FBI investigator in Hillary Email fired from job for Anti Trump Bias
Two senior Justice Department officials have confirmed to Fox News that the department's Office of Inspector General is reviewing the role played in the Hillary Clinton email investigation by Peter Strzok, a former deputy director for counterintelligence at the FBI who was removed from the staff of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III earlier this year, after Mueller learned that Strzok had exchanged anti-Trump texts with a colleague.
A source close to the matter said the OIG probe, which will examine Strzok's roles in a number of other politically sensitive cases, should be completed by "very early next year."
The task will be exceedingly complex, given Strzok's consequential portfolio. He participated in the FBI's fateful interview with Hillary Clinton on July 2, 2016 – just days before then-FBI Director James Comey announced he was declining to recommend prosecution of Mrs. Clinton in connection with her use, as secretary of state, of a private email server.
As deputy FBI director for counterintelligence, Strzok also enjoyed liaison with various agencies in the intelligence community, including the CIA, then led by Director John Brennan.
.....................................................
The article is too long to paste all of it here. The link is above.
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Who is online
98 visitors
“Immediately upon learning of the allegations, the Special Counsel’s Office removed Peter Strzok from the investigation,”
Unlike the removal of Flynn by Trump who waited until the Washington Post let it be known that Flynn was simultaneously a foreign agent and the White House National Security advisor!
Some shit takes time to resolve …
While Strzok was released immediately, and, admittedly, we should have been told about it immediately … on the other hand, Flynn was HIRED by Trump albeit Trump's having been warned of Flynn's compromised status … and WAS NOT FIRED by Trump UNTIL THE PRESS REVEALED THE CONFLICT!
… and then the White House LIED ABOUT THE REASON FOR THE FIRING!
PERSPECTIVE MY FRIENDS!
Maybe Trump only learned about Flynn from watching the news- the same way Obama learned about anything.
I'll skip the comment regarding Obama since that's the kind of pronouncement uttered by one has nothing valid to say in conjunction with content.
On the other hand, if you actually got your information from reliable accounts …
Maybe YOU'd have learned that Obama, as well as acting Attorney General Sally Yates, warned Trump about Flynn long before Trump hired him.
Free knowledge … bring your own container.
My take my friend, Is T-Rump ignored recommendations from the opposition, neither side could put away their difference politically. T-Rump went to Flynn and questioned him about this and accepted Flynn's explanation.
Live and learn..... but then the Presidency is a job that takes a lot of OTJ training. Every president goes into it with his own ideals of what it should be and to their chargrin, the job isn't anything like they imagined.... Kennedy was famous for being overheard exclaiming "Anyone that wants this fucking job is insane" on another occasion; If Johnson wants this fucking job so bad he can have it"...
With every president the first 100 days is not to implement his agenda, in reality, it is to allow him to get his feet under him and be taught the things all presidents HAVE to know.
The last one to actually listen and learn something about the job in his first 100 days was Slick Willy and he ran the office much different than he campaigned on. (and paid one hell of a price from the missus for it)
Since then we have had three presidents in the Robert Bork ideal......
The Imperial Presidency.
It took two and a half, almost three years for Bush II to figure it out, And Obama never figured it out. And, I have serious doubts about T-Rump.....
The president is NOT all powerful. the "Most powerful man on the planet" is a false euphemism trying to overwhelm everyone with bullshite.
How much proof does anybody need to see how corrupt the FBI, Mueller and Team Clinton are?
That depends upon how one defines "proof".
Please provide us with any of which you are aware that has not been debunked many times (which, of course, then, would not actually constitute "proof").
Damned, f'n details!
We all know that regardless of what proof is provided, none of it bring them around to reality.
I feel sorry for people like you and mandie. You sound just like the die-hard Nixon supporters right up to the point and even after the House judiciary committee cleared the way for an impeachment debate and vote follwing which Nixon cut a deal and ran.
We aren't denying proof of collusion exists. It does. Just so happens most of the proof being exposed is showing that the Dems were more involved in it than the GOP. You all keep on with this impeachment crap right in step with Maxine Waters and it just won't happen. There has to be a impeachable offense. So far all you have is a few people failed to make some claims and you hurt feelings.
Also, I don't need you to feel sorry for me. I'm not one of these that are easily offended by something somebody says. But I am kind of honored that what I have to say can have such an impact on you that it makes you think of me. Can't say I feel the same.
and?
the future looks interesting
Once again …
“Immediately upon learning of the allegations, the Special Counsel’s Office removed Peter Strzok from the investigation,”
Unlike the removal of Flynn by Trump who waited until the Washington Post let it be known that Flynn was simultaneously a foreign agent and the White House National Security advisor!
Some shit takes time to resolve …
While Strzok was released immediately, and, admittedly, we should have been told about it immediately … on the other hand, Flynn was HIRED by Trump albeit Trump's having been warned of Flynn's compromised status … and WAS NOT FIRED by Trump UNTIL THE PRESS REVEALED THE CONFLICT!
… and then the White House LIED ABOUT THE REASON FOR THE FIRING!
PERSPECTIVE MY FRIENDS!