10 Ugliest Cars of All Time
By: Jalopy Talk
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
10 Ugliest Cars of All Time
Beauty is said to be in the eye of the beholder. That's all very well, but most people acknowledge the immense, undiluted splendor of the Taj Mahal. At the same time, most people recognize the tragic horror of Baltimore USA's Morris A. Mechanic Theatre, or the gag-reflex triggering London UK Lincoln Plaza 'luxury apartment' block.
Thus, it appears that beauty and ugliness are levels of aesthetic or anti-aesthetic that the majority of folks can agree on, for which reason I am happy to stake my claim that these here below are the 10 ugliest cars of all time . (Take the 'currently on the market bit' with a large dollop of salt, though.)
The Pontiac Trans Sport
Not to get into the super-sensitive area of identity politics or anything, but the fact that this minivan has 'trans' in its name is ironic and piquant. It's as if the vehicle was born a minivan but suffered the attentions of an inebriated pimp-my-car hack to become a wheeled door wedge.
That this entry is the least ugly of the ten vehicles on this list is understandable because the Trans Sport (lol) has a certain charm for all its aesthetic faults. The thing is, this two-tone motor is an aborted vehicular Benjamin Button. It looks old and rickety on its first day on the forecourt, but it doesn't get younger-looking with each passing year. It just gets older-looking and more dilapidated, and older-looking and ricketier.
Fearsomely awful feature: the worst thing about the Pontiac Trans Sport (lol) is that it is so ugly, it was probably a social danger to the family unit . Any Dad who showed up with one of these was likely to face his family's instant and permanent loss of respect for him.
The Crosley
Once you realize that the Crosley was born in Britain at the height of rationing just after the Second World War, you can understand why it seems like a timid and apologetic motor scooter forced to leave its comfort zone and pretend to be a car. Looking into its cabin and discovering that it had a driver's seat alongside a passenger seat gave me such a frightful shock that it took ages for the effects to wear off.
I can only say in this vehicle's favor that I forgive its designer. The car fully conveys dolorous mournfulness, a heavy, dark shadow that bears the unbearable testament of gloom, doom, and despair. I assume these are indications that the designer went through hell during the war, a hell that weighed heavily on his mind as he designed the car. I feel his pain. In fact, anyone who gazes upon this car will feel his pain too.
Outstandingly awful feature: the abject surrender to an air of defeat and despair . Based on the looks of this car, it is incomprehensible that the Brits went on to win the war.
The Marcos Mantis M70
Obviously built as a joke, the Mantis M70 is no joke. It is blindingly apparent that its designers sought to lend the M70 an air of quiet menace reminiscent of a Preying Mantis, just as it is glaringly evident that they failed horribly.
From the front of the cabin to its rear, the M70 looks like a car. From the front cabin to the front grill, the M70 looks like a metal sculpture given to a sophomore art student with the brief, " Toad-and-Lizard Chimera." That said, the M70 may be simply a prank that went too far, a notion bolstered by the color of the example I saw, a sort of diarrhea-brown. The problem is, it is tough to imagine that there are people in the world with such a warped sense of humor.
Slightly awful feature: I don't know whether it's just me and my somewhat overactive writer's imagination, but the M70's weird hood strongly suggests a gentleman pulling down his pants . Honestly. Worse yet, once seen, you can't unsee it.
The Aston Martin Lagonda
Aston Martin is a name that will long live in the Hall of Fame for Beautiful Cars-sorry, Hall of Infamy for Ugly Cars, for cursing the public with the unmitigated horror of the Lagonda. If you think that sounds too harsh, let me tell you that you're wrong. If anything, I don't go far enough.
Imagine being a wealthy young man eager to impress friends, family, and beautiful girls. However, imagine that this man has more money than sense, a flair for style that doesn't exist, and a surfeit of arrogance so that he can't understand his car is not receiving looks of envy but of sheer loathing.
If you can imagine all that, you will still fall short of the revulsion generated by the stupidly elongated hood artlessly dunked onto the boxy body of a car that sits too high off the ground (and not in a good way, mind), so it looks as if it is designed to test the limits of a misplaced center-of-gravity.
Stomach-churning awful feature: the strange, jutting nose of the car that is at once space-age and retro, sleek, yet boxy and unremittingly infuriating .
The Citroen Ami
"Ami" is French for "friend," but there's nothing aesthetically friendly about this car. The Ami is a curious, misshapen mix of three very distinct features. First, it has a front end that is classically an early 1960s automobile, then it has a cabin midsection that is clearly modeled on the deckhouse of a barge, and last, it has a trunk that is equally clearly modeled on an outhouse.
