New Court Docs Blow Massive Hole in Moore Accuser’s Story
Since day one, Roy Moore has unequivocally denied the allegations of decades-old sexual misconduct that have tarnished his Senate race.
While Democrats and the mainstream media are trying desperately to smear the GOP candidate and shame anyone who gives him the benefit of the doubt, some new evidence just blew a hole in the accusations.
One of Moore’s accusers, Leigh Corfman, claims that almost 40 years ago, Moore tried to initiate a sexual relationship with her while she was still a teenager.
Advertisement - story continues below
Her accusations hinge on two points: First, that she was left alone with the then-32-year-old attorney Roy Moore during a family court case… and second, that she lived with her mother in Gadsden, Alabama, when Moore allegedly harassed her.
Both of those points have now been called into question. The Washington Post story that originally outlined the case against Moore appears have have left some major details out — details that bring new questions about the story itself.
TRENDING: Dossier Records Unsealed: Clinton Firm Caught Red Handed
“Regarding the original court hearing where Corfman says that Moore asked her for her number while Wells went inside the courtroom, the Post reported that it ‘confirmed that her mother attended a hearing at the courthouse in February 1979 through divorce records,'” explained Breitbart News.
That part is a known fact. There was a court hearing involving Leigh Corfman and her mother, Nancy Wells. However, the Post left out a glaring detail: It was a custody case involving the 14-year-old girl, which means that there’s a good chance Corfman was in the courtroom, not left with Moore.
Advertisement - story continues below
Additionally, the entire point of that court hearing was to give custody of the teenager to her father. She went to live with him soon after, not at her mother’s Gadsden house as the allegations claim.
According to court records, Corfman’s father’s house was in a completely different town called Ohatchee.
“This would mean that from the court hearing on February 21, 1979, until Corfman was ordered to move to her father’s house, Moore would only have had 12 days, including the day of the court hearing, to have repeatedly called Corfman at her mother’s Gadsden house, arrange two meetings, and attempt another. Moore has strenuously denied the accusations,” reported Breitbart.
Oddly, the fact that there was a window of just over 10 days for all of the alleged incidents to have taken place was not raised by the Washington Post’s article. Even more strangely, the change of custody and living location is completely missing from the accounts of Moore’s accuser.
Advertisement - story continues below
“Neither Corfman nor Wells publicly mentioned the change in custody during the critical period where Moore was said to have arranged meetings with Corfman outside her mother’s home,” stated Breitbart.
A skeptic might wonder why these seemingly major details were left out. It gets even more odd.
RELATED: Trump Comes to Moore’s Aid Just As Cards Seemed to Be Stacked Against Him
Not only do court records indicate that Corfman stopped living at her mother’s house during the time frame of the accusations, but details provided by the accuser simply don’t hold up to scrutiny.
For instance, Leigh Corfman claims that Moore secretly called her on her bedroom phone in her mother’s house to arrange a meeting. Remember, this was 1979, long before cell phones and even cordless home phones were commonplace.
Advertisement - story continues below
“Wells, 71, says that her daughter did not have a phone in her bedroom during the period that Moore is reported to have allegedly called Corfman — purportedly on Corfman’s bedroom phone,” stated Breitbart.
On that apparently non-existent phone, the accuser claims she agreed to meet Moore at a specific intersection “around the corner” from her house… a house where she no longer lived.
Around the corner — remember that.
“The Post reports, ‘She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house,'” summarized Breitbart.
Problem: It isn’t anywhere near “around the corner” from her house.
“[T]hat intersection was almost a mile away from her mother’s house at the time and would have been across a major thoroughfare,” Breitbart continued.
Let’s be extremely clear: We don’t know with certainty whether the claims against Roy Moore are true or not. Neither does anyone else, except the people directly involved.
That is the point: When an accusation is made, the first rule of our society and our laws is that the accused are innocent until proven guilty.
What we do know is that the timing of these accusations is extremely odd. After decades of Moore in the public light, these claims emerged with only weeks left in a key election that the candidate seemed to be winning.
We also know that there are many questions and blatant holes in the accusations. At the same time, the media is literally scolding and shaming any person who doesn’t buy into their narrative.
Facts should be independent of politics. In the Roy Moore controversy, however, politic seems to be overshadowing everything… and that alone should cause people to take a step back and take a hard look at what is happening. https://conservativetribune.com/court-docs-roy-moore-allegation/
Tags
Who is online
57 visitors
The Washington Post leaving out information? I'm shocked! /s
So is this article....I'm not shocked.
It's amazing the lengths the left will go to so they can makes excuses for Franken ("mock groping" goes right up there with "wardrobe malfunction") but they refuse to even consider the allegations against Moore are false.
Good job Mando, I was wondering how long it would be before you showed up to deflect.
It's not a deflection. It's a "comparison".
Rather poor comparison don't you think? Moore is accused of molesting a 14 year old girl. Franken? Accused of having poor taste.
Moore could be accused of being Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer rolled into one. It doesn't matter since it's an unproven accusation.
We have photographic proof of what Franken did. And sexual assault isn't just poor taste.
only in the most twisted and depraved minds would a gag photo compare to the past activities of a known local stalker of teenage girls.
1) Sexual assault isn't a prank.
2) How is Moore a "known" local stalker? The mall ban myth has been debunked.
Gadsden locals say Moore's predatory behavior at mall, restaurants not a secret
Some neo-nazi pedophiles may still consider Breitbart a credible news source.
I didn't post anything that said Moore was banned from the mall.
What I posted was that the citizens of Gadsden all knew about him being a creepy older man trying to hump young girls.
Some liberals still refuse to accept facts in articles.
That's kind of how we ended up with the last savior.
And he admitted....wait BRAGGED about sexually assaulting women and they still ignored it..."What's wrong with grabbing 'em by the pussy"? But a picture of fake grabbing some breasts through a flack jacket ...well, that's terms for prison!
Their whole religion ends up on the trash heap if they start to question any authority that impregnates a 14 year old girl.
Wouldn't they all love it to be true?
Good Lord have mercy on my soul!
Moore has been accused. He is not guilty until proven so.
Funny you don't afford that same courtesy to linerals...Hillary Clinton for example
The funny part is that the only thing I have accused Ms. Clinton of is being a woman driven for power and money! I do not like her!
I think the same generosity that was extended to Clinton IS being extended to Moore.
"the fact that there was a window of just over 10 days for all of the alleged incidents to have taken place was not raised by the Washington Post’s article."
I find it hilarious that conservatives imagine 10 days too short a time for him to have called her twice... I recall some friends saying they got 10 calls in two days from infatuated suitors back in high school. Nothing raised in this article adds any doubt to her story, it's a whole lot of smoke being blown by nervous conservatives fearful they'll lose a Senate seat to a Democrat.