This isn't going to go over too well........in SOOOO many ways and venues.
FORT BRAGG, N.C., Nov 3 (Reuters) - U.S. Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl on Friday was spared prison time for endangering fellow troops when he deserted his post in Afghanistan in 2009, but a military judge ordered he should be dishonorably discharged from the service.
Bergdahl was captured by the Taliban and spent five years under brutal captivity by the insurgent group. He had faced up to life in prison after pleading guilty to desertion and misbehavior before the enemy.
Prosecutors had asked Army Colonel Jeffery Nance to send Bergdahl to prison for 14 years for the hardships and injuries endured by service members who searched for the soldier after he left his combat outpost in Paktika province in June 2009 without permission.
Defense lawyers had said the 31-year-old Idaho native, who experts testified has several mental health conditions, should be spared confinement.
Bergdahl's case made him a polarizing figure. He drew withering criticism from political leaders in Washington and fellow soldiers, both for the dangerous efforts to find him and the 2014 Taliban prisoner swap brokered by the Democratic Obama administration that secured his release.
During his successful campaign for the presidency last year, Republican Donald Trump called Bergdahl "a no-good traitor who should have been executed."
Nance, acting on a defense motion, ruled that Trump's comments had not influenced him nor affected Bergdahl's chances of a fair sentence, but said he would consider them a mitigating factor.
Defense attorneys argued at Bergdahl's sentencing hearing at Fort Bragg in North Carolina that he was a young, hardworking soldier who did not understand the full consequences of his actions when he deserted.
Bergdahl, who has said he wanted to report problems in his unit, apologized in court this week for the suffering he caused his comrades and admitted he had made "a horrible mistake."
Prosecutors, however, said Bergdahl knew his disappearance would trigger alarm in the war zone.
Prosecutors acknowledged that Bergdahl suffered during his years as a prisoner of the Taliban, but argued that did not diminish the pain of fellow service members who were injured during the futile hunt for him.
Annnnnnnnd............discuss seems Mr. Trump's comments didn't hurt this trial.................
Tags
Who is online
92 visitors

I think the judge needs to be investigated for dereliction of duty!
My heart goes out to the six heroes who tried to find this gutless traitor - those soldiers were: Staff Sergeant Clayton Bowen, Staff Sergeant Kurt Curtiss, Private 1st Class Morris Walker, 2nd Lieutenant Darryn Andrews, Staff Sergeant Michael Murphrey, Private 1st Class Matthew Martinek, Your sacrifice, although dishonored by this putrid judge, shall NEVER BE FORGOTTEN! RIP!
If you want to look at it like that, as a total waste of lives..
I choose to think that those 6 men died doing one of the most honorable actions they can do, going in harms way to retrieve a fellow soldier or their body or the soldier in any condition in between. YOU DON"T LEAVE ONE OF YOUR OWN BEHIND! Ever if they had known he was a 4-alarm F^@& up, he's the U.S.s 4-alarm f^@& up to deal with.
If you don't understand why they'd do that or why I consider it a honorable act, I can't explain it to you.
(sigh) I gotta stop trusting this wreck. EVEN not ever.
Thanks to Trump's utter incompetence, justice and sanity prevailed in the Bergdahl case. He's far better suited to be a feral cat whisperer.
.
The reality is that given his mental health issues Bergdahl never should have been inducted in the military. That he was is just another indication of how Bush's wars in Afghanistan and Iraq caused standards to slip.
Please explain just what the hell that is supposed to mean.............Thanks
You must be unaware of the utterly reckless comments which Trump has made as a candidate and as president about various legal cases including Bergdahl and the NYC truck terrorist. Especially in a court martial those comments by the CinC fouled the prosecution's case, but they've also pretty much guaranteed that the truck terrorist won't get the death penalty.
How do you figure this? You think the judge went pussy because of something Mr. Trump said? Are you saying the judges are so incompetent they care what POTUS says? In the case of the truck killer, there will more than likely be a jury and as I said in another post..................concerning the truck driver
It was cut and dried premeditated murder. That usually indicates First Degree Murder........................So again, you are saying the judge is going to show leniency?
Help a fella out. I cannot get my arms around your points here. Need more "in depth psychological evaluation" of what could possibly be going through your head...........well except for your propensity to dissing everything Mr. Trump........
Actually the judge noted that Trump's idiotic comments were a factor. They amount to unlawful command interference and it shows yet again how utterly unfit for office Trump is. Here's some other coverage on the issue:
.
.
No, I'm saying that it will be difficult if not impossible for prosecutors to now seek the death penalty in the truck terrorism case. It will also be much harder to seat a jury.
That is just what a damned terrorist wants anyway. The WORST that could happen to him, as a perceived martyr, is the opportunity to live. They still can seek it but if this ass is a true follower, he won't take the option and will "pray to Allah" to be executed.......to further his "fame" in the cause. Unless the lawyers are trying to make a name for themselves, they'll let him.
If for one minute you think that they will be able to find anyone who hasn't heard something, anything about the truck carnage, you are sadly mistaken. You may get some that say "oh is that why I'm here" bullshit to sit on that jury and fry his ass but I sincerely doubt there is 12 virgins as far as this story is concerned.
Sorry folks but the stretching to push the anti Trump rhetoric is getting old. Any other time you wouldn't give a damn about what someone said (the police acted stupidly) but in your never ending denial, in your never ending butt hurt, the only thing that matters is that Mr. Trump had an opinion. I know, precedence shows it MAY have an affect on outcome but all of the examples I have seen today are comparing apples to spare tires.
Sorry but these are just facts - a president's remarks about a case can prejudice the outcome of a trial.....which is why a sane and ethical president would keep his trap shut.
I'm not sure that I agree with this verdict but I'm not privy to information that those involved were. I imagine that the recommendations from General Dahl who led the investigation into Bergdahl's actions and who testified that jail time would be inappropriate may have had a lot of weight in the decision.
Hopefully we'll learn more on why this judgement was handed down. I'm just sad for the other soldiers forced to be placed at risk.
Idaho native, who experts testified has several mental health conditions
..............
DUuuu No ya dont say.
Just because a soldier gets up in the middle of the night and goes singlehandedly to look for the enemy he's got mental health issues ?
Maybe he just wanted to say "HI. Lets talk."
It's even dumber than that.....he left his base to walk to a larger US base in order to file a complaint. He was abducted on the way. So it wasn't even desertion much less treason, it was just pure stupidity fueled by delusional mental illness. Who could imagine that there might be hostile Taliban in the wilds of Afghanistan?