The entire vehicle seems to have gone into production way too early in the design cycle on the back of a mishmash of experimental thoughts and over-excited creative ideas. It is the sort of thing that would be associated nowadays with a vulgar parvenu director who had pretensions of restoring the movie industry to the heyday of nouvelle vague French cinema. In short, an uncouth charlatan with delusions of grandeur.
Unforgivably awful feature: the whole dang thing! No kidding, the more you look at it, the less you like it . The less you like it, the less willing you are to forgive anyone for owning or driving one of these vehicular abominations.
The Pontiac Aztek
Unlike many of the other cars on this list, the Aztek doesn't engender hate-filled feelings of red-hot burning rage but a simple sigh and sad acknowledgment that some people weren't brought up properly. Anyone who agrees to be caught dead or alive in this hot mess of an automobile only deserves pity; it's not even worth contempt because the Aztek isn't worth any strong emotion whatsoever. In looks, it appears to be an unimaginative, unassuming, small-to-mid-range vehicle, so on that front, you'd see there is little to complain about.
However… you start to notice the plastic-everywhere aesthetic. Dinky little wheels, dark grey plasticky roof rack, rubbery front bumper, and you suddenly realize you're looking at an automobile that Pontiac must have hurriedly thrown together using a Mattel toy car for inspiration. There's nothing for it but to just " pity the fool " who drives one.
Dedicated to horribleness, awful feature: cheap, plasticky, unserious toy car , not-for-grownups look.
The Nissan Cube
It should have been a wheeled coffin for a quirky little person who had a wicked sense of humor and wished to go out with garish flamboyance. Misnamed "the Cube" as an obvious ploy to pretend that this vehicle's boxy, drab, uninspiring look is an admirable design feature, what we've really got is what seems to be an attempt to marry the allure of an airport transport to the solid needs of a quirky urban soccer mom. The effort failed, and instead, the Cube is an overgrown circus clown car with a hardtop.
The Cube comes in a wide variety of colors. There's even a two-toned version. Unfortunately, none of these panaceas help cover the ugly that is so painfully smacked onto this car.
Oh Lord, my eyes! awful feature: the bulge in the Cube's behind, which looks like an afterthought when the designer realized he had moved the rear wheels too far backward.
The Corbin Sparrow
The Sparrow is a three-wheeled atrocity that is an assault on the sensibilities of any normal person. Cantankerously diminutive, the Sparrow weaponizes its small size and ugliness to bully people out of the way. Folks are only too happy to oblige the tiny repugnance because not looking at the Sparrow is more pleasing and soothing than looking at it.
That the Sparrow is very aware of what it's doing is given witness by its rear end, which is clearly a cocker spaniel sticking its tongue out at those unfortunate enough to be following behind. I have no idea, therefore, why the car isn't called the Corbin Spaniel.
"I hate you back" awful feature: the car's cavalier insolence . It dares you to hate it, then doubles down, insults you, and dares you to hate it all over again.
The AMC Pacer
Straight out of a Dawn of the Dead type horror movie, this car is in every nightmare ever suffered during the late 70s. A two-tone eyesore that cunningly fools the eye into believing that good things are about to happen as the onlooker eagerly traces its outline along promising curves, only for things to end in a soul-destroying combination of drab dowdiness and sheer boredom.
The one special thing about the way this car looks is its peculiar air of menace; it is so easy to see that this was probably the favorite automobile of the serial killer. The phrase "surreptitious hearse" comes to mind upon viewing the vehicle, along with a powerful urge to call the police and proceed somewhere far away.
Horror movie fugitive awful feature: the funeral hearse, glassy hatchback and sullen, angry look from the front .
Nissan S-Cargo
I've left the worst till last because I didn't feel it would have been right to oppress you with this despotically dreadful-looking vehicle earlier in the article. I wanted to alleviate the horror of this list by being as playful as possible. However… unfortunately, there's nothing funny about the S-Cargo.
Part van (the back part), part vehicle (the middle part), and part frog (the front part), my first honest-to-goodness reaction upon spying this abomination was to ejaculate, "Good Lord!" and believe me, I had good reason to be taken aback.
This almost-van stands out for its beady little headlights (which I find impossible to believe would ever furnish proper illumination in the dark), dinky little wheels that are not cute, and overall tight, miserly size that makes it look as if its engineers were suddenly informed of serious and permanent steel shortages.
Stand out god-awful feature: the S-Cargo's standard color is an inconsistent off-pale green, as if something went wrong in the factory paint workshop , with odd highlights in fireman red and a metallic grey that stubbornly resists having any color-coordination with the rest of the vehicle.
