A YEAR of Clinton lies about the 'golden showers' dossier exposed as Hillary's lawyer is under fire for falsely denying paying for it
A YEAR of Clinton lies about the 'golden showers' dossier exposed as Hillary's lawyer is under fire for falsely denying paying for it
- A YEAR of Clinton lies about the 'golden showers' dossier exposed as Hillary's lawyer is under fire for falsely denying paying for it
-
It's claimed that Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias and other Democrats falsely denied to reporters their involvement in the 'dirty dossier'
-
Two New York Times journalists say they were lied to at every turn
-
It's now established that Clinton lawyer Marc Elias arranged for the campaign and the Democratic Party to pay a dirt-digging firm to produce the dossier
-
'Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year,' Times reporter Maggie Haberman tweeted
A Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer who launched what would become known as the anti-Trump 'dirty dossier' denied involvement in the project for a year as reporters pressed him for information.
Marc Elias brokered a deal between the Clinton camp, the Democratic National Committee and opposition research firm Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on the president while he was running for office.
But a pair of New York Times reporters said Tuesday night on Twitter that Elias and others involved had lied about their ties to the arrangement.
'Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year,' Times reporter Maggie Haberman tweeted after The Washington Post linked the dossier to Elias and his law firm Perkins Coie.
Kennth Vogel, another Times journalist, tweeted: 'When I tried to report this story, Clinton campaign lawyer @marceelias pushed back vigorously, saying "You (or your sources) are wrong".'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5016865/A-YEAR-Clinton-lies-dirty-dossier-exposed.html
Tags
Who is online
93 visitors
Wall Street Journal Editorial Board calls for Mueller to resign:
The more troubling question is whether the FBI played a role, even if inadvertently, in assisting a Russian disinformation campaign. We know the agency possessed the dossier in 2016, and according to media reports it debated paying Mr. Steele to continue his work in the runup to the election. This occurred while former FBI Director James Comey was ramping up his probe into supposed ties between the Trump campaign and Russians.
Two pertinent questions: Did the dossier trigger the FBI probe of the Trump campaign, and did Mr. Comey or his agents use it as evidence to seek wiretapping approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Trump campaign aides?...
Mr. Mueller is a former FBI director, and for years he worked closely with Mr. Comey. It is no slur against Mr. Mueller’s integrity to say that he lacks the critical distance to conduct a credible probe of the bureau he ran for a dozen years. He could best serve the country by resigning to prevent further political turmoil over that conflict of interest.
Can somebody from the left please tell me how honest and qualified Clinton was to be in office again? So far what we just aren't seeing it.
Can you tell me why you care? She is just a private citizen. As for trying to muddy the waters on Russia, this is a big fail. But we know a lot of republicans are happy to push those false narratives, the way they have for years. As for the qualifications, if you don't know, you don't care so rhetorical question. NOTHING here in this article is a crime or illegal. There is no equivalence between the dossier and Trump's campaign colluding with Russia.
Just trying to figure out why you thought she was a viable candidate? Obviously nobody took her past into consideration.
What exactly do you think made her unqualified?
I'm having a really hard time with you even having to ask this question. She has a long record of service and served in the senate very well, working with everyone on all sides. Secretary of State. She was complimented by republicans who kept saying, too bad she didn't win instead of Obama (back in 2008). Everything was copacetic until they thought she'd run for president in 2016, then the narrative shifted back to all that old debunked Clinton conspiracy crap. Why are you gong on about something that worked for republicans? Can't you guys govern without an 'enemy' to blame and deflect to? You fucking control the entire government and you just can't quit Hillary. It really is pathetic. The most disgusting behavior goes unchecked by republicans while they question the qualifications of a former senator, SoS, lawyer, first lady....., who doesn't even hold public office!
you really have to ask that? Read the article.
And amidst that was being fired for ethics violations, a lot of questionable behavior and now this.
Please list the record of honesty and qualifications of the enormous bag of scum you helped put in the WH and continue to serve as apologist for now.
There is only one: He isn't part of the problem. Clinton has been part of the problem for the better part of 40 years. Not once do I think anybody took her history into consideration.
And I didn't know you were a mind reader.
And that paragon of virtue who's currently in the office? He's so "qualified," is he?
Tell me again, which one was under criminal investigation during the campaign? That is the one that YOU wanted in office. Some shit stain that was (and looking like will be again) under CRIMINAL investigation. This is the same person who can't understand why a lot of the media didn't report this so called "damn all dossier" that probed the collusion with Russia (that as it turns out, is looking more like the Obama administration, to include Clinton, had actually conducted). How about looking at the Clinton Foundation. Donations were coming in from all over the place during the campaign. Now she lost, those donations seem to have died off. I wonder why that is. Sounds too much like some countries trying to get some favoritism for something after she wins.
The only real thing you have against the President is that said mean things and he talks too much. Yet you (the left) waited with bated breath for him to tweet something so that you can have your freak out of the day. And when he doesn't you (the left) freak out over the most trivial shit, like the President eating steak with katsup. Not to mention doing something as childish as this "National Scream Out" I've seen planned for the 1 year anniversary of Clinton getting her ass handed to her in the election.
The strangest thing is that despite all this major news CNN is still obsessed with talking about Corker and Flake. Talk about having some serious blinders on.
Says the poster that brings up Clinton on virtually every single article no matter what for YEARS now.
Looks like time has proven me correct.
Interesting that I watch CNN and haven't heard their names often at all unlike faux saying Clinton.
If you want to call Hillary a liar, lets put it into context.
.
.
Now, who is the liar again?
blob:
Fox news...
Nuff said.
The Clintons get paid by actual Russians !
The Clinton campaign and the DNC pay actual Russians !
Hillary Clinton (Clinton Campaign) claims "Ignorance" !
Debbie Wasserman Shultz (DNC Talking Head) Claims "Ignorance" !
hmmmmmmm........Interesting...... Trump is the one colluding with Russians ? I truly didn't know WikiLeaks was a Russian thing !