questions claim that unmailed ballots in Nevada were shown as counted due to glitch - MEAWW News
Jesse Watters expressed skepticism over unmailed ballots being counted and criticized the Secretary of State's assurance that it was a mere glitch

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


By Tamkeenat Rose
Published on : 02:57 PST, Feb 21, 2024FOLLOW Fox News host Jesse Watters raised concerns over unmailed Nevada ballots being shown as counted (Fox News)

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA: Fox News host Jesse Watters has ignited a debate on social media after calling out what he referred to as an "election glitch" in Nevada, where unmailed ballots appeared to have been counted.

Watters shared a segment from his show on Twitter, expressing concerns about voters discovering that their votes were counted in an election they never participated in.

In the accompanying video, Watters voiced skepticism over the Nevada Secretary of State's assurance that it was merely a glitch.

Jesse Watters sparks outcry on twitter over alleged Nevada election irregularities


Watters shared the video on Twitter, writing, "Nevadans found out votes were counted in their names in an election they never even voted in. The Secretary of State says it was just a glitch."

In the video, Watters expressed his discontent with the situation in Nevada, stating, "We are not happy with what we found. Nevada had a primary two weeks ago, and people were complaining even if they did not vote. The state's website said that their ballot was counted. This weekend, the Secretary of State came out and said, 'It's just a glitch, trust us, it's secure.' I don't trust people who are constantly telling me to trust them. We are just supposed to trust that no one voted in our name."


Nevadans found out votes were counted in their names in an election they never even voted in. The Secretary of State says it was just a glitch. pic.twitter.com/Jnv98iICFL
— Jesse Watters (@JesseBWatters) February 21, 2024

Official response from Nevada secretary of state's office


The background of the controversy involves the Nevada Secretary of State's Office issuing a statement to the 8 News Now Investigators, assuring the public that all issues related to "erroneous vote history" are being identified and fixed.

According to 8newsnow, The statement explained that the problem stemmed from a nightly data upload process, where some counties failed to take additional steps to ensure voters who did not return their ballots did not have a voting history, resulting in inaccurate data.

Secretary of state's office assures isolated nature of error


The statement from the Secretary of State's Office emphasized that the error was related to the code used when a voter is sent a mail ballot and does not return it, having no connection to the vote tabulation process. The office is working on fixing the issues, validating new files from each county, and moving them into production as accuracy is verified.

"On Sunday, February 18, the Secretary of State's Office became aware of possible technical issues related to the vote history of individuals who did not participate in the Presidential Preference Primary," a spokesperson said. "Elections and IT staff began working on the issue immediately, and met with county clerks and registrars this morning. We are working to resolve the issue as soon as possible, and will provide further updates as we can."

Public outcry on over alleged Nevada election glitch


Following Jesse Watters' Twitter post about the alleged Nevada election glitch, users voiced concerns and skepticism about the incident. Some users speculated that it might be a test run for the upcoming November election.

One user said, "Sounds like a test run for the Nov election. Of course they're going to cheat again. Why not? They got away with it in 2020. And if anyone protests to call them out, they'll send them straight to prison."


Sounds like a test run for the Nov election. Of course they're going to cheat again. Why not? They got away with it in 2020. And if anyone protests to call them out, they'll send them straight to prison.
— chicago (@LJT1212) February 21, 2024

Another one added, "It's always just an accident with zero consequences!!!!


It's always just an accident with zero consequences!!!!
— Sir Chugs (@vitale1776) February 21, 2024

One replied, "It wasn't a glitch. My vote from 2020 is missing as is my husbands. We also have people who voted in person in 2020 but it's showing 'mail ballot counted'."


It wasn't a glitch. My vote from 2020 is missing as is my husbands. We also have people who voted in person in 2020 but it's showing 'mail ballot counted'
— Chelsy Freedom (@ChelsyFreedom) February 21, 2024

One commented, "I wonder who the 'glitch' votes went for? I have a hunch it was Not Trump. Just saying"


I wonder who the "glitch" votes went for? I have a hunch it was Not Trump. Just saying
— Calibrat0r (@Calman1225) February 21, 2024

Another one added, "And what are they doing about it? Nothing. Just complaining."


And what are they doing about it? Nothing. Just complaining.
— Matt Strickland (@MattForVA) February 21, 2024

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.


Red Box Rules

No personal insults
No death wishes of any individual
All of NT's rules apply
Calling members "trolls" or ""dishonest" will result in your comment being deleted.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    2 months ago

Who would have thunk it?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 months ago
'It's just a glitch, trust us, it's secure.'

A glitch my ass.  

The background of the controversy involves the Nevada Secretary of State's Office issuing a statement to the 8 News Now Investigators, assuring the public that all issues related to "erroneous vote history" are being identified and fixed.

Sounds like a new election needs to be held to ensure the history is corrected.  And that those involved are removed from their positions.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1  Ronin2  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2    2 months ago
Sounds like a new election needs to be held to ensure the history is corrected.  And that those involved are removed from their positions.

That will never happen. Remember in 2020 when the current Governor was SoS and was in charge of voting that machines in dominantly Republican areas didn't work; and couldn't tabulate votes which caused excessively long delays and voters being rerouted to other districts to cast their ballots. A leftist judge refused to extend the voting deadline for the districts involved. Imagine the screaming if it had been a Republican SoS and this had occurred in only minority predominantly Democrat districts. 

Democrats are great at "gaming" the system. Especially when they are in charge of it. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    2 months ago
the error was related to the code used when a voter is sent a mail ballot and does not return it, having no connection to the vote tabulation process. 
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @3    2 months ago

Just for the benefit of the eternally stupid among us what the Secretary of State's office in Nevada is saying is that the website that showed they had voted is not reflective of the actual ballot tabulation process

if you read the explanation closely you see that the information that was available on the website was not necessarily connected to tabulated votes

people seeing online next to their name that a vote had been counted does not mean  their vote was counted

it means that the website erroneously indicates their vote was counted

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    2 months ago

How can a vote that was never made  be counted ?  a mail in vote has to have a physical presence and be verified by the election officials

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    2 months ago
How can a vote that was never made to be counted ?  a mail in vote has to have a physical presence and be verified by the election officials

But...but...but...HUNTER BIDEN'S LAPTOP!!!!!!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Ozzwald @3.1.2    2 months ago

If someone went on their county assessors website, and searched their name and address and the website indicated they owed 72 million dollars in property taxes, would they actually owe 72 million dollars (because the website says so), or would it be a mistake in the online website of the assessors office ? 

Same principle here. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.1.4  Ozzwald  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.3    2 months ago
Same principle here.

But a website popped up and told me my car's service warranty had expired.  Does that mean I don't have to call that phone number for India?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    2 months ago
and be verified by the election officials

Lol

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.6  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.5    2 months ago

Like trusting the fox in the hen house when he tells you he didn’t eat any of your chickens.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4  Greg Jones    2 months ago

The Republicans in all states and districts need to be on high alert that the Dems will working overtime to cheat during this coming election and make the polling places and ballots are secure as possible..

 
 

Who is online






40 visitors