Afterword: The 10 Ugliest Cars of All Time
This consideration of the ten ugliest cars of all time raises two important questions. First, how did someone-possibly even more than one-look upon what he/they had created and still submit to a demonic impulse to practice his iniquity upon unsuspecting fellow humans? Second, what sort of aesthetically challenged visual-hooligan buys these vehicles?
No politics, no religion, no instagrams, and commentary must be civil. The ToS and the CoC will be enforced, and anything that the administrator deems to be offensive will be deleted. YouTubes, videos and images that the administrator is unable to open must be described and explained or they will be deleted.
Tags
Who is online
140 visitors
While reading this article and laughing out loud about 5 or 6 times I began to wonder why I didn't post this article on my Great Non-Political Articles group where I post humour articles. As for the content, I thought that the Corbin Sparrow was a car that little green men from Mars might drive, and the Citroen Ami competes with a certain model of Studebaker that we used to say we didn't know was coming or going. However I do have a criticism in that the author speaks of parts of the cars that we can't see, cause the cars are posed the opposite way. I will try to find images that show what he has described in a later comment.
I do have a question, though. Why isn't the Ford Edsel included?
In comparison to the cars listed (many I've never seen or heard of before) the Edsel wouldn't be so bad.
What is amazing about the boomer generation is that they typically put style and ride last to other considerations. Right from the beginning they put cost first. Therefore, I would like to add some popular cars to the ugly list starting with the Prius:
Popular & ugly.
And anyone who lived through the 60s must remember the inexpensive and practical VW Beattle:
Popular & ugly.
Although Chrysler started the trend around 90 years ago, aerodynamics as had an effect on car design as well as cost.
Hey, I lived through the 60s, in fact I lived through the 40s. The inexpensive and practical VW Beetle provided wheels for many, and it didn't even appear of the Ed Sullivan Show.
The Fiat 500. Very economical and well suited for European roads:
Popular & ugly.
I does kind of resemble the VW Beetle.
I never though of it being particularly ugly-- probably because it was so common. I grew up in suburbia-- it seemed everyone there had one in their driveway!
(A "second car")
IMHO while it may be a bit ugly-- its not ugly enough to be included here!
Maybe so, but I can still recall comments that the grill had a reputation for looking somewhat sexual.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!
And a perverted mind.
1970 Superbee is the most awful looking thing Dodge made, I think. The split grill looks like ran into a telephone pole right in the middle
If that's how you feel about a split grill, I guess you don't like the fiberglass nose on the 1973 Pontiac Grand Am - I owned one just like this image, and really liked it.
Wow, and to think I used to like you. /s
Calling the Superbee an awful looking thing.. you.. you... OMG!!!!
How could you think the Superbee is worse than the 1962 Dodge Dart? Too many days in the 60's?
Now this thing is the most awful looking car ever made by Dodge...
The other years were good looking, just that front end of that year,
Yep, that one wouldn't win a beauty contest.
Even a split grill looks better. LOL
When I was 10 or so my neighbor had a Super Bee and I so wanted to have one when I grew up (still do actually), don't remember what year it was just that it was cool looking.
Images that illustrate what the author said about some of those cars, if it wasn't obvious from the article images.
The Crosley - " Looking into its cabin and discovering that it had a driver's seat alongside a passenger seat gave me such a frightful shock that it took ages for the effects to wear off." Note how narrow the passenger seat is.
.
Pontiac Aztek - " Dinky little wheels, dark grey plasticky roof rack,.." It's actually a pretty dinky roof rack.
.
The Nissan Cube - " Oh Lord, my eyes! awful feature: the bulge in the Cube’s behind, which looks like an afterthought when the designer realized he had moved the rear wheels too far backward." Check out the bulge in the back.
.
The Corbin Sparrow - "That the Sparrow is very aware of what it’s doing is given witness by its rear end, which is clearly a cocker spaniel sticking its tongue out at those unfortunate enough to be following behind. I have no idea, therefore, why the car isn’t called the Corbin Spaniel."
.
The AMC Pacer - "... sullen, angry look from the front ."
.
Nissan S-Cargo (Why does that name make me think of a snail?) - " Stand out god-awful feature: the S-Cargo’s standard color is an inconsistent off-pale green, as if something went wrong in the factory paint workshop, with odd highlights in fireman red and a metallic grey that stubbornly resists having any color-coordination with the rest of the vehicle."
I guess is all a matter of personal preference because I tend to see beauty in utilitarian designs. I loved VW Buses, and I like the Nissan Cube because it's a small car that maximizes interior space and that's how it looks. I love mini cars and trucks even more modern Japanese kei cars. I love the look of an old Land Rover even though it looks like it's made of Lego blocks. I don't like that Aston Martin Lagonda but I always liked 240 series Volvos (large seating area and huge trunk) but not the later Volvos that kind of look like the Lagonda. It's weird because I love curvy lines on old Ferraris and hate the angular designs of the eighties Ferraris and Lamborghinis, maybe I just like boxes more than Triangles.
