╌>

Jeff Sessions Just Threw Trumps Dossier Meme Under the Bus

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  galen-marvin-ross  •  9 years ago  •  19 comments

Jeff Sessions Just Threw Trumps Dossier Meme Under the Bus

President Trump is unhappy with Attorney General Jeff Sessions for recusing himself from the Russia investigation — which led to special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. Trump has also criticized the Justice Department's handling of his travel ban, and he clearly has been unhappy with Sessions's perceived lack of zeal in investigating Democrats.
And now Sessions has done something Trump surely won't like: shooting down a conservative conspiracy theory at which the president himself has hinted.
During an appearance before the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, an animated Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) pressed Sessions on what Jordan felt was the need to appoint a second special counsel to look into Democrats' role in that infamous anti-Trump dossier. And Sessions rebuffed him.
Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post
“We know one fact: We know the Clinton campaign and the [Democratic] National Committee paid for — through the law firm — paid for the dossier. We know that happened,” Jordan began. “And it sure looks like the FBI was paying the author of that document. And it sure looks like a major political party was working with the federal government to then turn an opposition research document that quoted some National Enquirer story into an intelligence document, take that to the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] court so that they could then get a warrant to spy on Americans associated with President Trump's campaign. That's what it looks like.”
Sessions's retort: “I would say 'looks like' is not enough basis to appoint a special counsel.”
The exchange came the morning after The Washington Post reported that a new Justice Department letter showed that Sessions was entertaining the idea of that new special counsel. That letter came in response to members like Jordan calling for one, and it wasn't clear how close Sessions was to actually appointing one. His comments Tuesday suggest that he's not terribly close.
But the call isn't coming just from House Republicans; it has also come from Trump. Two weeks ago, Trump called on his own Justice Department to investigate Hillary Clinton. Trump added that the “saddest thing” was that he couldn't order the DOJ to do such things.
“Hopefully, they are doing something and, at some point, maybe we are going to all have it out,” he said.
Trump has also tweeted conspiratorial ideas about the dossier and alleged that the Obama administration wiretapped Trump Tower before his victory last November.
In recent weeks, Trump has suggested that the FBI paid for the dossier and worked with Democrats on it. (The FBI did reach a deal with the dossier's author, Christopher Steele, The Post has reported, but scrapped it before making payments when Steele's name became public.)
Trump has also urged investigations of Clinton for both the dossier and the alleged rigging of the 2016 Democratic primary contests.
Trump hasn't connected the dots between the dossier and the alleged monitoring of his campaign to the extent that Jordan did in his question, but it's pretty evident that Trump shares many of the concerns and the general idea behind Jordan's theory. And in response, Sessions basically suggested that the whole idea was conspiratorial and highly speculative.
In some ways, this is what Sessions signed up for. He has got to balance the conspiracy-theory-loving and loyalty-demanding impulses of his boss with what the law calls for and allows. He has also got to maintain the independence of the Justice Department when it looks as if Trump is leaning on him to take specific actions.
And as the scene Tuesday morning showed, that can lead to some decisions and comments that the boss probably won't be thrilled with.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jeff-sessions-just-threw-a-wet-blanket-on-president-trumps-russia-dossier-conspiracy-theory/ar-BBEXZLD?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartandhp


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
1  seeder  Galen Marvin Ross    9 years ago

Session did say one thing right during his hearing today, there's no reason to start a special council to investigate the Clinton campaign or, the DNC. 

 
 
 
Rex Block
Freshman Silent
1.1  Rex Block  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1    9 years ago

Actually, there multiple reasons Hillary and the previous administration should be investigated about. You already know what they are so I won't waste the time to list them here.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
1.1.1  epistte  replied to  Rex Block @1.1    9 years ago
Actually, there multiple reasons Hillary and the previous administration should be investigated about. You already know what they are so I won't waste the time to list them here.

The GOP have wasted 8 years and millions of taxpayer dollars investigating Hillary Clinton and you have only managed to get a dozen eggs on your face but still, you want more.  The idea that you beleived Trump's claim that she should be locked up doesn't create any evidence of a crime. 

Maybe you should build a basement under the pizza shop before the next partisan fishing expedition.  Make the basement big enough for an office for Roy Moore.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
1.1.3  epistte  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @1.1.2    9 years ago
The fact that you’ve turned a blind eye to her crimes and scandals and her corruption and unethical behavior is beyond mind boggling to me nothing you say from here on out could ever be trusted based on that admission.

The only crimes are the ones the GOP create to deflect attention from Trump.  I don't like her but there is no evidence that she committed a crime, despite what you want to believe. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3  Bob Nelson    9 years ago

Investigating political opponents would just one more step in the transformation into a banana republic.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
3.2  Rmando  replied to  Bob Nelson @3    9 years ago

How about illegally stripping political opponents of their tax exempt status?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
3.2.1  Krishna  replied to  Rmando @3.2    9 years ago
How about illegally stripping political opponents of their tax exempt status?

The main thing that the Republicans want to strip from tax exempt status are existing deductions for state and local taxes, so that people get taxed twice on this. (Like most provisions of the Republican tax plan, the people it will hurt most are the Middle Class . . . after all, they need to get money to pay for the tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy-- they have to get the money from somewhere..

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
3.2.2  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @3.2.1    9 years ago

And while Trump promised to get the Mexicans to pay for the wall, that like most of his promises ain't gonna happen. (So guess who's going to be left holding the bag-- who's going to pay for the Wall? After all, they got to get a Bigly YUGE amount of money for that from someone...)

Watch Trump's border wall prototypes being built

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
3.2.3  Rmando  replied to  Krishna @3.2.1    9 years ago

Actually not letting people deduct state taxes will force high tax states like California and New York to be more accountable to how they spend tax dollars. Say bye bye to exorbitant Cadillac pension plans for overpaid state employees.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
4  Rmando    9 years ago

The biggest waste of an investigation is the one going on in the Trump/ Russia fantasy.

On the plus side it looks like the Podesta bros are caught up in the net.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
5  Krishna    9 years ago

Jeff Sessions Just Threw Trumps Dossier Meme Under The Bus

Since the Trump won the nomination, its looks like its getting really, really crowded under that bus!

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
5.1  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @5    9 years ago
Jeff Sessions Just Threw Trumps Dossier Meme Under The Bus Since the Trump won the nomination, its looks like its getting really, really crowded under that bus!

Believe me folks, this is YUGE. In fact, its actually Bigly YUGE! I can tell you that Donald Trump has fired these people (Unbelievable!) 

Here’s a list of people Trump has fired or threatened to fire

 
 

Who is online



Ozzwald


65 visitors