Emails: Obama DOJ Officials Sought to Route ‘Slush Fund’ Cash to Orgs of Their ‘Choosing’
Former President Obama's Department of Justice sought to route settlement money to organizations of their "choosing" while seeking to exclude conservative groups, documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show.
The practice in question began in August 2014 when the Justice Department entered into a $17-billion settlement with Bank of America for selling residential mortgage-backed securities leading up to the 2008 financial collapse. Similar arrangements were made with J.P Morgan Chase and Citigroup that brought the total amount to $36.65 billion.
The DOJ settlement program has come under fire by a number of critics who refer to it as a "slush fund" that allows money to be funneled to third-party activist groups.
In some cases during settlement, the companies agreed to pay financial penalties that consisted of "donations" to nonprofits instead of giving the money directly to the Treasury. The Bank of America and Citigroup settlement included a provision that required $150 million in donations to groups that help people who have been harmed by corporate actions, with the donations counting for twice as much as money that is paid towards the settlement total.
Approved nonprofits included groups such as UnidosUS (formerly the National Council of La Raza), NeighborWorks America, and the National Urban League, which gives grants to left-leaning community organizing groups.
The documents obtained by the Free Beacon show that individuals in the Justice Department sought to route money to allied groups while excluding conservative groups.
"I'm sorry to be a pest. We keep tinkering with the settlement agreement and I want to make sure we are doing it right," Elizabeth Taylor, then the principal deputy associate attorney general, wrote in a November 6, 2013 email. "Can you explain to Tony the best way to allocate some money to an organization of our choosing?" she later added, referring to Associate Attorney General Tony West. (Emails are below)
Another message from a redacted email address shows that West's group had made it a point to make sure conservative groups are not a part of the process:
Got it. Ok, this will hopefully address the concerns we'd like to avert:
Donations to state-based Interest on Lawyers' Trust Account (IOLTA) organizations (or other statewide bar-association affiliated intermediaries) that provide funds to legal aid organizations, to be used for foreclosure prevention legal assistance and community development legal assistance.
Concerns include: a.) not allowing Citi to pick a statewide intermediary like the Pacific Legal Foundation (does conservative property-rights free legal services) or a statewide pro bono entity (will conflict out of most meaningful legal aid) we are more likely to get the right result from a state bar association affiliated entity; b.) making sure that it's legal assistance provided, not a scenario where the bank can direct IOLTA or other intermediary to give to even a legal aid organization but to do only housing counseling, for example, under the umbrella "foreclosure prevention assistance." This get you closer?
(Emphasis added.)
Documents Show Obama DOJ's ‘Slush Fund' Sought to Route Money To Organizations of Their ‘Choosing'
Tags
Who is online
77 visitors
the obama administration is going have the legacy of being the most corrupt in history..
umm.....the reason that was sent out is that when banks donate more money than the settlement agreement they get a one dollar credit for every dollar they give, but when it goes to a state connected entity they get a 2 dollar credit for every dollar they donate
That money should have gone to the US treasury - nowhere else - least of all leftist organizations
Here's the thing not ALL of the organizations that received funds were leftist organizations nor were they hand picked or chosen by the administration. Did they apply? Yeah, just like EVERY organization that met the criteria was able to. So yeah if you contention is that it should have went to the Treasury, fine, that's a viable argument, but don't be disingenuous in the false assumption that ONLY leftist organizations benefited or was the only ones that received funds.