To me, all the new cars look the same.
They all look the same to me too. there are only two main models these days, The Car and the SUV and they come in a lot of sizes but they all look the same no matter who makes them. While there are a few distinct models out there they are the exception, for 90% of what's on the road it is very hard to distinguish make and model from more than 50 feet away.
When I was a kid spending summer vacatlon at my grandmother's cottage at Burlington Beach, that thin spit of land that divides the far west end of Lake Ontario from Burlington (a/k/a Hamilton) Bay, where the busy Queen Elizabeth Highway ran through, we kids would sit at the side of the road and have a contest about how fast we could identify a coming car on the highway. We could never do that today.
IMO the Pontiac Aztec was a beauty queen compared to the Tesla Cybertruck.
Anyone remember the AMC Matador?
Not I.
Lol that was my first car, for $500 you can't be picky
How about the Chrysler Cordoba -- with rich Corinthian leather.
I owned one and loved it. Very comfortable car to drive, very smooth on the road. Felt a lot like a Lincoln Continental. It was the only car I've ever owned that had an A/C vent right under the drivers wheel shaft to blow cool air between your legs to help keep 'Mr Happy' comfortable on those long drives. LOL
So that's why Ricardo Montalban was smiling. The Cordoba did have a plush interior and a nice ride. If I remember correctly the back seat was a little cramped.
Those are great looking seats.
LOL. Kept you cool in that hot spot.
Yes, they are. It's been too long but I remember the interior being the selling point for the Chrysler Cordoba. The Chrysler that competed with the Lincoln was the Imperial LeBaron. The Imperial was a bigger car than the Cordoba. Better design IMO. This one is a coupe but Chrysler produced a four door model, too.
When my parents took me to Miami Beach when I was 16 the owner of the hotel took a liking to my father, who told great stories and was a champion bridge player, so he asked me to drive his Chrysler Imperial to Palm Beach to pick up his niece at the Breakers Hotel and bring her back to his hotel. I think he was trying to set up a relationship, between her and me because he liked my father and liked me and his niece was my age. He succeeded. Myra, who was from NYC and lived in a penthouse there, and I, carried on a lovely correspondence, and she even sent me a book - Understanding the Americans. Anyway, about the Imperial, it would have looked like this:
My only other Chrysler Imperial experience was when the guy who ran the Rock Festival "Strawberry Fields" tried to sell me his 1960 Imperial coupe (I didn't buy it). It was the one with the wierd tail lights. It looked like this:
I think that at the time it was around 10 to 12 years old, but when I look at it now, I think it's not a bad looking car.
Chevrolet Corvette E-Ray. IMO it's worse in person than in the pictures.
Wait a minute - an "ELECTRIC" Corvette????
OMG.
Yeah, but one just set a new American record on the track at Nurburging.
I always preferred the original Corvette design, was never that particular about their disigns after this one.
I dunno. IMO the 1963 - 67 Stingrays were pretty cool.
I just don't think I ever liked that shark-shaped nose.
Doesn't need to be, it's bad enough.
Looks like a big shiny door wedge
LOL
Then there was the 5-door Chevrolet Citation produced from 1980 - 85. Not a very inspiring design but the Citation was a fairly popular car. I suppose hatchbacks were the transition from station wagons to SUVs.
Ford's bestselling truck. The Ford 150:
They think it is ultra safe. Big and ugly.
Looks like the one Clint Eastwood's son ended up with when he became a millionaire in the movie The Longest Ride.
Just read somewhere today , that GM has renewed its rights and trademark for Pontiac .
does this mean we may see some new itineration's of some Pontiac classics? seems a lot of the makers are doing that lately .
a new up to date version based on a classic GTO or trans am/firebird ? how about the grand am ?
my first car out of high school was a hand me down from dad that cost me $1, a 1972 Pontiac Catalina 2 door , with the 400CI and a 2 barrel carb . i called it my land battleship, was just as big too.
Glad that they are resurrecting the Pontiac. As a university graduation gift my father gave me a brand new 1959 Pontiac Parisienne convertible, which 4 years later I traded for a 1963 Pontiac Parisienne Convertible, and later on owned a 1973 Pontiac Grand Am coupe. I always liked Pontiacs, but eventually they stopped making them.
the article i read didnt say they were resurrecting the line , just that they had protected their claims and rights , which is common and frankly a good idea in my mind .
with the tendency for nostalgia in the car making market , the bringing back of old and fondly remembered lines and designs , i could only wish for a modern day remake of some of what some think of classics .
Oh, okay, I misunderstood.