╌>

Liz Cheney's Finest Hour

  
Via:  Bob Nelson  •  5 years ago  •  3 comments

By:   Shay Khatiri (The Bulwark)

Liz Cheney's Finest Hour



Her support for impeachment is a late but welcome act of leadership

Leave a comment to auto-join group The Beacon

The Beacon


original

This may be an attempt to corral the non-denialist rump of the Republican Party, on the presumption that the Party is going to splinter.

Or it may be an act of moral courage... from a Cheney?? 



S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



384 Rep. Liz Cheney, the third-highest-ranking Republican in the House of Representatives , announced on Tuesday in a strongly worded statement that she will vote to impeach President Donald Trump. "Much more will become clear in coming days and weeks," Cheney said, "but what we know now is enough." She is among the first Republicans in the House to clearly indicate support for a second Trump impeachment.

Liz Cheney: “The President of the United States
summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and
lit the flame of this attack.
Everything that followed was his doing.”
Bill Clark / CQ Roll Call / Getty

Cheney is the daughter of Dick Cheney, the former vice president who once held the same congressional seat she does. Back then, the elder Cheney's dream was to become the speaker of the House; he even co-authored a book about congressional leaders with his wife, the scholar Lynne Cheney. But he never fulfilled that dream.

In the last Congress, Liz Cheney became the chairwoman of the House Republican Conference in only her second term. Such a meteoric rise puts her in an advantageous position to achieve (assuming Republicans someday win back the House) what her father never did.

But in announcing her intended impeachment vote, she risks that advantage and imperils the aspiration of two generations. Her announcement is a testament to the idea that party allegiance, winning re-election, climbing to the top of the greasy pole, and even fulfilling a family dream all come second to doing the right thing for the country.

Like most of her colleagues in the House, Cheney faced this decision before. Thirteen months ago, she, and they, had the opportunity to vote for Trump's first impeachment, and thereby possibly to influence Senate Republicans to remove him before 400,000 Americans had died of the coronavirus; before he spread his plague of misinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies about the election; before he incited a deadly insurrection against Congress. Like every other House Republican, Cheney declined that opportunity. She apparently was unwilling to risk her re-election, her position in leadership, or anything else.

This time, though, while most of her Republican colleagues remain in their defensive crouch, Cheney is standing up. There's a good argument that senators, as quasi-jurors, should refrain from pre-judging an impeachment case before it gets to them, but no such imperative applies to members of the House, and a handful of members—Reps. John Katko, Adam Kinzinger, Fred Upton, and Jaime Herrera Beutler, in addition to Cheney—are showing courage by announcing early that they will support impeachment. Cheney in particular may, because of her prominence, rally others to join her.

Also of note: Cheney is the highest-ranking House Republican not to have joined the Texas attorney general's bogus, sanction-worthy lawsuit attempting to overturn the election. She did this despite representing a congressional district—the entire state of Wyoming—that voted for Trump over Biden by a 43-point margin. She's putting herself in political danger, and, if House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy is to be believed, possibly physical danger as well. (Ironically, McCarthy's argument against impeachment is another reason for it.)

Donald Trump on his own would not have been as great a threat to the republic without the congressional Republicans who enabled him. Cheney was one of those responsible for some of the harm he's done. While she memorably opposed Trump on some foreign policy and military matters, and defended Anthony Fauci and the witnesses who spoke out during the first impeachment, she went along with or remained silent about many other odious Trump actions. But by using her position now to gather votes for impeachment, she's offering less brave members support so they won't have to stand alone.

Cheney understands that this may well be the last chance to stop the GOP from sliding permanently into Trumpist authoritarianism, and she knows very well, as polls show, that the odds of saving the party are slim. And while she is late to recognize and speak up about the danger that Donald Trump poses to the republic, it is not too late to minimize his future harm by trying to disqualify him from running for president again—and by clearly setting a historic marker that his brand of demagogue must never again hold the highest office in the land.



Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Bob Nelson    5 years ago

The Republicans who voted to impeach, from the New York Times:

Representative John Katko of New York was the first Republican to publicly announce that he would back the impeachment proceedings. Not holding the president accountable for his actions would be “a direct threat to the future of our democracy,” he said.

Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming, the No. 3 House Republican, said on Tuesday evening that she would vote to impeach, citing the president’s role in an insurrection that caused “death and destruction in the most sacred space in our Republic.”

Representative Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, a frequent critic of Mr. Trump, joined his Republican colleagues on Tuesday evening, saying the nation was in uncharted waters. He said that Mr. Trump “encouraged an angry mob to storm the United States Capitol to stop the counting of electoral votes.”

Representative Fred Upton of Michigan issued a statement saying that he would vote to impeach after Mr. Trump “expressed no regrets” for what had happened at the Capitol.

Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler of Washington State issued a statement saying, “The president’s offenses, in my reading of the Constitution, were impeachable based on the indisputable evidence we already have.” (An earlier version of this item incorrectly stated which state Ms. Herrera Beutler represents.)

Representative Dan Newhouse of Washington announced that he was backing impeachment, attacking his party’s core argument, that the process was being rushed. “I will not use process as an excuse,” he said during the impeachment debate, to cheers and applause from Democrats. Mr. Newhouse also offered a mea culpa, chiding himself and other Republicans for “not speaking out sooner” against the president.

Representative Peter Meijer of Michigan said that Mr. Trump had “betrayed his oath of office by seeking to undermine our constitutional process, and he bears responsibility for inciting the insurrection we suffered last week.”

Representative Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio said Vice President Mike Pence and lawmakers in the House and Senate “had their lives put in grave danger as a result of the president’s actions,” adding, “When I consider the full scope of events leading up to Jan. 6 including the president’s lack of response as the United States Capitol was under attack, I am compelled to support impeachment.”

Representatives Tom Rice of South Carolina and David Valadao of California also voted for impeachment.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  JBB    5 years ago

Atta Girl!

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
3  Mark in Wyoming     5 years ago

Cheney has no worries currently , or at least for the next year and a half, Wyoming is a state that has no provision to recall congressional representatives( house or senate on the federal level ) either in law or its constitution , that is subject to change by either its residents (by means of a ballot initiative come spring/summer) or the legislature over the next year and a half of her ter, to change the law to allow such a provision for recall.

 As it stands , if i were a betting person , and if it could be done , i think there would be a good chance she would be recalled and fired . i am speaking as one actually "on the ground" here in wyoming.

Things being as they are and she is somewhat safe until her term ends and there is another election in 2 years ,  if  one thinks about it she actually has a primary to go through first before the general in a year and a half , i think she pretty much shot down any chances of re election by the folks of wyoming that disagree with her if what i am seeing and hearing means anything.

 If i were a person that bets , i would think its a safe bet that she will lose in the primary to someone else of the R party, AND i would think its also a safe bet the residents are looking into either getting the legislature to change or create a recall provision to law ( likely the easiest path for now) or a ballot initiate is started to have it done  through the peoples votes, that of course will have to pass the states constitutional "smell" test, it would have to conform to existing law and the state constitution. thats a little harder.

As one can tell ,i think, she likely wont have the job after her current term ends, but she has already served long enough to get that congressional pension from the feds. even if this is only her second term.

 
 

Who is online





113 visitors