╌>

The Science Is Settled! Now Shut Up!

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  xxjefferson51  •  7 years ago  •  35 comments

 The Science Is Settled! Now Shut Up!
Oftentimes, those on the political left assume the mantle of moral superiority, and superiority in their knowledge of scientific advances as well. Both are self-serving and usually fraudulent claims, but that doesn't stop liberals from pretending they are our intellectual and philosophical betters. No matter how much factual evidence they're shown that disproves an argument, they continue to spout the same nonsense and then accuse those who don't agree with them of being behind the times or anti-science. Their alleged scientific proof is often filled with holes or is nonexistent altogether, even as the liberal news media promote their unsubstantiated theories. Disagreement is met with angry and sometimes violent rebukes from those who specialize in outrage instead of honest debate.

The most recent area of scientific legerdemain is, of course, climate change, or man-made global warming. For the past decade or so, we've been inundated with dire predictions of earthly catastrophes that have yet to materialize, while we're shamed into reducing our imagined "carbon footprint" in order to save the Earth. We're told the science is settled and that no further debate is necessary, despite no significant change in the worldwide climate or temperature. Meanwhile, there is proof of faked data, which was revealed in the "Climategate" email scandal, and proof that the methodology for gathering temperature was fraudulent, as exposed by author Christopher Horner in his book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming and Environmentalism. There is abundant verifiable evidence that man-made global warming is a hoax perpetrated by the power-hungry and embraced by the gullible, but we're told that the science is settled and that dissent is wrong or ignorant or even stupid.


Another area where the debate is allegedly over is homosexuality. Lately, we've been assaulted by liberals who claim that an aberrant sexual orientation is assigned by heredity and that we should accept it as normal. Of course, there is zero reliable evidence to support that theory, and the search for the elusive and most likely completely fictitious "gay gene" is ongoing. However, we're told that the science is settled there, too, because anecdotal accounts that Dave or Jane was always attracted to members of the same sex are supposed to be unassailable truth, regardless of the psychological conditions of Dave and Jane. If we disagree, we're anti-science or, of course, bigots. There is no actual proof that the science is anywhere near settled on this, nor that it isn't a choice, but we're told we need to change laws and the definition of marriage because feelings are all that matter. Oh, and "love wins," whatever that's supposed to mean.

Just as hotly contested as the previous two topics is the theory of evolution, which is now the official version of how mankind came into being on planet Earth. One, and only one, explanation is allowed to be taught in schools, and it has nothing to do with a deity, because not everyone believes in a supreme being. So atheist scientists who don't believe in a supreme being are unwilling to consider the possibility that something other than a self-generated desire to change allowed the species to survive, thrive, and adapt in their environments.

Atheists in science have convinced themselves and other atheists that evolution is reality, but that isn't enough. Their goal is to silence the debate by calling their theory "settled science" as well.

In her book Godless" Ann Coulter confronted the so-called settled science of evolution and found significant gaps in it. In fact, there is no supporting fossil evidence that proves that theory, and, Coulter notes, "[t]he evolutionists' proof is their capacity to concoct a story." Yet evolution is taught as fact, and any deviation from that belief is eliminated from public schools and universities. Once again, the science is settled because liberals say so.

To question any of the liberals' current holy trinity is to risk being ostracized, ridiculed, silenced, and even re-educated until conformity to their dogma is achieved. There is no room for alternate theories in the world of liberal beliefs.

To the ideological group that purports to be open-minded to other beliefs, liberals show an amazing ability to remain entrenched in their accepted groupthink universe while they accuse any dissenters of not being open-minded. However, the definition of "open-minded" is not to accept anything that's told to us, no matter how bizarre or unfounded in fact. The definition is "willing to consider new ideas; unprejudiced." Nowhere in that short phrase is it suggested that we abandon logic, evidence, or common sense for the sake of the feelings of another person.

Even without evidence, the issue isn't whether or not these theories are plausible. The issue is that scientific theories should be treated exactly as all assertions are treated in our legal system, which is with actual verifiable evidence rather than bluster, outrage, and inflexible adherence to wishful thinking. Prove it, or stop saying the science is settled.



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/03/the_science_is_settled.html#ixzz4cMG0uPZU
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
link   Bob Nelson    7 years ago

Oftentimes, those on the political left ...

anger

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Bob Nelson   7 years ago

Someone doesn't want their side exposed for what it is....

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
link   Bob Nelson  replied to  XXJefferson51   7 years ago

You keep saying that you post "policy"... but the very next seed is pure red meat. 

You make me wonder if you understand the concept of "conservative policy proposition". 

I'd suggest healthcare, since that has dominated conservative discourse for seven years... but after the events of yesterday, that's probably not a good topic. 

How about "defense policy"? Kinda like this . Or disagreeing. But not just "add $54 billion". 

 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51   7 years ago

Global warming was a hoax.  Climate change is a fraud as presently imposed by the the left.  Homosexuality is a choice people make.  It is also a sin.  Evolution is a theory and nothing more.  Not something to be crammed down our students throats as actual fact.  

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
link   Bob Nelson  replied to  XXJefferson51   7 years ago

You left off "the Earth is flat". 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Bob Nelson   7 years ago

There you go again.  I try to redirect the conversation to the subjects of the seeded article and the arrogant, talking down to condescending left responds in their usual manner.  No room to disagree with them without being called a flat earther.  

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
link   Bob Nelson  replied to  XXJefferson51   7 years ago

"Global warming was a hoax" is of the same value as "the Earth is flat". 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
link   Hal A. Lujah    7 years ago

How retarded does one need to be to find value in this garbage?  And then to propagate (seed) it?!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
link   Sean Treacy    7 years ago

It's very sad to see the war on science advanced by so many. The founders of the royal society,the first scientific organization, ment like Hooke,  Boyle and newton chose nullis in verba as its motto. That means, accept no one word for something, but prove it.  It's a mandate to question perceived wisdom.

now scientists fear questioning and hide the methods they use to keep The cash grant research spigot flowing. It's an insult to basic scientific principles.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
link   Bob Nelson    7 years ago

Maybe I'm older than most NT members... because I can remember a time when AGW was not yet the consensus theory in climate science. I can remember when the first articles appeared. They received the customary hazing from the Establishment. But the AGW people were... right... and the scene flipped within ten years.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
link   Cerenkov  replied to  Bob Nelson   7 years ago

You're kidding, right? A few decades ago we were being warned of the coming ice age...

 
 

Who is online



Just Jim NC TttH
evilone
Snuffy
Vic Eldred
Jeremy Retired in NC
Eat The Press Do Not Read It


73 visitors